{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 297,
  "pageSize": 18,
  "pageCount": 17777,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide highlights subtle differences in priorities between the two student groups, specifically regarding career training vs. supportive learning environments.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2b8bb06a0d62",
          "evidence": "p5 funnel breaks out low-income; p6-p8 split metrics by cohort; p9 quotes first-gen concerns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Split first-gen vs continuing-gen across transfer funnel, considerations, and pain points to expose differential outcomes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-6df61fdac56f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey takeaways + ROI/enrollment/transfer/considerations data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-7f03b03d0ceb",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Funnel collapse + cohort splits + pain quotes escalate tension",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a diverging color scale to represent importance levels, with a legend at the bottom.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2b8bb06a0d62",
          "evidence": "p5 funnel breaks out low-income; p6-p8 split metrics by cohort; p9 quotes first-gen concerns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Split first-gen vs continuing-gen across transfer funnel, considerations, and pain points to expose differential outcomes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-6df61fdac56f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey takeaways + ROI/enrollment/transfer/considerations data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-7f03b03d0ceb",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Funnel collapse + cohort splits + pain quotes escalate tension",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "pain_points",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2b8bb06a0d62",
          "evidence": "p5 funnel breaks out low-income; p6-p8 split metrics by cohort; p9 quotes first-gen concerns.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Split first-gen vs continuing-gen across transfer funnel, considerations, and pain points to expose differential outcomes",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-6df61fdac56f",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey takeaways + ROI/enrollment/transfer/considerations data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-7f03b03d0ceb",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Rising Action",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
          "evidence": "Funnel collapse + cohort splits + pain quotes escalate tension",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "transition",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2e533d53b0a7",
          "evidence": "p10 'so what' turn -> p11-12 source-gap data -> p13 'must invest in targeted support' action.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Cascade from transition insight through support-source data to the recommended action",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-715c7420714c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Transition + support-source gap drives 'so what' insight",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-82933ad45b3d",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Climax",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
          "evidence": "Pivot slide turns to 'first-gen face barriers'",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "comparison_table",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format with delta annotations to show the percentage point difference between the two student groups.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2e533d53b0a7",
          "evidence": "p10 'so what' turn -> p11-12 source-gap data -> p13 'must invest in targeted support' action.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Cascade from transition insight through support-source data to the recommended action",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-715c7420714c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Transition + support-source gap drives 'so what' insight",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-87d23f5e3953",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Resolution",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution",
          "evidence": "Support-source mismatch resolved with recommendation",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table highlights differences in information-seeking behavior between student demographics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2e533d53b0a7",
          "evidence": "p10 'so what' turn -> p11-12 source-gap data -> p13 'must invest in targeted support' action.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Cascade from transition insight through support-source data to the recommended action",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-715c7420714c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Transition + support-source gap drives 'so what' insight",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-87d23f5e3953",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Resolution",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution",
          "evidence": "Support-source mismatch resolved with recommendation",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout with icons to represent the problem, the insight/mismatch, and the recommended solution.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-2e533d53b0a7",
          "evidence": "p10 'so what' turn -> p11-12 source-gap data -> p13 'must invest in targeted support' action.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Cascade from transition insight through support-source data to the recommended action",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 13,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-742b9c4e20a6",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Three-column recommendation calls for targeted investment",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-87d23f5e3953",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Resolution",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution",
          "evidence": "Support-source mismatch resolved with recommendation",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "docSlug": "ad1696893486e413",
      "documentTitle": "Gen Z Attitudes Toward Higher Education",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.91,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "disclaimer",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-25818685fcb0#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "Includes BCG logo and date.",
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/K4BqXa6XZpzpbXgM0ngiwiLy94AZAom8AcjTwJ4rG0k/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81OTk0MDZiMDcxNzNmYjgwL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/NvUxn2UNJiFKveZT2wFnOEdiQniOIg7BI5wI-lHDQaQ/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81OTk0MDZiMDcxNzNmYjgwL3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/gO4fdD_qLC4sDVP8kSSip3C1cS5Kxy9j1C9iaI-1ak8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81OTk0MDZiMDcxNzNmYjgwL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/sAWUqUSu40WLNo9ff30XClKxpB1t4WoP6J2x8FRJ_hY/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy81OTk0MDZiMDcxNzNmYjgwL3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "situation_overview",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 2,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-fefa8c481659",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "'Background | Objectives and context of this work' frames scope and stakeholders.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sidebar of key metrics and a list of strategic implications.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-af8b2b60b48a",
          "evidence": "p3 lists six 'so what' bullets with $-figures; p4 sizes the three implications via pre/post-IRA bubbles.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Cascade exec-summary insights into quantified market/exports/jobs proof",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-01b51937fc7c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Exec summary + pre/post-IRA bubbles quantify $2.8B market, 1k jobs, $0.3B exports.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-11fc3ca5c5aa",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Quantified policy impact: deployment, cost, exports, jobs.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Uses a bubble-based comparison to show pre- and post-policy growth.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-af8b2b60b48a",
          "evidence": "p3 lists six 'so what' bullets with $-figures; p4 sizes the three implications via pre/post-IRA bubbles.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Cascade exec-summary insights into quantified market/exports/jobs proof",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-01b51937fc7c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Exec summary + pre/post-IRA bubbles quantify $2.8B market, 1k jobs, $0.3B exports.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-11fc3ca5c5aa",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Quantified policy impact: deployment, cost, exports, jobs.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Includes a waterfall chart for cost reduction and bar charts for capacity growth.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Waterfall Value",
          "slug": "31-waterfall-value",
          "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-b2063924704c",
          "evidence": "p5 incremental-cost waterfall (-45% BAU, -10-25% IRA = -55-70%); p6 45Q waterfall ($600->$420) and stacked $12B IIJA build-up.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose cost decline and funding into named drivers",
          "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-04511bef30bf",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Mechanism of policy lever: ~4x deployment, ~50% cost decline, $12B IIJA funding stack.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-11fc3ca5c5aa",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Quantified policy impact: deployment, cost, exports, jobs.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to show cost reduction and a stacked bar chart to show funding allocation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Waterfall Value",
          "slug": "31-waterfall-value",
          "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-b2063924704c",
          "evidence": "p5 incremental-cost waterfall (-45% BAU, -10-25% IRA = -55-70%); p6 45Q waterfall ($600->$420) and stacked $12B IIJA build-up.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose cost decline and funding into named drivers",
          "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-04511bef30bf",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Mechanism of policy lever: ~4x deployment, ~50% cost decline, $12B IIJA funding stack.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-11fc3ca5c5aa",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Quantified policy impact: deployment, cost, exports, jobs.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "timeline",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a timeline framework to map specific project stages (OEM, Project development, EPC, O&M, Transport & storage, Offtake) against numbered pain points.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-b6c3f406318d",
          "evidence": "p7 lists 6 numbered pre-IRA gaps along the value chain; p8 explicitly columns 'Pre-legislation' vs 'Changes from recent legislation' vs 'Remaining areas'.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Contrast pre-legislation gaps with what new policy still leaves unsolved",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-09536c03f153",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Pre-legislation gaps and 'remaining challenges' that policy must still close.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-14cb8a77e529",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Unaddressed gaps = future risk to US DAC leadership.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80",
      "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Uses a value chain structure (OEM, Project development, Transport & Storage, Offtake) to categorize challenges.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-b6c3f406318d",
          "evidence": "p7 lists 6 numbered pre-IRA gaps along the value chain; p8 explicitly columns 'Pre-legislation' vs 'Changes from recent legislation' vs 'Remaining areas'.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Contrast pre-legislation gaps with what new policy still leaves unsolved",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-09536c03f153",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Pre-legislation gaps and 'remaining challenges' that policy must still close.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-14cb8a77e529",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Unaddressed gaps = future risk to US DAC leadership.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}