{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 262, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-33", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a map with callouts to specific regions, detailing their unique value propositions (e.g., CCS, renewable resources, infrastructure).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-34", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Illustrative slide showing specific actions for exporters and importers in two distinct trade corridors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-35", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a puzzle-piece vertical process flow to illustrate the sequential development of market maturity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-36", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "appendix", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-37", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a process-flow style layout (Inputs -> Optimization -> Outputs) to explain the methodology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose total demand into specific transport and trade categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-39", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The map uses a hexagonal grid pattern to represent landmasses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-40", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/PG9VCsw6qEaJOtFa1AYJLUywxVnybwIlMHNa4jvh-jo/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8xNThkZjg2MjdhMGI5YWNhL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "879d5693-fa0d-471e-8bc6-dddb3a68ee78", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document introduces the problem of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and complicates it through examples of overlapping work.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/e4VGv9AdjFS8zIvxppkrGreCa9rQLmrFuOwyv-rbndU/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8xNThkZjg2MjdhMGI5YWNhL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/31rGtbRe2mcHjKJq8A1rcxO0QcnY-oEa2656KhjMb-U/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8xNThkZjg2MjdhMGI5YWNhL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/ZV_RhF_nH1lz8gh2AMxmYWg5jcbjc-8IQ-7zt1Z4iuw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8xNThkZjg2MjdhMGI5YWNhL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "table_of_contents", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "879d5693-fa0d-471e-8bc6-dddb3a68ee78", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document introduces the problem of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and complicates it through examples of overlapping work.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a text-heavy document page, likely from a congressional or oversight committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "879d5693-fa0d-471e-8bc6-dddb3a68ee78", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document introduces the problem of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and complicates it through examples of overlapping work.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide appears to be part of a larger report or legal disclosure document, indicated by the page number '4' at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "879d5693-fa0d-471e-8bc6-dddb3a68ee78", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document introduces the problem of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and complicates it through examples of overlapping work.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a congressional or investigative report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "879d5693-fa0d-471e-8bc6-dddb3a68ee78", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document introduces the problem of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and complicates it through examples of overlapping work.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or congressional document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from a formal report or legal document, likely a Congressional Committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal government or investigative report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or congressional document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or disclosure section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (likely a Congressional or regulatory report) rather than a standard consulting deck, but it is inventoried as requested.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page appears to be from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the heavy reliance on document reference numbers (MCK-HCOR) as footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing detailed footnotes referencing internal McKinsey documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a formal report or investigative document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by showing consultants who worked for both regulatory bodies and the companies they regulated.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Contains extensive footnotes documenting specific internal McKinsey engagement lists and correspondence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by mapping concurrent consulting engagements and meetings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (e.g., a congressional report) rather than a standard consulting deck.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "The slide serves as a disclosure/evidence page for a report, citing specific internal documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide is an embedded image within a larger document, likely a report or legal filing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This page appears to be an excerpt from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide is a text-heavy disclosure page from a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 6, "beatId": "ca9c3ab4-903c-4ff0-b53d-42335d2ce596", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents extensive evidence of McKinsey's conflicts of interest, including consultant overlaps and contract details.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or committee document, given the footnote citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide includes an excerpt from an email sent by McKinsey partners to a client, highlighting their strategy to win business.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing numbered footnotes referencing internal documents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide is embedded within a larger document; the red oval is an annotation from the document author, not the original slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, not a standard consulting deck slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 35 of a larger document, containing extensive footnotes citing legal and journalistic sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This is a text-heavy page from a report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This is a page from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and legal citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from a formal investigative report, likely a Congressional committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a page from a formal report or legal document, likely a congressional or investigative committee report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 40, "from": 24, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "308c22ef-34f3-45b8-b50d-c273c6edeb88", "evidence": "The document presents the concerns of regulatory bodies through examples of McKinsey's actions and lack of disclosure.", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the concerns of regulatory bodies regarding McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing footnotes and an email excerpt.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, indicated by the footnote citations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This slide appears to be from a report or legal document detailing McKinsey's involvement with Purdue Pharma, specifically focusing on the 'ADF Strategy'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide contains a pull-quote highlighting the core strategy and detailed footnotes citing internal McKinsey documents and external reports.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This slide appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (indicated by footnotes and redacted text).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the footnote style and content.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 48, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This page contains footnotes 229-236.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/48", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-48", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, indicated by the footnote numbering and page number at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a congressional or investigative report (page 50).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-50", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 51, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "cite_precedent", "notes": "This page contains footnotes referencing specific internal documents (MCK-HCOR codes) and news articles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/51", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-51", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "docSlug": "158df8627a0b9aca", "documentTitle": "Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 52 of a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-45501f4b359b#slide-52", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "ee9686db-f8b5-4bc9-bf6e-2d29966ee033", "evidence": "The document implies the cost of inaction through its presentation of McKinsey's conflicts of interest and their potential impact on the opioid epidemic.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in addressing McKinsey's conflicts of interest?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "1170eac2-9202-4b41-a53c-edbd934ded10", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document concludes with implications of McKinsey's actions and potential next steps for regulatory action.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }