{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 236,
  "pageSize": 18,
  "pageCount": 17777,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "timeline",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like timeline structure to contrast operational vs support areas over time.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a methodology for scaling military capacities and lists the 15 specific capacities analyzed across four branches (Flyvevåbnet, Hæren, Søværnet, SO-KOM).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f6d4e60a1a9c",
          "evidence": "Action title 'skaleringskoncept og skaleringer for 15 operative kapaciteter' followed by scenario overview tables.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Introduce the up/down scaling-scenario concept across 15 capacities",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide serves as a disclaimer/limitation for the scaling model presented in the deck.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f6d4e60a1a9c",
          "evidence": "Action title 'skaleringskoncept og skaleringer for 15 operative kapaciteter' followed by scenario overview tables.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Introduce the up/down scaling-scenario concept across 15 capacities",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes a footnote regarding Hærens kapaciteter (Army capabilities) and their cost variations.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f6d4e60a1a9c",
          "evidence": "Action title 'skaleringskoncept og skaleringer for 15 operative kapaciteter' followed by scenario overview tables.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Introduce the up/down scaling-scenario concept across 15 capacities",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide is part of a BCG presentation for Struensee & Co. It uses a table to compare 7 scenarios across different military units.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f6d4e60a1a9c",
          "evidence": "Action title 'skaleringskoncept og skaleringer for 15 operative kapaciteter' followed by scenario overview tables.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Introduce the up/down scaling-scenario concept across 15 capacities",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses callouts to annotate a template of a one-pager document.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 4-point pie-chart icon scale to represent levels of obstacles.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide outlines the findings of an analysis of VFK (Værnsfælles Kommando) and proposes a restructuring to optimize operational focus and efficiency.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 25,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f91430721292",
          "evidence": "Three intro pages (I/III, II/III, III/III) cascade to the sized potential on p.28.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Cascade from operative-area data to a 517-637 mio. kr. potential",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured list format to present diagnostic findings and proposed efficiency measures, including specific financial impact ranges.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 25,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f91430721292",
          "evidence": "Three intro pages (I/III, II/III, III/III) cascade to the sized potential on p.28.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Cascade from operative-area data to a 517-637 mio. kr. potential",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "recommendation",
      "function": "recommend",
      "notes": "The slide outlines specific operational and personnel restructuring proposals with associated financial impact ranges.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 25,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f91430721292",
          "evidence": "Three intro pages (I/III, II/III, III/III) cascade to the sized potential on p.28.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Cascade from operative-area data to a 517-637 mio. kr. potential",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide includes a specific callout (green circle) on the 2022 total potential figure.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 25,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-f91430721292",
          "evidence": "Three intro pages (I/III, II/III, III/III) cascade to the sized potential on p.28.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Cascade from operative-area data to a 517-637 mio. kr. potential",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table uses a 'Struktur og koncept er' label spanning rows 1-4. Some data points are redacted with black bars.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table uses pie-chart icons to represent feasibility levels.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table includes a column for 'Realisérbarhed' represented by pie-chart icons indicating feasibility levels.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table tracks initiatives 14-19 under the category 'Kapaciteter og enheder'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table uses a pie-chart icon to represent feasibility (all are partially filled).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 34,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The table uses a visual indicator for feasibility (pie charts).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/34",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-34",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 29,
          "name": "Pareto Focus",
          "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
          "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-fcfc5956c12c",
          "evidence": "Six-page (I-VI) list of proposals with provenue figures showing where the largest savings sit.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Catalogue all operative-area efficiency proposals with size",
          "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 115,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 138,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}