{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 231,
  "pageSize": 30,
  "pageCount": 10666,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 55,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/55",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-55",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 56,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to define operational excellence criteria for each stage of a project lifecycle.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/56",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-56",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 57,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top right to anchor the 'Define' phase.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/57",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-57",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 58,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Design' phase.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/58",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-58",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 59,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Schedule' phase.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/59",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-59",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 60,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top to contextualize the 'Execute' phase.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/60",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-60",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 61,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right and several diagnostic charts (bar, treemap, waterfall) on the right side.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/61",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-61",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 61,
          "from": 56,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302",
          "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 62,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process header (Develop Hypothesis, Test with Data, Design through Pilot, Implement and Scale) to frame the exercise.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/62",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-62",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 64,
          "from": 62,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd",
          "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.",
          "position": 8,
          "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 63,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow at the top and a stacked bar chart to compare O&M and Capital spend composition.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/63",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-63",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 64,
          "from": 62,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd",
          "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.",
          "position": 8,
          "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 64,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process framework to describe a case study at PG&E.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/64",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-64",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 64,
          "from": 62,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9ebeb0f062cd",
          "evidence": "Per-diem labor problem -> spend analysis ($355M) -> 25-30% O&M savings outcome.",
          "position": 8,
          "objective": "Gas Ops external-labor precedent case",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 65,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow structure with a placeholder for content and a callout box asking for data validation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/65",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-65",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 65,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278",
          "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.",
          "position": 9,
          "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 66,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like bridge to show the transition from 'All Jobs' to a detailed breakdown of 'Jobs with false starts'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/66",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-66",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 65,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278",
          "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.",
          "position": 9,
          "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 67,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Uses a before-after-bridge framework to illustrate process improvement.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/67",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-67",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 65,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278",
          "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.",
          "position": 9,
          "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 68,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to define meeting logistics, activities, roles, and tracking metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/68",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-68",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 65,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278",
          "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.",
          "position": 9,
          "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 56,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 69,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The table is structured by themes: Consolidate cost centers, Right Size, Re-design, and Other, with sub-totals for each.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/69",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-69",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 70,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "This is a standard regulatory or legal redaction notice.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/70",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-70",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 71,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "This is a regulatory filing document (Exhibit AAM-1, Page 105 of 268).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/71",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-71",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 72,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "Includes case numbers and exhibit/page references in the header.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/72",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-72",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 73,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/73",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-73",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 74,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "This is a page from a formal regulatory filing or RFP document.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/74",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-74",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 75,
      "slideType": "implementation_plan",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide also includes a section on 'Respondent Qualifications' which acts as a secondary topic.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/75",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-75",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 76,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal legal or procurement document (Exhibit AAM-1).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/76",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-76",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 77,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "Page 111 of 268 from a regulatory filing.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/77",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-77",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 78,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "This is a procedural document page from a regulatory filing (Cases 18-E-0067 & 18-G-0068).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/78",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-78",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 79,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) document.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/79",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-79",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 80,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "This appears to be a page from a formal RFP or regulatory filing document.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/80",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-80",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 81,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "This is a standard legal/regulatory disclosure slide used in public filings.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/81",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-81",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 82,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "Regulatory filing document (Exhibit AAM-1, Page 249 of 268).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/82",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-82",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 83,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "Regulatory exhibit page detailing financial adjustments for rate filing.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/83",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-83",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 84,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "Regulatory filing document, specifically a supplemental response to an interrogatory.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/84",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-84",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}