{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 1935, "pageSize": 60, "pageCount": 5333, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9", "docSlug": "82cc7e27e2cc", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "press-release", "documentKindLabel": "Press release", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a text-heavy press release document.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/NWse2acTrEm3bc2H7bFrF8CuGUbLRBA_hNm3pTC54F4/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy84MmNjN2UyN2UyY2MvcDAwMS5wbmc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "d9c8a738-248c-4cf9-afb6-1173bcbe14f1", "evidence": "The document implies that accepting the offer would be costly.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of accepting an insufficient offer?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "b5eb0000-585e-4b6d-a160-4b2c7b998be2", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Hook", "beatSlug": "hook", "evidence": "The first slide serves as a hook to grab attention.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "ecb7ed79-0492-4784-bd43-e3fdad5c8829", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Complication", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "The first slide presents the complication (insufficient offer).", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/tWgGKQR7wXIRcBC_BrtLAhlrnI-27Mqz81wt7TpPgZI/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy84MmNjN2UyN2UyY2MvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/0zeTslLqW8OmgJOu4e9VlwarSKqOCWGL5Y2iuMgCXnU/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy84MmNjN2UyN2UyY2MvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/PNiKLbfIm2nnpflGycL85uYUiH8C6KUvq2fLMISDZTo/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy84MmNjN2UyN2UyY2MvcDAwMS5qcGc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9", "docSlug": "82cc7e27e2cc", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "press-release", "documentKindLabel": "Press release", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-436dd8eceae9#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "d9c8a738-248c-4cf9-afb6-1173bcbe14f1", "evidence": "The document implies that accepting the offer would be costly.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of accepting an insufficient offer?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "32f8af70-449e-4248-826f-e91d3b1d56ef", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "The second slide provides additional information.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as an introduction to a series of company profiles.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/-oGsXnAAk8JtatcDnp5ecXtdwsVgyW9TqsV8T5u1xIM/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iZTJiMDg5YWU3MzQvcDAwMS5qcGc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "cc141a7e-0797-4a22-9ee1-944861c866fd", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The document identifies the pain of underperformance and excessive compensation.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/zlKAeL_CD1Ynb9LlCnLgAdmAeFjqxeW7ZGy4Wpkz7lM/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iZTJiMDg5YWU3MzQvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/_Mk2cyM2HspUKV_ANbQII_lPL0jtvk8KRLAZ2IGuLxo/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iZTJiMDg5YWU3MzQvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/jLSTCKXYZYxrZG_iSncC3mYYiPeXNQl2Uta3pJBYzsE/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iZTJiMDg5YWU3MzQvcDAwMS5wbmc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "precedent_table", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "The table lists 21 companies, but only 20 rows are visible in the provided image.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "cc141a7e-0797-4a22-9ee1-944861c866fd", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The document identifies the pain of underperformance and excessive compensation.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal", "function": "preempt_rebuttal", "notes": "The slide uses a consistent structure for two different companies to advocate for voting against compensation committees.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to highlight specific companies and their CEO compensation relative to TSR.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to advocate for shareholder action against specific boards.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "peer_gap", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to highlight misalignment between pay and performance for two specific REITs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to advocate for voting against compensation committees due to pay-for-performance misalignment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to advocate for shareholder voting against compensation committees.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'name and shame' approach to advocate for voting against compensation committees due to persistent underperformance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to highlight specific companies for shareholder activism.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to advocate for voting against compensation committees due to performance-pay misalignment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "f3efd905-b1e1-44ef-9af9-5c8ef0e1fc1a", "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to highlight the gap in compensation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the gap in compensation between underperforming REITs and their peers.", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" }, { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "8749cc7c-d193-40a9-8168-7c76075caa33", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by providing precedent tables, peer benchmarks, and highlighting the gap in compensation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "villain_critique", "function": "name_villain", "notes": "The slide uses a 'Proxy Compensation Spotlight' format to target specific companies and their boards.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 12, "beatId": "f4b67d71-f0b6-4348-9c93-12462999fd42", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The document implies a solution by criticizing compensation committees and suggesting that shareholders should vote against them.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_gap", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "Includes a specific call to action for shareholders to vote against the compensation committee members.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 12, "beatId": "f4b67d71-f0b6-4348-9c93-12462999fd42", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The document implies a solution by criticizing compensation committees and suggesting that shareholders should vote against them.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "docSlug": "be2b089ae734", "documentTitle": "Multiple REITs (21 underperformers)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2026-04-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c53cc812b578#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "86fc5371-9aea-449c-8499-cd929ed7099b", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is excessive compensation and continued underperformance.", "position": 1, "objective": "Emphasize the cost of inaction in adjusting executive compensation.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 12, "beatId": "f4b67d71-f0b6-4348-9c93-12462999fd42", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The document implies a solution by criticizing compensation committees and suggesting that shareholders should vote against them.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/GIimzBKwD8xBgLoQa6Lc8voRK00y-ZzveP_fnOF1DUY/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80MDM0NGI2ODZjNjUvcDAwMS5qcGc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/GH9hQcQ8LhjFmxWgTkQyrnhXOM08-ybAfrpVWQm-yb8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80MDM0NGI2ODZjNjUvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/IS_7AB_wuQgw3nWpx5HSyzbgLnbHMvNNAO1iGcyQDvw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80MDM0NGI2ODZjNjUvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/PUHevbm16gGP8STxQ3MtAAt3c47JLedfZ-cQwX-8OV8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy80MDM0NGI2ODZjNjUvcDAwMS5wbmc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "disclaimer", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "team_bio", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Includes a logo grid of companies where Engine Capital has negotiated board representation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a bulleted list to summarize the investment thesis against the Veritas offer.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a four-quadrant layout to summarize the investment thesis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "frame_situation", "notes": "The slide establishes the context for an activist campaign against a specific M&A transaction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-6", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "LBO model transaction overview slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "f959478f-1b05-43d8-9a17-5cb341b30bc4", "evidence": "Slides 7-10 compare valuations", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight undervaluation", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "The slide uses two bar charts to demonstrate that the offer price is undervalued relative to the company's cash flow generation potential.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "f959478f-1b05-43d8-9a17-5cb341b30bc4", "evidence": "Slides 7-10 compare valuations", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight undervaluation", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 1, "beatId": "e92ce237-7456-4dd8-8d4b-a744f3491d6e", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Monster (Undervaluation)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-monster", "evidence": "Slides 1-8 outline the opposition and undervaluation", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Hook", "parentBeatSlug": "hook" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "preempt_rebuttal", "function": "preempt_rebuttal", "notes": "The slide uses a stock chart to visualize the gap between the current offer and the projected stock price based on fundamental performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "f959478f-1b05-43d8-9a17-5cb341b30bc4", "evidence": "Slides 7-10 compare valuations", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight undervaluation", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "8da8b404-7d4a-4d42-99d0-420656d2c6d5", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Struggle (Flawed Sales Process)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle", "evidence": "Slides 9-12 highlight the flawed sales process", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "valuation_reveal", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table to highlight qualitative differences (higher ed exposure, digital transition, NOLs, business mix) to justify a premium valuation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "f959478f-1b05-43d8-9a17-5cb341b30bc4", "evidence": "Slides 7-10 compare valuations", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight undervaluation", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" }, { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "The Reveal", "slug": "05-the-reveal", "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings", "matchId": "1e76fcce-ab8c-426b-a304-9f99a21b053f", "evidence": "Slides 10-13 present an alternative valuation", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal a more accurate valuation", "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "8da8b404-7d4a-4d42-99d0-420656d2c6d5", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Struggle (Flawed Sales Process)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle", "evidence": "Slides 9-12 highlight the flawed sales process", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' comparison of financial models to expose management's lack of credibility.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "The Reveal", "slug": "05-the-reveal", "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings", "matchId": "1e76fcce-ab8c-426b-a304-9f99a21b053f", "evidence": "Slides 10-13 present an alternative valuation", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal a more accurate valuation", "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "8da8b404-7d4a-4d42-99d0-420656d2c6d5", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Struggle (Flawed Sales Process)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle", "evidence": "Slides 9-12 highlight the flawed sales process", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "expose_contradiction", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a direct quote from a regulatory filing and a numbered list of analytical critiques.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "The Reveal", "slug": "05-the-reveal", "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings", "matchId": "1e76fcce-ab8c-426b-a304-9f99a21b053f", "evidence": "Slides 10-13 present an alternative valuation", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal a more accurate valuation", "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "8da8b404-7d4a-4d42-99d0-420656d2c6d5", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Struggle (Flawed Sales Process)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-struggle", "evidence": "Slides 9-12 highlight the flawed sales process", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "The slide uses a sensitivity table to demonstrate the range of potential returns for an LBO scenario.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "The Reveal", "slug": "05-the-reveal", "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings", "matchId": "1e76fcce-ab8c-426b-a304-9f99a21b053f", "evidence": "Slides 10-13 present an alternative valuation", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal a more accurate valuation", "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "cc454b24-ddc2-4a1d-aa62-cb4544722c11", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory (Superior Plan)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Slides 13-21 present the superior plan for HMHC shareholders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "scenario_table", "function": "quantify_opportunity", "notes": "Includes a footnote explaining the conservative assumptions (10% reduction in billings growth, 40% incremental variable costs).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-14", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "cc454b24-ddc2-4a1d-aa62-cb4544722c11", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory (Superior Plan)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Slides 13-21 present the superior plan for HMHC shareholders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "quantify_opportunity", "notes": "Includes a callout box at the bottom regarding employee sentiment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "cc454b24-ddc2-4a1d-aa62-cb4544722c11", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory (Superior Plan)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Slides 13-21 present the superior plan for HMHC shareholders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "scenario_table", "function": "quantify_opportunity", "notes": "Includes a callout box highlighting the key takeaway and a legend for IRR thresholds.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "cc454b24-ddc2-4a1d-aa62-cb4544722c11", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory (Superior Plan)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Slides 13-21 present the superior plan for HMHC shareholders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "docSlug": "40344b686c65", "documentTitle": "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMHC)", "authorId": "27_Engine_Capital", "authorName": "Engine Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-03-22 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2941177, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "propose_solution", "function": "propose_solution", "notes": "Includes a footnote regarding interest rate assumptions for the recapitalization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b95-478a8c1a9f82#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "cc454b24-ddc2-4a1d-aa62-cb4544722c11", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "The Victory (Superior Plan)", "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory", "evidence": "Slides 13-21 present the superior plan for HMHC shareholders", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f", "docSlug": "fed36a1771da", "documentTitle": "National Healthcare Corporation (NHC)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "press-release", "documentKindLabel": "Press release", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "press-release", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide outlines a conflict of interest involving the Adams brothers and proposes three potential outcomes for NHC, starting with a 'bad' scenario.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/tVEFlXbetEUqOdy74py8KbpySa_0kyUQepx20zYwisY/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mZWQzNmExNzcxZGEvcDAwMS5wbmc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "abd51319-74ac-472f-82f8-baaaf6fdf2ee", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Setup", "beatSlug": "setup", "evidence": "NHC faces three potential outcomes", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.6, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "6a304543-b370-4eee-b7ed-3193682ef738", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "Details on potential outcomes", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.6, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/UjSDvIZrV3ifONS25Ovco2dUAy6XGV8I-r4glU9Msvc/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mZWQzNmExNzcxZGEvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/ZaA_JXwQ-JhVtKqVD3c-DPzrZeZeRsQYUJrrwytUBiI/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mZWQzNmExNzcxZGEvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/MvjDH4puqRBiuUbShwXIrm8b6pYWl7FkR4rIZjlhojk/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mZWQzNmExNzcxZGEvcDAwMS5qcGc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f", "docSlug": "fed36a1771da", "documentTitle": "National Healthcare Corporation (NHC)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "press-release", "documentKindLabel": "Press release", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "disclaimer", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide continues a list of scenarios (starting at 2) and provides a rationale for a short position in NHC shares.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cb75574afb6f#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "6a304543-b370-4eee-b7ed-3193682ef738", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Evidence", "beatSlug": "evidence", "evidence": "Details on potential outcomes", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.6, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "Includes three distinct tables: Gaming Real Estate Transactions, Public Gaming REIT Valuations, and Public Gaming OpCo Valuations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-22", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a diagnostic approach to frame the 2022 performance as a self-inflicted error rather than a structural market failure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1c66e4b1-68d1-4686-acf9-ae0baa86359f", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of not taking action, including continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not taking action?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 24, "beatId": "d1a51f34-b057-4ca5-93df-0d7e9921cff0", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The deck identifies the problem of underperformance and depressed valuation.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "ceo_quote", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a CEO quote to expose a management failure or strategic misstep.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1c66e4b1-68d1-4686-acf9-ae0baa86359f", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of not taking action, including continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not taking action?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "nominee_bio", "function": "introduce_nominees", "notes": "Includes a line chart showing stock performance over 18 years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1c66e4b1-68d1-4686-acf9-ae0baa86359f", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of not taking action, including continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not taking action?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1c66e4b1-68d1-4686-acf9-ae0baa86359f", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of not taking action, including continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not taking action?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a 'low bar' argument to suggest upside potential for investors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1c66e4b1-68d1-4686-acf9-ae0baa86359f", "evidence": "The deck highlights the consequences of not taking action, including continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the consequences of not taking action?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "ceo_quote", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide uses a 'ceo-quote-contradiction' pattern to contrast past failure with current optimism.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-29", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-30", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "propose_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a grid of event images to illustrate the proposed strategy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-31", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "propose_solution", "function": "propose_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 32, "beatId": "92dc9e7f-1977-40d7-a360-7ce3d5eb1873", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The deck presents a solution of real estate sales to fast-track path to buybacks and dividends.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses green arrows to denote specific insider buy events with corresponding dollar amounts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The chart shows revenue growth for existing operators, supporting the 'moat' thesis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Includes citations from Variety, Fortune, and Attractions Management to support the thesis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as a concluding summary for an activist investor presentation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "9ef54254-d3af-4d54-a5d9-e0a8c650d118", "evidence": "The deck presents a potential outcome of taking action, including increased shareholder value.", "position": 1, "objective": "What is the potential outcome of taking action?", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "docSlug": "239b4bdd7d55", "documentTitle": "Six Flags Entertainment Corp. (SIX)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land & Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.7777778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-bca6057ac775#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "docSlug": "0c8c4da500b6", "documentTitle": "Public REIT sector (vs. private real estate)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-11-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a data table comparing annualized returns over various trailing periods.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/pzMErlx8eg1HVoTGrNzNVJA4oS0Y2CAgceP68RFDhIk/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wYzhjNGRhNTAwYjYvcDAwMS5wbmc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1f922320-37e0-494b-9b45-7e81de2bb644", "evidence": "The deck implies that choosing private real estate may result in missed opportunities for higher returns", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of choosing private real estate over publicly traded REITs?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "2fde9b31-ac8e-4c8e-a769-23441fd12ab9", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Identify Pain", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The first slide introduces the key message about superior historical returns", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/R5rwCdkhqrvK4MBgHArfRy2JZvI8FDMpMAbogn2fsHg/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wYzhjNGRhNTAwYjYvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/dtILZwKWQoaRufmRA7jacF8JG3n331HVY0BEiQI1blY/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wYzhjNGRhNTAwYjYvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/JmIE9LmjEORNMBWDQGpGMNppgvkYfBCt5y7i_MjCTGg/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy8wYzhjNGRhNTAwYjYvcDAwMS5qcGc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "docSlug": "0c8c4da500b6", "documentTitle": "Public REIT sector (vs. private real estate)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-11-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a line chart to demonstrate the performance gap between public and private real estate over 30 years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1f922320-37e0-494b-9b45-7e81de2bb644", "evidence": "The deck implies that choosing private real estate may result in missed opportunities for higher returns", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of choosing private real estate over publicly traded REITs?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "a1877899-469e-479a-8a44-86dd566e851e", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The second slide highlights advantages of public real estate over private", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "docSlug": "0c8c4da500b6", "documentTitle": "Public REIT sector (vs. private real estate)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-11-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses two charts: a stacked bar chart showing REIT sector composition and a time-series bar chart showing institutional investor positioning.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1f922320-37e0-494b-9b45-7e81de2bb644", "evidence": "The deck implies that choosing private real estate may result in missed opportunities for higher returns", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of choosing private real estate over publicly traded REITs?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "0348f004-72a4-4c95-8403-a61de4c33b02", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The last two slides provide evidence of material outperformance", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "docSlug": "0c8c4da500b6", "documentTitle": "Public REIT sector (vs. private real estate)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2024-11-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses two charts to support the thesis that public real estate is better positioned than private real estate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-c09e42cb0169#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "1f922320-37e0-494b-9b45-7e81de2bb644", "evidence": "The deck implies that choosing private real estate may result in missed opportunities for higher returns", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of choosing private real estate over publicly traded REITs?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "0348f004-72a4-4c95-8403-a61de4c33b02", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The last two slides provide evidence of material outperformance", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "docSlug": "df6572694f87", "documentTitle": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as an introduction to a white paper or research note on executive pay practices in the REIT sector.", "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/LOnub_ZZejwrCFQd33PJvEOAzSGdk2xfR0yRXa7eoIw/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5qcGc", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-1", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 1, "from": 1, "beatId": "7d49a804-102b-4943-be21-3635a8164078", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The executive summary presents the problem", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/p2UVUoXzOqGLDYKfE41LXnNsHoQoq70qsVvsWIfVmB0/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5wbmc", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Zf2szqSK0DdLydXHPs0lh5xWUybCKVQKm_mJQwnZv_I/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5qcGc", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/UnQ2IUum7MJG_N51XJqC2h_8WQtDoyQsq6lUyPe7dvY/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9kZjY1NzI2OTRmODcvcDAwMS5wbmc" }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "docSlug": "df6572694f87", "documentTitle": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "propose_solution", "function": "propose_solution", "notes": "The table highlights a disconnect between poor shareholder returns and high executive compensation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "8e158b42-80b0-456b-95c1-db5f8f237342", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "The proposal slide implies the need for change", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "docSlug": "df6572694f87", "documentTitle": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "precedent_table", "function": "expose_contradiction", "notes": "The slide highlights a potential conflict of interest or lack of accountability by showing the specific committee members responsible for compensation at underperforming firms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "22dc6f8a-509f-4f77-9fc0-44903b3c61ed", "evidence": "The document implies a gap between current pay and ideal pay", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the benchmark for executive compensation?", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "f2e51cdb-9e32-4d99-a71a-f593859d9734", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "docSlug": "df6572694f87", "documentTitle": "US REIT sector (15 underperforming large-cap REITs)", "authorId": "26_Land_and_Buildings", "authorName": "Land and Buildings", "documentKindSlug": "research-note", "documentKindLabel": "Research note", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.7777778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "other", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-cca3d92ef182#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "f2e51cdb-9e32-4d99-a71a-f593859d9734", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The precedent table and appendix provide supporting evidence", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.7, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }