{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 179, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Uses green arrows for positive trends and red arrows for negative trends for USPS.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a dual-line forecast (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and compares it against a worst-case EU benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a sharp decline after 2008 and projects three distinct recovery paths through 2020.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to show volume distribution across segments and sender types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a quantitative trend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate a causal link between broadband adoption and mail volume decline across multiple countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a simple binary classification (positive/negative) for various risk/opportunity factors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8fc7077006e7", "evidence": "p20 'All reasonable scenarios suggest volume will continue to decline'; p21 lists external/USPS events", "position": 4, "objective": "Test robustness of decline through revenue gap and scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-7d013d49ef95", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Implications section: revenue gap, scenarios, external events", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2-like matrix structure to contrast 'Conventional' vs 'Structural' changes across revenue and cost dimensions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-701645d8b834", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Structural cost changes table; precedent of other posts pursuing them", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast implemented changes versus proposed changes in postal delivery frequency and scope.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-701645d8b834", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Structural cost changes table; precedent of other posts pursuing them", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "BCG branded slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-90af6e415be9", "evidence": "p22 lists changes 'implemented by other posts'; p23 'Some posts are pursuing these structural changes now'", "position": 5, "objective": "Recommend structural changes by citing peer-post precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-76379a0c6dd6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "'The path forward' slide enumerates required structural changes", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 24, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-82072b43dde1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Structural changes required and path forward", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-25", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart illustrates the net impact of growth factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth) and diversion factors (Autopay, Online/Mobile presentment) on total volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart shows a starting volume of 14.4B in 2009 and an ending volume of 11.0B in 2020, with various positive and negative drivers in between.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }