{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 1680, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a bar-style visualization to show cost ranges for different energy sources, with specific annotations for conventional energy sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a bar-stacked-like approach to show the range of LCOE values based on different subsidy scenarios.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a bar-chart format to represent cost ranges for different energy sources, distinguishing between renewable and conventional energy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar approach to show baseline LCOE versus LCOE adjusted for carbon pricing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a series of dotted lines to show the trend of LCOE as the cost of capital increases across six data points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Lazard LCOE Analysis Version 17.0, page 14.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show base LCOE, subsidies, and firming costs, with a data table below for ELCC, Capacity Factor, and Resource Penetration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "Sensitivity Test", "slug": "52-sensitivity-test", "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb", "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters", "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart tracks LCOE ($/MWh) across multiple energy sources over time, with a break in the x-axis between 2021 and 2023.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 16, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb36-76c9-9a96-37c9a7d10dc4", "evidence": "Multi-tech historical line chart (p.16) reinforced by wind/solar specifics (p.17) build the pattern that costs have leveled.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 15-year LCOE decline plateauing recently", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 50, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a split-axis chart format to show cost trends over time for two different energy sources.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 16, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb36-76c9-9a96-37c9a7d10dc4", "evidence": "Multi-tech historical line chart (p.16) reinforced by wind/solar specifics (p.17) build the pattern that costs have leveled.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show 15-year LCOE decline plateauing recently", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 50, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "This is a standard introductory slide for a Lazard LCOS report, setting the scope and providing necessary legal disclaimers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare three cost scenarios (LCOS, Subsidized incl. Energy Community, Subsidized excl. Energy Community) across five storage configurations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a bar-chart style to represent cost ranges for different storage use cases, categorized by 'In-Front-of-the-Meter' and 'Behind-the-Meter'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to indicate applicability of revenue streams to specific storage configurations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical segmentation (In-Front-of-the-Meter vs. Behind-the-Meter) to organize the case studies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide maps seven distinct energy storage project scenarios across four US regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide presents stacked bar charts showing revenue components for seven specific use cases, with IRR percentages displayed above each bar.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b", "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).", "position": 4, "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "docSlug": "190510b49511442d", "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Lazard", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-26", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities", "position": 3, "confidence": 35, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }