{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 164, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "Uses BCG branding and standard consulting chart layout for market sizing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a line chart for user growth and a horizontal bar chart for spending CAGR.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses color coding to distinguish between developed and emerging countries, with China highlighted by a dashed box.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a BCG-developed indicator (eGDP) to measure the Internet economy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a horizontal bar chart for market cap and two stacked bar charts for unicorn distribution.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart comparison with visual callouts (red circles) to emphasize specific segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e83dcfb64efa", "evidence": "Every slide juxtaposes China vs US/peers (710m vs 290m, 6.9% GDP, 5 of 10 giants).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish China's Internet scale via US/G20 benchmark", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d387b2858b21", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Size/growth/penetration headlines vs US & G20", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-11", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses population pyramid style charts to compare age demographics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ed4c146ec884", "evidence": "Each slide compares Chinese vs US user behavior (14 yrs younger, mobile-native, app churn).", "position": 2, "objective": "Show Chinese users behave differently than US users", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d796c0620e96", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "User demographics, mobile-native, app behavior", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Includes annotations for percentage differences between China and US.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ed4c146ec884", "evidence": "Each slide compares Chinese vs US user behavior (14 yrs younger, mobile-native, app churn).", "position": 2, "objective": "Show Chinese users behave differently than US users", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d796c0620e96", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "User demographics, mobile-native, app behavior", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses two bar charts to contrast app installation volume and retention frequency.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ed4c146ec884", "evidence": "Each slide compares Chinese vs US user behavior (14 yrs younger, mobile-native, app churn).", "position": 2, "objective": "Show Chinese users behave differently than US users", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d796c0620e96", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "User demographics, mobile-native, app behavior", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a timeline-based bar visualization to contrast adoption speeds across four categories: E-commerce, Online finance, Social networks, and Public services.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ed4c146ec884", "evidence": "Each slide compares Chinese vs US user behavior (14 yrs younger, mobile-native, app churn).", "position": 2, "objective": "Show Chinese users behave differently than US users", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d796c0620e96", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "User demographics, mobile-native, app behavior", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to compare frequency distributions across two markets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ed4c146ec884", "evidence": "Each slide compares Chinese vs US user behavior (14 yrs younger, mobile-native, app churn).", "position": 2, "objective": "Show Chinese users behave differently than US users", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d796c0620e96", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "User demographics, mobile-native, app behavior", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to represent both segment size and market concentration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f2593d0dd7a4", "evidence": "Three evidence slides (CR3 mosaic, fad cycles, unicorn speed) build to a competition pattern.", "position": 3, "objective": "Demonstrate competition is uniquely intense and fad-driven", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 72, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d8d9826eb7c9", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Competition dynamics + characteristics summary", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a series of line charts to illustrate the 'fad' nature of specific business models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f2593d0dd7a4", "evidence": "Three evidence slides (CR3 mosaic, fad cycles, unicorn speed) build to a competition pattern.", "position": 3, "objective": "Demonstrate competition is uniquely intense and fad-driven", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 72, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d8d9826eb7c9", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Competition dynamics + characteristics summary", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses two bar charts to compare the distribution of time to unicorn status between Chinese and US startups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f2593d0dd7a4", "evidence": "Three evidence slides (CR3 mosaic, fad cycles, unicorn speed) build to a competition pattern.", "position": 3, "objective": "Demonstrate competition is uniquely intense and fad-driven", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 72, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d8d9826eb7c9", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Competition dynamics + characteristics summary", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-21", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d8d9826eb7c9", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Competition dynamics + characteristics summary", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f58bc2f67495", "evidence": "p22 names 3 characteristics; p23 lists 5 explicit questions structuring rest of deck.", "position": 4, "objective": "Synthesize characteristics and structure 5 driving questions", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 82, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-d8d9826eb7c9", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Competition dynamics + characteristics summary", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 22, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-e7cb6cab6316", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Size, users, competition data", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a stepped arrow diagram to present the questions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f58bc2f67495", "evidence": "p22 names 3 characteristics; p23 lists 5 explicit questions structuring rest of deck.", "position": 4, "objective": "Synthesize characteristics and structure 5 driving questions", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 82, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-24", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a process-like flow to map drivers to industry impact scope.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 25, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fa26b0b56c37", "evidence": "Surface (3 forces) → hidden (underdeveloped industries) → root cause (leapfrog) on p25-26.", "position": 5, "objective": "Identify leapfrogging as root cause of market uniqueness", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a dual-line graph to show industry efficiency over time, contrasting a steady US trajectory with a sharp, late-stage acceleration for China.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 25, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fa26b0b56c37", "evidence": "Surface (3 forces) → hidden (underdeveloped industries) → root cause (leapfrog) on p25-26.", "position": 5, "objective": "Identify leapfrogging as root cause of market uniqueness", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses stacked bar charts to compare market segments; highlights 'leapfrogging' phenomenon.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 25, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fa26b0b56c37", "evidence": "Surface (3 forces) → hidden (underdeveloped industries) → root cause (leapfrog) on p25-26.", "position": 5, "objective": "Identify leapfrogging as root cause of market uniqueness", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a comparative framework to highlight the 'gap' in offline retail maturity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fc3359af1e17", "evidence": "Old retail weak (p28-30) → e-commerce leapfrog with 1.5x US measurable delta (p31).", "position": 6, "objective": "Prove e-commerce leapfrog with before/after data", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate how e-commerce addressed infrastructure and efficiency limitations in traditional retail.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fc3359af1e17", "evidence": "Old retail weak (p28-30) → e-commerce leapfrog with 1.5x US measurable delta (p31).", "position": 6, "objective": "Prove e-commerce leapfrog with before/after data", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative structure to highlight structural advantages in the Chinese market.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fc3359af1e17", "evidence": "Old retail weak (p28-30) → e-commerce leapfrog with 1.5x US measurable delta (p31).", "position": 6, "objective": "Prove e-commerce leapfrog with before/after data", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to show the trend of e-commerce penetration over time.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-fc3359af1e17", "evidence": "Old retail weak (p28-30) → e-commerce leapfrog with 1.5x US measurable delta (p31).", "position": 6, "objective": "Prove e-commerce leapfrog with before/after data", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to compare two distinct market compositions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-0047a8ad09a4", "evidence": "Cash-dominant before (p32-33) → mobile payments 70x US after (p34).", "position": 7, "objective": "Prove mobile payments leapfrog vs cash baseline", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative structure to diagnose the root causes of low credit card usage in China.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-0047a8ad09a4", "evidence": "Cash-dominant before (p32-33) → mobile payments 70x US after (p34).", "position": 7, "objective": "Prove mobile payments leapfrog vs cash baseline", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses stacked bar charts to show substitution effect and a simple bar chart to show market scale difference.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-0047a8ad09a4", "evidence": "Cash-dominant before (p32-33) → mobile payments 70x US after (p34).", "position": 7, "objective": "Prove mobile payments leapfrog vs cash baseline", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }