{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 1494, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a link to an external video with a password.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 13, "beatId": "019de793-b488-71cf-ae9a-be44fa802d81", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Opportunity exists but perception gap on effective action, p.13-18.", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de793-b528-707c-9697-5e7df8bc62e2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey data on public climate sentiment.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-20", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-21", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a visual metaphor of a tangled path with signposts (GRI, UNGC, CDP, SASB, SDGs) to represent the complexity of the sustainability landscape.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de793-b656-74cc-adc9-1a878f85cfca", "evidence": "Tangled-path metaphor (p.22) -> blurring E&S (p.24) -> BrewDog reputational case (p.25).", "position": 5, "objective": "Surface root cause behind brand sustainability failures", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a pie chart to visualize survey data regarding corporate responsibility priorities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de793-b656-74cc-adc9-1a878f85cfca", "evidence": "Tangled-path metaphor (p.22) -> blurring E&S (p.24) -> BrewDog reputational case (p.25).", "position": 5, "objective": "Surface root cause behind brand sustainability failures", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a collage of news clippings to visually reinforce the 'blurring' of E (Environmental) and S (Social) factors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de793-b656-74cc-adc9-1a878f85cfca", "evidence": "Tangled-path metaphor (p.22) -> blurring E&S (p.24) -> BrewDog reputational case (p.25).", "position": 5, "objective": "Surface root cause behind brand sustainability failures", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Uses a quote to frame the hypocrisy of a brand's public vs private behavior.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de793-b656-74cc-adc9-1a878f85cfca", "evidence": "Tangled-path metaphor (p.22) -> blurring E&S (p.24) -> BrewDog reputational case (p.25).", "position": 5, "objective": "Surface root cause behind brand sustainability failures", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Uses a knight metaphor to categorize brand sustainability elements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "019de793-b676-750e-bd1a-d870dc48221e", "evidence": "Why (integral role) -> How (Shield/Sword/Standard) -> What (Patagonia leadership) -> recap.", "position": 6, "objective": "Articulate brand sustainability framework and applied example", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a brand example to argue for proactive industry leadership rather than reactive compliance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "019de793-b676-750e-bd1a-d870dc48221e", "evidence": "Why (integral role) -> How (Shield/Sword/Standard) -> What (Patagonia leadership) -> recap.", "position": 6, "objective": "Articulate brand sustainability framework and applied example", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "019de793-b676-750e-bd1a-d870dc48221e", "evidence": "Why (integral role) -> How (Shield/Sword/Standard) -> What (Patagonia leadership) -> recap.", "position": 6, "objective": "Articulate brand sustainability framework and applied example", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b4a9-725b-9382-684eca885f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Shield/Sword/Standard brand framework introduced, p.26; Patagonia precedent.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de793-b547-7461-a9a0-f7879cbcef52", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability framing as brand opportunity, Shield/Sword/Standard.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "closing_ask", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-29", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-30", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "Includes Tetra Pak and Ipsos branding.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-31", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Mentions Ipsos as the research partner.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de793-b697-7225-99fe-2e3d31b63b0a", "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index research -> 61% cooking more -> 73% want to minimize food waste.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that home-cooking surge is driven by food-waste concern", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 72, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de793-b697-7225-99fe-2e3d31b63b0a", "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index research -> 61% cooking more -> 73% want to minimize food waste.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that home-cooking surge is driven by food-waste concern", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 72, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de793-b697-7225-99fe-2e3d31b63b0a", "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index research -> 61% cooking more -> 73% want to minimize food waste.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that home-cooking surge is driven by food-waste concern", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 72, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de793-b697-7225-99fe-2e3d31b63b0a", "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index research -> 61% cooking more -> 73% want to minimize food waste.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that home-cooking surge is driven by food-waste concern", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 72, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "docSlug": "a41999e523b976fe", "documentTitle": "ENVIRONMENT EMERGENCY?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to rank drivers of home cooking, with 'Ability to minimise food waste' highlighted by an oval.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-942500f7d1c2#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de793-b697-7225-99fe-2e3d31b63b0a", "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index research -> 61% cooking more -> 73% want to minimize food waste.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that home-cooking surge is driven by food-waste concern", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 72, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b4c9-7416-bcd3-3adcfef3f8b0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tetra Pak Index, India and Korea case studies provide proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 64, "from": 30, "beatId": "019de793-b565-749f-a1b5-c6defa81b1cb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case studies showing companies/consumers/regions acting.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }