{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 1415, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a stacked bar representation of survey responses ranging from 'Strongly agree' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 68% of respondents agreeing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of agreement levels across different global regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays the percentage of respondents who strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree/strongly disagree, or don't know.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey results across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 5-point Likert scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "e457910d-b9ea-4a44-9243-5edb8f4be7fa", "evidence": "The loop is visible in the comparison tables and peer benchmarks that outline global preferences (p6-p15)", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the global preferences for a plastic pollution treaty?", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "a47e8cc9-beb9-4df9-b72f-989b5a580ed8", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Outlines global preferences for an international plastic pollution treaty and views on specific rules (p6-p15)", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 85% of respondents viewing such bans as important.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data represents a survey of 24,727 online adults across 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 90% of respondents viewing the ban as important.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point sentiment scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart shows a high level of global consensus on the importance of re-use and refill systems, with most countries showing over 80% support.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of sentiment across different regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "docSlug": "fa25b036d047fff6", "documentTitle": "Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point Likert scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-1514996411a1#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "dae9a2cb-6b8a-43a9-9d99-8c29a44e4587", "evidence": "Implicitly addressed through the presentation of support for specific treaty components (p16-p27)", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the consequences of not implementing a global treaty?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "beatId": "58992c60-7c1d-4e42-9e57-e51cb698f368", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Presents comparisons and benchmarks of global rules that could be included in the treaty, supported by data (p16-p27)", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }