{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 120,
  "pageSize": 30,
  "pageCount": 10666,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "cite_precedent",
      "notes": "The slide contains a mix of positive corporate messaging and a critical report from Dagens Media.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e50f73c26705",
          "evidence": "Each case (MTGx, Volvo VC, AstraZeneca) gets a detail slide + press-clipping page.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Deep-dive on each Swedish CV case in the appendix",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2-style matrix to map the venture capital strategy. The 'Volvo Group Venture Capital' box is positioned in the 'Adjacent' to 'Close to core' capability range and '4-6 years' time horizon.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e50f73c26705",
          "evidence": "Each case (MTGx, Volvo VC, AstraZeneca) gets a detail slide + press-clipping page.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Deep-dive on each Swedish CV case in the appendix",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "cite_precedent",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 'sticky note' visual metaphor for the quotes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e50f73c26705",
          "evidence": "Each case (MTGx, Volvo VC, AstraZeneca) gets a detail slide + press-clipping page.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Deep-dive on each Swedish CV case in the appendix",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "market_landscape",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The chart is a 2x2-style matrix mapping operational capability vs time to impact.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e50f73c26705",
          "evidence": "Each case (MTGx, Volvo VC, AstraZeneca) gets a detail slide + press-clipping page.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Deep-dive on each Swedish CV case in the appendix",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "cite_precedent",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-e50f73c26705",
          "evidence": "Each case (MTGx, Volvo VC, AstraZeneca) gets a detail slide + press-clipping page.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Deep-dive on each Swedish CV case in the appendix",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "disclaimer",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6",
      "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "closing_ask",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "This is a cover memorandum for a consulting deck.",
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/7p0k_iiDnAu89ch_f2RXCxdBJ3LZfafCERKfM4hZiz8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mNDhkNDU0MDhjMjZmNWEyL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/0SLcpl53dkW8j56y9VMZA6eOg2Q9cUEW-9YHLU8Nw5Y/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mNDhkNDU0MDhjMjZmNWEyL3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/Hdi50Tbqm5W6a42Jwqyg-NJjM_6fYOXHkZwHI4RULJw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mNDhkNDU0MDhjMjZmNWEyL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/NV0gD8sSLxJTwjvT9YOROcJSCo26jZjpaFZ9VXZv1ug/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mNDhkNDU0MDhjMjZmNWEyL3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "situation_overview",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "Includes project constraints and specific focus areas (dog population).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "The slide uses a table-like structure to map information types to actions taken.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Uses a stock-and-flow diagram metaphor to explain system dynamics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Analogy",
          "slug": "08-analogy",
          "bestFor": "Complex concepts, new markets, technical explanations for non-experts",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-14d79b32940c",
          "evidence": "p.6 bucket/faucet diagram + 'Imagine the Dallas dog population as a bucket of water'",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Frame dog problem with bucket-of-water analogy",
          "structure": "The Familiar Domain -> Key Parallel -> Applied to Our Situation -> Insight",
          "confidence": 90,
          "description": "Explain the unfamiliar through a well-understood parallel domain"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "Uses a stock-and-flow diagram to represent the dog population system.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Analogy",
          "slug": "08-analogy",
          "bestFor": "Complex concepts, new markets, technical explanations for non-experts",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-14d79b32940c",
          "evidence": "p.6 bucket/faucet diagram + 'Imagine the Dallas dog population as a bucket of water'",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Frame dog problem with bucket-of-water analogy",
          "structure": "The Familiar Domain -> Key Parallel -> Applied to Our Situation -> Insight",
          "confidence": 90,
          "description": "Explain the unfamiliar through a well-understood parallel domain"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "The slide highlights 'Key Findings' in green, indicating it is the current section of focus.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9057e720c43c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "Memo, cover, agenda, Context section, BCG approach + buckets/flows framing",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured list format to categorize findings into operational context, public safety issues, animal welfare opportunities, and organizational challenges.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a combination of bar charts to illustrate the demographic problem statement regarding dog population growth.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-1aa7f9c0a609",
          "evidence": "Setup: ~350k dogs → growth math → 8,700 loose dogs insight",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Reveal scale of dog and loose-dog population",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The chart uses a line graph to compare three scenarios: no intervention, DAS collection/placement only, and DAS + low-cost S/N surgeries.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-1aa7f9c0a609",
          "evidence": "Setup: ~350k dogs → growth math → 8,700 loose dogs insight",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Reveal scale of dog and loose-dog population",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "Includes methodology references (WHO, WSPA, Beck Method).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-1aa7f9c0a609",
          "evidence": "Setup: ~350k dogs → growth math → 8,700 loose dogs insight",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Reveal scale of dog and loose-dog population",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the composition of dog bites over time, highlighting the growth of loose-owned dog bites.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 13,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-1f5c6ab8cd39",
          "evidence": "'bites from loose-owned dogs growing at 23%' — accumulating harm if ignored",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Establish urgency via rising bite trend",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show both absolute volume and percentage composition of intake types over time.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The slide uses a comparative bar chart approach to highlight operational efficiency gaps.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a simple three-column layout to categorize ASO activities and quantify time spent.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table categorizes calls into 'Dispatched' (levels 1-6) and 'Non-dispatched' (levels 7-8).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses two charts to diagnose the problem: a bar chart for growth trends and a stacked bar chart for response rates.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "kpi_dashboard",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses green circles to highlight positive trends in adoption and transfer, and a negative trend in euthanasia.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative volume, with a table below showing average dogs per partner per year.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a callout to emphasize the 2% intake figure for the top 3 rescues.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 14,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2172df3410a3",
          "evidence": "Intake flat → 80% reactive → 56% citation response → low transfer share with top rescues",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Cascade DAS operating data to underperformance insight",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart uses a dashed line to indicate the mean spending of peer cities (excluding Dallas).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-27a466b3d6c3",
          "evidence": "'~10% below peers'; 'Reaching average would require $8M/yr in funding'",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Show DAS budget gap vs peers and 501(c)3 cities",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
      "function": "compare_peers",
      "notes": "The chart highlights the gap between current spending and the mean of benchmark cities, suggesting an $8M/yr funding opportunity.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-27a466b3d6c3",
          "evidence": "'~10% below peers'; 'Reaching average would require $8M/yr in funding'",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Show DAS budget gap vs peers and 501(c)3 cities",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-95142a9312b8",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Executive findings on pop growth, bites, flat intake, transfer gap, budget, org issues",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}