{
  "kind": "all",
  "value": "all",
  "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 319975,
  "page": 115,
  "pageSize": 60,
  "pageCount": 5333,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 1,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/aSUS6mBq5cXfq19XKqwKJs6JicuXXa6R3FBWk-557_s/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mMzc5ZDkxNWMwNGRlYTNiL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/1",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-1",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/oLX2QaffR7i_6kPaLscOZSThfm5J-htYf9SQaFT5yv0/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mMzc5ZDkxNWMwNGRlYTNiL3AwMDEucG5n",
      "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/OmtW3g2zGAYtm2QhMxpVu1he0ICM3fRRKmQUxiKg2BM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mMzc5ZDkxNWMwNGRlYTNiL3AwMDEuanBn",
      "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/uYU91Eg3iGzz5tBTd0bTYi3jiK25Iv4UqbqG1s-PcOM/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9mMzc5ZDkxNWMwNGRlYTNiL3AwMDEucG5n"
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 2,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/2",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-2",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "This is a formal legal or regulatory filing index.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "table_of_contents",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 6,
      "slideType": "appendix_data",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": "Cases 18-E-0067 & 18-G-0068",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/6",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-6",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "Regulatory filing document, page 1 of 2.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": "This appears to be a page from a legal or regulatory filing.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a standard Q&A table format to communicate internal change management messaging.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "section_divider",
      "function": "transition",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42",
          "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish case for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a chevron-based process flow to represent project phases.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42",
          "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish case for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1a80dea3a271",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "BCO definition, FAQs, diagnostic-phase timeline.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart uses a shaded area to represent the gap between 'Growth with inflation' and the 'Management forecast' (Flat to 2017).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42",
          "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish case for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like transition to show how the 'Color of Money' (Capital vs O&M) maps to 'Savings Type' (Materials, Contract, Labor) and 'By BU'.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42",
          "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish case for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to structure the communication summary.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 13,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8008412b1d42",
          "evidence": "BAU not sustainable + escalating challenges + $200M target + communication summary.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Establish case for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "appendix",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide provides internal communication context regarding cost reduction strategies, specifically addressing employee concerns about hiring, benefits, and safety.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "cover",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 23,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a bidirectional arrow to imply a reinforcing relationship between cost effectiveness and the three strategic pillars.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/23",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-23",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The chart illustrates the gap between historical growth trends and the flat target, implying a $200M value requirement.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32",
          "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-1e2a7b8bbdea",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Case for change, $200M flat-O&M gap vs growth-with-inflation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 25,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "decompose_segments",
      "notes": "The chart uses a series of stacked bar segments to illustrate the composition of a ~$320M-$550M opportunity pipeline.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/25",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-25",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32",
          "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 26,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow from left to right, starting with a dense table of raw data, moving to a list of sub-opportunities, and ending with a set of four strategic themes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/26",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-26",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32",
          "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-based diagnostic framework to map operational pain points and opportunities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32",
          "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "prioritize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded legend to categorize opportunities into six types: Unnecessary/Low value work, Inefficient processes, Inefficient org structure, Contractor strategy opportunity, and Intuition/Experience.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-87dc2e3d4e32",
          "evidence": "$200M target then segmentation by money/category/type/BU, then 5-stage decomposition.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Decompose the savings opportunity",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide highlights the second agenda item with a red box, indicating the current focus of the meeting.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "key_takeaways",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Maturity Curve",
          "slug": "36-maturity-curve",
          "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee",
          "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Frame the methodology",
          "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap",
          "confidence": 60,
          "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a linear process flow to describe the initiative development lifecycle.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Maturity Curve",
          "slug": "36-maturity-curve",
          "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee",
          "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Frame the methodology",
          "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap",
          "confidence": 60,
          "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented framework on the left to contextualize the current phase (Develop Hypothesis).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 32,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Maturity Curve",
          "slug": "36-maturity-curve",
          "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee",
          "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Frame the methodology",
          "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap",
          "confidence": 60,
          "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to guide a working session.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 34,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented header (Develop hypothesis, Test with data, Design solution, Implement and scale) to frame the case study.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/34",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-34",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 35,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare operational metrics across three yards.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/35",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-35",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 36,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a process improvement initiative, likely part of a larger transformation project.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/36",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-36",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 37,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/37",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-37",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow at the top and a grouped bar chart to show the impact of a scheduling intervention.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 39,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/39",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-39",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 40,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/40",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-40",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 41,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "prioritize",
      "notes": "The slide highlights 'Planning-Execution Alignment' with a red box, indicating it as the focus of the current exercise.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/41",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-41",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 42,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The chart uses grouped bars to show deviations across 2014, 2015, and 2016 for various functional categories.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/42",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-42",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 42,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2eeac853d078",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Capex underrun bar chart shows $20M deviation.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 43,
      "slideType": "problem_statement",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a simple four-step process flow as a header for a central problem statement.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/43",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-43",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 44,
          "from": 43,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 44,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "This appears to be a workshop or working session slide.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/44",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-44",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 44,
          "from": 43,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 45,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process flow at the top, highlighting the third step (Design solution and refine through pilot).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/45",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-45",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 45,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-3416302b15ce",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Pilot solution + scale plan slides.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 46,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "The slide uses a linear process flow as a framework for a working session.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/46",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-46",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 41,
          "name": "Hypothesis Test",
          "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
          "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204",
          "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis",
          "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 45,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-3416302b15ce",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Pilot solution + scale plan slides.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 47,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/47",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-47",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 48,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to map roles to specific responsibilities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/48",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-48",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 51,
          "from": 48,
          "name": "Stakeholder Map",
          "slug": "45-stakeholder-map",
          "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e",
          "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles",
          "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 49,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a two-column structure to contrast support provided vs. support needed.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/49",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-49",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 51,
          "from": 48,
          "name": "Stakeholder Map",
          "slug": "45-stakeholder-map",
          "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e",
          "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles",
          "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 50,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a hierarchical structure to define governance and execution responsibilities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/50",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-50",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 51,
          "from": 48,
          "name": "Stakeholder Map",
          "slug": "45-stakeholder-map",
          "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e",
          "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles",
          "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 51,
      "slideType": "org_design",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide contains a placeholder for 'Initiative Lead' and a callout note regarding iteration with Glenn.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/51",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-51",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 51,
          "from": 48,
          "name": "Stakeholder Map",
          "slug": "45-stakeholder-map",
          "bestFor": "Change management, political navigation, implementation planning",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9766ac37d89e",
          "evidence": "Steering Committee -> BCO Core Team -> Business leads -> Initiative leads -> Change agents.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "Define BCO governance and roles",
          "structure": "The Decision -> Key Stakeholders -> Their Interests/Concerns -> The Alignment Strategy",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Identify key players, their interests, and how to navigate them"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 52,
      "slideType": "agenda",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/52",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-52",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 53,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal process flow diagram to outline the timeline and key activities for each phase.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/53",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-53",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 54,
      "slideType": "closing_ask",
      "function": "state_next_steps",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/54",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-54",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 48,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-29344368199c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "BCO Core Team org design, field force work approach, closing 'Questions?'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "recommend",
      "notes": "The slide contains a list of recommendations followed by a detailed set of footnotes defining categories and metrics used in the broader report.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 26,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-6bf2a8b35e80",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Three local-edge plays plus 'How brands/retailers can win' with 'Prepare for New Retail.'",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        },
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 26,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-7419c289455b",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "Three local-edge plays plus 'Prepare for New Retail' CTA.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "other",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "filler",
      "function": "filler",
      "notes": "The slide contains only the header and footer branding.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "filler",
      "function": "filler",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "appendix_disclosure",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "This slide serves as a corporate boilerplate or disclosure page for the two organizations involved in the deck.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a",
      "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.707,
      "pageNumber": 32,
      "slideType": "disclaimer",
      "function": "front_matter",
      "notes": "This is a standard Bain & Company closing slide.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": null,
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/32",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-32",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}