{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 1115, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "other", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "This is a textbook-style informational page, likely from a report on hydrogen energy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-678a3a437cb1", "evidence": "Drivers section narrows from macro context to electricity-cost driver and scenario implications", "position": 2, "objective": "Drill into drivers and scenario role for green hydrogen", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to detail specific challenges in the green hydrogen value chain.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-69e828a65bf7", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers + cost components box + grid emissions threshold + policy gaps", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface visible cost/emission symptoms then expose deeper structural barriers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-cc8bbf363910", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers, cost components, emissions threshold, weak existing policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e3893269fbf8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Barriers section translates facts into implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes footnotes 7 and 8, and source/notes for Figure 1.3.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-69e828a65bf7", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers + cost components box + grid emissions threshold + policy gaps", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface visible cost/emission symptoms then expose deeper structural barriers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-cc8bbf363910", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers, cost components, emissions threshold, weak existing policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e3893269fbf8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Barriers section translates facts into implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "appendix", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Contains a specific threshold value of 190 gCO2/kWh for sustainable electrolytic hydrogen.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-69e828a65bf7", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers + cost components box + grid emissions threshold + policy gaps", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface visible cost/emission symptoms then expose deeper structural barriers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-cc8bbf363910", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers, cost components, emissions threshold, weak existing policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e3893269fbf8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Barriers section translates facts into implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a dot-matrix visualization to represent policy counts across production, infrastructure, and end-use segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-69e828a65bf7", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers + cost components box + grid emissions threshold + policy gaps", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface visible cost/emission symptoms then expose deeper structural barriers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-cc8bbf363910", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers, cost components, emissions threshold, weak existing policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e3893269fbf8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Barriers section translates facts into implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "maturity_model", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a three-stage framework to categorize the development of green hydrogen policy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-69e828a65bf7", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers + cost components box + grid emissions threshold + policy gaps", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface visible cost/emission symptoms then expose deeper structural barriers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-cc8bbf363910", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Section 1.3 Barriers, cost components, emissions threshold, weak existing policies", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e3893269fbf8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Barriers section translates facts into implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": "The slide uses a large '2' in the title, but the text explicitly mentions 'four central pillars'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Part of a series of pillars for green hydrogen policy making.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 19, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-6e9db60e68ba", "evidence": "Figure 2.1 four-stage progression and Figure 2.2 plots countries against the same stages", "position": 4, "objective": "Stage countries along R&D→Vision→Roadmap→Strategy maturity ladder", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide outlines a sequential process from R&D to Strategy, with a cross-cutting PPP layer and a follow-up analysis phase (P1).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 19, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-6e9db60e68ba", "evidence": "Figure 2.1 four-stage progression and Figure 2.2 plots countries against the same stages", "position": 4, "objective": "Stage countries along R&D→Vision→Roadmap→Strategy maturity ladder", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide provides a narrative history of hydrogen policy, referencing specific countries like the US, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, China, France, and the EU.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 19, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-6e9db60e68ba", "evidence": "Figure 2.1 four-stage progression and Figure 2.2 plots countries against the same stages", "position": 4, "objective": "Stage countries along R&D→Vision→Roadmap→Strategy maturity ladder", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "timeline", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical timeline format to categorize policy initiatives by type and date.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 19, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-6e9db60e68ba", "evidence": "Figure 2.1 four-stage progression and Figure 2.2 plots countries against the same stages", "position": 4, "objective": "Stage countries along R&D→Vision→Roadmap→Strategy maturity ladder", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 23, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-706206074826", "evidence": "Box 2.1 EU strategy + Figure 2.3 instruments illustrate pillar 1 in practice", "position": 5, "objective": "Use EU hydrogen strategy as worked precedent for the four-pillar approach", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "other", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a timeline framework to outline the three stages of the EU hydrogen strategy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 23, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-706206074826", "evidence": "Box 2.1 EU strategy + Figure 2.3 instruments illustrate pillar 1 in practice", "position": 5, "objective": "Use EU hydrogen strategy as worked precedent for the four-pillar approach", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a structured categorization framework to map policy instruments to strategic pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 23, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-706206074826", "evidence": "Box 2.1 EU strategy + Figure 2.3 instruments illustrate pillar 1 in practice", "position": 5, "objective": "Use EU hydrogen strategy as worked precedent for the four-pillar approach", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 'P2' icon to denote the pillar. It includes two photos illustrating hydrogen infrastructure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7573dd6a8c13", "evidence": "Pillar 2 argues hydrogen is not a substitute for fossil fuels and identifies highest-value applications", "position": 6, "objective": "Establish priority hierarchy of hydrogen applications", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 60, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix to map sectors against technology solutions, highlighting green hydrogen's specific role.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7573dd6a8c13", "evidence": "Pillar 2 argues hydrogen is not a substitute for fossil fuels and identifies highest-value applications", "position": 6, "objective": "Establish priority hierarchy of hydrogen applications", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 60, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Page 28 of a report, part of Chapter Two, focusing on policy priorities (P2) and the principle of additionality.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 26, "name": "Elimination", "slug": "07-elimination", "bestFor": "Decision justification, recommendation defense, skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7573dd6a8c13", "evidence": "Pillar 2 argues hydrogen is not a substitute for fossil fuels and identifies highest-value applications", "position": 6, "objective": "Establish priority hierarchy of hydrogen applications", "structure": "The Options -> Why Not A -> Why Not B -> Why C is the Answer", "confidence": 60, "description": "Systematically rule out alternatives to arrive at the only viable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide details the necessity of certification for green hydrogen and provides a comparative table of existing schemes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 29, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-78e1034f4273", "evidence": "Figure 2.5 shows lifecycle emissions across Production→Infrastructure→End Use chain", "position": 7, "objective": "Trace GO scheme certification along production→infrastructure→end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 80, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide discusses the complexity of hydrogen certification and proposes a lifecycle approach (Figure 2.5) for Guarantees of Origin (GO).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 29, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-78e1034f4273", "evidence": "Figure 2.5 shows lifecycle emissions across Production→Infrastructure→End Use chain", "position": 7, "objective": "Trace GO scheme certification along production→infrastructure→end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 80, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Part of a series of policy pillars for green hydrogen.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 31, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7f4a9c5a6c46", "evidence": "Pillar 4 lists distinct governance/enabling policy categories that complete the framework", "position": 8, "objective": "Assemble enabling policies into a complete governance system", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide outlines strategic pillars for hydrogen policy, including energy security, financing, standards, infrastructure, data collection, and research.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 31, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7f4a9c5a6c46", "evidence": "Pillar 4 lists distinct governance/enabling policy categories that complete the framework", "position": 8, "objective": "Assemble enabling policies into a complete governance system", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 31, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-7f4a9c5a6c46", "evidence": "Pillar 4 lists distinct governance/enabling policy categories that complete the framework", "position": 8, "objective": "Assemble enabling policies into a complete governance system", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 55, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d0d5f67f3f51", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2 lays out the four policy pillars (national strategies, priorities, GO, governance)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 34, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-82eb5ce2a755", "evidence": "Figure 3.1 segments Electrolysis/Infrastructure/Industry/Aviation/Shipping with per-segment barriers and options", "position": 9, "objective": "Split policy problem into five distinct value-chain segments with their own barriers", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table/matrix format to align challenges with potential policy interventions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 34, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-82eb5ce2a755", "evidence": "Figure 3.1 segments Electrolysis/Infrastructure/Industry/Aviation/Shipping with per-segment barriers and options", "position": 9, "objective": "Split policy problem into five distinct value-chain segments with their own barriers", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Page 36 of a report. Contains text-heavy analysis of hydrogen market barriers and policy needs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 36, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-84a55456893d", "evidence": "Section 3.1 contrasts current 2-3x cost vs grey hydrogen with policy levers to bridge", "position": 10, "objective": "Show electrolysis cost gap and policy actions to close it", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 55, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 36, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-84a55456893d", "evidence": "Section 3.1 contrasts current 2-3x cost vs grey hydrogen with policy levers to bridge", "position": 10, "objective": "Show electrolysis cost gap and policy actions to close it", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 55, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Page 38 of a report, likely from a larger energy transition study.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 38, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-884aaa49102b", "evidence": "Context on transport/storage challenges drives directly into recommendation slide", "position": 11, "objective": "Cascade infrastructure challenge into recommended policy attention", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 60, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 38, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-884aaa49102b", "evidence": "Context on transport/storage challenges drives directly into recommendation slide", "position": 11, "objective": "Cascade infrastructure challenge into recommended policy attention", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 60, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Chapter 3 page 40. Discusses iron, steel, chemicals, cement, lime, and aluminium. Mentions carbon leakage and cost differentials.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 40, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-8e6dd29cb4a3", "evidence": "Barriers callout on p40 followed by recommendations callout on p41 (cost, demand, leakage)", "position": 12, "objective": "Translate industrial barriers into prescriptive policy recommendations", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 40, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-8e6dd29cb4a3", "evidence": "Barriers callout on p40 followed by recommendations callout on p41 (cost, demand, leakage)", "position": 12, "objective": "Translate industrial barriers into prescriptive policy recommendations", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 34, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-d54af2cd1ea7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sectoral barriers/policy options for electrolysis, infra, industry, aviation, shipping", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 47, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-e769c7e0b5af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pillars and sectoral policies prescribe action", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }