{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 107, "pageSize": 30, "pageCount": 10666, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "BCG slide from 2008 regarding the LA Harbor Commission.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram uses a system dynamics approach to show how policy levers (ban, fee, financing) impact truck supply and driver availability.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style approach to represent labor supply segments, commonly referred to as a 'supply stack' in labor economics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-abec01fab6a7", "evidence": "Numbered 5-element list, interaction diagram, then truck/driver market sizing.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose CTP into five interlocking elements plus market sizing", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three distinct policy models (Basic, Enhanced, Enhanced with employee commitment).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_solution", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a series of line charts to compare three options (I, II, III) across four dimensions: environmental impact, labor supply, market structure, and costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses color coding (green for benefits, red for risks) to distinguish between positive and negative outcomes for each option.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "Uses a qualitative pie-chart visual to represent performance levels (Worse to Better).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Risk Reward Plot", "slug": "46-risk-reward-plot", "bestFor": "Investment decisions, project prioritization, strategic bets", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b2457136824b", "evidence": "Quant model output -> benefits/risks per horizon -> Harvey-ball verdict naming Option III.", "position": 5, "objective": "Compare options on risk vs reward across short and long term to pick Option III", "structure": "The Options -> Risk Assessment -> Reward Assessment -> The Optimal Choice", "confidence": 84, "description": "Evaluate options by plotting risk against potential reward" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a5668e465f0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Analytical model output, benefits/risks matrix, Harvey-ball scorecard.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b6add3d20d5c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Option III chosen; unified-approach recommendation.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide evaluates three options for a drayage market program, concluding that a unified approach between the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles is necessary.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a943e317302a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Six-point conclusion recommending Option III and unified approach.", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b6add3d20d5c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Option III chosen; unified-approach recommendation.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to present strategic levers alongside their implementation details and justifications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to map specific policy levers to their rationales, with numbered categories (1, 4, 5) indicating their place in a broader framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to define the mechanics of a policy option. Red text indicates changes from a previous option.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-b61b323b14e8", "evidence": "Option I baseline, Option II 'Blue = adjustment from Option I', Option III 'Red = adjustment from Option II'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Detail options additively: base plan, then incentives, then employee commitment", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "appendix", "notes": "This is a bibliography/reference slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-21", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/opeSlI6uEfZ7CNX9HcuKHHx-1RsFSOWJJZO5PEfdL8Q/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/zGc-KbarAvy6pjSHN_6ntqJYxv9QcZJ_ixWGEAy_cu8/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/7e2O0MENOCvyS3I3wmtgjwSaz7jXA2zaatmRRcyhDWw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/ykvWCgkiYVb-Byl1Itg2ZiKbpNk4aFYjSJNdqsLAkU8/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iODc3MTgyNzZkMmU4ZWY4L3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast First-Class Mail and Standard Mail, with visual examples for each sub-segment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize volume distribution across multiple categorical dimensions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-823083bd233c", "evidence": "p5 splits all mail into First-Class vs Standard subcategories; p6 forecasts each segment", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish methodology by segmenting mail into MECE categories", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6469ee183b79", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, objectives, approach, mail segmentation methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-7", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a BCG-branded background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Uses green arrows for positive trends and red arrows for negative trends for USPS.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a dual-line forecast (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and compares it against a worst-case EU benchmark.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a sharp decline after 2008 and projects three distinct recovery paths through 2020.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to show volume distribution across segments and sender types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a quantitative trend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-860f111cd060", "evidence": "p9 reveals -15% headline; p10-13 cascade drivers and segments; p14 closes with sender quote", "position": 2, "objective": "Cascade from aggregate decline to segment-level evidence and sender voice", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6afd52629570", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Results section: -15% volume decline projection across segments, sender quotes", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-8a4d57c193f9", "evidence": "Section explicitly titled 'Benchmarks from other global posts'; p17 plots CAGR vs broadband across countries", "position": 3, "objective": "Validate decline thesis using peer-post benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-6d59c738dacb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Peer post benchmarks, broadband regression, revenue gap, scenarios", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-793f9f86b6f5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Results forecasts and peer benchmarks present the data", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }