{ "kind": "all", "value": "all", "collectionKey": "slides:all:all:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 319975, "page": 107, "pageSize": 18, "pageCount": 17777, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-47", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 48, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/48", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-48", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to represent Likert-scale survey responses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 50, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses on a 5-point scale. Two specific bars are highlighted with yellow dashed boxes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/50", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-50", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 51, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey responses on a 5-point scale. Yellow dashed boxes highlight specific segments for comparison.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/51", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-51", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 52, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The red dashed box highlights the lower-performing categories identified in the remarks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/52", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-52", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights specific areas of deficiency in talent management, with yellow dashed boxes emphasizing certain high-deficiency segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-53", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 54, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a consistent downward trend in superior ratings for all talent management aspects between 2013 and 2021.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/54", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-54", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 48, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de0ed-a7d9-7480-a20f-0a8f27d9c1e5", "evidence": "p.54 callout 'all aspects related to talent management have worsened compared to 2013'.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show talent management has worsened across all dimensions vs 2013", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 38, "beatId": "019de0ed-a5e0-7728-aead-9ed12d53be49", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tech paradox and talent worsening reveal underlying root cause.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 54, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de0ed-a694-760b-a2a7-b0347971cf30", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section summaries diagnose quality/efficiency/tech/talent issues.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 55, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/55", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-55", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a split-layout to contrast positive and negative sentiment themes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "testimonial", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to categorize qualitative feedback.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 58, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a grid layout to categorize concerns into five thematic areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/58", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-58", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 56, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019de0ed-a801-7798-809e-3019ac628e5d", "evidence": "p.57-58 organize verbatim quotes into 4 thematic quadrants of excitement/concern.", "position": 8, "objective": "Synthesize verbatim underwriter quotes into themes", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 85, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a608-7502-87e6-f2a2c5ad3d0d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end qualitative concerns spell out implications.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 58, "from": 55, "beatId": "019de0ed-a6bc-708f-b2e6-6e0aa31d9e1f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Open-end excitements and concerns hint at next moves but no recommendations.", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 1, "slideType": "cover", "function": "front_matter", "notes": null, "imagePath": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/oXm53tZY9MoAwCSq7Ib24AGwMA2HQGUvLAK6dorbmaE/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iNzIzN2FmNzI1YWU1YTcwL3AwMDEuanBn", "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/1", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-1", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/tZ1GOIxi18Cv7WNm3X52AarOP5rq3Evtf0BorkXDHo0/rs:fit:1200:1200:0/q:82/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iNzIzN2FmNzI1YWU1YTcwL3AwMDEucG5n", "thumbSrc": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/patDyVe09NOQ-ugiuPZMHr_nIYG1B_8Oh4xA4AhcrAw/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iNzIzN2FmNzI1YWU1YTcwL3AwMDEuanBn", "thumbSrcAlt": "https://imgproxy.kitesheet.com/1kz8Eg8kj4irJ0uA0QrhVtU71Gq0Qiw4IvT7dC0SZqk/rs:fit:480:480:0/q:78/f:webp/czM6Ly9raXRlc2hlZXQvY29ycHVzL3NsaWRlcy9iNzIzN2FmNzI1YWU1YTcwL3AwMDEucG5n" }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de0d3-356c-758f-8d08-2371268c234e", "evidence": "Trend (p2,6) -> trigger (COP26 p7, war p8) -> window of opportunity (p9)", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish urgency: commitments rising, COP26 momentum, sustained despite headwinds", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-33ec-70c9-88e5-3219a3ba3264", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability commitments rising globally; COP26 momentum (p2,6,7,10,11)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-34ed-762c-9f47-5166a1c87e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Targets, intermediates, renewables, TCFD adoption data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a mix of narrative text and a numbered list to frame the research scope.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de0d3-356c-758f-8d08-2371268c234e", "evidence": "Trend (p2,6) -> trigger (COP26 p7, war p8) -> window of opportunity (p9)", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish urgency: commitments rising, COP26 momentum, sustained despite headwinds", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-33ec-70c9-88e5-3219a3ba3264", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability commitments rising globally; COP26 momentum (p2,6,7,10,11)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-34ed-762c-9f47-5166a1c87e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Targets, intermediates, renewables, TCFD adoption data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de0d3-356c-758f-8d08-2371268c234e", "evidence": "Trend (p2,6) -> trigger (COP26 p7, war p8) -> window of opportunity (p9)", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish urgency: commitments rising, COP26 momentum, sustained despite headwinds", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-33ec-70c9-88e5-3219a3ba3264", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability commitments rising globally; COP26 momentum (p2,6,7,10,11)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-34ed-762c-9f47-5166a1c87e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Targets, intermediates, renewables, TCFD adoption data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Three-column text layout with a highlighted central callout in purple.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de0d3-356c-758f-8d08-2371268c234e", "evidence": "Trend (p2,6) -> trigger (COP26 p7, war p8) -> window of opportunity (p9)", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish urgency: commitments rising, COP26 momentum, sustained despite headwinds", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-33ec-70c9-88e5-3219a3ba3264", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability commitments rising globally; COP26 momentum (p2,6,7,10,11)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-34ed-762c-9f47-5166a1c87e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Targets, intermediates, renewables, TCFD adoption data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de0d3-356c-758f-8d08-2371268c234e", "evidence": "Trend (p2,6) -> trigger (COP26 p7, war p8) -> window of opportunity (p9)", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish urgency: commitments rising, COP26 momentum, sustained despite headwinds", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-33ec-70c9-88e5-3219a3ba3264", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sustainability commitments rising globally; COP26 momentum (p2,6,7,10,11)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 17, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de0d3-34ed-762c-9f47-5166a1c87e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Targets, intermediates, renewables, TCFD adoption data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }