{
  "kind": "tool",
  "value": "swot-analysis",
  "collectionKey": "slides:tool:swot-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 8,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be6-419596581a46",
      "docSlug": "ff423e0befdad1f9",
      "documentTitle": "2024 Corporate Impact Report",
      "authorId": "Alaska-Airlines",
      "authorName": "Alaska Airlines / Hawaiian Airlines",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.6,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "Mentions TCFD, IPCC, and ISO frameworks. Includes tables for time horizons and risk evaluation scenarios.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Risks / Opportunities pairing mirrors SWOT-style structured analysis (TCFD-aligned).",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be6-419596581a46/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be6-419596581a46",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be6-419596581a46#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 27,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2b-a4d3bb19b26b",
          "evidence": "TCFD analysis with Low (SSP2-4.5) and High (SSP5-8.5) emissions scenarios across short/medium/long horizons.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Analyze physical and transition climate risks under emissions scenarios",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 29,
          "from": 12,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd62-941517b4f3a9",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Safety as priority, environmental impact, climate risks (TCFD) p27-29 most explicit complication.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 50,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-5545fa71721e",
      "docSlug": "852eb8103109",
      "documentTitle": "Time Warner Inc. (TWX)",
      "authorId": "14_Icahn",
      "authorName": "Lazard",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2006-02-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 99,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a standard 2x2 SWOT matrix layout.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly lists strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, which is the structure of a SWOT analysis.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-5545fa71721e/99",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-5545fa71721e",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-5545fa71721e#slide-99",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de512-d3ac-767c-b91f-d758a214251c",
      "docSlug": "2667760ce0a81fb025aa92005ed9b291",
      "documentTitle": "Informatica | Investor Presentation Deck | 46 slides",
      "authorId": "informatica",
      "authorName": "Informatica",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2022-04-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "unfair_advantage",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide discusses the company's competitive moat, which can be related to a SWOT analysis.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de512-d3ac-767c-b91f-d758a214251c/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de512-d3ac-767c-b91f-d758a214251c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de512-d3ac-767c-b91f-d758a214251c#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "959d9eb8-9c98-407f-81f5-b9a6de1c1df8",
          "arcName": "The Sparkline",
          "arcSlug": "sparkline",
          "beatName": "Development",
          "beatSlug": "development",
          "evidence": "The deck showcases Informatica's product innovation led transformation journey and solution",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29",
      "docSlug": "bi-299410752528b9b4",
      "documentTitle": "See pitch deck music data startup Chartmetric used to raise $2 million",
      "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
      "authorName": "Chartmetric",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.779,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal layout with hexagonal icons for each SWOT component.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a SWOT analysis with a framework",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-8947d4e61e29#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "84ac2180-3a83-42c6-8bc3-a68329179603",
          "evidence": "The loop zooms in on the problem statement and solution.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What is the music industry challenge?",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "1f7a9c16-4d62-4ad2-a584-8dd170a0ecc5",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
          "evidence": "The solution is presented on pages 7-10.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41",
      "docSlug": "5f83c7bb8eeb6521",
      "documentTitle": "SOUTHEAST ASIA’S GREEN ECONOMY 2024",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.914,
      "pageNumber": 80,
      "slideType": "case_study",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a visual timeline/process diagram to show the shift in focus from short-term (transition-heavy) to long-term (green-heavy) finance.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Lessons-learned framing of EU policy.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41/80",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41#slide-80",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 90,
          "from": 76,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2d-020e7835f6c6",
          "evidence": "p.78 SEA scored 6/10; p.81 IRA $282B as benchmark; p.84 81 carbon-pricing schemes globally.",
          "position": 10,
          "objective": "Compare SEA policy/carbon-pricing to global benchmarks; identify gap to fix",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 125,
          "from": 76,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-b690db8c4027",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Deep-dives on each accelerator with case studies (EU taxonomy, IRA, ACEN, Pentagreen, Bayfront)",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 125,
          "from": 46,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-c066ab667052",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "What ideas/accelerators are needed to close the gap",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41",
      "docSlug": "5f83c7bb8eeb6521",
      "documentTitle": "SOUTHEAST ASIA’S GREEN ECONOMY 2024",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.914,
      "pageNumber": 92,
      "slideType": "testimonial",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a grid of quotes to validate the need for catalytic financing.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Voice-of-experts validates blended-finance thesis.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41/92",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-516ee1323c41#slide-92",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 107,
          "from": 92,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2d-0612e8980601",
          "evidence": "Six case studies (Pentagreen, Bayfront, ACEN, Emerging Green One, etc.) culminating in scaling recommendations p.107.",
          "position": 11,
          "objective": "Use stacked case studies to validate blended finance as a workable lever",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 84,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 125,
          "from": 76,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-b690db8c4027",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Deep-dives on each accelerator with case studies (EU taxonomy, IRA, ACEN, Pentagreen, Bayfront)",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 125,
          "from": 46,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd63-c066ab667052",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "What ideas/accelerators are needed to close the gap",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-83187257f35b",
      "docSlug": "5d146414b5cc38c9",
      "documentTitle": "Vaccines &amp; Therapeutics Outlook Part I: Timelines and Success Factors",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "data_table",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a heatmap-style table to visualize financial health metrics across sectors.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a table with sector performance and default risk, which could be analyzed using a SWOT framework.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-83187257f35b/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-83187257f35b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-83187257f35b#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Segmentation Split",
          "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
          "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-cbc5b2acf370",
          "evidence": "Slides anchored on de-averaged; sector/country splits across mobility, retail, PMI, TSR.",
          "position": 6,
          "objective": "De-averaged view: how recovery splits by country, sector, and category",
          "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-b0151d6fa4d2",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Therapeutics, scenario fork, de-averaged econ indicators by country/sector",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 30,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-c0089e981d55",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
          "evidence": "De-averaged econ implications by sector/country to inform agenda",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
      "docSlug": "3544dfcc3316",
      "documentTitle": "Viacom (VIAB)",
      "authorId": "18_SpringOwl",
      "authorName": "Eric Jackson",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-01-13 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 16,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "diagnose_problem",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "This slide contains a SWOT analysis, which is a common strategic planning tool.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c/16",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c#slide-16",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 10,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "9800239c-ef65-41e3-b47f-b85209756f23",
          "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the consequences of not taking action to address Viacom's decline.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction and the need for change",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "3fbc1753-34ff-47c1-96df-2b6cd8783239",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The deck then agitates the problems, highlighting the consequences of inaction and the failures of Viacom's management and board.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}