{
  "kind": "tool",
  "value": "prospect-theory",
  "collectionKey": "slides:tool:prospect-theory:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 4,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8e-de86-74e9-bc1c-9d817243c13e",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1",
      "documentTitle": "28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1",
      "authorId": "28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2013-01-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 30,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Goldman Sachs deck slide 27.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide discusses potential risks and considerations, framing choices in terms of potential losses.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-de86-74e9-bc1c-9d817243c13e/30",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-de86-74e9-bc1c-9d817243c13e",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-de86-74e9-bc1c-9d817243c13e#slide-30",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437",
      "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d",
      "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "impact_sizing",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "RODI stands for Return on Digital Investment. OES likely refers to Original Equipment Suppliers.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Pairs p17 loss with p18 gain framing - reference-point flip.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019de0c4-9510-7124-82ef-7eb4572980c2",
          "evidence": "p17 sizes loss bands (>5% cost/talent), p18 sizes incremental RODI from closing the same deficits.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Quantify what's lost by inaction vs gained by closing deficits",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019de0c4-9431-756b-86ed-e47000952195",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "diagnosis of deficits and cost vs gain of acting",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 62,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
      "docSlug": "20eb9b28f09b8375",
      "documentTitle": "Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage",
      "authorId": "Kearney",
      "authorName": "Kearney",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 56,
      "slideType": "industry_trends",
      "function": "establish_context",
      "notes": "Includes a legend for performance metrics (Advantage to Drawback).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Cons: High cost, Land competition, Competitiveness on energy price, Significant efficiency penalties cause the failure of many projects",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e/56",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e#slide-56",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 166,
          "from": 41,
          "beatId": "fe8271bb-772f-484a-a616-dfe52603a74c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Outlook, economics, policies, and regulations.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-5fe9-7629-9a7c-0c1814044ea8",
      "docSlug": "8e81e851d344f7ff9ceac4f5605fb0c7",
      "documentTitle": "Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 37 slides",
      "authorId": "moelis-company",
      "authorName": "Moelis & Company",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2015-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.2929293,
      "pageNumber": 24,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a classic pros/cons comparison matrix structure.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Pros and Cons comparison matrix",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-5fe9-7629-9a7c-0c1814044ea8/24",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-5fe9-7629-9a7c-0c1814044ea8",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-5fe9-7629-9a7c-0c1814044ea8#slide-24",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 24,
          "name": "Why Now",
          "slug": "15-why-now",
          "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval",
          "matchId": "1413d409-dea8-4a84-90b0-0f37fc318bac",
          "evidence": "The document discusses the current market volatility and its impact on the company's strategic alternatives.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Why is now the right time to consider strategic alternatives?",
          "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "f9fc98c1-83f7-48c6-8556-2fd47f880d01",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "The document reviews strategic alternatives and considerations for the company.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}