{
  "kind": "tool",
  "value": "process-flow",
  "collectionKey": "slides:tool:process-flow:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 986,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 42,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "docSlug": "4ccbe5a4f667a79f6253d55ec8458249",
      "documentTitle": "Absci | Investor Presentation Deck | 26 slides",
      "authorId": "absci",
      "authorName": "Absci",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2022-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "solution",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Uses a process-flow diagram to explain the platform's capabilities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "De novo discovery in silico: target -> lead · Lead optimization in silico: lead -> multiparametric optimization -> drug candidate",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "docSlug": "4ccbe5a4f667a79f6253d55ec8458249",
      "documentTitle": "Absci | Investor Presentation Deck | 26 slides",
      "authorId": "absci",
      "authorName": "Absci",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2022-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "solution",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a dual-box layout to contrast two distinct platform capabilities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "De novo discovery in silico: target -> lead · Lead optimization in silico: lead -> multiparametric optimization -> drug candidate",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "docSlug": "4ccbe5a4f667a79f6253d55ec8458249",
      "documentTitle": "Absci | Investor Presentation Deck | 26 slides",
      "authorId": "absci",
      "authorName": "Absci",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": "2022-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "solution",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the transition from parental mAb to optimized mAb via AI models.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "Goal: Parental mAb to mAb with desired affinity · Overview of workflow: Lab assays to AI models",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-9cbe-768d-a7d1-8fc0965b655d#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-443fc9bb172d",
      "docSlug": "Jm734nU31u6QvrjUfE9G",
      "documentTitle": "See the pitch deck that helped a video-editing startup raise $12 million to take on Adobe and expand into the US",
      "authorId": "Pitchdecks",
      "authorName": "Toch",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "solution",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Uses a before-and-after comparison to demonstrate efficiency gains.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "Live Video API <> Toch -> Clip/tag content -> One-click advert / graphics -> Push to all channels -> 1-3 Minutes · Live Video -> Download to Studio -> Cut content & render -> Ads & graphics -> Upload to social -> 1-3 Hours",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-443fc9bb172d/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-443fc9bb172d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5f69-752d-a9b6-443fc9bb172d#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 2,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "d891ce9a-da96-42bb-b769-4269e8b9e3d1",
          "evidence": "The 'Customer Pain-points' and 'Total Saving on Cost & Time' slides imply the costs of inaction.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "What are the costs of not adopting Toch.ai's solution?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "2e240f80-556d-420a-a76b-51141866c28a",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
          "evidence": "Slides 2 and 3 elaborate on the solution offered by Toch.ai.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de511-f4ba-76ac-a3e9-5eebfe109ec7",
      "docSlug": "136698f139ecdc351da74b49e9d28fe9",
      "documentTitle": "SoundHound | SPAC Presentation Deck | 52 slides",
      "authorId": "soundhound",
      "authorName": "SoundHound",
      "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2021-11-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "solution",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "Uses a process diagram to contrast legacy methods with the proprietary solution.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 2,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: TRADITIONAL APPROACH: SPEECH -> AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION -> TRANSCRIPTION -> NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING -> MEANING · diagram/process: WITH HOUNDIFY: SPEECH -> SPEECH TO MEANING -> MEANING",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de511-f4ba-76ac-a3e9-5eebfe109ec7/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de511-f4ba-76ac-a3e9-5eebfe109ec7",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de511-f4ba-76ac-a3e9-5eebfe109ec7#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "ecf89914-3a61-4915-878d-5b3cfbb86010",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
          "evidence": "Slides 21-24 present SoundHound's innovations in voice AI and its competitive advantage.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64",
      "docSlug": "17680cec2cbd3510",
      "documentTitle": "Accelerated Access Review UK Mapping",
      "authorId": "Deloitte",
      "authorName": "Deloitte",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The diagram uses a flow-chart style to represent iterative loops and parallel processes within the pharmaceutical lifecycle.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Complex flow diagram showing stages: Basic research, Clinical testing, Market access, NICE guidance, Specialised commissioning, Patient access",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "216c31e8-2aee-4a6b-81ea-25d4d04ac422",
          "evidence": "The document highlights the consequences of not addressing the challenges, such as limited access to new treatments and technologies.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving access to medical innovations?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "aacd1ccc-bd28-4624-b7f6-626b3a9a4a01",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The document highlights the consequences of not addressing these challenges, such as limited access to new treatments and technologies.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64",
      "docSlug": "17680cec2cbd3510",
      "documentTitle": "Accelerated Access Review UK Mapping",
      "authorId": "Deloitte",
      "authorName": "Deloitte",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 72,
      "slideType": "roadmap",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a multi-line color-coded system to represent different device classes. It includes decision diamonds and iterative loops.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: Process flow diagram showing stages from basic research to developed product with regulatory and clinical testing loops.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64/72",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-bc879d1b6d64#slide-72",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 109,
          "from": 21,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "575c67ea-abbb-4bd3-80bc-943f97973ed4",
          "evidence": "The document proposes solutions to address the challenges, including streamlining development pathways and improving regulation.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "How can the NHS improve access to medical innovations?",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 109,
          "from": 21,
          "beatId": "4bae8ed9-97e4-4ca8-988f-171e64b0598d",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The document proposes solutions to address the challenges, including streamlining development pathways and improving regulation.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced",
      "docSlug": "1c4914e993be3f96",
      "documentTitle": "AI-Enabled Engineering Excellence",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "executive_summary",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a circular process flow diagram to illustrate the SDLC stages and their AI-driven enhancements.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: SDLC lifecycle process flow with AI integration",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
          "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
          "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-6ecadc6d8ef0",
          "evidence": "p17 imagines 2X future; p18 explicit two-column 30% vs >2X comparison.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Contrast singular tool rollout vs holistic transformation",
          "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
          "confidence": 88,
          "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-09a7900d8bde",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Velocity data, future-state org, 2X productivity, holistic vs tools comparison",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-1406f4c948c4",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)",
          "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain",
          "evidence": "Reshaped roles, flatter org, 2X productivity vision",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1",
      "docSlug": "4bb31e88e640882d",
      "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2019 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 48,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow to explain how consolidated sales are converted to retail value and how bottom-up and top-down estimates are reconciled.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: Retail + Wholesale + Licenses = PLAYER CONSOLIDATED SALES -> Retail + Wholesale at retail value + Licenses at retail value = PLAYER SALES AT RETAIL VALUE",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1/48",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1#slide-48",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 154,
      "slideType": "process",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a methodology for capacity selection, cost definition, scaling analysis, and economic impact assessment.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: A: Udvælgelse af kapaciteter; B: Definition af omkostninger; C: Analyse af relevante skaleringer; D: Skaleringernes økonomisk effekt",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/154",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-154",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 162,
          "from": 152,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019",
          "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.",
          "position": 23,
          "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 12,
      "slideType": "situation_overview",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-style process diagram to map activities to stakeholders (Værnsstabe, VFK, KA'erne/FMI, FMN, Andre).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Nine-step process flow from Idé-/ behovsudvikling to Kravsspecifikation diagram/process",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/12",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-12",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 27,
          "from": 9,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59",
          "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 165,
          "from": 9,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664",
      "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.445,
      "pageNumber": 348,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide outlines a process flow (Registration -> Transfer -> Entry) and lists multiple options for each stage, with specific recommendations highlighted by dashed boxes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Generel procesbeskrivelse og mulige løsninger for digital opsamling af hhv. tids- og rejseregistrering",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/348",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-348",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 322,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84",
          "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.",
          "position": 11,
          "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 86,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 420,
          "from": 322,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 365,
          "from": 166,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b",
      "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 37,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Diagram/process: Develop hypothesis, Test with data, Design solution and refine through pilot, Implement and scale",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/37",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-37",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 33,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57",
          "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 46,
          "from": 25,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-147658651792",
      "docSlug": "596427bf9101403d",
      "documentTitle": "Capgemini Group Presentation 2025",
      "authorId": "Capgemini",
      "authorName": "Capgemini",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 11,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a three-stage process framework to describe client services and a sidebar for internal ESG commitments.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Commit, Act, Monitor & Report process flow",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-147658651792/11",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-147658651792",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-147658651792#slide-11",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 8,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019deaae-587e-7670-9add-e921e256776a",
          "evidence": "p.8-10 broad value prop, p.11 sustainability, p.12 cyber, p.13 GenAI, p.14-17 brands and innovation.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "From big picture of client value to deep dives into AI, sustainability, cyber, brands, innovation",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 17,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "019deaae-580f-7394-8bfc-05089f9a799e",
          "arcName": "The Golden Circle",
          "arcSlug": "golden-circle",
          "beatName": "How",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Four service pillars, sustainability/cyber/AI capabilities, brand portfolio.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551",
      "docSlug": "779b6b192abf180f",
      "documentTitle": "Industrial Speedsters How advanced technologies can turbocharge your speed to market",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "Uses a gear metaphor to represent interconnected processes.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide describes a structured survey along three processes.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-63afb117857c",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Situation & Context",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context",
          "evidence": "C-level ask, speed-to-market definition, study and three-process framework",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        },
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-7584eca25ec2",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Survey, framework, industry-wide and segment TTM data",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 78,
      "slideType": "diagnosis",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide provides a detailed breakdown of intake sources (Field vs. OTC) and shelter capacity utilization.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "From 2011-2015, DAS had an annual intake of approximately 20,000 dogs",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/78",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-78",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 91,
          "from": 78,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-4cbc2d0be8fb",
          "evidence": "ASO staffing vs peers, intake per ASO, budget exhibits",
          "position": 15,
          "objective": "Diagnose DAS operations against peer benchmarks",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 76,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 142,
          "from": 45,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 196,
      "slideType": "appendix",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow framework to detail the operational steps of a specific program.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Four-step process flow: I. Dogs brought to DAS, II. Dog assessed, III. Transfer partners make call, IV. Target dogs redirected.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/196",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-196",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 214,
      "slideType": "implementation_plan",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram combined with a responsibility matrix (RACI-like).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: 6-step process flow from Transfer to Deliver",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/214",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-214",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 215,
      "slideType": "implementation_plan",
      "function": "plan_implementation",
      "notes": "The slide uses a process flow combined with a responsibility matrix (RACI-like).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: 5-step process flow for pet transport",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/215",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-215",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 267,
          "from": 161,
          "name": "Build Up",
          "slug": "33-build-up",
          "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387",
          "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189",
          "position": 18,
          "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements",
          "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2",
      "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 302,
      "slideType": "other",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast input sources with output enforcement actions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "DAS receives community information from four sources",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/302",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-302",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 310,
          "from": 299,
          "name": "Funnel Analysis",
          "slug": "32-funnel-analysis",
          "bestFor": "Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-61982c2dba5b",
          "evidence": "311→dispatch→ASO→citation→response funnel; '60% dispatched', '44% non-response'",
          "position": 20,
          "objective": "Walk the enforcement funnel from 311 calls to citation response",
          "structure": "Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak",
          "confidence": 75,
          "description": "Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706",
      "docSlug": "a72f1e75b0e7b746",
      "documentTitle": "Next Generation Manufacturing Tech Innovation",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.545,
      "pageNumber": 28,
      "slideType": "key_takeaways",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "The slide uses a vertical timeline-like structure to connect strategic themes to specific country examples.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide contains a 'diagram/process: Three-part process flow showing strategic lessons and country-specific examples'.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706/28",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706#slide-28",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 20,
          "name": "Precedent",
          "slug": "09-precedent",
          "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-23555ff23263",
          "evidence": "2x2 superstar map -> seven country case studies -> 'Three key lessons to be learnt'",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Use 7 manufacturing-superstar precedents to extract 3 lessons for India",
          "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning",
          "confidence": 90,
          "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-972aff97d19f",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "'Manufacturing superstars' show others racing ahead, ending with 3 lessons",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-a79e34774a89",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
          "evidence": "Sector state + superstar benchmarks establish facts",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 70,
          "parentBeatName": "Setup",
          "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "diagnose",
      "notes": "The slide uses a swimlane-style process map to visualize the applicant journey and identify bottlenecks.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Process flow chart showing applicant steps from scheduling to eligibility determination",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 21,
          "from": 17,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-f2d69ce24c40",
          "evidence": "Tenant-interview process diagnostic, systems example, org redesign, HR sizing, HR maturity ladder.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Illustrate each opportunity type with a worked example",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 14,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e587ebad39a3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Lenses to identify opps; '$16B challenges, mutually reinforcing' on p23.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-83afd848a07c",
      "docSlug": "1170ef163e33b2af",
      "documentTitle": "Shaping Future Indian ME",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.337,
      "pageNumber": 39,
      "slideType": "client_example",
      "function": "illustrate_case",
      "notes": "The slide uses a framework to categorize content producers and consumers, highlighting specific industry examples like Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Dream11.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "diagram/process: Content Producers to Content Consumers flow",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-83afd848a07c/39",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-83afd848a07c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-83afd848a07c#slide-39",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Why Now",
          "slug": "15-why-now",
          "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-648e90c60ba7",
          "evidence": "p32 hook ($10Bn+), p34-35 demystify, p36 timeline, p38-39 live use cases, p40 sized adoption curves.",
          "position": 5,
          "objective": "Argue metaverse is the next $10Bn unlock by defining it, showing tech convergence, then sizing",
          "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 31,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-388fdf620626",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Section 2 'The age of metaverse' — $10Bn+ opportunity",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 80,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 42,
          "from": 31,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-4cffaad2c1fe",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Metaverse opportunity sized at $10Bn+ with five-dimension flywheel",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 55,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a2709765f07b",
      "docSlug": "62c9b2539bf1585b",
      "documentTitle": "Whats Next Insurance Pricing",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.773,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "implementation_plan",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": null,
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Develop, File, Implement process flow",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a2709765f07b/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a2709765f07b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a2709765f07b#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Zoom In",
          "slug": "06-zoom-in",
          "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-03aff0e780a5",
          "evidence": "Exhibit 1 process map -> Exhibit 2 modeling detail -> Exhibit 3 implication of GBM transition",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Drill from process big picture into modeling detail and its implication",
          "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-099544b2493d",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Exhibit 1 siloed process + Exhibit 2 diminishing returns curve",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 85,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}