{ "kind": "tool", "value": "problem-statement-canvas", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:problem-statement-canvas:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 2665, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 112, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3", "docSlug": "bf350dd574c19997", "documentTitle": "2021 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2021", "authorId": "AirStreetCapital", "authorName": "Air Street Capital", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses two charts to illustrate demographic imbalances: a population pyramid by ethnicity and age, and a stacked bar chart showing sex distribution by ethnicity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Missing information and biases in demographic information are widespread in biomedical data that form the basis of the drug discovery process · Slide type tagged 'diagnosis'; frames bias problem.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-fd5012384ae3#slide-53", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 55, "from": 52, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-5a2841b69367", "evidence": "Data deserts -> measuring bias -> 94% systems worse than radiologist -> racial identification — symptom to system to root.", "position": 7, "objective": "Surface bias problems in medical AI", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 152, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-0affbadec38e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Definitions p.5-6, Exec Summary p.7, then Sections 1-3 catalog evidence.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 152, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-1b3ee3a1c012", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Three sections accumulating evidence of accelerating progress.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965", "docSlug": "76ea6cc397533e35", "documentTitle": "2022 Benedict Evans 2022 The New Gatekeepers", "authorId": "BenedictEvans", "authorName": "Benedict Evans", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "independent_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Independent analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 85, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a screenshot of a Perplexity AI search result to demonstrate the capability of generative search to answer complex queries, contrasting this with traditional search.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Frames the unresolved problem space · How many more search queries could be served as answers? Where do the ads go? How are they sold?", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965/85", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-853951586965#slide-85", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 91, "from": 78, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2e-9463f9e3fcb7", "evidence": "p79 ImageNet 2013 'so what'; p81 'same moment with generative networks'; same callout repeated", "position": 10, "objective": "Argue generative AI is at the same 'cool demo / so what' moment as ImageNet 2013", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 85, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 100, "from": 70, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-14aeb33da1bd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "'Dreams for the Future' p70; metaverse, generative AI bets, JTBD questions", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 100, "from": 70, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-243a2d74e603", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Resolution", "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution", "evidence": "future bets, generative AI, optimism close p100", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Uses a classic Situation-Problem-Solution framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Situation, Problem, Løsning framework/instance · Slide labelled problem_statement and frames what/who/scale.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59", "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 76, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a two-row layout to contrast the current state (Overview) with the future state (Team Recommendations).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Compliance-driven, error-prone model · Slide labelled 'Section 8 (I/II)' lays out problem with regulatory/legal/PR risks.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/76", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-76", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 93, "from": 71, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1920f0844597", "evidence": "Each function has (I/II) diagnosis ('current pain') and (II/II) implementation ('proposed model').", "position": 13, "objective": "Run each support function through diagnostic-then-target-state pattern", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-972838ea413b", "docSlug": "415999e01a7b517f", "documentTitle": "Thought you knew the Scope 3 issues in your supply chain? Think again.", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a provocative headline to challenge conventional wisdom regarding supply chain decarbonization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Defines who/what/scope of the problem and frames Scopes 1/2/3. · The slide presents a clear problem statement regarding companies' efforts to decarbonize Scope 3 emissions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-972838ea413b/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-972838ea413b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-972838ea413b#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Myth Buster", "slug": "12-myth-buster", "bestFor": "Rebranding, changing market perception, correcting false assumptions", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-2b5b71f8bf0a", "evidence": "Foreword + 'missing the mark' explicitly say companies 'don't know where to find' Scope 3 emissions; deck title is 'Think again'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Challenge the belief that Tier 1 visibility is enough", "structure": "The Common Belief -> The Friction/Failure of that Belief -> The New Truth", "confidence": 78, "description": "Address a common misconception head-on to clear the room for a new truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-9070357d6c20", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, Foreword, 'missing the mark', Scopes 1/2/3 explainer, Intro, n-tier visibility setup.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "This slide presents a problem statement with a premise and research question.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de0c4-947b-705d-aa8b-5c893f20ffb7", "evidence": "Premise (p2) -> survey data (p3) -> 'It is all a matter of management' insight (p4).", "position": 1, "objective": "Set up the research question and reveal the management insight", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0c4-9330-779d-b51b-df5c225bac9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "cover, premise/research question, survey methodology, current scaling status", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a pull-quote style for the main message and cites a risk survey statistic.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "banks need to improve their planning for risks we cannot always see", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 14, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-377961e78d0a", "evidence": "Trend 3 lists cyber, rates, CRE, non-bank, China as separate risk categories.", "position": 3, "objective": "Enumerate the five distinct unforeseen risks of 2024", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a specific case study reference to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's core system replacement.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "If there's a single theme that has dominated discussions about banks' technology over the past few decades, it is the constraints of their digital core.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 38, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-4d7d21a14092", "evidence": "CBA's 5-year/$750M legacy core vs Goldman writing 40% of code via gen AI.", "position": 9, "objective": "Contrast painful core replacements vs gen-AI-enabled core renewal", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide serves as an introductory diagnosis for a report on the future of work and learning.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Our diagnosis: Current education and corporate learning systems are not equipped to address the coming revolution in skills demand.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-1b42ebdf5e26", "evidence": "'Staying still is not an option' + Figure 1 sizes US$11.5tn cumulative GDP at risk.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify the price of standing still", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 90, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-70927e6d748d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Race-is-on, $11.5tn at risk, role clusters and skills mix subverted", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-80171dea1add", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Race-is-on framing names the skills-crisis pain", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "Page 14 of a deck. The text poses a rhetorical question about how to adapt learning systems to evolving demands.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "paragraph/paragraph: It’s a finding that raises a daunting challenge: today’s education and training systems are ill-equipped to build these skills.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-2353ffd735d5", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots importance and change-since-2004 across every cluster.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show how the required skills mix has moved from 2004 to 2017", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-70927e6d748d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Race-is-on, $11.5tn at risk, role clusters and skills mix subverted", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 15, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-8719adb9c760", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Role clusters + skills-mix data amplify the threat", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "docSlug": "25cda12aac1298b5", "documentTitle": "Commercial payments, reinvented Your blueprint for accelerating payments revenue growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a heatmap approach to highlight the most challenging areas (purple cells) across different industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Structured trade finance, documentary trade finance and liquidity management are the areas where they are most dissatisfied.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 15, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-9c63d91e77c8", "evidence": "Section titled 'voice of the commercial payments client'; pain points heatmap + switch likelihood + selection criteria.", "position": 3, "objective": "Aggregate client verbatims and survey data into pattern of dissatisfaction and switching intent", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 88, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-fbf85a039005", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Incumbents losing to fintechs/bigtechs, legacy tech, client pain points and switching risk.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-0aa1f6f15442", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantified competitive erosion + voice-of-client pain.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout: the left column provides the narrative context, while the right column provides definitions for key terms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Unresolved technical debt is a barrier to productivity and innovation for communications service providers (CSPs).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-5cf1d5b0ad16", "evidence": "<7% ROI satisfaction (p.3) plus 60/49/37% pain points and HIGH-DEBT vs LOW-DEBT revenue chart (p.4).", "position": 1, "objective": "Make tech debt feel expensive and accumulating", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 80, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-109b87c249fe", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Establishes CSP tech-debt landscape and rising IT TCO/Opex/Capex (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2604e8202f40", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Tech debt drag named, costs quantified (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a mix of qualitative bullet points and a quantitative bar chart to illustrate the correlation between tech debt and revenue growth.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The cost of delayed technology transformation affects a CSP's agility, costs, competitiveness and, ultimately, its business growth.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-5cf1d5b0ad16", "evidence": "<7% ROI satisfaction (p.3) plus 60/49/37% pain points and HIGH-DEBT vs LOW-DEBT revenue chart (p.4).", "position": 1, "objective": "Make tech debt feel expensive and accumulating", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 80, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-109b87c249fe", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Establishes CSP tech-debt landscape and rising IT TCO/Opex/Capex (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2604e8202f40", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Tech debt drag named, costs quantified (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a metaphorical illustration of geometric shapes (sphere, cube, cone) with wireframe overlays to represent the integration challenge.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Imagine an electrician who installs a new gadget for a customer... It's causing an innovation achievement gap—the difference between potential and realized value from technology investments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a large background image of an office building to represent the complexity of modern business operations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Unfortunately, most businesses today struggle to evaluate how risks within their sector affect them, let alone risks from across different sectors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-2cb2e367b306", "evidence": "p.13 surface symptom, p.14 small-multiple charts, p.15 heatmap matrix exposing the system, p.16 cross-sector implication.", "position": 3, "objective": "Reveal hidden interconnection beneath visible risks", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-fe0d52be3c7f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Risk is everywhere' + 'Organizations need to raise their game' sections lay out the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 26, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1586370e77a1", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Challenges & Allies", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-challenges-allies", "evidence": "Interconnected web, tech and skills allies", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "All too often, when there is a need to mitigate an emerging risk or comply with a new regulation, businesses create completely new teams.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "name": "Ripple Effect", "slug": "26-ripple-effect", "bestFor": "Change management, scaling initiatives, demonstrating broad value", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-3c4e01de7dbd", "evidence": "Capabilities (p.32), de-duplication (p.33), growth (p.34), value creation (p.35), conclusion (p.36).", "position": 7, "objective": "Scale impact from team to enterprise to growth", "structure": "Individual Impact -> Team Impact -> Organizational Impact -> Market/Industry Impact", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show how impact spreads from individual to team to organization to market" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-08129a0daba9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Capability building, growth narrative, and Andrée callback conclusion", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 34, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1a525df1d11a", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Transformation", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-transformation", "evidence": "Agility, culture, growth-driving reinvention", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "docSlug": "779b6b192abf180f", "documentTitle": "Industrial Speedsters How advanced technologies can turbocharge your speed to market", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a clear problem statement with specific questions related to speed to market.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551#slide-2", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-63afb117857c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "C-level ask, speed-to-market definition, study and three-process framework", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "docSlug": "0e02124818fafd32", "documentTitle": "Innovate or Fade European businesses need to address the technology deficit to turn the tide", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Our results show that the gap between European and North American innovation investments is widening", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 17, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-66cbaac7fc6e", "evidence": "Rec 2 'Extend advantage in smart manufacturing' followed by R&D-as-%-revenue line chart (p21), AI-patent share (p22), HQ-region patents (p23), and Key steps (p24).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify Europe's R&D and innovation gap vs NA/APAC", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-4c0487de7056", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Benchmark charts: R&D gap, AI patents, board tech maturity vs NA/APAC", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-58b905426505", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three implications converted into recommendations and benchmark proof", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "docSlug": "bbff997ea013e081", "documentTitle": "Innovation Unleashed Building a culture that drives sustained growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "A key reason why companies struggle to build an innovation culture is that their focus is overwhelmingly on creating pockets of innovation excellence", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-803e70b3bc6b", "evidence": "p8 '81% lack the behaviors' and p9 case where capabilities stayed siloed and the culture eroded.", "position": 3, "objective": "Make the pain of doing nothing concrete", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 75, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-872769b07cbe", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "81% lack behaviors; even strong cultures fall back into siloed R&D.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-969b986656e9", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Stragglers lag, $11.8bn forgone, 81% lack behaviors.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4", "docSlug": "54670b3c50047525", "documentTitle": "Making finance the predictive powerhouse How to create an agile finance function", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a metaphorical image of people walking up stairs to represent progress or preparation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Today's uncertainty has dialed up the pressure on chief financial officers (CFOs) and their finance planning and analysis (FP&A) teams as the function helps the business prepare for what's next.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 4, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-5002de8d52f7", "evidence": "Pressure on CFOs (p4) -> data shows 85% prep / 15% insight (p6) -> insight: flip it for 80%/95%/12hrs (p8)", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the 85/15 imbalance and size the upside of flipping it", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 88, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-2fc191cc8831", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, TOC, opening section title and uncertainty-pressure context callout", "position": 1, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "docSlug": "1053e574c4b7b824", "documentTitle": "March Macro Brief Financial fissures emerge", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a line chart to visualize the divergence in performance between Credit Suisse and the broader European banking sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Credit Suisse's troubles were largely structural and idiosyncratic, but could have broader repercussions for Swiss banking and for the European banking system", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 12, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-72aee7fd5ad2", "evidence": "p13 Credit Suisse case study, p14 European bank exposure, p15 deposit pass-through detail.", "position": 3, "objective": "Zoom from Europe to Credit Suisse to deposit dynamics", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-53cbf20e7eef", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Spotlight section peels into regional banking stress (NA, Europe, APAC).", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 52, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-60c07eb39102", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Bulk of deck is data charts and KPI dashboards across topics.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "docSlug": "80cd99a578787b77", "documentTitle": "Ready for take-off Why niche markets are the next big thing", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a '01' callout, suggesting it is part of a series of case studies or key points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The strategic impetus lies not in merely recognizing the dual value potential of tech-propelled markets but actively quantifying them and using them to guide decision making.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 13, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-cf95ac534cce", "evidence": "Frame then Dubai $3.2-8.4B context then Fig 4 only-42% chart then recommendation then Dubai precedent.", "position": 4, "objective": "Pillar 1: societal+commercial value, proven via Dubai 3D-print case", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 76, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-a1ebb3037c12", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Each pillar proved with Figs 4-5 plus Dubai 3D, Japan elder care, Gacha, Singapore VF cases", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 30, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-b19005771eda", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three-pillar lens + 'what business leaders can do' recommendations", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "docSlug": "01deef2de22e8e5f", "documentTitle": "Re-focus your talent lens: Abundance awaits", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a high-impact portrait image to anchor the narrative.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a 'problem statement' with 'key challenges' and a list of issues.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-adedc8f4634f", "evidence": "p10-13 enumerate why competing is hard; p14 title 'struggled to keep up, but an abundance of talent awaits' explicitly resolves the paradox.", "position": 2, "objective": "Resolve the apparent contradiction between fierce competition and abundant talent", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 78, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-7b6b9e61cd63", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Key challenges, domestic competition, intensifying worker demands", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-8e2e0bef3739", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Competition rising, workers want to switch to MNCs", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5954613bc3b1", "docSlug": "60078e00bf419887", "documentTitle": "Reinventing Operations in Asset Management", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.738, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a 5-point scale (1-5) to rank challenges, with 1 likely representing the most pressing.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The three operational challenges most frequently cited by respondents are related to supporting complex investments, data management and addressing the limits of legacy technology across the investment lifecycle", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5954613bc3b1/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5954613bc3b1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5954613bc3b1#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-fb3bec3f7ef8", "evidence": "Figure 4 ranks ~17 challenges; text isolates top three (complex investments, data, legacy tech) + 66% data-disruption stat", "position": 4, "objective": "Isolate the few operational challenges that matter most", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-dec80f86733c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Growth/efficiency/innovation/data levers framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 11, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-e90c051543f6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey figures and percentages dominate", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }