{ "kind": "tool", "value": "plausibility-loop", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:plausibility-loop:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 7, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "docSlug": "a13515c298f3fbf2", "documentTitle": "ALTAGAMMA 2018 WORLDWIDE LUXURY MARKET MONITOR", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style diagram to illustrate the bottom-up aggregation of player data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Methodology page maps claims to brand-by-brand bottom-up retail value cross-checks.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417#slide-34", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "docSlug": "6dcd3449fa2bada6", "documentTitle": "Draft BCG proposal Mercury Genesis Energy", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "Includes a disclaimer about the draft nature of the timeline and specific protocols for maintaining independence in the electricity sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Methodology lists data sources: Transpower Whakamana, CCC modelling, MBIE EDGS, sector AMPs", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-5f8bcda39145", "evidence": "Sequential timeline (commencement -> draft -> review -> release) plus methodology and data sources stacked together", "position": 3, "objective": "Build the engagement plan from base components: timeline + methodology", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-3e06e3fd9d1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recommendations framework + Section 5 Methodology describing data sources", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-dd0013a63889", "docSlug": "444c2570e8f0ee01", "documentTitle": "European Distressed Credit Watch List", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Source citation 'AFME' grounds every claim in the bullet list.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-dd0013a63889/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-dd0013a63889", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-dd0013a63889#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-1e2fca62e641", "evidence": "Each slide compares current quarter to prior quarter and prior year (e.g. €22.6bn vs €25.6bn vs €60.1bn).", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame the market by contrasting current 1Q'16 against 4Q'15 and 1Q'15 benchmarks.", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-71418a079f32", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "Capital markets headlines: leveraged finance issuance, HY/loan share.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-85aefc2767a3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Capital markets state.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "docSlug": "0f4c2c9dcf80afca", "documentTitle": "Measuring What Matters", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide defines the CPM formula and justifies its use as an industry standard.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Lists why CPM specifically is the right metric vs alternatives", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-c08248fbaae2", "evidence": "p.8 defines CPM equation; p.10 Exhibit 1 is an explicit issue tree of 7 cost categories with sub-elements.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose Cost per Mile into MECE driver tree", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 88, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-219b2e6cc155", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "pp.8-12 introduce CPM Framework, principles, driver tree", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "appendix", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Appendix maps every claim back to the underlying sample of 100 firms.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-18", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-2c79eb4da4f7", "docSlug": "fd1a22c5f6d95a06", "documentTitle": "TEI Microsoft Agentic AI", "authorId": "Forrester", "authorName": "Forrester", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "This slide is part of a Total Economic Impact (TEI) study by Forrester Consulting.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Each row in benefits table maps to a downstream evidence section.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-2c79eb4da4f7/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-2c79eb4da4f7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-2c79eb4da4f7#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019de8c9-ff48-750f-8798-525f365fb210", "evidence": "Benefits table p10 then p12-15 break GTM into marketing/sales/CS and product/market innovation drivers.", "position": 4, "objective": "Quantify Go-to-market transformation benefits", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 84, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de8c9-fdf5-7511-a886-09c1ac2e7bff", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Detailed quantified benefits and costs with risk-adjusted tables and quotes.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 31, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de8c9-fe8a-778d-ae50-87ab43e9ed55", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-category benefit and cost analyses with risk-adjusted PV.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ac58440e1490", "docSlug": "338991806cb56b3b", "documentTitle": "World Economic Forum Digital Transformation Initiative: In collaboration with Accenture", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a logarithmic scale for both axes. The bubble size represents combined annual impact in 2025.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Side panel explicitly explains value-at-stake methodology and sources", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ac58440e1490/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ac58440e1490", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ac58440e1490#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 4, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-e5c5503c3d26", "evidence": "Framework chart on p4 maps four themes; p5-8 are one slide per theme with case study", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the digital opportunity into four MECE themes with proof", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-5758a3de5d9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Four digital themes plotted on a value-at-stake matrix", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 8, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-6483b4bcd5e3", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "$1.3T at stake across four digital themes", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }