{ "kind": "tool", "value": "matrix-nxn", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:matrix-nxn:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 597, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 25, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table defines how company CAGR projections are adjusted over time based on their starting CAGR and whether the company or industry median is used as the baseline.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Company CAGR ranges and corresponding multipliers for 2020-2049", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-37", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "docSlug": "b7237af725ae5a70", "documentTitle": "Accelerating net zero 2050", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table maps company CAGR ranges to specific projection methodologies (Company CAGR vs Industry median) across time buckets from 2020 to 2049.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Company CAGR ranges and projection values across time periods", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c04627fe2871#slide-38", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "docSlug": "1c4914e993be3f96", "documentTitle": "AI-Enabled Engineering Excellence", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide uses a 5-row matrix structure to categorize strategic requirements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Matrix of 5 pillars (Ways of working, Tech stack, Org conditions, Reskilling, Human enablers) mapped against Short-term actions and Long-term initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 19, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-72c095c1e895", "evidence": "p20 explicit 'Short-term actions' vs 'Long-term initiatives' columns across five capability rows.", "position": 8, "objective": "Sequence requirements into short-term actions and long-term initiatives", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 90, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-0cc2c1c06285", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Requirements, short/long-term actions, risks, getting started, CIO next steps", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 20, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-1a4a6edba306", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Holistic transformation contrasted with tools rollout, with action plan", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide contrasts a quote about the shift from a knowledge economy to an innovation economy with a data table showing skill importance trends.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Table showing importance and change for 4 skill categories across 9 job roles.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-2353ffd735d5", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots importance and change-since-2004 across every cluster.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show how the required skills mix has moved from 2004 to 2017", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-70927e6d748d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Race-is-on, $11.5tn at risk, role clusters and skills mix subverted", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 15, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-8719adb9c760", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Role clusters + skills-mix data amplify the threat", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to show the change in importance of various skills, with creativity showing the highest positive change.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "chart/bar-horizontal: Change in importance of skills for science and engineering roles — multi-dimensional skill change data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-25b5ab397e97", "evidence": "Section divider 'three steps' followed by Step One, Step Two, Step Three deep dives.", "position": 5, "objective": "Decompose the recommendation into three mutually exclusive steps", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-78b3b23a1add", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Figures 7-9 plus Skills-to-Succeed and France case studies", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 29, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-8bebeea35263", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Three-step relief plan plus CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide argues that complex reasoning is becoming more important across all roles, while traditional STEM skills are becoming less important in many non-STEM roles.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Table comparing importance and change for STEM/Analysis vs Complex Reasoning across 10 job categories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-25b5ab397e97", "evidence": "Section divider 'three steps' followed by Step One, Step Two, Step Three deep dives.", "position": 5, "objective": "Decompose the recommendation into three mutually exclusive steps", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-78b3b23a1add", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Figures 7-9 plus Skills-to-Succeed and France case studies", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 29, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-8bebeea35263", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Three-step relief plan plus CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 93, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table lists 7 specific efficiency initiatives (numbered 36-42) categorized by theme.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Tværgående driftsydelser og administrative processer: Oversigt over effektiviseringsforslag (I/II)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/93", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-93", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 94, "from": 93, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-236660a0a13e", "evidence": "Two-part list with sizing 66-84 mio. kr. on p.94.", "position": 16, "objective": "Catalogue cross-cutting proposals with size", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 94, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The table lists three specific initiatives (43, 44, 45) with their financial impact and qualitative risk assessments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Tværgående driftsydelser og administrative processer: Oversigt over effektiviseringsforslag (II/II)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/94", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-94", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 94, "from": 93, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-236660a0a13e", "evidence": "Two-part list with sizing 66-84 mio. kr. on p.94.", "position": 16, "objective": "Catalogue cross-cutting proposals with size", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 130, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial and operational potential (Løn/ØD) across multiple organizational units. BCG/Struensee branding present.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Large matrix table with 25 rows of initiatives and multiple columns for units (VFK, Hæren, etc.) and metrics (Løn, ØD)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/130", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-130", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 131, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial or resource potential values across multiple organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) and specific initiatives (26-35).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Table showing potential values for initiatives 26-35 across various organizational units", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/131", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-131", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 132, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table breaks down financial potential (Løn, ØD, Anlæg) by specific organizational units and initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Detailed matrix of initiatives (rows) vs units (columns) with financial values", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/132", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-132", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 133, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays 'Løn' (Salary) and 'ØD' (Operating Expenses) impacts for 25 initiatives across multiple organizational units.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Detailed matrix of 25 initiatives vs organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) with Løn and ØD columns", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/133", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-133", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 134, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table displays financial impact data across multiple organizational units. The rows represent specific initiatives, and columns represent organizational entities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Detailed matrix of financial potential by unit and initiative", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/134", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-134", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 135, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Detailed matrix of initiatives vs units with financial values", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/135", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-135", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The slide includes a diagonal callout box stating that the baseline is too small to pursue the initiative in this context.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide contains a table/data component, which could be a matrix.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 28, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-48b7ee098467", "evidence": "Survey data -> tema-effekt -> recommendations -> 33 mio. kr. potentiale -> indfasningstakt.", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose contract templates and recommend kommerciel uddannelse", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 335, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table compares four models (minimum, expanded minimum, service-based, and agency-level) across different military entities (Flyvevåbnet, Hæren, Søværnet).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison matrix of 4 models across military units", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/335", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-335", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 336, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix format to show the distribution of units across locations, with color-coded boxes indicating the four models. Asterisks denote 'headquarters' for units spread across multiple locations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix of units vs garrisons with 'x' markers indicating presence.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/336", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-336", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 435, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize findings into horizontal and vertical overlaps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Indikationer på aktivitetssammenfald", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/435", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-435", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 422, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-74bf64322c2e", "evidence": "Six hovedaktiviteter -> niveau III enheder -> individual capacity assessments -> skalering methodology.", "position": 13, "objective": "MECE map Forsvaret organisation, capacities, and economic baseline", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 81, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 421, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2f76348a029e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Kortlægning af forsvaret, capacity assessments, skalering & realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-0dd18b578782", "docSlug": "929939d4f7b6ca1f", "documentTitle": "Global Retail Banking 2022", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to categorize banking initiatives into 'Innovations' (Enabling sustainable behaviors, Coaching and personalizing engagement) and 'Foundations' (Reinforcing trust, Treating customers fairly) across six value streams.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "framework/instance: Matrix of Value Streams vs Innovations/Foundations", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-0dd18b578782/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-0dd18b578782", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-0dd18b578782#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-50cd59400887", "evidence": "Exhibit 6 value-streams x innovations/foundations matrix, then Exhibit 7 lifecycle process diagram.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show product opportunity grid across value streams and lifecycle stages", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 70, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-b26e609228df", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Value-stream matrix + customer life-stage purpose framework, then Strategic Agenda divider", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-116360085cd2", "docSlug": "47c3d81d266e61ad", "documentTitle": "Investor Perspectives Series Pulse Check 21", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses color-coding to indicate shifts in importance (red for less important, green for more important).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Table showing investment criteria rankings across 5 survey periods and the net difference.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-116360085cd2/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-116360085cd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-116360085cd2#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-dd2c2d1418a9", "evidence": "Six-page side-by-side comparison table titled 'Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks (1/6 ... 6/6)'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Benchmark current pulse check vs all 20 prior pulse checks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-4ea9a4ad9ad6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Six-page historical comparison appendix plus contact page anchor next steps.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 26, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-5979637c711a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Trend evidence + appendix + contact close the loop on what executives should do.", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 327, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate how intake source and final outcome correlate with the duration of stay in the shelter.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "chart/bar-grouped: Average Days in DAS by intake type", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/327", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-327", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 358, "from": 311, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-64284a59ff04", "evidence": "Section '3 DAS Operations'; intake, kennels, costs, LRR breakdown", "position": 21, "objective": "Detailed zoom on DAS shelter operations, length-of-stay, costs, outcomes", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 76, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f2c898493c9f", "docSlug": "79fe9478c66e2f55", "documentTitle": "Path to digital marketing maturity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a standard maturity model framework to categorize organizational capabilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix comparing Data-driven Targeting, Automated Activation, Measurement & Attribution, and Organization collaboration across four maturity stages.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f2c898493c9f/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f2c898493c9f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-f2c898493c9f#slide-14", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "docSlug": "ba6f5e1f7c24f1ae", "documentTitle": "Port of LA Clean Truck Program", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three distinct policy models (Basic, Enhanced, Enhanced with employee commitment).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "table/data: Comparison matrix of three CTP options across five levers: Environmental Cargo Fee, Truck ban, Safety and security, Concession, and Truck financing program.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b17598fef593#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-adba23b8c08f", "evidence": "Side-by-side option matrix then narrative slides on Option II rationale and Option III stretch.", "position": 4, "objective": "Define and contrast Options I/II/III as a decision fork", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-a07bf07db208", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five CTP elements, interactions, labor market, three options defined.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-b19420ca245c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Objectives, framework, options compared on benefits/risks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376", "docSlug": "7261572e56ae8561", "documentTitle": "What’s in a (Domain) Name? The $2 Billion Secondary Market for Dot-Com Domains", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The table uses a heatmap-style background to emphasize diagonal values (intramarket transactions).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Matrix of transactions between Seller and Buyer markets", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-1641a5cc53b2", "evidence": "p.14 channel waterfall (marketplaces 55%) -> p.15 country split -> p.16 buyer/seller flow matrix.", "position": 4, "objective": "Zoom into where the money flows: channels and geographies", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-2a71b48615b6", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Implications", "beatSlug": "onion-implications", "evidence": "US/China concentration and intramarket flow matrix close the analysis.", "position": 5, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 16, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-3be04773b897", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Resolution", "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution", "evidence": "Methodology + segment + channel + geography unpack the climax.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }