{ "kind": "tool", "value": "lie-factor", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:lie-factor:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 15, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f", "docSlug": "6cb6906ccd008ecf", "documentTitle": "2019 Global Treasury Benchmarking", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.775, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart is zoomed in to show ratings 5-10.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Note states chart zoomed to 5-10 to emphasise variance", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-2a26d35cbd8f#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 23, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019de971-0297-711c-b36e-45c66c580730", "evidence": "Funding criteria (p24) -> review frequency gap (p25) -> cash left on table (p26) -> tech satisfaction (p27) all roll into action callouts", "position": 6, "objective": "Move from banking-criteria data to relationship-management recommendations", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de971-0121-72c2-8e7d-3ec771855007", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cash/banking and financial-risk benchmarks back recommendations", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 33, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de971-01cb-76b0-9041-0db3601859ac", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cash/banking, risk, tax recommendations and partner sign-off", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a", "docSlug": "eea7524c557036f4", "documentTitle": "2020 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2020", "authorId": "AirStreetCapital", "authorName": "Air Street Capital", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 96, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a line chart to illustrate the lack of reliability in 'miles per disengagement' as a metric for AV progress, specifically calling out Baidu's data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Calls out misleading 8,679% YoY metric.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a/96", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a#slide-96", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 106, "from": 93, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-154d2d6f882c", "evidence": "Surface (legislation/permits) -> sketchy metrics -> capital consolidation -> root tech limits of supervised perception.", "position": 12, "objective": "Diagnose why self-driving progress is slower than headlines suggest", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-ed2a8f38a754", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Research, Talent, Industry sections inventory what happened in AI in 2020.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 129, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-fc384f439bba", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Research, Talent and Industry sections build momentum of AI progress.", "position": 2, "confidence": 40, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-01cf0d8a8fbc", "docSlug": "cc8183ec02431b7a", "documentTitle": "2022 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2022", "authorId": "AirStreetCapital", "authorName": "Air Street Capital", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show the difference between standard corpus and CNKI-included corpus for China.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Adds Chinese-language CNKI database to expose 4.5x larger gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-01cf0d8a8fbc/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-01cf0d8a8fbc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-01cf0d8a8fbc#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 49, "from": 47, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-b57d30c8590e", "evidence": "Two slides directly title 'China vs US' and chart paper-volume gap and topic divergence.", "position": 8, "objective": "Compare Chinese vs US AI research output and focus", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 80, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-2557e3799e96", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Definitions, exec summary, Research and Industry sections inventory the state of AI.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 93, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-35abf646aa8b", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Research, Industry, Politics sections accumulate signals.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9", "docSlug": "8757f1b44ef7f176", "documentTitle": "2024 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2024", "authorId": "AirStreetCapital", "authorName": "Air Street Capital", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 90, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar representation for the challengers and a single bar for NVIDIA.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bar lengths proportional to NAV magnitudes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9/90", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-0856e1444fb9#slide-90", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 105, "from": 87, "name": "David Goliath", "slug": "16-david-goliath", "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-49389fa5a379", "evidence": "Pages span $3T market cap, $120B vs $31B counterfactual, compute index, AMD/SoftBank/start-ups failing to dent NVIDIA, smuggling", "position": 11, "objective": "Establish NVIDIA as unassailable Goliath while challengers fail", "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple", "confidence": 82, "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 153, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-5f2398b8d1d0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + Research + Industry sections inventory the year", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 174, "from": 86, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-73133c63a096", "arcName": "Voyage and Return", "arcSlug": "voyage-return", "beatName": "Discoveries", "beatSlug": "voyage-return-discoveries", "evidence": "Industry + Politics findings on NVIDIA, regulation, geopolitics", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-de7c2393caad", "docSlug": "8bb6870d5deeea67", "documentTitle": "2024 Reinvention in the Age of Generative AI Executive Summary", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart highlights a 15 percentage point gap in 2022 and a projected 37 percentage point gap by 2026, representing a 2.4x increase in the growth gap.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Indexed (2019=100) baseline keeps proportions honest.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-de7c2393caad/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-de7c2393caad", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-de7c2393caad#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de073-d85d-77af-8da8-e267bae401e4", "evidence": "p.5 names 9% Reinventors; p.6 shows 6.6x execution gap; p.7 projects 2.4x revenue-growth gap to 2026.", "position": 1, "objective": "Quantify the widening gap between Reinventors and the rest", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de073-d6b5-74e4-8187-d97e7bbaa93c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "p.6-7 quantify widening 6.6x execution and 2.4x revenue gap.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 8, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de073-d7d9-711a-b848-0d4e02537d81", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey data on Reinventors and BBVA proof.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-92cb9e5864da", "docSlug": "dfd94aead7429e9f", "documentTitle": "2025 Benedict Evans 2025 Autum AI eats the world", "authorId": "BenedictEvans", "authorName": "Benedict Evans", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "independent_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Independent analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The y-axis is truncated starting at 90%.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Truncated y-axis flagged 'NB truncated axis'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-92cb9e5864da/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-92cb9e5864da", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-92cb9e5864da#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 48, "from": 33, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2e-c68666bae910", "evidence": "Model convergence (35), 5% paying (37), 'where is value capture?' (48)", "position": 3, "objective": "Reveal that despite spend, value capture location is unclear", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 75, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 48, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-4f5b40875a96", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Inside tech: $400bn capex, $1.4tr OpenAI, models commoditize, value capture unclear", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 48, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd65-5b209794247f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Platform shift evidence + capex surge + model proliferation data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546", "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the additive impact of specific tariff categories on the total effective rate.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Stacked steps preserve magnitude proportional to data.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 12, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-86cfadfb8491", "evidence": "Timeline (p.12) -> Liberation Day specifics (p.13) -> 90-day pause carve-outs (p.14) -> waterfall totaling +23pp in effect, +13pp pending (p.15).", "position": 2, "objective": "Build cumulative tariff burden from individual measures to total effective rate", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-c4ef101612f7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary, macro KPIs, tariff timeline & waterfall — establishes what is happening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 19, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-d59403340719", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Aggressive tariff rollout, scenarios deteriorating.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "docSlug": "13eb135e1f137482", "documentTitle": "Brazil Education Technology Market L.E.K. Perspectives", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Includes a quote from a portfolio manager and specific methodology for the Brazil index calculation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Broken axis used for 248% outlier", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de7d8-f567-75db-97ba-9a2042e3993a", "evidence": "Multiple charts comparing BVSP and LATAM EdTech vs global peers (p5,8,9).", "position": 1, "objective": "Show Brazil/LATAM resilience vs global benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de7d8-f35a-72cf-ad06-1c8854cbd234", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "BVSP vs global indices benchmark (p3-9)", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de7d8-f496-76e8-bc3a-861f34950e44", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Index and earnings data analysis", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "docSlug": "13eb135e1f137482", "documentTitle": "Brazil Education Technology Market L.E.K. Perspectives", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "competitive_analysis", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Includes a line chart showing stock price movement from Q1 2019 to Q4 2022 and a table showing year-on-year percentage changes for various sectors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Y-axis break flagged in notes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de7d8-f567-75db-97ba-9a2042e3993a", "evidence": "Multiple charts comparing BVSP and LATAM EdTech vs global peers (p5,8,9).", "position": 1, "objective": "Show Brazil/LATAM resilience vs global benchmarks", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de7d8-f35a-72cf-ad06-1c8854cbd234", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "BVSP vs global indices benchmark (p3-9)", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de7d8-f496-76e8-bc3a-861f34950e44", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Index and earnings data analysis", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "docSlug": "13eb135e1f137482", "documentTitle": "Brazil Education Technology Market L.E.K. Perspectives", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses broken axes to accommodate extreme negative values for net income.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Broken axes for -1407% outlier", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-ff5959cc3717#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de7d8-f58f-734f-861b-81b047e59908", "evidence": "Stock-vs-net-income bars (p11-12) culminate in profitability insight (p13).", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal that earnings growth (not revenue) drives valuation", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 75, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de7d8-f383-76af-8dbc-6d9475750181", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Earnings growth now drives stock price (p11-13)", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de7d8-f496-76e8-bc3a-861f34950e44", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Index and earnings data analysis", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-a24d59720868", "docSlug": "b4646aa65cc47ad7", "documentTitle": "Building a Winning Culture", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Includes a line chart showing St. George Bank's market performance as a supporting example of culture-driven success.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Indexed-to-100 baseline shows true relative outperformance honestly.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-a24d59720868/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-a24d59720868", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-a24d59720868#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-56248da6da22", "evidence": "St. George (failing → bold change → outperform market chart) and Rotech (operations focus → service culture → 16% growth).", "position": 2, "objective": "Prove framework with before/after company transformations and measurable deltas", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-f1e690b187d1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "St. George Bank and Rotech case studies, including outperformance chart.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-eb48698c56d2", "docSlug": "0ccbd21d8d39c9d1", "documentTitle": "Re-Imagine the Possible 2018/2019", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays government spending by ministry/sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Brief notes final bar misaligned with scale.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-eb48698c56d2/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-eb48698c56d2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-eb48698c56d2#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019de92c-287f-74a1-875f-df9800fa83f1", "evidence": "Starts with revenue vs expenditure totals (p.10), then drills into tax mix, SACU, debt, top-10 allocations and expenditure breakdown.", "position": 2, "objective": "Zoom from total revenue/expenditure into composition and allocations", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de92c-26d9-736e-88de-32c7e73a5eb6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sections 'Key Focus Areas' and 'The Numbers' lay out fiscal data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de92c-27ac-7725-b00c-4af4bc1e3d85", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Persistent deficit, declining SACU, rising debt stock.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499", "docSlug": "7716ae6db98267fe", "documentTitle": "Syracuse University Diagnostic Report", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging stacked bar format to show revenue (positive) and expenses (negative) over time.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Mirror chart uses consistent scale so visual gap matches numeric gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 11, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-ade69a189c4a", "evidence": "Strengths (p11) -> expense>revenue (p12) -> peer enrollment/cost benchmarks (p13-14) -> cost growth (p15) -> 80% agree change (p16).", "position": 1, "objective": "Show Syracuse's current state vs peers to motivate change", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-e23e4005677b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Expenses outgrowing revenues; peers undercut; 80% agree change needed.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-f123b889804e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Methodology + financial/peer fact base.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-43094eb6e673", "docSlug": "2f9d005d37efcf9a", "documentTitle": "The evolving private equity playbook", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Figure 3. Uses a maturity model framework to segment performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Y-axis 0–24% scale, no truncation; ratios match visual.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-43094eb6e673/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-43094eb6e673", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-43094eb6e673#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-8f3279aa648f", "evidence": "Six capability measures × four maturity levels, then 2.3x operating-margin gap by maturity tier.", "position": 4, "objective": "Present operations maturity model and quantify the gap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-d6c57c64379f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "2.3x maturity gap chart, edge bars, EBITDA delta, 40% carve-out result.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-e13bf5497c19", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Maturity model + 2.3x margins + partner-driven EBITDA edge.", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2", "docSlug": "88c81413269f048c", "documentTitle": "Women-led startups losing across the board: from creation to funding, in all key European markets", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a projection based on linear trends from 2008-2022 to estimate the year of parity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Time-axis break (... between 2022 and 2065) is visualised", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-5284798ed66c", "evidence": "Five consecutive data points on diversity decline, partnering, industries", "position": 2, "objective": "Stack evidence that gender diversity at creation is deteriorating", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 78, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-98cdbdfe7265", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Analytical lens on creation: parity decline, partnering, industry mix", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 19, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-a81d12485e12", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Trend worsens, gap widens with maturity (x5.6), Europe-wide", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }