{ "kind": "tool", "value": "legend-context", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:legend-context:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 92, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 4, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-6e381a4d392b", "docSlug": "4d4e919dcca9fbdd", "documentTitle": "Brazil Digital Report", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-country comparison (US vs China) across two time periods (2010 vs 2019) to illustrate the rise of tech firms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Other companies (black), Technology companies (blue)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-6e381a4d392b/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-6e381a4d392b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-6e381a4d392b#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "738c1daf-f086-4fff-beb2-15753f645a23", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Current Situation", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-1", "evidence": "The report begins by providing an overview of Brazil's digital landscape, including the top 10 companies by market cap.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "docSlug": "c266d0250725f0c1", "documentTitle": "Building Sustainable Organizations", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a circular diagram to map 10 enablers to three core pillars (Human Connections, Collective Intelligence, Accountability).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Legend: Human Connections (white box), Collective Intelligence (black bar), Accountability at All Levels (dotted circle), Practices (arrow)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 12, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-4f73c88e74c5", "evidence": "Five Elements (p.12) -> 3 behavior types (p.13) -> 10 enablers, 21 practices wheel (p.14).", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose Sustainability DNA into MECE elements/enablers/practices", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 84, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-a8b884a3cdc9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five Elements + Sustainability DNA framework (pp.12-14)", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "docSlug": "c266d0250725f0c1", "documentTitle": "Building Sustainable Organizations", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a radial layout to show performance across 10 distinct enablers. The legend at the bottom maps abbreviations to full names.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Legend mapping abbreviations (St, Em, Mi, Te, In) to full names", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 18, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-54ac088c3c2a", "evidence": "'How strong is your DNA?' divider -> radial chart of average=52 with per-enabler gaps.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show readers' likely DNA gap vs leaders via average enabler scores", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-ad9f014f129f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Performance charts (16-17), benchmark (18-19), case studies (20-24)", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-b9b59024ea1d", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "DNA-strong firms deliver 19.6% EBITDA, higher impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "docSlug": "25cda12aac1298b5", "documentTitle": "Commercial payments, reinvented Your blueprint for accelerating payments revenue growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart approach to show usage percentages for different payment services.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Traditional banks, Fintechs and bigtechs, Non-banking providers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-968651d39e0a", "evidence": "Figs 2-4 stack stats: 80% banks, 56% erosion, 72% can't compete, 84% multi-provider.", "position": 1, "objective": "Stack data points proving incumbents are losing share to digital challengers", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-fbf85a039005", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Incumbents losing to fintechs/bigtechs, legacy tech, client pain points and switching risk.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-0aa1f6f15442", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantified competitive erosion + voice-of-client pain.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "docSlug": "25cda12aac1298b5", "documentTitle": "Commercial payments, reinvented Your blueprint for accelerating payments revenue growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays 17 categories of payment services, each with three data points representing the percentage of respondents using different provider types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Traditional banks; Fintechs and bigtechs; Non-banking providers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-968651d39e0a", "evidence": "Figs 2-4 stack stats: 80% banks, 56% erosion, 72% can't compete, 84% multi-provider.", "position": 1, "objective": "Stack data points proving incumbents are losing share to digital challengers", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-fbf85a039005", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Incumbents losing to fintechs/bigtechs, legacy tech, client pain points and switching risk.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-0aa1f6f15442", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantified competitive erosion + voice-of-client pain.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-6ec5e5ff6a01", "docSlug": "95cf64962e1f54d6", "documentTitle": "Digital Consumer Trends 2023", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Donut charts compare two income segments across four metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Household Income below £30,000 (green), Household Income £75,000 or above (blue)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-6ec5e5ff6a01/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-6ec5e5ff6a01", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-6ec5e5ff6a01#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 43, "from": 40, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "74e90035-3046-4c5d-8e95-510edc518682", "evidence": "Slides 40-43 present data on the digital divide and spending on broadband.", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlight the impact of cost of living on digital behaviors", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-e67bab10741f", "docSlug": "d6cee83645e98a6d", "documentTitle": "FDI Confidence Index Exec Summary", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.678, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to visualize the 2024 rankings, with color-coding to distinguish between developed and emerging markets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart has a legend explaining the color scheme.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-e67bab10741f/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-e67bab10741f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-e67bab10741f#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "da27a1ee-eb45-452e-910a-fe0bb6d48353", "evidence": "The document highlights investors' preferences and key risks.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the key trends and risks in FDI?", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "ddbe194d-5935-412e-a814-c41cfda1dadb", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Need", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-need", "evidence": "The industry trends slide highlights investors' preferences and needs.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-acabed655185", "docSlug": "01e2afb31fee38a7", "documentTitle": "February Macro Brief", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a rebased index where 100 represents the neutral point.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide features a legend explaining the color coding for different countries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-acabed655185/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-acabed655185", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-acabed655185#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 32, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-2b5b7628c947", "evidence": "Aggregate consumer view -> US vs Europe vs Australia split -> services vs goods detail", "position": 7, "objective": "Segment consumer spending by region", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 62, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-e26a116b6c13", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chart pack of PMI, consumer, labor, inflation, trade, supply, energy, markets", "position": 4, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "docSlug": "cb6397350c432cb3", "documentTitle": "Global Consumer Insights March 2021", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The 'conscientious cohort' is defined by respondents prioritizing health and safety measures and COVID-19 certification.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Conscientious cohort; Global sample", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de99a-4fab-700c-ad73-ea7d1832e191", "evidence": "p15 introduces cohort; p16-17 contrast cohort vs global sample on in-store and willingness-to-pay", "position": 4, "objective": "Split out a 'conscientious cohort' vs the global sample on health/safety and ESG", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 87, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4de8-7736-b857-4f15c5c32c20", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four 'fault line' segments with 'Our insight:' callouts on p7-20", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 20, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de99a-4edb-7017-b746-1afcaf02b08c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-segment data tables, charts and insights", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-7c9d11a2073d", "docSlug": "2806bcff14631572", "documentTitle": "Global Fashion & Luxury Private Equity and Investors Survey 2021", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a grid layout to compare 9 distinct F&L sectors, with a summary footer for the total panel.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Rest of the World, North America, Europe", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-7c9d11a2073d/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-7c9d11a2073d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-7c9d11a2073d#slide-11", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3434bb82df9a", "docSlug": "ac5e7d50e9f690c8", "documentTitle": "Global Future of Cyber Survey", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to show distribution of confidence levels (unconfident to very confident) segmented by maturity level.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: TOTAL (n=1,196) Low cyber maturity (n=421) Medium cyber maturity (n=612) High cyber maturity (n=163)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3434bb82df9a/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3434bb82df9a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-3434bb82df9a#slide-28", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162", "docSlug": "6ebe7bc3c470921e", "documentTitle": "Global Private Equity Report 2015", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide provides a detailed analysis of PE performance benchmarks using mPME methodology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide provides context for the legend of a chart, which helps to clarify the meaning of the data.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 22, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-34a8e73fd7b5", "evidence": "Short-term, long-term, vintage and top-quartile vs bottom-quartile comparisons.", "position": 4, "objective": "Benchmark PE returns vs public markets and across quartiles", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a4-702a-b0b2-8bbe0cc98a23", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Mind the gap' returns concern and key takeaways frame the tension", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 28, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-81ee316ec9c7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Section 1: what happened in PE in 2014", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6", "docSlug": "ad48a7aff8040249", "documentTitle": "Global Private Equity Report 2016", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a text-heavy page from a report, functioning as a narrative summary of market trends.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "quote: We are looking at every possible lever to lessen the cost, but [making] sure we still have access to the talent that we need. — Ted Eliopoulos, CalPERS' chief investment officer", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 39, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-6387c08942db", "evidence": "Callout about 'chasm between big well-performing GPs (haves) and less prominent GPs'; charts on top funds exceeding targets.", "position": 5, "objective": "Open the gap between top-quartile haves and have-not GPs", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 39, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-9134c65d023e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "'PE firms face a mandate to differentiate' — haves vs have-nots, top funds pulling away.", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 58, "from": 39, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-a09dd459aa75", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Mandate to differentiate via sweet-spot, thematic investing.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa", "docSlug": "c1199c966e738cd3", "documentTitle": "Global Risks Report 2024", "authorId": "WEF", "authorName": "World Economic Forum", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "academic_think_tank", "sourceTypeLabel": "Academic / think tank", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 72, "slideType": "regional_insights", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a dot plot format to show risk ranking (x-axis) by region (y-axis), with color representing criminality score.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Criminality score color scale from 0 (low) to 10 (high)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa/72", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-8723ab235efa#slide-72", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 92, "from": 21, "beatId": "5b8e856c-94c6-4703-abd7-87130fa2245a", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The document provides strategies to address these risks, including localized strategies, breakthrough endeavors, collective actions, and cross-border coordination.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-05d61f7ceb18", "docSlug": "3db9e44ddd817ba8", "documentTitle": "Investment Industrial Policy Future", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Output gap % of GDP >75 51-75 26-50 1-25 <1 No data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-05d61f7ceb18/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-05d61f7ceb18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-05d61f7ceb18#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 9, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "a55a4647-8dc8-418f-a86a-98520382082e", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle to explain why globalization increases GDP", "position": 1, "objective": "Explaining the benefits of globalization", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7", "docSlug": "fd952aedeca416cc", "documentTitle": "Investor Perspectives Q1 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table uses color-coded cells to indicate the direction of change in investor sentiment.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Color coding for change: Red (less important), Green (more important), Grey (no change)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7#slide-22", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-39fdca9895f6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Word clouds, longitudinal comparisons, contact details.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd57-9a38c04c6e26", "docSlug": "a7105342536e952a", "documentTitle": "ipsos global trends 2021 report", "authorId": "IPSOS", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart is a stacked bar chart showing agreement vs disagreement. The data is sorted by agreement percentage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: % agree % disagree", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd57-9a38c04c6e26/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd57-9a38c04c6e26", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd57-9a38c04c6e26#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 47, "from": 4, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "f077669d-875c-4d4e-b8da-e72cea622280", "evidence": "The report follows the golden circle loop, starting with why (climate concern), then what (key trends), and finally how (data-driven insights).", "position": 0, "objective": "Why - What - How", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" }, { "to": 50, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "4a44a0fe-a309-4d3e-aa2e-08817f1b9298", "evidence": "The report implies the cost of inaction through highlighting emerging trends and shifts in public values.", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlighting the consequences of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 13, "beatId": "aaf5449a-b514-4ebd-b73e-ec64cb8c3296", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The report provides satisfaction through data-driven insights and key takeaways.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-8c74ac76e4cf", "docSlug": "ae93d6a9ae475ff0", "documentTitle": "IPSOS GLOBAL TRUSTWORTHINESS MONITOR January 2023", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 138, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays 'Agree' (teal) and 'Disagree' (red) percentages for 19 countries plus a global average.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide includes a legend with 'Agree / Disagree' labels.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-8c74ac76e4cf/138", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-8c74ac76e4cf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-8c74ac76e4cf#slide-138", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 139, "from": 128, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de78d-711e-709d-9b11-0fed5e96803c", "evidence": "Country splits across 11 CPG attribute slides.", "position": 13, "objective": "Segment CPG trust by country across attributes", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 151, "from": 21, "beatId": "019de78d-6e47-7609-a0b7-b9da60b121bc", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Trust factors then 10 sector deep dives across 9 attributes.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 151, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de78d-6ecd-71bb-84f1-d1fc046b9e11", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sector and attribute data dominate p.5-151.", "position": 1, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses two world maps to visualize the geographic concentration of critical mineral extraction and refining, with specific callouts for key countries and their respective market shares.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Extractor / China or extractor with Chinese BRI investment", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 30, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-ebb56d290406", "evidence": "Same data-then-recommendation cadence: elections, M&A, property, minerals, industrial policy.", "position": 5, "objective": "For trends 6–10, drive from data to insight to recommendation", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-b49d6da6674b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Each trend ends with a 'Business considerations' recommendation slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 38, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-c785c164d625", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Charts, maps, and data slides for each of the 10 trends", "position": 4, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be", "docSlug": "f2361344f7ae4a70", "documentTitle": "MARKET DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays 'Strongly Agree' (black) and 'Somewhat Agree' (light grey) segments, with the total percentage and 2019 comparison data listed on the right.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide features a legend with clear labels (STRONGLY AGREE | SOMEWHAT AGREE | TOTAL AGREE).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be#slide-16", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 16, "beatId": "2d12bcdd-cdaf-4a76-bba0-a906bb4f5616", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The deck presents findings and support for government policies to improve trust in the internet.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be", "docSlug": "f2361344f7ae4a70", "documentTitle": "MARKET DATA FROM SECONDARY SOURCES", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays two segments (Greatly Improve, Somewhat Improve) summing to a Total Improve percentage.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide features a legend with clear labels (GREATLY IMPROVE | SOMEWHAT IMPROVE | TOTAL IMPROVE).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-57a7a74d07be#slide-17", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 16, "beatId": "2d12bcdd-cdaf-4a76-bba0-a906bb4f5616", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The deck presents findings and support for government policies to improve trust in the internet.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "docSlug": "f980fcfd12cbc5e2", "documentTitle": "Project Spiritus Final report Market Study", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "EY Parthenon", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 76, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 2D positioning map (matrix) to categorize market participants.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Price and perceived quality", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416/76", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-4e6df0b45416#slide-76", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 101, "from": 61, "beatId": "ca2cb617-ff0d-4b73-bffe-897c9c22ecc8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses growth opportunities, initiative list, and appendix", "position": 4, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-9a18b30a43c1", "docSlug": "ce62d3d978381f05", "documentTitle": "Trend 2030 Dynamic Technology Innovation", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide highlights the difficulty in predicting innovation speed by contrasting Cisco's 2013 vs 2016 forecasts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: M2M; non cellular, M2M and consumer electronics; cellular, Consumer electronics; non cellular, PC, labtop, tablet, Mobile phones, Fixed phones", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-9a18b30a43c1/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-9a18b30a43c1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-9a18b30a43c1#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "aa680251-185f-4185-8b89-7088310af07a", "evidence": "The document uses the golden circle to explain innovation.", "position": 0, "objective": "Why, what, and how of innovation", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" }, { "to": 30, "from": 15, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "549f2af1-8162-4789-ab2c-fce0705dbfd8", "evidence": "The document highlights the costs of inaction in innovation.", "position": 1, "objective": "Consequences of not innovating", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 16, "beatId": "c88790bb-1473-4650-84da-8a3019f02d31", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The document provides satisfaction by outlining solutions and guidance.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "docSlug": "7561802f6a67abba", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future Standalone", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a cost-curve style visualization for global reserves and a bar chart for associated gas reserves.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "legend: Gas basins in US; Gas basins in Canada", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9f63b5270bbf", "evidence": "Six consecutive data slides (production lead, unconventional share, exports, reserves, productivity) each adds an evidence point to the same conclusion.", "position": 1, "objective": "Build evidence stack proving US gas dominance", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 85, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-8583c1cf72c3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Section 'Unconventional Rise' establishes US gas dominance (pp.3-9).", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 15, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-9ba0b898dbea", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Boom evidence and demand drivers establish what is happening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }