{ "kind": "tool", "value": "issue-tree", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:issue-tree:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 104, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 5, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "docSlug": "1c4914e993be3f96", "documentTitle": "AI-Enabled Engineering Excellence", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured list format to categorize barriers to AI value realization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Decomposes 'AI value blockers' into six branches.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-5a92183b3585", "evidence": "p4 shows widespread adoption / shallow impact, p5 enumerates six root challenges.", "position": 2, "objective": "Move from visible adoption symptom to six underlying value blockers", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-019c693acd5a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Six challenges, pain points across SDLC, 20% adoption gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 8, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-138c660582af", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Shallow impact, six blockers, low adoption", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "docSlug": "1c4914e993be3f96", "documentTitle": "AI-Enabled Engineering Excellence", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to categorize requirements, with a 'Measures' column and a bottom 'Improvement loop' section.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "paragraph/paragraph: Measurement framework to track & drive efficiency across inputs, outputs, outcomes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6448b5a40ced#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 19, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-72c095c1e895", "evidence": "p20 explicit 'Short-term actions' vs 'Long-term initiatives' columns across five capability rows.", "position": 8, "objective": "Sequence requirements into short-term actions and long-term initiatives", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 90, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-0cc2c1c06285", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Requirements, short/long-term actions, risks, getting started, CIO next steps", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 20, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-1a4a6edba306", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Holistic transformation contrasted with tools rollout, with action plan", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f", "docSlug": "0fc3aba985cbd390", "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2018 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to present high-level industry predictions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Six numbered branches each unpacked in subsequent sections", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f#slide-8", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-a9e65c2a1e0d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Six themes unpacking how 'Luxury 2025 will be a different place'", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-b4339d7212bd", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Luxury 2025 will be a different place' overview slide", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 156, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show how the FMI organization is broken down into six specific focus areas (A-F).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Org analysis broken into 6 named delomraader.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/156", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-156", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 172, "from": 150, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-5b4fc08a2941", "evidence": "1.752 ansatte mapping -> 6 delområder -> 16-28 mio. kr. samlet potentiale -> indfasning.", "position": 6, "objective": "Diagnose FMI organisation and propose six delforslag", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 233, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide outlines a structured diagnostic approach to procurement centralization, referencing a 2016 report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Analysen fordelt paa seks delanalyser.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/233", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-233", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 330, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide presents a custom framework for evaluating administrative solution models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Five-criterion design framework structured.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/330", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-330", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 365, "from": 322, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6e9175aa6c84", "evidence": "5 designkriterier -> 4 konkrete modeller (page 334-336) -> recommendation + 14 mio. kr. kursusadm.", "position": 11, "objective": "Compare four models for administrative faellesskaber plus kursusadministration", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 86, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 482, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 4-point scale represented by pie-chart icons to indicate the severity of obstacles to feasibility.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Metodik til vurdering af realiserbarhed framework.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/482", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-482", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 422, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-74bf64322c2e", "evidence": "Six hovedaktiviteter -> niveau III enheder -> individual capacity assessments -> skalering methodology.", "position": 13, "objective": "MECE map Forsvaret organisation, capacities, and economic baseline", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 81, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 482, "from": 421, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2f76348a029e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Kortlægning af forsvaret, capacity assessments, skalering & realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a stepped arrow diagram to present the questions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Five sequential questions structure all subsequent sections.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 22, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-f58bc2f67495", "evidence": "p22 names 3 characteristics; p23 lists 5 explicit questions structuring rest of deck.", "position": 4, "objective": "Synthesize characteristics and structure 5 driving questions", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 82, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "docSlug": "6dcd3449fa2bada6", "documentTitle": "Draft BCG proposal Mercury Genesis Energy", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "appendix_disclosure", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes a legal disclosure regarding the public availability of report outputs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Hierarchical decomposition: Context -> Whole-of-sector view -> Renewable projects -> sub-stages (commissioned/under construction/FID)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-5b1375ba4f1e", "evidence": "Nested bullet structure decomposes deliverables, context, whole-of-sector view, supply/demand, storage, networks into distinct categories", "position": 2, "objective": "Comprehensively scope the proposed deliverables and pathway dimensions", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-39220102798c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Sections 2 (Objectives), 3 (Scope), and roadmap pathway breakdown", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a column-based categorization to define scope boundaries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "2x4 hierarchical decomposition of media sector subsectors", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-4", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a649f8adf4db", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, intro, exec summary, sector boundaries, agenda", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "docSlug": "427acb0947e20afd", "documentTitle": "Everyday Moments of Truth", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative bar chart to highlight the decline in positive sentiment among experienced women.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Decomposes 'why erosion?' into three branches diagnosed in following pages", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-05a595f93792", "evidence": "Section 1 explicitly names 'three critical areas': ideal worker stereotypes, lack of supervisory support, too few role models.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose erosion into three distinct root causes", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-b92ba070937d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "eNPS gap quantified, 3 root causes diagnosed (stereotypes/support/role models)", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 11, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-cb8f2a78f80c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Section 1 + setup: data on the gap and its causes", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832", "docSlug": "599406b07173fb80", "documentTitle": "Impact of IRA IIJA CHIPS Clean Tech", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "timeline", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a timeline framework to map specific project stages (OEM, Project development, EPC, O&M, Transport & storage, Offtake) against numbered pain points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Six numbered 'Key pre-IRA gaps' grouped along the value chain.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2afa553a7832#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-b6c3f406318d", "evidence": "p7 lists 6 numbered pre-IRA gaps along the value chain; p8 explicitly columns 'Pre-legislation' vs 'Changes from recent legislation' vs 'Remaining areas'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Contrast pre-legislation gaps with what new policy still leaves unsolved", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-09536c03f153", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Pre-legislation gaps and 'remaining challenges' that policy must still close.", "position": 4, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-14cb8a77e529", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Unaddressed gaps = future risk to US DAC leadership.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7", "docSlug": "fd952aedeca416cc", "documentTitle": "Investor Perspectives Q1 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The table tracks shifts in investor sentiment regarding various macroeconomic and operational risks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of BCG's investor pulse checks (5/7)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-2c022fadbfa7#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-39fdca9895f6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Word clouds, longitudinal comparisons, contact details.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 251, "slideType": "org_design", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list structure to map organizational areas to governance impacts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "list/bullet with three items: Delivery and Execution, Communication and Coordination, Resources and Talent", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/251", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-251", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "docSlug": "0f4c2c9dcf80afca", "documentTitle": "Measuring What Matters", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a tree-like decomposition structure to illustrate the cost components of autonomous trucking operations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Exhibit 1 is a literal value tree: CPM → 7 drivers → sub-elements", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-6e239bbc025d#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-c08248fbaae2", "evidence": "p.8 defines CPM equation; p.10 Exhibit 1 is an explicit issue tree of 7 cost categories with sub-elements.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose Cost per Mile into MECE driver tree", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 88, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-219b2e6cc155", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "pp.8-12 introduce CPM Framework, principles, driver tree", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide serves as an executive summary for a procurement consulting proposal.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 1 enumerates 11 distinct procurement challenges as systematic breakdown.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-ba03fbc9a90a", "evidence": "Data review -> 11 challenges -> 'proven approach addresses these' -> $900M annualized savings claim.", "position": 1, "objective": "Cascade from spend data review to $900M opportunity insight", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 80, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-be254a319a97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Figure 1: 11 key challenges public-sector procurement organizations face.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The matrix uses Revenue Growth (CAGR) on the x-axis and Profitability (EBT margin) on the y-axis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four numbered 'pressing questions' decompose the analytical agenda.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-0f518333654e", "evidence": "Figure 2 splits 1,615 firms into five revenue x profit groups; insight is the 15%.", "position": 2, "objective": "Segment companies into five performance groups", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-f8d22b440add", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Four pressing questions; only 15% achieve long-term profitable growth.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5", "docSlug": "6cfacd78cbd42db5", "documentTitle": "Technology Foresight", "authorId": "ArthurDLittle", "authorName": "Arthur D. Little", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a text-heavy thought leadership page from an Arthur D. Little report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Implicit question 'how to make foresight succeed?' decomposed into 10 sub-imperatives", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-33718c0bb3d5#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-1a7a4dc5e49d", "evidence": "Numbered 10 imperatives covering horizon, alignment, pragmatism, push/pull, indicators, comparisons, sector nuances, expert bias, and ongoing process — distinct categories aiming for completeness.", "position": 2, "objective": "Break technology foresight success into 10 distinct imperatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-ed48d07cd0d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Right approach varies' — 10 imperatives needed for success", "position": 2, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-f124cdbe7732", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "10 strategic imperatives walked through pp3-6", "position": 3, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-03e7401ed786", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "10 imperatives = implications for getting foresight right", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114", "docSlug": "6543568fbc47af38", "documentTitle": "The age of AI: Banking’s new reality", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list to present strategic imperatives, with a navigation bar at the bottom.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Single question 'how to reinvent' decomposed into five MECE imperatives", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-746ffdbc9114#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-1f533f589c0e", "evidence": "'How to lead' framing + numbered list of 01-05 imperatives sets the answer-first pyramid", "position": 4, "objective": "Cascade from data to the five recommended actions", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 78, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-5e45e8f2221b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'How to lead' + the five key imperatives list", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-6cc247a03304", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three usage modes + five imperatives derived from the facts", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-8945cc841bca", "docSlug": "a46d1765417ae6d2", "documentTitle": "The Canadian Venture Opportunity", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a process-flow style layout for the 5 dimensions and a tiered structure for the ecosystem/foundation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Pillars sit on 'Ecosystem' & 'Foundation' base — hierarchical decomposition.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-8945cc841bca/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-8945cc841bca", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-8945cc841bca#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 12, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-284413620fba", "evidence": "Framework p.12 then per-dimension peer benchmarks: talent p.13, R&D p.14, startups p.15, scale-up funding p.16, champions p.17.", "position": 3, "objective": "Score Canada vs peers on the 5 success dimensions", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-a1753f6019ec", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Section 2 divider plus '5 success dimensions' framework introduced on p.12.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 20, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-b0858931eca7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Section 2 benchmarks reveal gaps, valleys of death and missed opportunity.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7ac12d53cb34", "docSlug": "d7f769c3840020df", "documentTitle": "TSS Index 2025 France", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a quadrant-like conceptual diagram to explain the TSS index components (Operational performance, Transformation pressure, Restructuring pressure, Balance sheet robustness).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Two-branch decomposition (financial health, macro exposure) is the deck's analytical issue tree.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7ac12d53cb34/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7ac12d53cb34", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7ac12d53cb34#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30d-700fb751b106", "evidence": "p4 sets the question/method; p5 delivers '17% under transformation pressure, 5% restructuring' insight.", "position": 2, "objective": "Introduce the TSS Index and reveal the headline pressure finding", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 78, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-bb6b0cddd25d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "TSS Index methodology slide introduces the 2-pillar analytical framework.", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-c86e684737a1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Bankruptcy data, methodology, pressure rates and sector rankings.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "docSlug": "717a4a3b9695902b", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a value chain diagram for the top half and a decision-tree/segmentation matrix for the bottom half.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bottom: Natural gas branches to Global/Domestic, Domestic to US LNG/Electric/Other.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-7c7f95dc2833#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-786704cf0e09", "evidence": "p12 displays an explicit natural-gas + LNG value chain; p13 unpacks six business models on top of it.", "position": 4, "objective": "Walk the natural-gas value chain to surface segment-specific plays", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-4f20bf580e11", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Value chain growth plays + six LNG business models (p12-13).", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-63a2bedff6e6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Strategy plays for upstream, LNG, midstream players.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "docSlug": "7561802f6a67abba", "documentTitle": "US Natural Gas Future Standalone", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a tree diagram to segment the market and a table to compare metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Tree decomposes Natural gas → Global/Domestic → US LNG / Electric power / Other sectors with metric columns.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-827bc8d6204c#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 23, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-ac169fc6ba32", "evidence": "p.23 segments demand by type; p.24 names six LNG business models; p.25 maps strategies per player by scenario.", "position": 5, "objective": "Segment players, business models and scenario strategies", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-8c25da9e956f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Tomorrow's Growth Plays' frames strategic-fit table and six LNG business models (pp.22-25).", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-a0492190366c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Strategic options and player-specific recommendations close on action.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-846efee1e3af", "docSlug": "d2a38316576ffb5e", "documentTitle": "Widening AI Value Gap 2025", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide is text-heavy, structured as a series of strategic considerations for C-suite executives regarding AI integration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Slide poses a structured set of design questions to decompose the problem.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-846efee1e3af/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-846efee1e3af", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-846efee1e3af#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-4562b2bc574d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Five strategies of future-built companies and design questions for the C-suite.", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 18, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-58ee7549a050", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Design questions, fit-for-purpose tech, and playbook for climbing the curve.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }