{ "kind": "tool", "value": "hypothesis-driven-structure", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:hypothesis-driven-structure:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 87, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 4, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "A few leaders are taking an even more fundamental approach: reimagining what the business should ideally look like a few years from now, and then working backwards, re-engineering every aspect—from the ground up.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 41, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-5178d73c3b50", "evidence": "Figure 8 CIR stuck at 50-60% across decades vs auto-loan +50% case study.", "position": 10, "objective": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "docSlug": "3712a907c7b695bb", "documentTitle": "Blueprint for Service Success", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide sets up a segmentation framework used for the subsequent analysis of service transformation success.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames the financial parameters used to test pivoting hypothesis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-0ea0cfa8b721", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Customer expectations changing; 29% revenue from services; 4 player categories defined.", "position": 1, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-2147cf13ce31", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Research findings: 748 execs, 29% revenue, 4 categories.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1f29d1af210a", "docSlug": "60507f7e69f46c0f", "documentTitle": "Bridging Customer Experience Gap", "authorId": "Cognizant", "authorName": "Cognizant", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide references a 'Figure 4' which is not present on this page.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames hypothesis: strategy & culture matter most, but execution lags", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1f29d1af210a/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1f29d1af210a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-1f29d1af210a#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 17, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019de784-0b19-77eb-b5b8-9f32f8a9176c", "evidence": "p.20 chart explicitly compares importance % vs excellence % per capability (Strategy 55% vs 20%)", "position": 4, "objective": "Show gap between perceived importance and actual excellence of capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 47, "from": 11, "beatId": "019de784-095f-73d8-bd0e-98b3a0ba82f7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Each gap proven with marketer/consumer data tables and charts", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 27, "from": 17, "beatId": "019de784-0a53-7623-b81b-8dee02bd9872", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Capabilities and culture gaps explored", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide uses a linear process flow to describe the initiative development lifecycle.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Develop hypothesis for savings opportunities by identifying pain points, assessing vs. best practices, and using external POV", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee", "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame the methodology", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented framework on the left to contextualize the current phase (Develop Hypothesis).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Title explicitly uses 'hypothesized actions'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 30, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8a7e90e0a8ee", "evidence": "Best practices for utilities, 4-step develop-test-design-scale, hypothesized actions.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame the methodology", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 60, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to guide a working session.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames opportunity hypothesis to test.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 33, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-8d5561e30f57", "evidence": "Frame issue -> utility-co example -> pilot solution -> scale -> measurable result (145).", "position": 4, "objective": "Walk through scheduling/work-plan case study", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide highlights 'Planning-Execution Alignment' with a red box, indicating it as the focus of the current exercise.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Exercise frames a testable opportunity.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "docSlug": "6dcd3449fa2bada6", "documentTitle": "Draft BCG proposal Mercury Genesis Energy", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide outlines a methodology for pathway analysis and subsequent recommendations, including stakeholder requirements (sector vs government).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Recommendations section frames 'what would need to be true for the desirable pathway to be achieved'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-02cc8d381457#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-5f8bcda39145", "evidence": "Sequential timeline (commencement -> draft -> review -> release) plus methodology and data sources stacked together", "position": 3, "objective": "Build the engagement plan from base components: timeline + methodology", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-3e06e3fd9d1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Recommendations framework + Section 5 Methodology describing data sources", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "docSlug": "5acc72be81397b34", "documentTitle": "EY Academic Resource Center – mission", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.779, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Students must generate their own question, find and ETL data, develop their own visualization and present their findings to the class.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-d65acfc8060e#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 41, "from": 32, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de8b3-2af4-779c-a8b5-4b320280d2da", "evidence": "Ten case-study cards (DuPont, TechWear, PCard, etc.) with role-based scope", "position": 4, "objective": "Showcase case-study portfolio segmented by topic", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 70, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 59, "from": 31, "beatId": "019de8b3-29ae-71c9-89c0-7849ed6739d4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Case study showcase + Peach State deep-dive walkthrough", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 70, "from": 31, "beatId": "019de8b3-2a62-76a8-a3fa-f1d2eebde7cc", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "What", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Cases, Helix tool, website, contact", "position": 3, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d96bb78b0215", "docSlug": "266229cb23b14901", "documentTitle": "Insurance Trends Growth Poland", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to show the central role of telematics integration.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Telematics determines the risk and automatically charges the driver based on: driving behavior, time of day, driving location, etc.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d96bb78b0215/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d96bb78b0215", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d96bb78b0215#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "d33a9655-41c9-4bca-9d34-3a871edbae12", "evidence": "The deck uses the golden circle to explain why insurers should focus on changing customer needs and industry trends.", "position": 0, "objective": "Why insurers should adapt to changing customer needs and industry trends", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" }, { "to": 18, "from": 15, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "fd78e57a-fd6f-48e0-b4b6-d7513a488023", "evidence": "The deck presents various opportunities for insurers to capitalize on industry trends.", "position": 2, "objective": "Identifying quick wins and big bets for insurers", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 10, "beatId": "8228e39a-904c-4094-b188-ec2514b37754", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "The deck presents various solutions, such as adapting to industry trends, leveraging technology, and adjusting product portfolios.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Weakflation' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Each region tested against three scenarios with 'most likely' verdict", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-36e2d7acbbdf", "docSlug": "2f15a00a34106933", "documentTitle": "L.E.K.’s 2024 ASC Insights Study Key takeaways for provider organizations", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented framework to map analytical inputs to strategic questions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a structured approach to analyzing local market and physician dynamics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-36e2d7acbbdf/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-36e2d7acbbdf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-36e2d7acbbdf#slide-12", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "beatId": "1d6f6293-68ea-4ae5-b16e-6e8b751fde84", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document offers strategic recommendations and calls to action", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 300, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a simple two-column structure to map research questions to specific analytical activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Two key questions served as basis for approach to understand efficacy of enforcement", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/300", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-300", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 310, "from": 299, "name": "Funnel Analysis", "slug": "32-funnel-analysis", "bestFor": "Sales optimization, customer journey, process efficiency", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-61982c2dba5b", "evidence": "311→dispatch→ASO→citation→response funnel; '60% dispatched', '44% non-response'", "position": 20, "objective": "Walk the enforcement funnel from 311 calls to citation response", "structure": "Top of Funnel -> Stage 1 Conversion -> Stage 2 Conversion -> Bottom of Funnel -> The Leak", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show progressive filtering through stages to identify where drop-off occurs" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-2441308c532f", "docSlug": "e35b4398051ce5d0", "documentTitle": "Megatrend 5 – Technology & Innovation", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses the Gartner Hype Cycle framework to categorize blockchain applications by their expected time to reach the plateau of productivity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a structured analysis of blockchain applications and their expected penetration, driven by a hypothesis about their future adoption.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-2441308c532f/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-2441308c532f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-2441308c532f#slide-33", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "docSlug": "1e4ab4ba8602a452", "documentTitle": "Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format with circular imagery to represent three distinct pillars of innovation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Slide states hypothesis whose dimensions p.10-12 will validate", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-d7a39f97403f", "evidence": "p.9 sets hypothesis (3 dimensions); p.10/11/12 each test one dimension with supporting data.", "position": 3, "objective": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 84, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-34ef45c9ad71", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Introduces three-dimensions-of-leadership framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-443e36e5c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three leadership dimensions explain the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-7edf38496e1a", "docSlug": "f25c65d04eef733b", "documentTitle": "Network and Product Design Case Study", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "Oliver Wyman", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.714, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "To support the requisite preparation for a successful network build across multiple markets and products, OW: Compiled the latest understanding of federal and state network adequacy requirements; Completed c", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-7edf38496e1a/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-7edf38496e1a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-7edf38496e1a#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "b83f90f7-5664-487d-9e1d-5e399f7e712c", "evidence": "The executive summary on page 4 and case study on page 5 outline the strategic opportunities", "position": 1, "objective": "What are the strategic opportunities to drive greater affordability and differentiation?", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "8ed38e7b-3fb6-47ee-a645-3324963a9147", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The executive summary and case study on pages 4-5 outline the impact and next steps", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706", "docSlug": "a72f1e75b0e7b746", "documentTitle": "Next Generation Manufacturing Tech Innovation", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.545, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses icon-based bar charts to represent percentage adoption.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Section opens with implicit hypothesis (India is ready) and tests it across pages", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d8401c229706#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 50, "from": 44, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-2fb9b4159e1e", "evidence": "79% adoption -> 50% process automation -> quality+cost objectives -> cobot/IIoT cases -> 75% inventory cut", "position": 5, "objective": "Cascade survey data into adoption examples and quantified prize", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 80, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 50, "from": 42, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-9d25d9a2165e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'IS INDIA READY?' surveys + adoption examples + size of prize", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 50, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-a87302312bd8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Industry 4.0 era + India-readiness + size-of-prize draw the implication", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79", "docSlug": "93405cb0c1d4b6d1", "documentTitle": "NY COVID-19 Preliminary Economic Impact Assessment", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical timeline-like structure to group assumptions by category (Epidemic, US economy, NY economy).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The Covid scenario used in this analysis makes the following, high-level assumptions:", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-42873dc46c79#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 15, "beatId": "7c9a571a-116e-4a9d-81de-16eb39846963", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides evidence and proof of the economic impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Includes a process diagram for the 'BCG Spend Cube' methodology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames Spend Cube as engine for rapid PO/invoice ingestion to test value hypotheses.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide is essentially blank, serving as a placeholder for a figure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Title: 'Initial Hypotheses for Commonwealth on Highest-Value Levers'.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "docSlug": "80cd99a578787b77", "documentTitle": "Ready for take-off Why niche markets are the next big thing", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "This slide details the assumptions and approach for three specific market value models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Assumptions used in our model:", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-50c3a80593bc#slide-32", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-770f21c01013", "docSlug": "e3bf88e2051e758a", "documentTitle": "Solving fashion’s product returns", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Figure 5: Report inputs and outputs", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide outlines a clear methodology with defined inputs and outputs.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-770f21c01013/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-770f21c01013", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-770f21c01013#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 106, "slideType": "other", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide provides a detailed textual explanation of market rules, including a specific revenue calculation example.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Principles of Forward Capacity Market auction", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/106", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-106", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 108, "from": 99, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "0be058dc-e7b4-47ae-bca3-4d757000c5b4", "evidence": "The document mentions the costs of inaction and the benefits of electricity efficiency measures.", "position": 1, "objective": "To highlight the costs of inaction on electricity efficiency measures", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 129, "from": 53, "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-bc75431f85ac", "docSlug": "fab138a975d4d266", "documentTitle": "What if all vehicles were electric?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize drivers of EV adoption.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a hypothesis about the shift to fully electrified powertrains and supports it with data and factors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-bc75431f85ac/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-bc75431f85ac", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-bc75431f85ac#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "d8a7a66c-fdb7-482c-8307-682170bb1953", "evidence": "The document presents several factors contributing to the growing importance of electric vehicles.", "position": 0, "objective": "Why is the shift to electric vehicles happening now?", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "e5e5e9e2-7b13-4a67-a3d0-b527ea6194a2", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Need", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-need", "evidence": "The document highlights the growing importance of electric vehicles and the need for industry response.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }