{ "kind": "tool", "value": "horizontal-logic", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:horizontal-logic:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 49, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 3, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "docSlug": "75154b823290a109", "documentTitle": "2021 P&C Underwriting Survey", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a consistent color palette to represent different segments across multiple charts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Demographic facets share same level of abstraction across slides.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-bc0f4a0a3ef5#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0ed-a70f-7226-8ff8-91743b09b900", "evidence": "Five slides decomposing 434 respondents by LOB, account size, age, tenure.", "position": 2, "objective": "Profile sample by line of business and account size", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a590-7188-b1af-88fa6b38bceb", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Role of Underwriter section exposes 40% time waste.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 6, "beatId": "019de0ed-a664-72ab-bbbd-ee61e005d0f0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + activity/time data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0", "docSlug": "f81129b8aa9548e2", "documentTitle": "2023 Post Parcel industry trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Figures in bold represent increase in revenue. Japan Post and Royal Mail data are for years ending March 2008, 2015, and 2022.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four buckets sit at same logical level for comparison.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de09b-0e69-7658-8384-6d369278ba77", "evidence": "CAGR tables (p10) + diversification flat (p11) + price/volume insight on mail (p12) accumulate into 'be bold' recommendation.", "position": 3, "objective": "Stack evidence that Posts have failed to grow and must act on mail", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de09b-0d55-71d0-aba7-6c3cc5abe9b7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Posts struggling, diversification flat, parcel-share loss, EV/EBIT gap, Amazon, supply-chain shift, ESG.", "position": 3, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de09b-0dee-705c-82d6-1215f0116001", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'So what is happening?' divider then 9 slides diagnosing implications.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-61f463537a59", "docSlug": "553f9f7ed73f17b3", "documentTitle": "AI in Retail", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 layout of bar charts to present survey findings on AI enablers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Four sibling categories at the same level - financial, tech, data, people", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-61f463537a59/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-61f463537a59", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-61f463537a59#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 20, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de8c4-d0bf-7252-bded-ac2bdacdd1c7", "evidence": "p20 lists critical enablers (Financial/Tech/Data/People); p21 mirrors with implementation challenges in same MECE shape.", "position": 4, "objective": "Identify capability enablers and the gaps blocking AI deployment", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de8c4-cf66-75fa-8d50-f09319359dae", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Enablers, challenges, journey patterns synthesizing what data means", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 18, "beatId": "019de8c4-d022-72de-9337-91215d95f881", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Maturity, enablers, challenges, journey data", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546", "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to contrast regional economic performance and outlooks.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Same indicator set across countries enables apples-to-apples reading.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-8083efa0dcd1", "evidence": "Six slides each present different evidence (PMI heatmap, EU mfg, policy uncertainty index, sentiment, US table, RoW outlook) all pointing at deteriorating outlook.", "position": 1, "objective": "Converge multiple macro indicators on a single conclusion: weak momentum + tariff drag", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-c4ef101612f7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary, macro KPIs, tariff timeline & waterfall — establishes what is happening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-d342bb9a9d20", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Macro economy state and existing weakness across regions.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "docSlug": "8c975254e7fcb9d0", "documentTitle": "Blurred lines FinTech 2016", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a smartphone graphic to represent the four sectors: Asset & wealth management, Banking, Fund transfer & payments, and Insurance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "promises parallel sector treatments at the same level", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-0c97b0f6ced7#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019de951-2a2d-744c-8950-2b85f6ae5e2f", "evidence": "Bubble charts on p10/11/13/14 with axes Level of importance and Likelihood to respond.", "position": 2, "objective": "Map FinTech trends per sector on importance × likelihood-to-respond", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de951-28d9-73c0-a1cd-92b6d6ffdc9f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "trend frameworks per sector + blockchain so-what synthesis", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de951-2986-745c-9f3f-7a5bb1313f09", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ecosystem, methodology, sector trend data", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443", "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a", "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide includes a specific chart (Figure 1) showing growth trends for Total FMCG, Food and beverage, and Personal and home care from 2011 to 2017.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categories sit at the same level of abstraction within FMCG aggregate.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-b8ec761c98d8", "evidence": "Aggregate growth → packaged food vs beverage vs personal care vs home care, each with own dynamics.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose aggregate FMCG growth across the four product sectors", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-60a90fe6abec", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Premiumization analysis (4% price rise) plus 2x2 of price vs volume strategies.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-6f0f96582676", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Twelve+ charts presenting market value, volume, ASP, channel share.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443", "docSlug": "a5a9cbfc3acd8b7a", "documentTitle": "China Shopper 2018 Vol 1", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "geographic_map", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide includes a legend for growth rates and a note about data limitations for specific provinces.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Geographic split sits at same level alongside category and channel cuts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f88e1d285443#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 14, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-be7d48f787d5", "evidence": "Geographic heatmap then explicit 2x2 with 'Raise price' vs 'Increase volume' quadrants for 26 categories.", "position": 3, "objective": "Map premiumization strategies on price vs volume axes", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 88, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-60a90fe6abec", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Premiumization analysis (4% price rise) plus 2x2 of price vs volume strategies.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-6f0f96582676", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Twelve+ charts presenting market value, volume, ASP, channel share.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391", "docSlug": "bf11fb5514698fcd", "documentTitle": "Constraints to growth: supply chain risks facing renewables Presentation", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure to contrast historical growth, policy drivers, and future forecasts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Three columns at same logical level: history / driver / forecast", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-0356a0f80391#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019de7de-f276-70ea-ae54-a93b1899faea", "evidence": "Solar framing (p4), interconnection (p5-6), labor (p7), equipment (p8), heatmap synthesis (p9)", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the constraint question into three sub-questions and synthesize answer", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de7de-f0ba-76c9-845b-762ae9439e39", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Solar-as-example shows shift from cost to capacity lens", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 4, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de7de-f191-710a-86fd-9ad3e0e81f6f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Capacity additions and cost-vs-capacity charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "docSlug": "2862941a98bffda6", "documentTitle": "Corporate Ventures in Sweden", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a variation of the Ansoff Matrix or a Technology-Market innovation grid.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens MECE breakdown loop: vehicles partition the innovation space.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d3738a63434c#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-d961b1a1cab4", "evidence": "CV positioned in Ansoff matrix, contrasted with M&A, then split into 3 vehicles × 7 industries.", "position": 3, "objective": "Introduce Corporate Venturing as a complementary, MECE-decomposed solution space", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-c40e152757b5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "CV expands Ansoff matrix; three vehicles (CVC, accelerators, labs) by industry.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570", "docSlug": "8141e074e67aa064", "documentTitle": "Distress Alert July 2024", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The chart displays distress percentages for various sectors, with Fashion Retail at 14.6% and Automotive at 4.4%.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens sector loop where each industry slide sits at same analytical level", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-fbbca78a5042", "evidence": "Aggregate '10 of 16 industries' splits into Fashion Retail, Media, Chemical, Construction deep dives with comparable metric tables.", "position": 2, "objective": "Segment distress by industry to surface worst-affected sectors", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-3872265fa326", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Sector + country deep dives with KPI tables and trend data", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-47c15ccb08d4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Distress data across geographies and sectors", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570", "docSlug": "8141e074e67aa064", "documentTitle": "Distress Alert July 2024", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "country_insights", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a background network graphic and a grid of squares at the bottom, likely for branding or layout consistency.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens country loop where each country sits at same analytical level", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-07323ef76570#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 13, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-fe48a4ead71b", "evidence": "Section divider names top 3 distressed markets, then 8 country deep dives with parallel KPI tables.", "position": 3, "objective": "Segment distress by country to surface worst-affected markets", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-3872265fa326", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Sector + country deep dives with KPI tables and trend data", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-47c15ccb08d4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Distress data across geographies and sectors", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-074faefcc6d5", "docSlug": "7b6d0579848000f1", "documentTitle": "Education: 2021 Deal Round-up and Trends to Watch Out For in 2022", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "LEK", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "6 parallel themes presented at same logical level", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-074faefcc6d5/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-074faefcc6d5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-074faefcc6d5#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 8, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de7e4-a162-73fc-8515-111cec5dc70a", "evidence": "p8 splits 6 numbered themes into Traditional vs Edtech columns; p9-15 supply one evidence slide per theme.", "position": 2, "objective": "Break the 2022 outlook into 6 MECE themes (3 traditional + 3 tech-enabled) and prove each", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de7e4-9f57-77ac-b23b-53ee935af3ef", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "6 bullish themes for 2022 framed (p8)", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 8, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de7e4-a073-76b4-a739-b4acef067d1b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "6 bullish themes proposed (p8)", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-600ee98008c1", "docSlug": "7b4b56ddadbdec17", "documentTitle": "e-mobility in India", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The diagram is a hub-and-spoke circular model representing an ecosystem.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Six pillars sit at the same level of abstraction", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-600ee98008c1/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-600ee98008c1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-600ee98008c1#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 9, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019de9aa-aadc-7738-993a-1ed5d0969fc7", "evidence": "Ecosystem framework -> policy timeline -> FAME-II diagnosis -> state policies -> 2x2 scenarios", "position": 2, "objective": "Frame India regulatory landscape and four future scenarios", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de9aa-a985-7061-928a-257b9c44d388", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Holistic ecosystem need, FAME-II target -97%, state policies, scenario 2x2", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de9aa-aa42-74aa-a97b-f20f3be10462", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Market data, regulations, FAME-II underperformance", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "docSlug": "cb6397350c432cb3", "documentTitle": "Global Consumer Insights March 2021", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "context", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a split-screen layout with a high-contrast pink background for text and a lifestyle photo on the right to illustrate the 'at-home worker' theme.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens parallel structure that p11/p15/p18 will repeat", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de99a-4f54-70fa-b79f-6c81a05226e5", "evidence": "p7 frames at-home vs away-from-home; p8-10 contrast spending, channel and ESG behaviour by segment", "position": 2, "objective": "Split consumers by work-location to surface the 'Zoom effect' segment", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4de8-7736-b857-4f15c5c32c20", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four 'fault line' segments with 'Our insight:' callouts on p7-20", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 7, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4eb2-775b-b5fd-8168e293e056", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four fault lines framework introduced as lens", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "docSlug": "cb6397350c432cb3", "documentTitle": "Global Consumer Insights March 2021", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Repeats fault-line divider pattern from p7 - parallel structure", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 11, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de99a-4f82-756d-aea7-a6cab09e3c4b", "evidence": "p11 fault-line divider; p12-14 compare Gen Z / Millennials / Gen X / Boomers across mobile, spending and priorities", "position": 3, "objective": "Split consumers by generation to expose generational shopping divergence", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4de8-7736-b857-4f15c5c32c20", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four 'fault line' segments with 'Our insight:' callouts on p7-20", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 20, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de99a-4edb-7017-b746-1afcaf02b08c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-segment data tables, charts and insights", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "docSlug": "cb6397350c432cb3", "documentTitle": "Global Consumer Insights March 2021", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": "Part of a series of 'fault lines' in consumer behavior.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Third repetition of fault-line divider template", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de99a-4fab-700c-ad73-ea7d1832e191", "evidence": "p15 introduces cohort; p16-17 contrast cohort vs global sample on in-store and willingness-to-pay", "position": 4, "objective": "Split out a 'conscientious cohort' vs the global sample on health/safety and ESG", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 87, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4de8-7736-b857-4f15c5c32c20", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four 'fault line' segments with 'Our insight:' callouts on p7-20", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 20, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de99a-4edb-7017-b746-1afcaf02b08c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-segment data tables, charts and insights", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "docSlug": "cb6397350c432cb3", "documentTitle": "Global Consumer Insights March 2021", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": "Part of a PwC Global Consumer Insights Pulse Survey deck.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Fourth repetition of fault-line divider format", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-53ad5323c600#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de99a-4fd2-7119-b81c-c975daaa45aa", "evidence": "p18 East-West framing; p19 regional map; p20 ESG-vs-safety table by region", "position": 5, "objective": "Split consumers by region to show Asia-Pacific divergence on frequency and ESG", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 86, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019de99a-4de8-7736-b857-4f15c5c32c20", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Four 'fault line' segments with 'Our insight:' callouts on p7-20", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 20, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de99a-4edb-7017-b746-1afcaf02b08c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Per-segment data tables, charts and insights", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c66a2cdd7552", "docSlug": "f8bfee80c2da803c", "documentTitle": "Investor Analyst Conference", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Ten sibling growth priorities listed at the same hierarchy level", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c66a2cdd7552/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c66a2cdd7552", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-c66a2cdd7552#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-9bbbb8e479c0", "evidence": "p7 lists 10 Strategic Growth Priorities; p8 quantifies them; p9 splits revenue across 11 countries and 10 industries", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose growth across Strategic Growth Priorities, geographies and industries", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-a0ed43c87cd5", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover, KPI step-up, three-pillar message, market outperformance, growth model and breadth", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-681727efcd3a", "docSlug": "f956eb83f2bbf1a0", "documentTitle": "Mastering Marketing Measurement", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "other", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to align time-based activities with strategic, tactical, and operational goals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop opens MECE breakdown; columns are coherent peers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-681727efcd3a/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-681727efcd3a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-681727efcd3a#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-9bdde68288db", "evidence": "Framework on p3 (Align/Modernize/Wire) then 6 MECE actions explained, capped by p9 summary.", "position": 1, "objective": "Decompose effective measurement into 3 buckets x 6 distinct actions", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-e1a6467bbd19", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Framework on p3 then 6 actions described p4-8", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "docSlug": "606681d272d16554", "documentTitle": "PwC’s 2019 actuarial robotic process automation (RPA) survey report", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes a navigation breadcrumb at the bottom indicating this is part of a larger survey report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Sibling chart slides at same MECE level (function categories).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-de2237a0e5b5#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de91d-974a-77f1-985f-dea127559a33", "evidence": "Six consecutive bar/stacked-bar slides each showing low current RPA usage across a different function category, all reinforcing the same pattern.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show RPA adoption is early-stage and fragmented across actuarial functions", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 78, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de91d-9648-777a-a3e3-14bff9f462cc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey methodology + 9 chart slides quantifying RPA usage, governance, skills.", "position": 4, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de91d-96c7-746d-b5c0-bae04f41cb6c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology plus chart-heavy data section establishing what insurers are doing.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The matrix uses Revenue Growth (CAGR) on the x-axis and Profitability (EBT margin) on the y-axis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Five segments at same level form MECE decomposition.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-0f518333654e", "evidence": "Figure 2 splits 1,615 firms into five revenue x profit groups; insight is the 15%.", "position": 2, "objective": "Segment companies into five performance groups", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-f8d22b440add", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Four pressing questions; only 15% achieve long-term profitable growth.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a", "docSlug": "8ba6a60b371fba68", "documentTitle": "Winning the EV Charging Race", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a circular diagram to represent the 'Winning CPO of the future' at the intersection of the three pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "First page of MECE loop — three pillars sit at same level of abstraction.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-aab62a36bb0a#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 4, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-44b1ce5940fe", "evidence": "p4 introduces 3 pillars; p5 Customer Centricity, p6 Right Locations, p7 Operational Excellence — one slide per pillar.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose CPO success into three MECE excellence pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-86880cb7079f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three Pillars framework introduced; Customer Centricity deep dive.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-efa919014b55", "docSlug": "bdc5a954691805fc", "documentTitle": "World at inflection 2025 FDI Exec Summary", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.678, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The chart uses color coding to distinguish between 'Market asset and infrastructure factors' and 'Governance and regulatory factors'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop start: pp5-7 are parallel survey-finding facets at same level.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-efa919014b55/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-efa919014b55", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-efa919014b55#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de7ca-4267-75ed-8243-11c74abd6b94", "evidence": "p5 priorities + p6 risks + p7 regional sentiment - three pieces of survey evidence pointing to uncertainty.", "position": 2, "objective": "Stack survey data points into a pattern of investor concern in an inflection world", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 55, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7ca-40fb-73a9-9b8a-22ed8e61ff63", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Why scores moved: drivers, risks, EU regional sentiment.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 5, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7ca-41dd-72bc-adb2-ed03a0823f42", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Decision-factor drivers behind the scores.", "position": 3, "confidence": 40, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-f35ef4572dde", "docSlug": "8f5a474934f3e2ec", "documentTitle": "World recalibrating 2026 FDI", "authorId": "Kearney", "authorName": "Kearney", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.678, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "regional_insights", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide provides a narrative analysis of regional shifts in the 2026 FDI Confidence Index.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop 2 segments narrative regionally with parallel paragraph blocks.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-f35ef4572dde/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-f35ef4572dde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-f35ef4572dde#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de7d0-dbce-75da-a0cd-a0431f9e6d1f", "evidence": "Splits emerging markets out (pp.13-15 dedicated rankings, bump chart, drivers) and contrasts segment-specific behaviour.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show how emerging markets behave as a distinct segment", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de7d0-d9e8-74ce-98ca-d89b5208cb3d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Rankings, bump charts, heatmaps and driver bars present the quantitative findings.", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de7d0-dae7-73b5-a8d0-79adeedd62ce", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Emerging-market segmentation and driver-importance bar chart.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }