{
  "kind": "tool",
  "value": "hicks-law",
  "collectionKey": "slides:tool:hicks-law:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 2,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435",
      "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.401,
      "pageNumber": 53,
      "slideType": "initiative_list",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide uses a stacked table visual to represent a large volume of initiatives.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Highlights need to reduce 100+ options to manageable set.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/53",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-53",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 58,
          "from": 53,
          "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
          "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
          "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-0ec52c8f107a",
          "evidence": "p53-54 prioritize 110 opportunities, sequence ~40 near-term; p56-58 EPMO + tracking tools.",
          "position": 10,
          "objective": "Prioritize ~110 opportunities and stand up EPMO governance to execute",
          "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 68,
          "from": 50,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-f39a4bb1bd76",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Implementation plan, EPMO, risks, progress to date — closes with 'continued commitment'.",
          "position": 5,
          "confidence": 95,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79",
      "docSlug": "2deda760ae33148f",
      "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 13,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a decision tree structure to categorize strategic paths for LLM implementation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Choice pre-narrowed to three labelled paths",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79/13",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79#slide-13",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 12,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-0e904367bedb",
          "evidence": "Three forks (build new / enhance / fine-tune) with cost comparison and timing decision.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Choose model build path and timing",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-806906270882",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "Pillars 1 (golden use cases, model choice) and 2 (workforce, org) worked through",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        },
        {
          "to": 28,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-93235f2deb66",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Use case selection, workforce reshape, risk surface",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}