{ "kind": "tool", "value": "framing-effect", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:framing-effect:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 42, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-dbfe56fadd00", "docSlug": "4106ec6c4dc6c3d8", "documentTitle": "2024 Making Reinvention Real with Gen AI", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes responsible AI from compliance burden to value driver", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-dbfe56fadd00/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-dbfe56fadd00", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-dbfe56fadd00#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 5, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019de055-5811-771f-bd8b-812e6e6d47e4", "evidence": "Section divider names 'five imperatives'; pp.6–15 deliver each one with paired case study", "position": 2, "objective": "Walk the five MECE imperatives, each proven by a case", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de055-5676-7485-8909-2537ce06eda0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Divider then 5 imperatives with embedded proofs", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 15, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de055-57ac-758b-b58a-1f6a3a7d5be4", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "5 imperatives + case studies form the bridge", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-5164ae0b8a6c", "docSlug": "07ab1bf67211fb59", "documentTitle": "2025 Nigeria Budget and Economic Outlook", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "Strategy&", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 36, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Dual-axis chart comparing Federal Funds, ECB, and BOE rates (LHS) against Nigeria's MPR (RHS).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a comparison of interest rates, which can be seen as a framing effect to highlight the difference in monetary policies between advanced economies and Nigeria.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-5164ae0b8a6c/36", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-5164ae0b8a6c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-5164ae0b8a6c#slide-36", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 31, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de8b6-0d33-74d2-8a4a-cf7b00559a26", "evidence": "Wheel highlights investments then remittance, capital importation, sector inflows and ASI charts converge on confidence theme.", "position": 4, "objective": "Stack remittance, capital, ASI evidence to diagnose investment attraction", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 11, "beatId": "019de8b6-0be4-7728-9b96-ba6dfabb5720", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Critical issues divider then seven-pillar diagnosis across fiscal, monetary, investment, consumer, real sector, social, global", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 69, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de8b6-0c7b-7222-8e66-8934bb03c539", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Macro dashboards, sector charts, seven-issue diagnosis", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41", "docSlug": "a888efab1defd2b2", "documentTitle": "2025 Sovereign AI report", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes globalisation itself as 'rewired for sovereignty'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-e8f1ef5d4b41#slide-20", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de0ac-14ac-718e-afbd-b5a0594f35ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Globalization rewired closing thought + Sovereignty Maturity Index leaderboard", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 21, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de0ac-152e-72ec-b512-dec3f20acaa8", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sovereignty as driver of competitiveness; named industry/country leaders", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-b0b628170f59", "docSlug": "1a3aa14e877aa887", "documentTitle": "Accenture Post and Parcel Industry Research 2019", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2-style categorization logic (Digital vs Financial performance) presented as a list.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "introduces 4-segment digital taxonomy that frames p35-36", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-b0b628170f59/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-b0b628170f59", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-b0b628170f59#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 33, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019de07b-569b-707d-bc65-a822ec037103", "evidence": "p33 3x3 matrix of digital initiatives, p35 2x2 plots 4 maturity quadrants, p36 90% strategy vs 13-35% execution.", "position": 5, "objective": "Locate post & parcel players on a digital maturity curve and quantify the strategy-execution gap", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 22, "beatId": "019de07b-536b-73c6-8450-b655d3488177", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Strategy-by-strategy Top10/Mid10/Bottom11 benchmarks plus digital maturity 2x2", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 36, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de07b-54a7-72ff-a7ba-988b9b14b75e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Sections 02-03 derive what high performers do differently", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216", "docSlug": "5415c04bdc8a86e3", "documentTitle": "Agile Innovation Brief", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide contrasts Agile vs. Traditional across six dimensions: Market environment, Customer involvement, Innovation type, Modularity of work, Impact of interim mistakes, and Corporate culture.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames choice as situational fit not ideology, defusing 'Agile is hype' objection.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-f14bc60149f1", "evidence": "Table 'Conditions favorable to Agile vs. traditional methods' with two opposing columns across six dimensions.", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Agile-friendly vs traditional-friendly conditions", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-6eceeb01a2fb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Waterfall vs Agile table, three impediments, conditions-favorable framework.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 14, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-8136de322fe4", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "When-Agile-works conditions, 5 pillars, value-bridge math from concurrent to focused.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "docSlug": "a13515c298f3fbf2", "documentTitle": "ALTAGAMMA 2018 WORLDWIDE LUXURY MARKET MONITOR", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The chart uses a timeline-based bar chart structure to show market value in billions of Euros over time, segmented by historical market phases.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames the year via TUNA acronym (Turbulence-Uncertainty-Novelty-Ambiguity).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-41de656a4417#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-cb334407de8e", "evidence": "p7 explicitly forks Better vs Realistic 2023; p8 contrasts crises; p9 projects 2030.", "position": 2, "objective": "Project personal luxury through 2023 scenarios into 2030", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 78, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-47ac081726a9", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Global luxury sizing, recovery vs 2019, scenarios to 2030.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-5a02795721a6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Market sizing and recovery facts laid out.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-ca3f17dd9f7e", "docSlug": "56575e7d1b649e88", "documentTitle": "A NEW WORLD DISORDER?", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 59, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Part of a series of trend slides; includes navigation bar at the top.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide components mention 'good for me personally' and 'good for my country', indicating a framing effect.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-ca3f17dd9f7e/59", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-ca3f17dd9f7e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-ca3f17dd9f7e#slide-59", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 90, "from": 10, "beatId": "31f13053-3b4a-483a-a23d-b0346385fcf2", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The deck provides satisfaction by presenting trends and data to support the need.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546", "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 40, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a 4-column matrix structure to categorize strategic actions based on decision triggers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Decisions framed by conditionality ('Do if X') anchors choices to scenario triggers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/40", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-40", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 38, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-9dd440a9dd3f", "evidence": "Resilience pillars (p.38) -> capability questions (p.39) -> p.40 explicitly splits 'No regret decisions' / 'No regret capability investment' from 'Do if recession unfolds' / 'Do if policies shift structurally' — quick wins vs big bets.", "position": 8, "objective": "Move from resilience framework to sequenced no-regret vs conditional decisions", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 38, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-cecc762e112d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Resilience pillars and no-regret decision matrix — what executives should do.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 40, "from": 40, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-e26342c0ba7f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "No-regret vs conditional decision matrix for executives.", "position": 5, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-24eb70073ae3", "docSlug": "0ae7fc01f78df562", "documentTitle": "article thebeatmar2025", "authorId": "MorganStanley", "authorName": "Morgan Stanley", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-chart layout to contrast historical PMI trends with recent downward revisions in 2025 GDP growth forecasts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a comparison of EU GDP forecasts and the impact of tariffs, which could be related to a framing effect.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-24eb70073ae3/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-24eb70073ae3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-24eb70073ae3#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "c00d8fbe-f904-4a7d-825b-7a2d4648e40e", "evidence": "The document emphasizes the benefits of adapting portfolios to the evolving market landscape.", "position": 1, "objective": "Highlight the potential costs of not adjusting portfolios in response to market changes.", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "789c8a0e-afc2-4b46-ad06-fc102247e940", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Satisfaction", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-satisfaction", "evidence": "The document provides detailed analysis and recommendations, offering solutions to address the identified needs.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "RODI stands for Return on Digital Investment. OES likely refers to Original Equipment Suppliers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Same deficits reframed as 'opportunity' not 'risk.'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 17, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019de0c4-9510-7124-82ef-7eb4572980c2", "evidence": "p17 sizes loss bands (>5% cost/talent), p18 sizes incremental RODI from closing the same deficits.", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify what's lost by inaction vs gained by closing deficits", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 88, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 14, "beatId": "019de0c4-9431-756b-86ed-e47000952195", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "diagnosis of deficits and cost vs gain of acting", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-cf67a5338b7d", "docSlug": "23841d2aca5dae77", "documentTitle": "Beyond 2021: How to Get Ahead and Stay Ahead", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a Penrose triangle illustration to represent the concept of 'Liquid Infrastructure'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "How and where we get things changed a lot in 2020. People started spending more time and money shopping online and in their neighborhood so they could avoid travel, and prioritize their communities over global delivery.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-cf67a5338b7d/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-cf67a5338b7d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-cf67a5338b7d#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-a048cf515f0c", "evidence": "Seven parallel trend slides (p3-9) collectively support the deck's pattern conclusion that organisations must adapt to a remade landscape.", "position": 1, "objective": "Build a renaissance thesis from seven evidence trends", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-efe6d85b69f6", "arcName": "Voyage and Return", "arcSlug": "voyage-return", "beatName": "Discoveries", "beatSlug": "voyage-return-discoveries", "evidence": "Six further trends explored as discoveries (DIY Innovation through Rituals).", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-07ddcfe5ff9e", "arcName": "Rebirth", "arcSlug": "rebirth", "beatName": "Transformation", "beatSlug": "rebirth-transformation", "evidence": "Trends 3-7 are organisational transformations across teams, brand, supply chain, empathy, ritual.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "docSlug": "5582858f8334e55e", "documentTitle": "Boardroom Agenda 2022", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Callout frames issue as incentives-vs-fairness tradeoff", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de9b0-8579-76b1-8236-862df2a21979", "evidence": "Sustained UK-vs-IoM comparisons across persona scenarios and tax cap data.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare UK fiscal regime vs Isle of Man tax position", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de9b0-83ea-7658-8565-576b8f008947", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Disruption grid p.4, tax facts pp.7-12, ESG definitions pp.21-22", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de9b0-848a-745d-846a-a226fc4d2093", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Macro context grid plus tax/ESG context-setting", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "docSlug": "5582858f8334e55e", "documentTitle": "Boardroom Agenda 2022", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Callout frames ESG as access to lower-cost capital", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 21, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019de9b0-85c8-71c1-a115-bab30eb7c91b", "evidence": "$20Tr demand stat, $50Tr mandate, lower-cost-of-capital question.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show the rising commercial cost of ignoring ESG", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 70, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de9b0-8412-77cc-9cd3-12ab4aa2f586", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ESG investor data, breach costs, workforce volatility surveys", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 34, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de9b0-84b1-7114-ad1a-ba14cb9fa216", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ESG capital pressure, breach costs, 'yesterday's cyber model' quote", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "docSlug": "5582858f8334e55e", "documentTitle": "Boardroom Agenda 2022", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "quote_slide", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Frames problem as outdated operating model", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 31, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019de9b0-8617-7610-83a5-8c5f9db81d35", "evidence": "Risk-moments list, $10.10M breach cost chart, 'yesterday's cyber model' quote.", "position": 6, "objective": "Establish that cyber risk is escalating and current models fail", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 75, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de9b0-8412-77cc-9cd3-12ab4aa2f586", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ESG investor data, breach costs, workforce volatility surveys", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 34, "from": 23, "beatId": "019de9b0-84b1-7114-ad1a-ba14cb9fa216", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ESG capital pressure, breach costs, 'yesterday's cyber model' quote", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "docSlug": "5582858f8334e55e", "documentTitle": "Boardroom Agenda 2022", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 55, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights a perception gap between HR and non-HR leaders regarding HR's effectiveness.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes HR effectiveness as a stakeholder-perception gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c/55", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-65e903950e8c#slide-55", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 56, "from": 45, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019de9b0-868b-703f-b575-8972dcea0bf5", "evidence": "Six numbered imperatives p.45 expanded across pp.46-56 with chart-per-move.", "position": 9, "objective": "Walk through six workforce moves with supporting evidence", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 70, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 45, "beatId": "019de9b0-8439-73b2-b4f4-0763e10b9951", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Six imperatives + tactical recommendations + contact CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 55, "from": 46, "beatId": "019de9b0-8502-72b8-a372-fabb8ce1bf04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey-driven bar charts justifying each move", "position": 4, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-63c0d4580685", "docSlug": "29e814a7b88350c2", "documentTitle": "cx global insights 2025 ipsos sneak peek", "authorId": "IPSOS", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The percentages do not sum to 100%, suggesting these categories may not be mutually exclusive or exhaustive in the source data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Half-good framing recasts mediocre data as opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-63c0d4580685/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-63c0d4580685", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-63c0d4580685#slide-9", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 9, "beatId": "019debe0-34ef-769d-8770-4a5212dffe0b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "State-of-CX donuts, Forces-of-CX framework, scatter validates predictive power", "position": 4, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 9, "from": 3, "beatId": "019debe0-3570-765c-bb12-11457eda1527", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Scope and finding slides reporting what the research shows", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-8d796c361b8f", "docSlug": "72175b19b60e1794", "documentTitle": "id19 an effective approach 3 case studies", "authorId": "CreditSuisse", "authorName": "CPA Australia", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.704, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "situation_overview", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "This slide appears to be a page from a case study or report, featuring extensive footnotes and narrative text.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The quote 'With this new model in place, \"risk lost its independence\" in Credit Suisse' frames the issue in a certain way.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-8d796c361b8f/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-8d796c361b8f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-8d796c361b8f#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 5, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "c5b2b6f5-fd86-4850-8011-673600ab92cb", "evidence": "Discussion of Credit Suisse's crisis and remedial actions", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlighting the consequences of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 9, "beatId": "bfbeb355-a5de-4f52-ad39-d01ddc0e8410", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Remedial actions and case studies", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-5e1f419886fc", "docSlug": "350fda40086bd172", "documentTitle": "IPSOS EQUALITIES INDEX 2023", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart is a stacked bar chart showing three categories of sentiment per country.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents data on public sentiment on equality promotion, using a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of opinions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-5e1f419886fc/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-5e1f419886fc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-5e1f419886fc#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "efdce820-721e-4023-8105-b9ee26415fb6", "evidence": "The document identifies patterns in public perceptions of equality", "position": 0, "objective": "Understanding public perceptions of equality", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "1a820df4-c2e0-402f-b564-d8326c1953e2", "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence", "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence", "beatName": "Need", "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-need", "evidence": "The document highlights the need to address inequality", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes underspend as missed opportunity rather than prudence.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-07f0c943a58e", "evidence": "1.7% Canada vs US, 5% current-vs-optimal TV gap, $1.4B missed.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify Canada-vs-optimal spend gap and missed sales", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b1bdf31f78b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "5 insights, 1.7% spend, 5% TV gap, $1.4B missed sales.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c323f729f0d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Study scope and Canadian spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-2147b7216218", "docSlug": "2fa8e7e42ea84c3f", "documentTitle": "PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide contrasts the warning from Allianz board member Günther Thallinger with the current political climate and specific news headlines regarding ESG.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide discusses implications of climate change perceptions for brands, indicating a framing of the issue.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-2147b7216218/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-2147b7216218", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-2147b7216218#slide-21", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-e39d4eeb1de3", "docSlug": "a1fcd1992930ac04", "documentTitle": "PwC’s 24th Annual Global CEO Survey", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "Includes a quote from Jeroen Drost (SHV Holdings) and a key metric regarding CEO concern about tax policy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "A new era of compromise. The tone of taxpolicy discussion, especially during challenging economic times, tends towards the confrontational.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-e39d4eeb1de3/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-e39d4eeb1de3", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-e39d4eeb1de3#slide-15", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de922-8728-76cc-82d0-d002cabb2489", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Thematic chapters interpret data: climate, cyber, digital, productivity, tax", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 16, "from": 15, "beatId": "019de922-8802-73ca-ad7f-e91eb2123e47", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Tax-policy and US-vs-China growth-market data exhibits", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9", "docSlug": "3adfc3a384e33148", "documentTitle": "The Evolving State of Digital Transformation", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare funding expectations across 8 industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes good news (more funding) as a discipline imperative.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-87f7b5d17942", "evidence": "p.11 establishes urgency, p.12 shows acceleration, p.13 shows funding will rise but with stricter policy — classic context/trigger/window.", "position": 3, "objective": "Use COVID-19 as the trigger event opening a window of opportunity", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-1c291d6086d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "COVID makes transformation more urgent, funding rises but with scrutiny.", "position": 2, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-2e32b55132f2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Acceleration of transformation with stricter funding discipline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-56e5bab88a58", "docSlug": "a80b9200ca2efa21", "documentTitle": "Transport & Logistics Barometer", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide combines a narrative on supply chain diversification (China +1) with a geographic map showing import growth rates and Chinese port influence.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Reframes EU-China decoupling as illusion rather than fact.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-56e5bab88a58/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-56e5bab88a58", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-56e5bab88a58#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 20, "name": "Myth Buster", "slug": "12-myth-buster", "bestFor": "Rebranding, changing market perception, correcting false assumptions", "matchId": "019de8ba-d39a-75bf-bfec-d217deef0d42", "evidence": "Slide 20 title literally calls it 'The illusion of independence from China'; pp 21-22 prove via BRI investment data; pp 23-24 quantify SEA deal flow.", "position": 4, "objective": "Bust the myth that EU has decoupled from China", "structure": "The Common Belief -> The Friction/Failure of that Belief -> The New Truth", "confidence": 85, "description": "Address a common misconception head-on to clear the room for a new truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de8ba-d241-7088-ae83-e1e148a33d58", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "China/SEA section reframes data as strategic implication.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 22, "from": 20, "beatId": "019de8ba-d2e2-72ad-9199-0a1008e37a38", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Chinese investment scrutiny in SEA.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-811b68b5c1f1", "docSlug": "599c8a37cac7abcb", "documentTitle": "What if the eurozone were to enter a recession? Roland Berger Institute", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart combines bar charts for debt and line charts for expenditure, with a clear distinction between historical data and forecasts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "potentially leading to even higher inflation rates", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-811b68b5c1f1/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-811b68b5c1f1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ddf-7308-8fca-811b68b5c1f1#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "defbde5a-c09c-41a4-bb05-1a045556d783", "evidence": "The document implies that inaction could lead to significant economic costs.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the potential costs of inaction in the face of a recession?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "beatId": "52cc3e38-c884-4ca7-bfd1-a74e46ab48ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses the potential impacts and next steps on pages 8-9.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }