{ "kind": "tool", "value": "five-whys", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:five-whys:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 7, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216", "docSlug": "5415c04bdc8a86e3", "documentTitle": "Agile Innovation Brief", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide is text-heavy, functioning as a page from a report or whitepaper rather than a traditional presentation slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Drills below 'companies reluctant to adopt' to surface three root causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9341c5941216#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 8, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-ef4c4c9d670f", "evidence": "Surfaces three impediments (methodology, mgmt support, principle/operating-model fit) under 'Keys to success'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Diagnose the root causes behind Agile adoption failures", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 75, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-6eceeb01a2fb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Waterfall vs Agile table, three impediments, conditions-favorable framework.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-7d1cc1f1cdef", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Agile delivers fast iterative value; NPR/Mission Bell wins.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to show the extent of the challenge and a ranked list to explain the underlying causes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Ranked board-refusal reasons drill into why funding fails.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 15, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019de0c4-94ea-75be-aab9-a1bc92dce15b", "evidence": "Funding-roadblock chart with ranked refusal reasons (p15) plus heatmap of alignment/skill challenges (p16).", "position": 4, "objective": "Diagnose the root causes blocking Contenders/Cadets", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 78, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 14, "beatId": "019de0c4-9431-756b-86ed-e47000952195", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "diagnosis of deficits and cost vs gain of acting", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "docSlug": "3712a907c7b695bb", "documentTitle": "Blueprint for Service Success", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a split layout with a purple sidebar for context and a white main area for the core problem diagnosis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Asks 'What's causing the most difficulty as they pivot?'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 11, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-b0b1569a410f", "evidence": "Symptom (lack capabilities) -> root causes (poor investment focus, weak management practices).", "position": 4, "objective": "Diagnose root causes of pivoting failure", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 80, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-1093ce9b9880", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Pivoting pitfalls section: 57% lack capabilities; challenges by category.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-24644cf09a2d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Pivoting pitfalls; capability gaps.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 66, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like bridge to show the transition from 'All Jobs' to a detailed breakdown of 'Jobs with false starts'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Asks for root causes - Five-Whys-style probing.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/66", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-66", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 65, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-a34dd296b278", "evidence": "Case setup -> root-cause questions -> quarterly alignment improvement -> pilot process.", "position": 9, "objective": "Utility Co planning-execution precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 75, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "docSlug": "427acb0947e20afd", "documentTitle": "Everyday Moments of Truth", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative bar chart to highlight the decline in positive sentiment among experienced women.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Drills past surface symptom into deeper systemic causes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-05a595f93792", "evidence": "Section 1 explicitly names 'three critical areas': ideal worker stereotypes, lack of supervisory support, too few role models.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose erosion into three distinct root causes", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-b92ba070937d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "eNPS gap quantified, 3 root causes diagnosed (stereotypes/support/role models)", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 11, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-cb8f2a78f80c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Section 1 + setup: data on the gap and its causes", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "docSlug": "78bb0ae4454c2778", "documentTitle": "Socio-economic case for deepening solar PV deployment in Nigeria", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a two-part comparison: the first chart shows reliance on PHCs, the second shows the service gap at PHCs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Drilling from 'low ANC' down to PHC constraints", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-4d41740ce8bb#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 29, "from": 21, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-898f3bf5cee6", "evidence": "Current ANC ~50% vs peer ~70% (p23); solar deployment closes gap by 10-20%pt and cuts vaccine waste 40-60%", "position": 5, "objective": "Health dimension: current PHC reality vs solar-enabled future", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8370f154005a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Health, Education, Food security, Environment, Trade dimension chapters", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 76, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-8ddb0b48fe56", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Lost ANC coverage, study hours, food, MSME revenue, GHG emissions piled up", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25", "docSlug": "9b24bcd38f15752d", "documentTitle": "The Hidden Value of Culture Makers", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 3D bar chart to visualize survey results from leaders regarding barriers to setting inclusion targets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Title literally asks 'why culture is low on the list' and lists root causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-6d41c9349b25#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-f16c88664cfc", "evidence": "Divider 'Prioritize culture' then 21% priority stat and four-bar barrier breakdown (42/40/38/33).", "position": 6, "objective": "Diagnose hurdles to prioritizing culture", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-23ee040a3416", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "$3.7T sizing, Culture Makers 2.2x/3.2x results, root-cause hurdles.", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }