{ "kind": "tool", "value": "fishbone-diagram-ishikawa", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:fishbone-diagram-ishikawa:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 15, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-2a6327867e00", "docSlug": "77728cfa6cd0f1b1", "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Supply Chains Unlocking potential from AI and GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to map risks to mitigation strategies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorized risk drivers (privacy, reliability, fragmentation, talent, data)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-2a6327867e00/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-2a6327867e00", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-2a6327867e00#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 16, "name": "Pre Mortem", "slug": "19-pre-mortem", "bestFor": "Project kick-offs, risk management, building trust with skeptical stakeholders", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-4995aac76f1e", "evidence": "5 risk columns each paired with 'Example mitigating actions'", "position": 7, "objective": "Surface limitations & mitigations", "structure": "The Future Disaster (Hypothetical) -> What Went Wrong -> The Prevention Plan", "confidence": 86, "description": "Build trust by anticipating failure modes before they happen and solving them in advance" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-01d2c64d6a29", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Process/role/tech before-after detail plus risk register", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 18, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-1195b2113c66", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Adopt-adapt-assemble + P/P/T transformation + 5 concrete actions", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "docSlug": "6bd7bf1c917770b7", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q2 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to rank root causes of 'trapped value' based on investor survey data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorizes causes of trapped value in ranked branches (controllable vs external)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 12, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-a80c58e42755", "evidence": "p.12 ranks 14 root causes of trapped value; sidebar groups them as fundamental concerns under corporate control.", "position": 4, "objective": "Diagnose root causes of trapped value", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 80, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-8a22dba6860f", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Trapped value root causes, M&A, dividends, ESG findings", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 15, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-91c19c9339fd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey findings and data charts dominate", "position": 1, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "case_study", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to detail three distinct procurement cases (Standards, Greenland vessel replacement, F-16 simulator).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Three lessons-learned cases categorise causes of failure.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 9, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-45efc998ae59", "evidence": "Problem statement -> segmentation -> diagnosis -> IPT recommendation -> 45 mio. kr. potentiale -> implementation plan.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame procurement-coordination problem and recommend Integrated Project Teams", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-200ed114be36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "First proposal's problem statement: 'manglende koordination mellem FMI og brugere'.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top right to anchor the 'Define' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The diagram/process on the slide could resemble a fishbone diagram used for identifying causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-044d1730f159", "docSlug": "cfb2f511f3879630", "documentTitle": "IFRS 9 Impairment Banking Survey", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "EY", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The radar chart uses a 'most difficult in centre' orientation, which is non-standard for radar charts (usually outer is higher).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "chart/radar: Difficulty of controls implementation (most difficult in centre)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-044d1730f159/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-044d1730f159", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-044d1730f159#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 18, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "c8b00575-41e3-416f-ad0f-69ce9493341b", "evidence": "The document discusses operating model and implementation considerations", "position": 1, "objective": "Understand operating model and implementation considerations", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 18, "beatId": "4a64eff4-53dd-4f70-9e5b-2b717ec30408", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The document discusses operating model and implementation considerations", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-91b7db12c0e9", "docSlug": "78ef3e19aacee201", "documentTitle": "Innovation thesis climate fintech", "authorId": "Barclays", "authorName": "Barclays", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 'mismatch' framework to explain the gap between company needs and investor requirements.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bullet-listed drivers under each side enumerate causes feeding the gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-91b7db12c0e9/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-91b7db12c0e9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-91b7db12c0e9#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a004-a73f5a6caaee", "evidence": "p.4 names the £1.5bn gap (symptom); p.5 reveals financing profile vs investor needs mismatch as root driver.", "position": 1, "objective": "Diagnose the missing-middle financing gap from symptom to root cause", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 75, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd5f-bf9755ae9e32", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Gap analysis' and 'Why is financing challenging' name the missing middle", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 11, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd5f-cdd12d34d6a3", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantitative gap framing and landscape tour", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "docSlug": "bb039b619ada143e", "documentTitle": "Modern Networks", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The central hexagon acts as a focal point for the 'What's at stake?' question.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Six cause categories radiating from central question (Ishikawa-style)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-365391f1de5a", "evidence": "Surface 87% bottleneck/64% risk stats then expose 6 hidden risk categories in hexagon", "position": 2, "objective": "Move from visible bottleneck symptom to underlying multi-dimensional risk", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 80, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-e502792a5312", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "87% bottleneck stat, 64% face risks, hexagon of 6 business risks", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-f586a071b6f2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Indices, survey data, risk percentages", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-74ce2cb13188", "docSlug": "bi-b3bb8e9d2f554c0e", "documentTitle": "PITCH DECK: ElasticStage raises $4.2 million to make vinyl records", "authorId": "Pitchdecks", "authorName": "ElasticStage", "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck", "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a process-based framework to highlight specific pain points at each stage of vinyl production.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Vinyl records are made by a largely unchanged 80-year old process, designed for an era when a few hundred artists sold millions of records each.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-74ce2cb13188/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-74ce2cb13188", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-605c-759f-b6b2-74ce2cb13188#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 5, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "47bb5a31-24d4-436a-a8d3-57d217d19369", "evidence": "The problem statement slides imply the costs of inaction for artists and the market.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the costs of not addressing the current vinyl manufacturing problems", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 5, "beatId": "efeafa4d-ef63-45c4-aa02-139232e3c3fc", "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch", "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem", "evidence": "Slides 5-6 present the problem statement, highlighting the challenges faced by DIY and independent artists.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 71, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Slide outlines diagnostic findings and initial recommendations for NYCHA property management restructuring.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Diagnostic of property management identifies multiple inefficiency causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/71", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-71", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 93, "from": 71, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1920f0844597", "evidence": "Each function has (I/II) diagnosis ('current pain') and (II/II) implementation ('proposed model').", "position": 13, "objective": "Run each support function through diagnostic-then-target-state pattern", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 82, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a two-row layout to contrast the current state diagnosis with future state recommendations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Diagnoses inventory-management dysfunction across multiple causes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/82", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-82", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 93, "from": 71, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-1920f0844597", "evidence": "Each function has (I/II) diagnosis ('current pain') and (II/II) implementation ('proposed model').", "position": 13, "objective": "Run each support function through diagnostic-then-target-state pattern", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-58fb34520518", "docSlug": "48b19b0dad5a1011", "documentTitle": "Southeast Asia’s Green Economy 2021 Report: Opportunities on the Road to Net Zero", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 64, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a grid layout to categorize qualitative pain points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Lists 'several barriers' impeding green capital flows.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-58fb34520518/64", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-58fb34520518", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-58fb34520518#slide-64", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 65, "from": 60, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-94d32801892d", "evidence": "Capital is flowing p60-62, but $2T needed p63, barriers p64, enablers p65.", "position": 10, "objective": "Promising flows but $2T gap + barriers + enablers", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 72, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 65, "from": 59, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-b782d5a739d4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'Unlocking Capital' section: green capital flows data, $11.9B, $2T need", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149", "docSlug": "e97464cc0a103dac", "documentTitle": "Southeast Asia's Green Economy", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain & Company", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram uses positive (+) and negative (-) signs to indicate reinforcing and balancing feedback loops within the green economy ecosystem.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Causal-arrow diagram pointing to central problem", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 49, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-4817660dfb32", "evidence": "Linked-systems map (p.49) -> two-outcome filter -> sector-vs-system reframing on p.54.", "position": 7, "objective": "Reveal that visible emissions sit on a hidden web of system linkages", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 86, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 58, "from": 48, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-9291572cedd1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Systems-thinking intro and three prioritized systems-level solutions", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 53, "from": 29, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-9f3feafe926e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Emissions data, sector contributions, current trajectories", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149", "docSlug": "e97464cc0a103dac", "documentTitle": "Southeast Asia's Green Economy", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain & Company", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 65, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a causal chain/system map to link current systemic barriers to specific bioeconomy interventions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bioeconomy node connected to Agri/Power/Transport pain branches with +/- arrows", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149/65", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-451df9a6d149#slide-65", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 72, "from": 60, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-53cdbb49241b", "evidence": "Takeaways -> sector context -> emissions diagnosis -> systemic barriers -> levers tree -> recommendations.", "position": 9, "objective": "Diagnose bioeconomy barriers, then prescribe levers and recommendations", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 82, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 145, "from": 59, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-94c0617c4e8b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Bioeconomy, grid, EV, finance, carbon markets, green AI deep dives with sizing and case studies", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 151, "from": 59, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-a5b7a27b3bf4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Per-system implementation levers and recommendations", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5", "docSlug": "2ccd72c2e2b9465a", "documentTitle": "The productivity push Powering the UK’s performance with five digital capabilities", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 32, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column layout to detail specific challenges in digital transformation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Splits one problem into three categorical causes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5/32", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8b79926ba3f5#slide-32", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 31, "name": "Root Cause Tree", "slug": "37-root-cause-tree", "bestFor": "Problem diagnosis, quality issues, operational failures", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-feb4973f8d74", "evidence": "p32 splits paralysis into Ambition / Investment / Delivery branches", "position": 10, "objective": "Diagnose three root causes blocking digital adoption", "structure": "The Problem -> Branch 1 (Cause A) -> Branch 2 (Cause B) -> Branch 3 (Cause C) -> The Primary Root", "confidence": 84, "description": "Branch out from a problem to its multiple contributing causes" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 31, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-4e985661e118", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Three barriers diagnosed; 'Learn more' partnership CTA", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9a0bb4402254", "docSlug": "34cc09be0c192e58", "documentTitle": "Total Enterprise Reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "pain_points", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a gradient aesthetic for the bars and includes photographic overlays.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Categorises the human-factor barriers diagnosis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9a0bb4402254/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9a0bb4402254", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-9a0bb4402254#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 37, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-5a0fe2990a01", "evidence": "Section title 'Human factors pose biggest barriers' + TQ remedy", "position": 8, "objective": "Surface human/talent factors as the hidden root cause of failure", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 70, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 48, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-baaac2f5c28b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Six characteristics of Total Enterprise Reinvention sectioned out", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 48, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-c9f3aaf5b7af", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Six characteristics frame what reinventors do differently", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }