{ "kind": "tool", "value": "diagnostic-test", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:diagnostic-test:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 88, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 4, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-5e4526e0d28c", "docSlug": "051eb633a65061ed", "documentTitle": "A future that works: AI, Automation, employment, and productivity", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "McKinsey methodology for assessing automation potential by decomposing jobs into tasks/activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "diagnosis with list/bullet and diagram/process", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-5e4526e0d28c/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-5e4526e0d28c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-5e4526e0d28c#slide-13", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 12, "beatId": "7e13f3b3-fbea-4f11-ab13-b363b80b86db", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Complication", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "The deck highlights the challenges and complications posed by AI and automation, including concerns about jobs and the economy.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c", "docSlug": "4c918a9a3c4caeef", "documentTitle": "A tough year for European chemicals players has come to an end – We do expect a continuation of the challenges into 2024!", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses two lines to compare competitive position inside vs outside the EU over time, with shaded regions highlighting periods of 'severe thread'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Intensified structural disadvantages also reflected in the industry's self-perception on its competitive position, especially outside Europe", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 4, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-83f34983025b", "evidence": "p.4 frames 'prolonged downturn requiring rigorous measures'; pp.5-10 stack independent dimensions of decline; p.11 closes with 'fast execution... essential!'", "position": 1, "objective": "Build urgency by stacking accumulating costs of the European chemicals downturn", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 85, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-8059a4ededfb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Capacity <80%, falling confidence, orderbook decline, energy gap, poly-crisis synthesis", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-92720230716f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Six data slides on share, capacity, confidence, orderbook, energy, perception", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide serves as an introductory diagnosis for a report on the future of work and learning.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "type: diagnosis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-1b42ebdf5e26", "evidence": "'Staying still is not an option' + Figure 1 sizes US$11.5tn cumulative GDP at risk.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify the price of standing still", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 90, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-70927e6d748d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Race-is-on, $11.5tn at risk, role clusters and skills mix subverted", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-80171dea1add", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Race-is-on framing names the skills-crisis pain", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 138, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide details collaboration with FES (Forsvarets Bygnings- og Etablissementstjeneste) and VFK (Værnsfælles Forsvarskommando) to assess infrastructure needs and financial implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide features a detailed analysis of a diagnosis, which is a clear instantiation of a diagnostic test.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/138", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-138", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 138, "from": 117, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0c8cb89cab1d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Total potential synthesis, investments, FTE impact, framework reduction.", "position": 5, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 56, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process-oriented layout to define operational excellence criteria for each stage of a project lifecycle.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide compares current practices against best practices across different stages, indicating a diagnostic approach.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/56", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-56", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top right to anchor the 'Define' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "This slide assesses issues and implications in the 'Definition' stage, using various charts and lists to diagnose problems.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 58, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Design' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "This slide continues assessing issues in the 'Design' stage with detailed charts and lists.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/58", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-58", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 59, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right indicating the 'Schedule' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide examines issues in the 'Scheduling' stage, using charts and bullet points for diagnosis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/59", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-59", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 60, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a process flow diagram at the top to contextualize the 'Execute' phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "This slide looks into 'Execution' stage issues with diagnostic charts and metrics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/60", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-60", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 61, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Includes a process flow diagram at the top right and several diagnostic charts (bar, treemap, waterfall) on the right side.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide assesses issues in the 'Order close' stage with a focus on efficiency and quality.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/61", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-61", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 61, "from": 56, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-99112269b302", "evidence": "Best-practice criteria + issues/implications for Definition, Design, Schedule, Execute, Order close.", "position": 7, "objective": "Diagnose issues across 5 workflow stages", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 68, "from": 56, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-27da03e23b04", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Best-practice assessment, issue tables, Utility Co + Gas Ops cases (25-30% savings).", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative structure to diagnose the root causes of low credit card usage in China.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Consumers were not used to paying by credit card due to weak payment infrastructure and low credit card penetration", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 32, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-0047a8ad09a4", "evidence": "Cash-dominant before (p32-33) → mobile payments 70x US after (p34).", "position": 7, "objective": "Prove mobile payments leapfrog vs cash baseline", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "docSlug": "22f6af8f6e5a7ac9", "documentTitle": "Decoding Chinese Internet 2.0 Next Chapter", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "Uses a causal mapping structure to link market gaps to product solutions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Certain domains in China are immature, therefore require innovative solutions which can make up for the missing pieces and achieve immediate results.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-ea33b3a921f0#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 36, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-05acdffed3a5", "evidence": "Industry-wide pattern (p36) → Alipay innovations (p37-38) → healthcare detail (p39) → implication (p40).", "position": 8, "objective": "Drill from app-driven thesis to Alipay specifics", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-dd85f0f62342", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Leapfrogging + application-driven innovation thesis", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 55, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ebaba93d7b1a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Drivers, KSFs, future trends explained", "position": 2, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-632fe59b1db4", "docSlug": "8a28ecac93b8cb5c", "documentTitle": "Deloitte Business Agility Survey 2021 A pulse check of business agility in the Nordics", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a navigation sidebar common in consulting decks. The chart shows a distribution of survey responses on a 1-5 scale.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Even though most of the organizations have the improvement of business agility as a high priority, still half of the respondents have not clearly articulated the desired business outcomes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-632fe59b1db4/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-632fe59b1db4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-632fe59b1db4#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "34e32388-c34d-4a89-a60a-21f6faef03ed", "evidence": "The document presents key findings and insights from the survey.", "position": 0, "objective": "What are the key findings of the survey?", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 5, "beatId": "57adf83d-5e46-4069-bab2-f2463cddc9c4", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document then dives into the challenges organizations face in achieving business agility.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "docSlug": "2c40ca39f67d1596", "documentTitle": "e-Conomy SEA Unlocking the $200 billion digital opportunity in Southeast Asia", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Google, Temasek", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.418, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses a split axis or break to represent the high negative values for the top countries compared to the positive values for the bottom countries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents a diagnosis of fraudulent activity in SEA countries, including a fraud index and a bar chart.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 29, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a002-1b6314a4384b", "evidence": "p29-30 enumerate 6 numbered challenges; p31-33 provide proof points (unbanked, internet speed, fraud).", "position": 5, "objective": "Lay out the 6 distinct challenges that block the opportunity, with evidence for the most material ones.", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 84, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 29, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-1de1c42ecdac", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "6 big challenges that must be overcome to capture the opportunity.", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 33, "from": 29, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-2a1e152e9162", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "6 challenges that must be addressed to unlock the $200B.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162", "docSlug": "6ebe7bc3c470921e", "documentTitle": "Global Private Equity Report 2015", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 63, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide serves as a diagnostic tool for PE firms to assess their internal processes for value creation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Successful portfolio activism prizes two qualities above all others: a sense of urgency and focused intention.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162/63", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-efee526b2162#slide-63", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 59, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-4c9f394ec80d", "evidence": "Quick hits + repeatable model + 5 interlocking building blocks + self-assessment questionnaire.", "position": 10, "objective": "Prescribe value-creation building blocks and a self-assessment", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 63, "from": 59, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-7e7b696d3b66", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Section 3 prescribes building blocks plus self-assessment", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 63, "from": 59, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-89324c7c3bac", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Section 3: portfolio building blocks and self-assessment", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-e49fb6b26dfd", "docSlug": "f45fbeb51fe7fd01", "documentTitle": "Inclusion and Diversity Survey Make It More Than A Mantra", "authorId": "EY", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart shows a decline in performance for the Retail sector as the maturity level increases from Foundational to Integrated & Sustainable.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Retail lags at partnering with diverse organizations and has limited scope of recruiting", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-e49fb6b26dfd/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-e49fb6b26dfd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-e49fb6b26dfd#slide-28", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 10, "beatId": "c5abb84b-36a1-44ca-8b58-33ac8d89a758", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides data and statistics to support its claims.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 298, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses two charts: a bar chart for mission priority and a stacked bar chart for satisfaction ratings. Annotations highlight the discrepancy for 'loose dogs'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "According to Dallas city survey, enforcement related to loose dogs cited as key mission for Code, but has low satisfaction", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/298", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-298", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 298, "from": 275, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5c184c18a8b6", "evidence": "Section divider '1 Supply of Dogs' + zip-level zoom + waterfall growth math", "position": 19, "objective": "Zoom into supply of dogs: population sizing and S/N levels", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4", "docSlug": "54670b3c50047525", "documentTitle": "Making finance the predictive powerhouse How to create an agile finance function", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to contrast 'Today' vs 'Tomorrow' (Ideal) workflows.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Our survey reveals that FP&A teams spend 85% of their time on tactical and labor-intensive production tasks to prepare data and just 15% of their time on generating insights", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3c32427dfab4#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 4, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-5002de8d52f7", "evidence": "Pressure on CFOs (p4) -> data shows 85% prep / 15% insight (p6) -> insight: flip it for 80%/95%/12hrs (p8)", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the 85/15 imbalance and size the upside of flipping it", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 88, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-3134af98ab23", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "FP&A lacks agility; 85% time on data prep; mired in transactional work", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 8, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-42636b538694", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey facts on time split and impact of flipping it", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "docSlug": "f6506cba246b6e5e", "documentTitle": "New Mexico State Staffing Study", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 117, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "list/bullet: Key Findings: Staff performing Communications work are mostly centralized... 74% of Communications work is being performed by FTEs...", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c/117", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c#slide-117", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 194, "from": 61, "beatId": "b91c1d77-e314-4263-ba4c-94eb382a49fc", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document outlines key opportunities for improvement and potential cost savings, as well as recommendations for implementation.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 46, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide contains a placeholder for a chart (Figure 33) which is currently blacked out.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "BCG has developed playbooks to address a wide range of procurement-related challenges", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/46", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-46", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 46, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-cc47e46c7cf6", "evidence": "Diagnostic capabilities -> 990 projects -> $1B healthcare, $400M federal, $240M retail case examples.", "position": 6, "objective": "Validate approach via 990 prior procurement engagements and named case studies", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 88, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 46, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c57a45a3c889", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "990 projects, $1B/$900M/$400M case studies, key personnel credentials.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499", "docSlug": "7716ae6db98267fe", "documentTitle": "Syracuse University Diagnostic Report", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast current 'Key Facts and Data' with recommended 'Perspectives'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide presents diagnostic perspectives and key facts and data.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-e91eaf537499#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 18, "name": "Issue Tree", "slug": "43-issue-tree", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, project scoping, complex analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-b13b8eb589b3", "evidence": "p18 numbered tree of 16 areas under 4 themes; pp19-35 walk each leaf with facts+perspectives.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose 'how to improve Syracuse' into 16 MECE opportunity areas", "structure": "The Key Question -> Sub-Question A -> Sub-Question B -> Sub-Question C -> Synthesized Answer", "confidence": 90, "description": "Break a key question into sub-questions until you reach answerable, actionable pieces" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 35, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-e848b59afc53", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "16 deep dives, each with KEY FACTS AND DATA + PERSPECTIVES columns.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 35, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-f462fb7ce078", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "16 opportunity areas with perspectives column.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 58, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram uses concentric circles to represent organizational depth, connecting specific leadership challenges to the broader organization.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Text describing the need for leader commitment, assessment dimensions (knowledge, soft skills, experience, motivation), and varying leadership roles.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/58", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-58", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 67, "from": 51, "name": "Golden Circle", "slug": "11-golden-circle", "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-cc69a0ef0e4a", "evidence": "Chapter leads with 'inspire through authentic purpose', purpose-driven retailer case, then structures/HR.", "position": 6, "objective": "Anchor sustained performance in authentic purpose (why) before structure", "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)", "confidence": 75, "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 67, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a351b5a5af36", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Part I introduces holistic 3-pillar framework chapter by chapter.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 67, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-ad6495641025", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Context and 3-pillar framework definition.", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "docSlug": "b89c4b2a8f5b0c45", "documentTitle": "Transformation Ebook", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 2.5, "pageNumber": 106, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a BCG publication or book, given the footer.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The biggest obstacle, however, is that new capabilities call for fundamental changes in behaviors—the ways that employees, managers, and executives work on a daily basis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1/106", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-df215e4f0bc1#slide-106", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 105, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-d9296b80153c", "evidence": "'Ruthlessly prioritize the critical few capabilities' + 10 practices + 4-element capability definition.", "position": 9, "objective": "Prioritize critical few capabilities and build them systematically", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 120, "from": 68, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-a46981f3662e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Part II execution chapters densely loaded with named-company case studies.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 120, "from": 69, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-b3d6e5d451ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Part II - leading, managing, building capabilities.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "docSlug": "0f638186bb9b059e", "documentTitle": "UK Electricity Efficiency Potential", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 61, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table to link problem statements (barriers) to the necessary conditions (beliefs) for a proposed solution (incentives) to work.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "What you would need to believe in order to conclude that market based incentives could address barriers to uncaptured potential being realised", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e/61", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-bb8662e8046e#slide-61", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 77, "from": 6, "beatId": "02a14110-f7eb-4a8e-ad6c-56f071f97bab", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document provides data tables and analysis to support the potential for electricity efficiency measures.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 129, "from": 53, "beatId": "9060aec2-6eb2-4c62-ad0e-6e1552b9219e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The document discusses design options and policy mechanisms to capture the electricity efficiency potential.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }