{ "kind": "tool", "value": "deductive-reasoning", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:deductive-reasoning:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 32, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 2, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c", "docSlug": "b516607343964728", "documentTitle": "2021 q4 earnings results presentation", "authorId": "GoldmanSachs", "authorName": "Petershill Partners", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure: IPO guidance, Q4 2021 progress, and 2022 guidance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Checkmarks validate hypotheses systematically", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-6b2bc553916c#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de8d8-1e98-73bf-af32-ce9004c41970", "evidence": "Five evidence slides (history, business model, revenue streams, growth strategy, progress vs goals) converge on 'we deliver'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish credibility through track record, model, and IPO progress", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8d8-1d44-715f-87ef-dfbcf72de8c2", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Setup & Stakes", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section 1 establishes business, IPO promise, track record", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de8d8-1e32-70d3-8814-9f1e1c345ca7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Three income streams + organic/inorganic growth model", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea", "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29", "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023", "authorId": "AirStreetCapital", "authorName": "Air Street Capital", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a traffic light system (Green=YES, Red=NO, Amber=~) to indicate the status of predictions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Each row pairs a stated premise with falsifying or confirming evidence.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 9, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-e2991bb31991", "evidence": "Scorecard divider then a YES/NO/PARTIAL evidence table on 2022 predictions.", "position": 1, "objective": "Audit last year's predictions to earn analytical credibility", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 80, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-4dec34eefca8", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Setup & Stakes", "beatSlug": "mountain-setup-stakes", "evidence": "Definitions, agenda, exec summary set scope and prior-prediction stakes.", "position": 1, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-82cf7b714f71", "docSlug": "bc4a0baabdc7f455", "documentTitle": "2023 global pe report roadshow deck", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "This appears to be a page from a published article or report, likely by BCG given the authors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens loop 1 with a syllogism: huge wealth pool + tiny PE share => opportunity.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-82cf7b714f71/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-82cf7b714f71", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-82cf7b714f71#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-8001c7f387b1", "evidence": "Sets retail's 50% wealth share against its 16% alternatives allocation, plus growth/public-market gaps.", "position": 1, "objective": "Quantify the gap between individuals' share of wealth and their share of alternatives AUM", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-f03435b1ba2b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, About Bain PE, TOC, intro 'Perfect Storm', and 'Why PE Is Targeting Individuals' frame the topic.", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-da0c6c6bce5e", "docSlug": "61e83be1f97014ca", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights – German vs. European Banks", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Includes footnotes regarding data sources (S&P Capital IQ) and methodology (60TD Avg, FY+2 ROE).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Sub-title chains: stocks surged → cost of capital declined → P/B recovers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-da0c6c6bce5e/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-da0c6c6bce5e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-da0c6c6bce5e#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-d8d81426d212", "evidence": "Four sequential evidence slides (P/B, P/E, ROE/CIR, CET1/NPL) all repeat the same German Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-de03121e7ab9", "evidence": "Every chart pairs European (navy) and German (orange) series; every takeaway quotes both numbers in [brackets].", "position": 2, "objective": "Persistent side-by-side comparison of German banks vs European peers across every metric", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-f362872ec902", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": "onion-surface-observation", "evidence": "P/B ratios and cost of capital — surface valuation metrics.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-07976c172eca", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Four data-dense slides on P/B, P/E, ROE, capital ratios.", "position": 1, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-08c4360e58ac", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Right-rail takeaways translate each chart into German-vs-European delta.", "position": 2, "confidence": 50, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Premise 1 (small-price-big-effect) + premise 2 (revenue beats cost) → conclusion.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 25, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-3dfc877a507e", "evidence": "1% revenue ≈ 40bps ROE > 1% cost ≈ 25bps premise → AI pricing conclusion.", "position": 5, "objective": "Argue dynamic AI pricing is highest-leverage move", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 65, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "docSlug": "c266d0250725f0c1", "documentTitle": "Building Sustainable Organizations", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent SOI score and bubble color to represent quartiles of performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Premise: DNA matters; data: 2x2 shows clustering -> conclusion: causally linked to performance.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 16, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-52869adf89cb", "evidence": "Hypothesis stated, 2x2 scatter (p.16) and EBITDA/TSR/ROIC bars (p.17) confirm it.", "position": 3, "objective": "Test and confirm DNA-strength to financial+impact performance hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 82, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-ad9f014f129f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Performance charts (16-17), benchmark (18-19), case studies (20-24)", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-b9b59024ea1d", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "DNA-strong firms deliver 19.6% EBITDA, higher impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-a22899d4368c", "docSlug": "b4a8fdf9bac26f10", "documentTitle": "Digital adoption in healthcare: Reaction or revolution?", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "agenda", "function": "front_matter", "notes": "This slide is a text-heavy transcript of a speaker's opening remarks, covering survey methodology, learning objectives, and high-level findings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens loop: question -> survey data -> insight", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-a22899d4368c/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-a22899d4368c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-a22899d4368c#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-aca0dfd0575a", "evidence": "Setup (survey of 12K), data (factors driving negative experience), insight (empathy 5x more important).", "position": 1, "objective": "Use survey data to reveal that empathy outweighs technology in driving experience", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 60, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 2, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-164eda1a4afb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover + intro; survey scope of 12,000 across 14 countries", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-29d0cbb41f6e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey findings on tech, experience, access", "position": 1, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a122dd3eeb8b", "docSlug": "bdc84f7508d2bd41", "documentTitle": "EARTH DAY 2021 GLOBAL ADVISOR https://www.ipsos.com/en/earth-day-2021-globally-people-wonder-whats-plan-tackle-climate-change Public opinion and action on climate change", "authorId": "misc", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 2, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses icons to represent three distinct points about public perception of climate policy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Premise (Super Year) + premise (low awareness) implies the ask", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a122dd3eeb8b/2", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a122dd3eeb8b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-a122dd3eeb8b#slide-2", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 2, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de79c-2cdc-75c1-80e0-25e6f3b4527c", "evidence": "Question framing on p.2/3, 31% headline statistic on p.4 delivers the insight", "position": 1, "objective": "Surface the headline gap: public asks 'what is the plan?'", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 75, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de79c-2b7a-745e-93ac-68aa831f750f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Survey data on plans (31%) and shared responsibility (72%)", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 4, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de79c-2bfc-73f9-afb8-5671f115e630", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Surface Observation", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "31% agree government has a clear plan", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "docSlug": "2c40ca39f67d1596", "documentTitle": "e-Conomy SEA Unlocking the $200 billion digital opportunity in Southeast Asia", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Google, Temasek", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.418, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "market_sizing", "function": "size_opportunity", "notes": "The chart uses a broken axis (indicated by the wavy lines) to represent the growth from 31B to 197B.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Sets the total that subsequent segments must sum to.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-ccde16d7b812#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 10, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a002-13e2dc06c991", "evidence": "p10 sets $200B total; p13 eCommerce $88B; p16 Travel $90B; p19 Media $20B; p21 Ads $10B with driver decompositions.", "position": 3, "objective": "Build $200B total by adding eCommerce + Travel + Media + Ads with drivers per segment.", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-16dde5358424", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Segmented sizing approach: $200B decomposed into eCommerce/Travel/Media/Ads.", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 21, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9027-21aa7acc856a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Market sizing data: 480m users, $200B by 2025, segment build-up.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "docSlug": "e1772a536ac0fb0d", "documentTitle": "Evaluating NYC media sector", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses stacked bar charts to show the composition of employment and spend across different sub-sectors of the filmed production industry.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "First slide of segmentation loop establishing the headline number to be decomposed", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-baa794470a76#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-9c2f12ad04aa", "evidence": "Each slide breaks down a different segment of filmed entertainment with consistent metrics ($ spend, jobs).", "position": 1, "objective": "Size NYC filmed entertainment by segment (TV, film, commercials, production-related)", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-a9147a7a24af", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Subsector-by-subsector data: filmed, broadcasting, ads, digital, VC", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 25, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-b9e0767fbeac", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Pure data slides on each subsector", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "docSlug": "2529e86cc1cf2d8d", "documentTitle": "Green Hydrogen: An assessment of near-term power matching requirements", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "IRENA", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a value chain framework to map the lifecycle of green hydrogen from renewable energy sources to various industrial and transport applications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "First slide of value-chain walk loop", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-587aba502de4#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Value Chain Walk", "slug": "44-value-chain-walk", "bestFor": "Operations improvement, cost reduction, competitive advantage", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-614a76bdef73", "evidence": "Figure 1.1 explicitly walks Production→Transformation→Transport→End Use", "position": 1, "objective": "Map green hydrogen across production, transformation, transport, end use", "structure": "Input -> Process Step 1 -> Process Step 2 -> Process Step 3 -> Output -> Value Assessment", "confidence": 85, "description": "Walk through each step of the value chain to identify where value is created or destroyed" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-ca2a8d8587b8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction, value chain, shades of hydrogen, drivers and scenarios establish the field", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dc-de5cfdcfdb18", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Status, drivers, scenarios for green hydrogen", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-1cb93bd7b7e8", "docSlug": "a6e03ff67c144692", "documentTitle": "High Throughput Satellites Viewpoint", "authorId": "ArthurDLittle", "authorName": "Arthur D. Little", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "other", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Arthur D Little Viewpoint document on High Throughput Satellites.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Premises (formulas + antenna constraint) → conclusion Ka-band wins", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-1cb93bd7b7e8/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-1cb93bd7b7e8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-1cb93bd7b7e8#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 2, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de779-27d9-769a-af54-923bc87ce208", "evidence": "p2 contrasts wide-beam vs spot-beam architectures and Ka vs Ku spectrum; p3 sustains the Ka-vs-Ku comparison through formulas and beamwidth ranges.", "position": 1, "objective": "Contrast conventional Ku-band satellites with HTS Ka-band on architecture and performance", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de779-270a-743f-b483-7fa6864b3fcd", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "C/N0 formulas prove Ka-band > Ku-band throughput", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 3, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de779-2793-761a-9922-f2a3bd8f801c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Ka-band throughput advantage demonstrated mathematically", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-56a0c0895215", "docSlug": "55c4a7f6bf360163", "documentTitle": "IBV Smarter Workforce Institute", "authorId": "IBM", "authorName": "IBM", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.332, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke model to connect the central concept of 'Employee listening' to its drivers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Necessary (imperatives) + Feasible (enablers) -> listening matters", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-56a0c0895215/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-56a0c0895215", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b637-56a0c0895215#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 5, "name": "Why Now", "slug": "15-why-now", "bestFor": "Sales pitches, fundraising, requesting immediate budget approval", "matchId": "019de8d2-8642-73d6-a1ed-d28ba53aa9af", "evidence": "Hub-and-spoke of three imperatives + three enablers, then consumer-mindset and tech-enabler context.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish why employee listening matters now (imperatives + enablers)", "structure": "The Context (Trends) -> The Trigger Event -> The Window of Opportunity", "confidence": 72, "description": "Create temporal urgency by proving that the window of opportunity is opening or closing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de8d2-84ff-760f-9a35-e47d8f1e5554", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Exec summary + drivers/enablers + methodology", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89", "docSlug": "6baa9ff6de20f260", "documentTitle": "Introduction to Bain and Report on Resilience", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a background image of light trails, which is unusual for a standard consulting deck but serves as a visual metaphor for growth.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop opens with Premise 1 (record profits) before adding Premise 2 and conclusion on next slides", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-067236bfcf89#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-b150e9726e3e", "evidence": "p5 premise (golden-age profits) -> p6 premise (6x risk-up) -> p7 conclusion (expect resilience demands).", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish that record profits plus rising risk imply demand for corporate resilience", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 85, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-ec0f200506c7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Golden-age profits, ratcheting risk, privatized rewards / nationalized risks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses multiple pull-quotes to validate the importance of platform choice and the variability in performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Opens hypothesis-test loop: sets up build-vs-buy decision premises.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-590aaed635a0", "docSlug": "d9b3b9be9cdd8155", "documentTitle": "Overview of the ASEAN-6 Automotive Market", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a dark background with a subtle map overlay. Data covers Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, and Singapore.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Strong economy premise vs weak auto premise opens the analytical chain", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-590aaed635a0/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-590aaed635a0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-590aaed635a0#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019de8bf-c757-7505-ab78-0165aab6f2fd", "evidence": "Six successive evidence slides (GDP/TIV, TIV by country, brand share, EV share, LV sales, LV production) all building the same conclusion", "position": 1, "objective": "Build ASEAN-6 market picture from multiple data points", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de8bf-c608-767a-ab81-a90144bb6065", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Section 1 opens, GDP rises across ASEAN-6, TIV baseline established", "position": 1, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 10, "from": 5, "beatId": "019de8bf-c6ea-743f-8122-e3c70695b712", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "ASEAN-6 macro and market data tables/charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "docSlug": "01deef2de22e8e5f", "documentTitle": "Re-focus your talent lens: Abundance awaits", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show current vs. growth figures for skilled workers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop 1 first page - premises about geographic distribution build to APAC/LATAM/Africa conclusion", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-a96eb8c49df1", "evidence": "90% CEOs report scarcity -> 437m -> 67% by 2030 -> unexpected places -> Figure 2 ranking - multiple proofs converge.", "position": 1, "objective": "Stack converging stats to prove talent is abundant in APAC/Africa/LATAM", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-7427217c4282", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Foreword + executive summary + global talent landscape charts", "position": 1, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-899a2ebd19bf", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Talent distribution data, Figures 1-2", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "docSlug": "01deef2de22e8e5f", "documentTitle": "Re-focus your talent lens: Abundance awaits", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a photo of a young man working on a laptop to humanize the concept of 'knowledge clusters' and talent development.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop 4 first page; growth premise -> emissions premise -> opportunity conclusion", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-b5931d4058ba", "evidence": "Recommendation (p22,25) -> supporting data on local appeal (p23-24) -> case study 'Enabling 5G adoption' (p26).", "position": 4, "objective": "Argue Lever 2 (Get in early) and prove with Ericsson Thailand 5G precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 80, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-80cba978d0e5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three lever sections each with recommendation, data and case study", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 34, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-93ce4c953f8b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three levers, case studies, closing questions", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "docSlug": "01deef2de22e8e5f", "documentTitle": "Re-focus your talent lens: Abundance awaits", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of market growth projections and survey data to support the argument for job redesign.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop 5 first page - GenAI premise leads to free-up-humans recommendation", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-4c87c6fd55cf#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 28, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-bb669a8e0154", "evidence": "Recommendation (p28,31) -> data on creativity = satisfaction (p29-30) -> case study 'Echo' (p32).", "position": 5, "objective": "Argue Lever 3 (Re-task work) and prove with Accenture's Echo precedent", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 80, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-80cba978d0e5", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three lever sections each with recommendation, data and case study", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 34, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-93ce4c953f8b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three levers, case studies, closing questions", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-57aa6db79325", "docSlug": "53a6da293395a220", "documentTitle": "Reimagining the Agenda", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "section_divider", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop 3 anchor: zooms big-picture sustainability into specifics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-57aa6db79325/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-57aa6db79325", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-57aa6db79325#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-e757bb1fd883", "evidence": "Big picture (98% sustainability) -> focus (47% responsible chains) -> detail (62% circularity, 56% data integration).", "position": 3, "objective": "Zoom from sustainability writ-large into circularity and data", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-c02646faf1ac", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Section 03 sustainability/circularity adoption stats by industry", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 15, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-ce12047b8831", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "CEOs are reimagining + sustainability is core", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18", "docSlug": "97143d2812b6a812", "documentTitle": "The Global State of Information Security® Survey 2018 Singapore highlights", "authorId": "PwC", "authorName": "PwC", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "This is a two-page spread presented as a single slide image.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop opens at this page: incidents catalog sets premises that p4 will resolve.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b63a-02e131a9cf18#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019de93e-51e3-7109-bb29-55c424e8747b", "evidence": "p3 catalogs visible attack symptoms; p4 explicitly diagnoses human error as the Achilles' heel beneath them.", "position": 1, "objective": "Move from visible incidents to root cause (human error)", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 80, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de93e-505a-748d-8f59-b8188e9d92dc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "p3 'Singapore key findings' lays out raw survey statistics.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 3, "from": 2, "beatId": "019de93e-5104-73de-81fa-c5d33fb058e3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Methodology + Singapore findings frame the regional cyber landscape.", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8e40bedadad4", "docSlug": "8c83943a6325e2dc", "documentTitle": "The ultimate healthcare experience: what people want", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The chart is a 100% stacked bar chart showing trust levels across different organizations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Loop opens with premise 'trust matters' and concludes with how to build it", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8e40bedadad4/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8e40bedadad4", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8e40bedadad4#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 12, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-0fab79a92ef1", "evidence": "Fig.5 ranks providers vs pharma/tech/insurers; Fig.6 lists trust builders", "position": 4, "objective": "Benchmark trust across institutions and identify trust-building levers", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 75, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-58414a75f41a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Tech convenience (8-11) and trust-building (12-15) themes outline the approach", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 15, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-677f0a3cfa64", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data across emotional, tech and trust facets", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-c6e4c58e1f6e", "docSlug": "c1395f24b4d7deb0", "documentTitle": "TSN Barclays Consumer Staples FINAL", "authorId": "Barclays", "authorName": "Tyson", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Premise 1 (62% skew) + Premise 2 (perimeter outperforms +2.1%) + Premise 3 (TSN outperforms category) -> conclusion.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-c6e4c58e1f6e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-c6e4c58e1f6e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-c6e4c58e1f6e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f8-7619-ac2d-67a7c0824a91", "evidence": "p15 chains: TSN skews perimeter (62%) + perimeter outperforms + TSN outperforms within, therefore advantaged; p16 plays it out.", "position": 3, "objective": "Prove Tyson's perimeter advantage via three-step deduction", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 80, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-13919e731cf6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Protein advantage, unique model, perimeter strategy, frozen plans, Prepared Foods model.", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 18, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-15a28f866448", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Core 9 +690bps vs F&B (p13); Tyson +4.9%/+7.2% vs frozen -1.2% (p18).", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd64-23de1ce2f7e8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Tyson is advantaged in protein, perimeter, frozen.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2", "docSlug": "88c81413269f048c", "documentTitle": "Women-led startups losing across the board: from creation to funding, in all key European markets", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses icons to categorize findings into creation, funding, and stage-based performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "First slide of aha-moment loop frames question to be answered", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-af17566806d2#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-4fc4a1f59abc", "evidence": "p.3 sets the question, p.4 lands the 7/7/2% shock as the insight", "position": 1, "objective": "Reveal the headline insight that women-led startups lose at every stage", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-9408b7e32fe1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "p.3 'women-only teams particularly struggle'; p.4 the 7/7/2% shock", "position": 2, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 4, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-a728782c6602", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "7% creation / 7% fundraisings / 2% funds raised", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }