{ "kind": "tool", "value": "contrast-principle", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:contrast-principle:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 713, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 30, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1", "docSlug": "fc0c90c9b630fa00", "documentTitle": "2014 Bond Cap Internet Trends 2014", "authorId": "BondCap", "authorName": "Mary Meeker", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 53, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-pairs framework to illustrate the shift from physical coins to digital apps.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Coins vs Square Cash UI side-by-side · framework/instance: Contrast between physical and digital money", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1/53", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-b315287f7ee1#slide-53", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 54, "from": 52, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019de7cf-87e6-75bb-ae15-f8ccddc3f8d7", "evidence": "Coin-vs-app visual (p.53) → Bitcoin wallet 8x growth chart (p.54)", "position": 9, "objective": "Reveal cryptocurrency surge as proof of money re-imagination", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 65, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 90, "from": 34, "beatId": "019de7cf-84a1-725e-af52-cab6c31823de", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "p.34 'Re-Imagining Continues' opens deep dive into messaging/apps/UI/sensors", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 91, "from": 4, "beatId": "019de7cf-858f-724f-8f90-9bc5829b709d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Bulk of deck is data slides establishing the trend facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "transition", "function": "transition", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "White Q on purple vs cyan-accented A creates emphasis.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0c4-9330-779d-b51b-df5c225bac9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "cover, premise/research question, survey methodology, current scaling status", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare performance metrics across segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Purple Auto-OES vs cyan Cross-Industry bars side-by-side.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0c4-94c5-768d-9efe-936cf587a3d1", "evidence": "Donut tiers (p12) and RODI bars by tier (p13) explicitly segment the sample.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split the population into Champions/Contenders/Cadets and show the performance delta", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Highlights branches still doing 2-of-3 of complicated journeys vs <15% online.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-31d4210009bd", "evidence": "Mastered digital servicing vs <15% sales conversion gap framed as digital dividend.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart shows a clear trend of non-bank financial institutions increasing their share of total global financial assets over time.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "9% in 2010 → 62% in 2022 highlights non-bank surge.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 14, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-377961e78d0a", "evidence": "Trend 3 lists cyber, rates, CRE, non-bank, China as separate risk categories.", "position": 3, "objective": "Enumerate the five distinct unforeseen risks of 2024", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "'Only 26%' frames a striking minority readiness gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 21, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-3933d4a7cf12", "evidence": "Old talent-war frame vs OCBC pilot delivering 50% faster work.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show how gen AI transforms ways of working using OCBC case", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 33, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a smoothed area plot to show the dramatic drop in new bank formations post-2008.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Three era averages (279→158→14) drive the visual contrast.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/33", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-33", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 31, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-46ba72f7dc15", "evidence": "Figure 7 charts new-bank charters collapsing from 279/yr to 14/yr post-GFC.", "position": 7, "objective": "Show regulatory burden is throttling banking innovation", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 70, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "docSlug": "152e08fd34c2d8f8", "documentTitle": "Bridging the Skills Gap in the Future Workforce", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses academic and industry research to support the argument for experiential learning.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Strong numerical contrast between learning modes", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f7c4f1af266d#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 16, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-25b5ab397e97", "evidence": "Section divider 'three steps' followed by Step One, Step Two, Step Three deep dives.", "position": 5, "objective": "Decompose the recommendation into three mutually exclusive steps", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" }, { "to": 18, "from": 18, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-29c9c9b27d1f", "evidence": "VR 75% vs reading 10% vs lecture 5% retention benchmark.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show retention gap between learning modes", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-75dbc2270cb6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Section divider 'three steps' + Steps 1 and 2 stated", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 29, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-8bebeea35263", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief", "evidence": "Three-step relief plan plus CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a mix of qualitative bullet points and a quantitative bar chart to illustrate the correlation between tech debt and revenue growth.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Two-color bars contrast High vs Low tech-debt cohorts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 4, "from": 3, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-5cf1d5b0ad16", "evidence": "<7% ROI satisfaction (p.3) plus 60/49/37% pain points and HIGH-DEBT vs LOW-DEBT revenue chart (p.4).", "position": 1, "objective": "Make tech debt feel expensive and accumulating", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 80, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-109b87c249fe", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Establishes CSP tech-debt landscape and rising IT TCO/Opex/Capex (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 6, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2604e8202f40", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Tech debt drag named, costs quantified (p.3-6).", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-row structure to contrast 'Significance/Critical' vs 'High Maturity' metrics for seven technology pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "High-significance row in bold purple vs muted maturity row.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6e679383b598", "evidence": "Significance-vs-maturity matrix (p.11) and top-quartile 0.8% vs 3.4% IT-cost rise comparison (p.12).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify maturity gap vs top quartile", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Repeated top-quartile vs less-advanced juxtapositions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6e679383b598", "evidence": "Significance-vs-maturity matrix (p.11) and top-quartile 0.8% vs 3.4% IT-cost rise comparison (p.12).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify maturity gap vs top quartile", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to visualize the 2x revenue growth gap between Leaders (9%) and Laggards (4%).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bar size 9% vs 4% with '2X' callout dramatises gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a 3D bar representation to show the proportion of budget spent on innovation, categorized by 'Increased', 'Stayed the same', and 'Decreased'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "93% vs 64% increased innovation budget repeated visual contrast.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-04182ea77f52", "evidence": "p12 lists Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human; p13/14/15 elaborate each; p16 closes with adoption-rate proof.", "position": 2, "objective": "Define Future Systems via three MECE pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-bf37a6db9d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Think like the top 10%' + 3 pillars Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to contrast the adoption of decoupling strategies between 'Leaders' and 'Laggards'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "80% Leaders vs <40% Laggards on decoupling.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-04182ea77f52", "evidence": "p12 lists Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human; p13/14/15 elaborate each; p16 closes with adoption-rate proof.", "position": 2, "objective": "Define Future Systems via three MECE pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-bf37a6db9d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Think like the top 10%' + 3 pillars Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to contrast high adoption rates of leaders (solid purple) against lower rates of laggards (hatched purple).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Solid vs outlined bars repeat Leader/Laggard contrast across all rows.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-04182ea77f52", "evidence": "p12 lists Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human; p13/14/15 elaborate each; p16 closes with adoption-rate proof.", "position": 2, "objective": "Define Future Systems via three MECE pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-bf37a6db9d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Think like the top 10%' + 3 pillars Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to contrast 97% adoption by Leaders vs 30% by Laggards regarding critical technologies for decoupling.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "97% vs 30% bars dramatise the adoption gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 17, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-0a770a944217", "evidence": "Section 'Act like the top 10%' walks five numbered actions p18-22 + barrier benchmark p23 — sequenced roadmap of moves Leaders make.", "position": 3, "objective": "Translate diagnosis into five sequenced actions", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c223d34034d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'Act like the top 10%' five numbered actions with 97% vs 30% proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 23, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-cfe73d440895", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Five numbered implications/actions tied to each finding.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to contrast 95% adoption by leaders vs 30% by laggards.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "95% vs 30% serverless adoption contrast.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 17, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-0a770a944217", "evidence": "Section 'Act like the top 10%' walks five numbered actions p18-22 + barrier benchmark p23 — sequenced roadmap of moves Leaders make.", "position": 3, "objective": "Translate diagnosis into five sequenced actions", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 70, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c223d34034d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'Act like the top 10%' five numbered actions with 97% vs 30% proof points.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 23, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-cfe73d440895", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Five numbered implications/actions tied to each finding.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0cf4b985591b", "docSlug": "19e27ba516c5bce6", "documentTitle": "Future-proof ad sales: The new transformation imperative", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a 3D perspective line graph to illustrate the crossover point in 2018.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Blue 'Digital' vs purple 'Traditional' lines crossing in 2018.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0cf4b985591b/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0cf4b985591b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0cf4b985591b#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 5, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-8b362478e39e", "evidence": "Six contiguous data slides (shock, digital vs non-digital chart, recession comparisons, share forecasts, trends list).", "position": 2, "objective": "Stack market evidence pointing to digital dominance", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-3187c9c56ac2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Ad market disruption history, digital vs non-digital, post-pandemic trends.", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide is split into two main sections: customer satisfaction (left) and market fragmentation (right).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Generational contrast 18-24 vs 65+ highlights gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-ac1a47f035cc", "evidence": "Visible symptom (positive but shallow satisfaction) → hidden system (multi-provider fragmentation) → root cause (lose-track frustration).", "position": 2, "objective": "Diagnose shallow satisfaction as fragmentation", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 78, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-6b5a5d6836ac", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Chapter 1: shallow satisfaction, fragmentation, branch desire", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-796715ea0957", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Chapter 1 surfaces customer behaviour facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Two-column 'from Products+Channels to (Products×Channels)Purpose'", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-bc797bce62ff", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots Interest→Satisfaction→Trust→Advocacy bullseye as the maturity progression unlocked by the multiplier effect.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show maturity ladder from satisfaction to advocacy", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-6e405b239df7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2: three pivots + four strategic plays + multiplier", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-7e17626f78e8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Chapter 2 derives pivots and strategic plays", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "docSlug": "abffd4c7eaab37e8", "documentTitle": "How aligning security and the business creates cyber resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.773, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The slide uses a donut chart to visualize survey responses regarding security involvement in cloud discussions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Cloud benefits vs security afterthought framed as tension.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-14444217b104", "evidence": "Three sequential data findings (270 attacks, 82% budgets up, 32% cloud gap) building to the alignment thesis.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show the data on where the cybersecurity world is now", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 78, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-e58807010fdf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Championing cybersecurity divider + state-of-the-world stats: attacks up, budgets up, cloud lagging.", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "docSlug": "abffd4c7eaab37e8", "documentTitle": "How aligning security and the business creates cyber resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast between two exec cohorts is the whole point of the slide.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 26, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-20623d50da77", "evidence": "Headline 'Are security and non-security executives on the same page?' with 43% vs 31% comparison.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast security vs non-security executive views as proof of misalignment", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-f0b30fd9e7ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'How to be a Cyber Champion' + 3 pillars (CISO seat, threat-centric, secure cloud).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "docSlug": "ee43cd765b3d02ea", "documentTitle": "How will COVID-19 change the consumer?", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart displays net purchase impact by COVID-19, with segments for postponed, brand new, used/refurbished, and unknown status.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Zero baseline contrasts purchases above vs postponements below.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 6, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-042c54822650", "evidence": "Net-purchase stacked bars (p6) + 34% headline (p7) reinforce same pattern.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show used/refurbished is now a widespread habit", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-c59d9ed8299b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover/context plus 9 data slides on ecommerce, used devices, and tech usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-df00f592beff", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Nine data slides on ecommerce, refurb, importance shifts, sustained usage.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "docSlug": "ee43cd765b3d02ea", "documentTitle": "How will COVID-19 change the consumer?", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a diverging bar format to show 'less important' vs 'more important' shifts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Red callout against magenta/purple bars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-0828195eecd4", "evidence": "Same factor list shown across Smartphones/TVs/Laptops (p8) and other devices (p9).", "position": 4, "objective": "Split purchase-decision drivers by device segment to surface what matters most", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-c59d9ed8299b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover/context plus 9 data slides on ecommerce, used devices, and tech usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-df00f592beff", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Nine data slides on ecommerce, refurb, importance shifts, sustained usage.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }