{
  "kind": "tool",
  "value": "confirmation-bias",
  "collectionKey": "slides:tool:confirmation-bias:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 2,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
      "docSlug": "dd91c78f6570bf29",
      "documentTitle": "2023 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2023",
      "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
      "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 142,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "summarize",
      "notes": "Slide from the State of AI 2023 report.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Slide acknowledges sceptics' counter-arguments to balance the prior x-risk slides.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea/142",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-06b04d219fea#slide-142",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 148,
          "from": 139,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-17c0a044d464",
          "evidence": "Hendrycks taxonomy, x-risk explosion, sceptics, govt attention, jailbreak evidence accumulate.",
          "position": 14,
          "objective": "Frame the safety debate, both x-risk and demonstrated unsafe behaviour",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 155,
          "from": 121,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-478c8c58938c",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Politics + Safety sections explore regulatory, geopolitical and risk implications.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        },
        {
          "to": 155,
          "from": 121,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-554ec1797b3a",
          "arcName": "The Mountain",
          "arcSlug": "mountain",
          "beatName": "Climax",
          "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
          "evidence": "Regulatory divergence and the x-risk debate erupt into the mainstream.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 45,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019f6b8f-1cbd-757b-94a7-b6ded1b35925",
      "docSlug": "jarvis-googles-ideological-echo-chamber",
      "documentTitle": "Googles Ideological Echo Chamber",
      "authorId": "googles-ideological-echo-chamber",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": null,
      "aspectRatio": null,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "key_messages",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "This slide appears to be from the 'Google's Ideological Echo Chamber' memo (Damore).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "We all have biases and use motivated reasoning to dismiss ideas that run counter to our internal values.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-1cbd-757b-94a7-b6ded1b35925/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1cbd-757b-94a7-b6ded1b35925",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-1cbd-757b-94a7-b6ded1b35925#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "a8d59a02-9ee3-4a03-ac43-4d1737b68cf1",
          "evidence": "The deck discusses the harm of Google's biases",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "The cost of inaction",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 7,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "ded0c26e-8b5b-4672-aed9-d8c8e598b914",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by discussing its harm",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}