{ "kind": "tool", "value": "centre-stage-effect", "collectionKey": "slides:tool:centre-stage-effect:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 13, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "docSlug": "da48f73eb97e2470", "documentTitle": "2018 True-Luxury Global Consumer Insight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "decompose_segments", "notes": "The slide uses a custom 2D matrix mapping age (x-axis) against nationality maturity (y-axis).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Megacitier/Rich Upstarter placed centrally in the matrix", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-20f07ae4bb60", "evidence": "Slide 9 plots 9 behavioral segments on Age × Nationality (mature/emerging) with sweet-spot quadrant highlighted.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal the segmentation map", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 88, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-0f6bca7fa183", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Segments to understand + 10 trends brands must master", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0", "docSlug": "4bc8260cae8e26dd", "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Unlocking potential from AI and GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare three vendor categories across approach, use cases, and sample vendors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Three options laid out symmetrically; central 'Point solutions' framed as balanced", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-42e9078455d0#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 19, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-c2d3f75df558", "evidence": "Three vendor archetypes (Enterprise / Point / Foundation), target architecture, 6 CSFs", "position": 8, "objective": "Equip CFO with vendor scenarios, target tech state, and CSFs", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e39-a4d2f8072a0e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Process/operating-model/tech implications, vendor map, 6 CSFs, contacts", "position": 5, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65", "docSlug": "e7b7f6a0a34ccac6", "documentTitle": "2025 Executive Perspectives Future of Marketing with GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide highlights 'Reshape' as the primary focus area. BCG framework.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Preferred option (Reshape, 50%+) placed in the centre column.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65#slide-3", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae97-61c9c35ee0f2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Title, intro and Deploy/Reshape/Invent value framing of AI in marketing.", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65", "docSlug": "e7b7f6a0a34ccac6", "documentTitle": "2025 Executive Perspectives Future of Marketing with GenAI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column structure to categorize strategic pathways.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Vision / Future Back placed at centre between optimise and lighthouses.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-4d8684543d65#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 25, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e0-6af5d56e786e", "evidence": "Three columns Optimize / Vision Future-Back / Lighthouses with quick-win and bigger-bet logic.", "position": 10, "objective": "Offer three sequenced entry paths: optimise, vision, lighthouses", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 78, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae97-73a033c88de7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "'How to get it right', operating model shifts, MarTech enablers, three ways to get started.", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 25, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae97-7fb0905ba2c6", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "The Bridge", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-the-bridge", "evidence": "Five enablers, operating model shift, MarTech, three starting paths.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 93, "slideType": "recommendation", "function": "recommend", "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table to highlight Scenario B, with a callout box explaining the rationale and a footer note addressing the primary risk.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "'Midterste scenarie anbefales' - explicitly chooses middle option.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/93", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-93", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 97, "from": 84, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-52e9a3c46a82", "evidence": "Scenario 1 (drift+vedl, fravalgt) vs scenario 2 (udvikling, 3 sub-scenarios).", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare insourcing scenarios for IT development", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 116, "slideType": "next_steps", "function": "state_next_steps", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format to outline strategic initiatives, with a dedicated callout box for the rationale of the recommended approach.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Recommendation favours larger but still-feasible 200-220 mil. option.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/116", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-116", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-b14694bb7c39", "docSlug": "8fa69d7a48bdf702", "documentTitle": "e-Conomy SEA 2021 Roaring 20s: The SEA Digital Decade", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Google, Temasek, Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 76, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights the dominance of e-Commerce and DFS in total deal value over the observed period.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Title literally invokes centre stage.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-b14694bb7c39/76", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-b14694bb7c39", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-b14694bb7c39#slide-76", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 81, "from": 70, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b313-ca4ab466da4c", "evidence": "Question (will funding survive COVID?) → data ($11.5B H1, $14B dry powder, 23 unicorns) → insight: SEA confidence intact.", "position": 6, "objective": "Reveal funding hit all-time high despite the pandemic", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 75, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 81, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9145-0162f8f4f11c", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Consumers, merchants, sectoral GMV, financial services, funding all build momentum.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 81, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9145-14a7f68729fa", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Is", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-is-3", "evidence": "Current state: 2021 GMV by sector + funding data.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "docSlug": "427acb0947e20afd", "documentTitle": "Everyday Moments of Truth", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide highlights the 'conference room' as the critical gap area for intervention, contrasting it with classroom and boardroom efforts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Recommended option placed in the centre of the three-column comparison", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-aa28bd32979b#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-0bdc53a6c6a6", "evidence": "Figure 7 highlights conference room (red) between greyed-out classroom and boardroom; title states 'we focus on the gap in the conference room.'", "position": 3, "objective": "Narrow focus from broad gender efforts to the conference room", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 86, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-bc288f53070f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Classroom/Conference room/Boardroom framework focuses on conference room", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 13, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a4-702a-b0b2-5e1c9ac79c6c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Conference room is where the gap can be closed", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6", "docSlug": "ad48a7aff8040249", "documentTitle": "Global Private Equity Report 2016", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 66, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize investment targets, highlighting the top-right quadrant as the prime target for recession-proofing efforts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Recommended quadrant placed top-right as the visual destination.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6/66", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-f31a406868d6#slide-66", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 65, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-72192a9b9c6f", "evidence": "Section opens 'Have you stormproofed your portfolio?', 2x2 prime-target quadrant on p.66, three numbered actions pp.68-69.", "position": 9, "objective": "Triage portfolio for recession with 2x2 and prioritized actions", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 85, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 69, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-96bfcaddcd0f", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Sweet-spot, thematic, value-creation playbooks plus recession-proofing in Section 3.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 69, "from": 65, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9143-a9e8f78c72e3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Section 3 recession-proofing playbook with 2x2 and three actions.", "position": 5, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "docSlug": "77f157094d06f0f2", "documentTitle": "Green by Default", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "Accenture Green Innovation framework", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Eco-essential placed in the centre column to nudge selection", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-d1ec7aa1fd91", "evidence": "p13 is a Market Impact x Business Model Impact matrix with three columns (Additive 85% / Eco-essential 16% / Boundless 37%); p14 contrasts the two extremes.", "position": 4, "objective": "Position eco-essential innovation as the sweet spot between two extremes", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-8f2dba73309e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Eco-essential innovation revealed; framework 2x2; 3-dimension preview", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-9dba52e21cc2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Concept reveal + 2x2 framework showing under-served quadrant", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-48cc8be3a9dd", "docSlug": "d9e7b643d40401de", "documentTitle": "Introduction to Ipsos May 2024", "authorId": "IPSOS", "authorName": "Ipsos", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst", "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "market_landscape", "function": "establish_context", "notes": "The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke layout to categorize competitors by sector (top half) and specialty (bottom half).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Ipsos placed at the centre of the wheel", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-48cc8be3a9dd/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-48cc8be3a9dd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e87-7479-8208-48cc8be3a9dd#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019debdb-d409-7158-99ac-3faa45fab583", "evidence": "p5 peer table with Ipsos highlighted dashed; p6 hub-and-spoke maps competitors by sector/specialty.", "position": 2, "objective": "Position Ipsos uniquely vs. competitor archetypes", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 2, "beatId": "019debdb-d2f7-746d-91aa-f05479ed473b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Scale, value chain, competitive position, business mix", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 7, "from": 3, "beatId": "019debdb-d3a2-72bc-ad15-3ca3fbce3601", "arcName": "The Golden Circle", "arcSlug": "golden-circle", "beatName": "How", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Value chain, services, methods, business mix", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "docSlug": "bb039b619ada143e", "documentTitle": "Modern Networks", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The central hexagon acts as a focal point for the 'What's at stake?' question.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "'What's at stake?' hexagon centered as visual anchor", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Iceberg", "slug": "10-iceberg", "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-365391f1de5a", "evidence": "Surface 87% bottleneck/64% risk stats then expose 6 hidden risk categories in hexagon", "position": 2, "objective": "Move from visible bottleneck symptom to underlying multi-dimensional risk", "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause", "confidence": 80, "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-e502792a5312", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "87% bottleneck stat, 64% face risks, hexagon of 6 business risks", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-f586a071b6f2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Indices, survey data, risk percentages", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0", "docSlug": "c2bc13ff7529e2ae", "documentTitle": "Out @ Work Barometer", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to segment the population. The percentages (44%, 8%, 35%, 13%) sum to 100%.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Quadrant percentages center the eye on the contrast 44%/8% vs 35%/13%", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-4fce5137340f", "evidence": "p.10 introduces 4 archetypes; p.11 title literally says 'The paradox of LGBT+ inclusion: 4/5 comfortable but only 50% out'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Surface and resolve the apparent contradiction in inclusion data", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 90, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-e4558c6e030a", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "4 archetypes reveal the paradox: 4/5 comfortable but only 50% out", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-f1010ca636e9", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Archetypes, paradox of inclusion, identity disparity", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }