{ "kind": "slide_type", "value": "peer_benchmark", "collectionKey": "slides:slide_type:peer_benchmark:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 4292, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 179, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses donut charts to represent segment distribution.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses donut charts to represent segment distribution.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0c4-94c5-768d-9efe-936cf587a3d1", "evidence": "Donut tiers (p12) and RODI bars by tier (p13) explicitly segment the sample.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split the population into Champions/Contenders/Cadets and show the performance delta", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare performance metrics across segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare performance metrics across segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0c4-94c5-768d-9efe-936cf587a3d1", "evidence": "Donut tiers (p12) and RODI bars by tier (p13) explicitly segment the sample.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split the population into Champions/Contenders/Cadets and show the performance delta", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart highlights a significant gap in perceived importance of digital skills between high-performing 'Champions' and other respondents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart highlights a significant gap in perceived importance of digital skills between high-performing 'Champions' and other respondents.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart compares two segments across 10 specific risk-related business activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart compares two segments across 10 specific risk-related business activities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-3a374715e840", "evidence": "Every chart explicitly contrasts 'more mature' vs 'less mature' groups, culminating in p.31 'Risk leaders are empowering the business'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Quantify leader-vs-laggard gap as the opportunity", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-06bf25894f0c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leader-vs-laggard benchmarks proving leaders' agility and empowerment outperform", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 34, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1a525df1d11a", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Transformation", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-transformation", "evidence": "Agility, culture, growth-driving reinvention", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "docSlug": "779b6b192abf180f", "documentTitle": "Industrial Speedsters How advanced technologies can turbocharge your speed to market", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide defines three segments based on speed-to-market criteria (I2P, P2P, D2D).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide defines three segments based on speed-to-market criteria (I2P, P2P, D2D).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-70cb3ecbd47a", "evidence": "p.8 frames 'Is there a direct link?'; pp.9-11 deliver three pieces of evidence (tech leverage, growth, profitability)", "position": 2, "objective": "Pose the speed-tech-performance question then reveal the speedster advantage across three dimensions", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 85, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-6ea328bbe0be", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Speedster topline growth 7.9% and operating margin 13.8% advantages", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 11, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-79fb6806df3a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Question and three advantages tying speed to tech to performance", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "docSlug": "779b6b192abf180f", "documentTitle": "Industrial Speedsters How advanced technologies can turbocharge your speed to market", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide highlights the correlation between speed-to-market and operating margin performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide highlights the correlation between speed-to-market and operating margin performance.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-70cb3ecbd47a", "evidence": "p.8 frames 'Is there a direct link?'; pp.9-11 deliver three pieces of evidence (tech leverage, growth, profitability)", "position": 2, "objective": "Pose the speed-tech-performance question then reveal the speedster advantage across three dimensions", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 85, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-6ea328bbe0be", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Speedster topline growth 7.9% and operating margin 13.8% advantages", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 11, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-79fb6806df3a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Question and three advantages tying speed to tech to performance", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "docSlug": "bbff997ea013e081", "documentTitle": "Innovation Unleashed Building a culture that drives sustained growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to illustrate the performance delta between two segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to illustrate the performance delta between two segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-7d9830a24610", "evidence": "p5 sets up the two cohorts; p6 shows 6.5X / 2.2X / 4.2X advantages; p7 charts the $11.8bn revenue gap.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast Pacesetters vs Stragglers and quantify the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-82d5c70dd096", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Frames innovation culture importance, introduces flywheel and Pacesetter vs Straggler benchmark.", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-969b986656e9", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Stragglers lag, $11.8bn forgone, 81% lack behaviors.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1", "docSlug": "231d34252220eeae", "documentTitle": "Level Up: Elevate Your Business With a Platform Strategy", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide highlights a consistent 1.5x to 2.6x higher investment ratio for platform adopters compared to non-platform companies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide highlights a consistent 1.5x to 2.6x higher investment ratio for platform adopters compared to non-platform companies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 18, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-34051abf8eaf", "evidence": "p18 paired bars across 7 tech categories show 1.5-2.6x gap between platform and non-platform spend.", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify the tech-investment gap between platform adopters and non-platform peers", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-f8587d99fbd2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three-step playbook with Walmart/LEGO/PayPal/Maersk cases and 2.3x tech-spend chart.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-09ce1515a37e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three steps to make the jump and 'game time' CTA.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "docSlug": "e6b3796b5d45dab4", "documentTitle": "Make the leap, take the lead: Tech strategies for innovation and growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked area representation to visualize the widening revenue gap between two cohorts over a 10-year period (2015-2025).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a stacked area representation to visualize the widening revenue gap between two cohorts over a 10-year period (2015-2025).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-3aa280cc16f9", "evidence": "Section 'At the leading edge' systematically benchmarks Leaders vs Laggards on adoption, growth, value, experience.", "position": 1, "objective": "Contrast Leaders against Laggards to size the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-1333d379dbf0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Leaders vs Laggards: 5x growth gap, widening divide.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-21a6d205c0ef", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Laggards falling behind, growth gap widening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "docSlug": "bb039b619ada143e", "documentTitle": "Modern Networks", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a vertical bar chart with a bridge/multiplier callout to compare different levels of network modernization shift.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a vertical bar chart with a bridge/multiplier callout to compare different levels of network modernization shift.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-465de0183eba#slide-19", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 17, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-3ea8333e978c", "evidence": "Imperative I diagram contrasts 0%->100% modernization, -21% cost reduction, 2.4x innovators, British Sugar proof", "position": 4, "objective": "Show measurable delta from flipping budget legacy->modernization", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-ef1ffd9c3846", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three imperatives, cost models, 4 client cases, maturity bar comparison", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 33, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-fea91efea593", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three imperatives plus closing CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide highlights that performance-vesting awards correlate strongly with company size.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide highlights that performance-vesting awards correlate strongly with company size.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-72bd8b10b9e9", "evidence": "Every LTI exhibit (p11-14) splits prevalence by market-cap buckets to surface size-driven differences.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show LTI design patterns vary systematically with company market capitalization", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-de09e6277adb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "LTI data segmented by market cap shows size-driven implications for plan design.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide provides industry benchmarking data for long-term incentive plan design in the E&P sector.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide provides industry benchmarking data for long-term incentive plan design in the E&P sector.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-72bd8b10b9e9", "evidence": "Every LTI exhibit (p11-14) splits prevalence by market-cap buckets to surface size-driven differences.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show LTI design patterns vary systematically with company market capitalization", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-de09e6277adb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "LTI data segmented by market cap shows size-driven implications for plan design.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-72bd8b10b9e9", "evidence": "Every LTI exhibit (p11-14) splits prevalence by market-cap buckets to surface size-driven differences.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show LTI design patterns vary systematically with company market capitalization", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-de09e6277adb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "LTI data segmented by market cap shows size-driven implications for plan design.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare the prevalence of different performance period lengths.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare the prevalence of different performance period lengths.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-72bd8b10b9e9", "evidence": "Every LTI exhibit (p11-14) splits prevalence by market-cap buckets to surface size-driven differences.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show LTI design patterns vary systematically with company market capitalization", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-de09e6277adb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "LTI data segmented by market cap shows size-driven implications for plan design.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "docSlug": "01932b757118df5b", "documentTitle": "Oil and Gas EP Incentive Plan Design", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart indicates that 63% of awards have a maximum payout of 200% of target.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart indicates that 63% of awards have a maximum payout of 200% of target.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-ed30207fe34d#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-72bd8b10b9e9", "evidence": "Every LTI exhibit (p11-14) splits prevalence by market-cap buckets to surface size-driven differences.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show LTI design patterns vary systematically with company market capitalization", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-de09e6277adb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "LTI data segmented by market cap shows size-driven implications for plan design.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "docSlug": "4e37d83ee6e25fae", "documentTitle": "Oil Gas EP Incentive Compensation", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Data presented in two grouped bar charts comparing LTI practices across years and market cap segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Data presented in two grouped bar charts comparing LTI practices across years and market cap segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-e726c3075bde#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 12, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-61fc47176d7c", "evidence": "Quote intro then 7 data slides each contributing one LTI design dimension", "position": 4, "objective": "Layer LTI evidence (vehicle mix, performance metrics, period, payout) into pattern of best practice", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 75, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-cfce13a66087", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Annual incentive plan and LTI mechanics decomposed", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 14, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-15af582aa7f0", "evidence": "Scatter (47% vs 14%), 13.5pp profit gap, 16pp resilience gap.", "position": 4, "objective": "Quantify gap between leaders and rest across capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0355ac434d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Scatter, gap charts, +7pp/-3pp, 70% benchmark prove leaders' edge.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "docSlug": "2c961bef6a29da9b", "documentTitle": "Resiliency in the making", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a dumbbell plot style to show the range of maturity scores per industry.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a dumbbell plot style to show the range of maturity scores per industry.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-2af016008d30", "evidence": "p10 piecemeal inadequate, p11 31 capabilities, p12 maturity 56/100 with bottom/top quartile spread", "position": 3, "objective": "Show industry maturity gap against Resiliency 2.0 capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-1b45fd587109", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Must mature; 31-capability framework; 56/100 industry maturity", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2cd91a9566ea", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Localized reconfigurable chains; reinvented roles; multi-skilled workforce", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "docSlug": "be7f58e911596f6c", "documentTitle": "Strategy at the Pace of Technology", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a base of 1.0 for 'all other companies' and shows the relative multiplier for 'tech-forward' companies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a base of 1.0 for 'all other companies' and shows the relative multiplier for 'tech-forward' companies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-7c9ac3983b89", "evidence": "p10 21% leaders → p11 2.3x ROIC → p12 TRS curve → p13 industry distribution explicitly compares the two groups.", "position": 3, "objective": "Quantify the gap between tech-forward leaders and the rest", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e31-8c9a97f9fdd7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Figures 2-4: 2.3x outperformance, TRS curve, 16-industry distribution.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 13, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e31-94d7135fdca7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Establishes tech-forward gap and outperformance data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7a814d47b8dd", "docSlug": "4d3687fa691fcd8b", "documentTitle": "The art of AI maturity Advancing from practice to performance", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a matrix of filled/empty squares to represent performance levels across four segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a matrix of filled/empty squares to represent performance levels across four segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7a814d47b8dd/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7a814d47b8dd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7a814d47b8dd#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-4639593ed737", "evidence": "Pp 14-16 quantify gap: 50% revenue growth, 25% scaling, 8% CX, 17 capability heatmap", "position": 4, "objective": "Show Achievers outperform peers on key metrics", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-83fe9528254e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Achievers outperform peers on revenue (50%), scaling (25%), CX (8%)", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "docSlug": "04e00f0265e26e9f", "documentTitle": "The disability inclusion imperative", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart compares revenue per employee ($845k vs $781k) to demonstrate the productivity advantage of disability inclusion leaders.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart compares revenue per employee ($845k vs $781k) to demonstrate the productivity advantage of disability inclusion leaders.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 11, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-71aad0d724c7", "evidence": "Revenue/net income/economic profit gains, productivity edge, half-trillion market, Microsoft case, 5x Glassdoor mentions, 4x positive reviews.", "position": 3, "objective": "Stack multiple proof points that leaders outperform", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 82, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-ae0a4b976654", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Business case + culture challenge (76% don't disclose) — the gap and why it persists", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 19, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-be56e502f9fc", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Workforce gap + culture challenge with concealment data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8537fbbea5ae", "docSlug": "4ab3464eb988b34b", "documentTitle": "The next billion consumers", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Fitch Country Risk Index scores (0-100, 100=lower risk).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Fitch Country Risk Index scores (0-100, 100=lower risk).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8537fbbea5ae/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8537fbbea5ae", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-8537fbbea5ae#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 21, "from": 17, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-cb89fb71c36c", "evidence": "Risk-index hurdles (p.18-19) -> 'Offerings exist to address these challenges' divider + BNPL 112.3% growth (p.20-21)", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame operational hurdles, then show emerging digital offerings closing the gap", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-2d301e587770", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Operational risk index, dissatisfaction funnel, China/India first-mover threat", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }