{ "kind": "slide_type", "value": "comparison_table", "collectionKey": "slides:slide_type:comparison_table:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 5807, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 242, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "docSlug": "da48f73eb97e2470", "documentTitle": "2018 True-Luxury Global Consumer Insight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative table structure to contrast two distinct geographic markets.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a comparative table structure to contrast two distinct geographic markets.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 21, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-3156de055353", "evidence": "Three slides build the same conclusion: social #1 (+29pp since 2013), Instagram/Wechat lead, influencer authenticity.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show social media's rise to #1 lever", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 78, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-15ef0d1686df", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Data on casualwear, social, channels, then Millennial & Chinese deep dives", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 29, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-1d4d961a1538", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Trend data: casualwear, made-in, social, channels", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "docSlug": "da48f73eb97e2470", "documentTitle": "2018 True-Luxury Global Consumer Insight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to show the delta in consumer behavior between global and Chinese luxury shoppers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to show the delta in consumer behavior between global and Chinese luxury shoppers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 41, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-3e11f88f929e", "evidence": "Opens with 3 Chinese segments (~55% spend), then digital ecosystem, WeChat journey, ROPO, brand ranking.", "position": 9, "objective": "Zoom into the Chinese consumer", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-15ef0d1686df", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Data on casualwear, social, channels, then Millennial & Chinese deep dives", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 51, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-23f7258e57dc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Millennial + Chinese segment deep dives", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0", "docSlug": "f81129b8aa9548e2", "documentTitle": "2023 Post Parcel industry trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a scatter plot to show the correlation between valuation multiples and analyst sentiment, alongside a bar chart for growth expectations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a scatter plot to show the correlation between valuation multiples and analyst sentiment, alongside a bar chart for growth expectations.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cb4450fbbed0#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 13, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de09b-0e89-733c-b3a1-34a28bbbac93", "evidence": "Volume/revenue/cost vs specialists (p13), EV/EBIT vs integrators (p14), competitor archetypes (p15).", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast incumbent Posts against specialists/integrators/marketplaces to expose the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019de09b-0d55-71d0-aba7-6c3cc5abe9b7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Posts struggling, diversification flat, parcel-share loss, EV/EBIT gap, Amazon, supply-chain shift, ESG.", "position": 3, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 18, "from": 9, "beatId": "019de09b-0dee-705c-82d6-1215f0116001", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "'So what is happening?' divider then 9 slides diagnosing implications.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "docSlug": "a4e612631d07709f", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights March 2024", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses a dot-plot/dumbbell chart style to compare 2022 vs 2023 metrics across industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses a dot-plot/dumbbell chart style to compare 2022 vs 2023 metrics across industries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-c7e0a75b62fd", "evidence": "Sequential charts (MRP, EV recovery, US-vs-CDAX, M&A premia) accumulate evidence about valuation dynamics", "position": 1, "objective": "Build a market-valuation pattern from four evidence pieces", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 3, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-c116fc306610", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Industry-level EV recovery breakdown across 10 sectors", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "docSlug": "a4e612631d07709f", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights March 2024", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dot plot/connected scatter plot style to compare metrics across industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dot plot/connected scatter plot style to compare metrics across industries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-c7e0a75b62fd", "evidence": "Sequential charts (MRP, EV recovery, US-vs-CDAX, M&A premia) accumulate evidence about valuation dynamics", "position": 1, "objective": "Build a market-valuation pattern from four evidence pieces", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-c6e9650709e0", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Cross-geography (US vs CDAX) and trading-vs-transaction premia", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "docSlug": "a4e612631d07709f", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights March 2024", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a custom range-bar visualization to compare transaction multiples (red) against trading multiple ranges (blue).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a custom range-bar visualization to compare transaction multiples (red) against trading multiple ranges (blue).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d1c878ef3f21#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-c7e0a75b62fd", "evidence": "Sequential charts (MRP, EV recovery, US-vs-CDAX, M&A premia) accumulate evidence about valuation dynamics", "position": 1, "objective": "Build a market-valuation pattern from four evidence pieces", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-c6e9650709e0", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Cross-geography (US vs CDAX) and trading-vs-transaction premia", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "docSlug": "0a69d862df0691e5", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights November 2023", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 3, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dot-plot/line chart hybrid to compare industry performance metrics over two years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dot-plot/line chart hybrid to compare industry performance metrics over two years.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be/3", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be#slide-3", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ccbdd3467537", "evidence": "p2 broad market → p3 industry multiples → p4 US vs DE → p5 M&A vs trading discount.", "position": 1, "objective": "Zoom from broad German MRP into industry- and region-level multiple comparisons", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-d5db954a8791", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Industry/region multiples comparisons", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-e6d27bf34374", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantitative market data presented", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "docSlug": "0a69d862df0691e5", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights November 2023", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dot-plot style visualization to compare performance metrics across two geographies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dot-plot style visualization to compare performance metrics across two geographies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ccbdd3467537", "evidence": "p2 broad market → p3 industry multiples → p4 US vs DE → p5 M&A vs trading discount.", "position": 1, "objective": "Zoom from broad German MRP into industry- and region-level multiple comparisons", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-d5db954a8791", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Industry/region multiples comparisons", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-e6d27bf34374", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantitative market data presented", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "docSlug": "0a69d862df0691e5", "documentTitle": "A&M Valuation Insights November 2023", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "A&M", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a custom range-bar visualization to compare transaction multiples (red) against trading multiple ranges (blue).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a custom range-bar visualization to compare transaction multiples (red) against trading multiple ranges (blue).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-d538e18344be#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 2, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ccbdd3467537", "evidence": "p2 broad market → p3 industry multiples → p4 US vs DE → p5 M&A vs trading discount.", "position": 1, "objective": "Zoom from broad German MRP into industry- and region-level multiple comparisons", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 72, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-d5db954a8791", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Industry/region multiples comparisons", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 5, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-e6d27bf34374", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Quantitative market data presented", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "docSlug": "25cda12aac1298b5", "documentTitle": "Commercial payments, reinvented Your blueprint for accelerating payments revenue growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a custom visual layout that functions as a comparison matrix of survey results.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a custom visual layout that functions as a comparison matrix of survey results.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fc7f78e76a18#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 27, "from": 23, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-a2e5178221d3", "evidence": "Section titled 'VAS could unlock huge revenue potential'; 60% would buy, 51% prefer their bank.", "position": 4, "objective": "Reveal that value-added services are the untapped revenue engine clients will pay for", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-fec0ee6f3991", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "VAS unlock revenue + future growth shape vs. investment alignment.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 23, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-0dcb7479af45", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "VAS = $371b untapped; investment misaligned with growth.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-row structure to contrast 'Significance/Critical' vs 'High Maturity' metrics for seven technology pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dual-row structure to contrast 'Significance/Critical' vs 'High Maturity' metrics for seven technology pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6e679383b598", "evidence": "Significance-vs-maturity matrix (p.11) and top-quartile 0.8% vs 3.4% IT-cost rise comparison (p.12).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify maturity gap vs top quartile", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-bc797bce62ff", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots Interest→Satisfaction→Trust→Advocacy bullseye as the maturity progression unlocked by the multiplier effect.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show maturity ladder from satisfaction to advocacy", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-6e405b239df7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2: three pivots + four strategic plays + multiplier", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-7e17626f78e8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Chapter 2 derives pivots and strategic plays", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "docSlug": "77f157094d06f0f2", "documentTitle": "Green by Default", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-pair structure to define the spectrum of green innovation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a contrast-pair structure to define the spectrum of green innovation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-d1ec7aa1fd91", "evidence": "p13 is a Market Impact x Business Model Impact matrix with three columns (Additive 85% / Eco-essential 16% / Boundless 37%); p14 contrasts the two extremes.", "position": 4, "objective": "Position eco-essential innovation as the sweet spot between two extremes", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-8f2dba73309e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Eco-essential innovation revealed; framework 2x2; 3-dimension preview", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-9dba52e21cc2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Concept reveal + 2x2 framework showing under-served quadrant", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "docSlug": "abffd4c7eaab37e8", "documentTitle": "How aligning security and the business creates cyber resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 26, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-20623d50da77", "evidence": "Headline 'Are security and non-security executives on the same page?' with 43% vs 31% comparison.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast security vs non-security executive views as proof of misalignment", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-f0b30fd9e7ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'How to be a Cyber Champion' + 3 pillars (CISO seat, threat-centric, secure cloud).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare two time periods (2023 vs 2021) across 8 categories of risk management activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare two time periods (2023 vs 2021) across 8 categories of risk management activities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-30f011d5a722", "evidence": "p.18 confidence gap, p.19 progress chart 2023 vs 2021, p.20 explicit 'less proactive when compared to 2021' delta.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show risk function regression vs. 2021", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-fe0d52be3c7f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Risk is everywhere' + 'Organizations need to raise their game' sections lay out the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 26, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1586370e77a1", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Challenges & Allies", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-challenges-allies", "evidence": "Interconnected web, tech and skills allies", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "docSlug": "1053e574c4b7b824", "documentTitle": "March Macro Brief Financial fissures emerge", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-panel layout: a bar chart for capital ratios and a table for liquidity programs, followed by a callout box for corporate implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dual-panel layout: a bar chart for capital ratios and a table for liquidity programs, followed by a callout box for corporate implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 16, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-7423db0a3dac", "evidence": "p17-18 explicitly benchmark APAC bank rate-risk and capitalization against US/Europe peers.", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare APAC banking resilience versus US/Europe", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 55, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-53cbf20e7eef", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Spotlight section peels into regional banking stress (NA, Europe, APAC).", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 52, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-60c07eb39102", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Bulk of deck is data charts and KPI dashboards across topics.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-07f0c943a58e", "evidence": "1.7% Canada vs US, 5% current-vs-optimal TV gap, $1.4B missed.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify Canada-vs-optimal spend gap and missed sales", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b1bdf31f78b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "5 insights, 1.7% spend, 5% TV gap, $1.4B missed sales.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c323f729f0d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Study scope and Canadian spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses arrows to indicate the direction and magnitude of the gap between current and optimal spend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses arrows to indicate the direction and magnitude of the gap between current and optimal spend.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-07f0c943a58e", "evidence": "1.7% Canada vs US, 5% current-vs-optimal TV gap, $1.4B missed.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify Canada-vs-optimal spend gap and missed sales", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b1bdf31f78b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "5 insights, 1.7% spend, 5% TV gap, $1.4B missed sales.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c323f729f0d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Study scope and Canadian spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a donut chart visualization to highlight the gap between two CAGR metrics.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a donut chart visualization to highlight the gap between two CAGR metrics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 21, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-137a92a24267", "evidence": "20% viewership CAGR vs 8% spend CAGR -> 2.0x ROI in auto.", "position": 5, "objective": "LFVC growth-vs-spend disconnect reveals 2x ROI insight", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 80, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 21, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b9cb06c261e7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "LFVC 12% disconnect and 2x ROI in auto industry.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 25, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c79f80d42f32", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Halo effect, marginal ROI, LFVC opportunity.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280", "docSlug": "8c480ec665143ca2", "documentTitle": "Pulse of Change Index", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded emphasis on 'Talent' to highlight the perception gap.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a color-coded emphasis on 'Talent' to highlight the perception gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 9, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-74ad9d2e9468", "evidence": "Index ranks Talent #2 vs leaders' #4 (p9) -> 42% cite skills shortage as top-3 industry-wide (p10).", "position": 3, "objective": "Contrast the Index's talent ranking with leaders' perception and surface the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-22f5b2ca1a3f", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Talent perception gap: Index says #2, leaders rank #4", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-2f4759977eab", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Preparedness gaps in tech, AI, and talent perception", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7fa84bbf490b", "docSlug": "4c8c92dad640bf3f", "documentTitle": "The art of AI maturity Advancing from practice to performance North America", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a matrix of colored squares to indicate performance levels across four categories: Strategy and Sponsorship, Data and AI Core, Talent and Culture, and Responsible AI.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a matrix of colored squares to indicate performance levels across four categories: Strategy and Sponsorship, Data and AI Core, Talent and Culture, and Responsible AI.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7fa84bbf490b/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7fa84bbf490b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-7fa84bbf490b#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 15, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-5d3edf07f6fa", "evidence": "50% greater revenue growth, 5% more likely to scale pilots, capability matrix vs peers.", "position": 4, "objective": "Quantify the performance gap between Achievers and others", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-901ded58915f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Achievers enjoy 50% greater revenue growth, scale pilots more, lead on sustainability.", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 17, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-a1d6fecab517", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Achievers outperform peers on revenue and sustainability.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "docSlug": "04e00f0265e26e9f", "documentTitle": "The disability inclusion imperative", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the breakdown of labor force status (Not in workforce, Unemployed, Employed).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the breakdown of labor force status (Not in workforce, Unemployed, Employed).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-6e1725139f7f", "evidence": "29%→37% over time and 37% vs ~76% labor force participation gap.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show employment improvement and gap vs. people without disabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-a8b43c521d11", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, preface, ToC, US workforce employment data establishing the situation", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 19, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-be56e502f9fc", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Workforce gap + culture challenge with concealment data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-fc144b0ce4a2", "docSlug": "c340b50d0e568422", "documentTitle": "UAE Health Sector Pulse Quarter 1, 2021", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The left chart uses a broken axis between 2015 and 2016. The right chart is a bar chart comparing 6 entities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The left chart uses a broken axis between 2015 and 2016. The right chart is a bar chart comparing 6 entities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-fc144b0ce4a2/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-fc144b0ce4a2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-fc144b0ce4a2#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-d79ed2ab33ee", "evidence": "Demographics (p.7) + disease prevalence vs peers (p.8) + spend vs peers (p.9) + covid trend shifts (p.10) accumulate to a UAE health profile.", "position": 1, "objective": "Show UAE patient context through stacked evidence", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 70, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-61fbea7d3f38", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Demographics, disease, spend, providers, beds, payers — descriptive data slides.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-6d686177debf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "At a Glance summary plus UAE patient demographics and spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 22, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-78115b9da1c6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Sourced charts and DHA/World Bank data interwoven through every analytical slide.", "position": 4, "confidence": 58, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b37827d85a8a", "docSlug": "016797fefd364afb", "documentTitle": "Year-end Macro Brief Into the Fog of Winter", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes regional maps and country-specific flags.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Includes regional maps and country-specific flags.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b37827d85a8a/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b37827d85a8a", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b37827d85a8a#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 6, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3c-18e0176e931e", "evidence": "Country×indicator heatmap then split into Americas/Europe and Asia outlook tables.", "position": 2, "objective": "Segment macro state by region/indicator", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 78, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-934d522185d6", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Regional growth outlook tables — Americas/Europe and Asia.", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 50, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-a034708f1682", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Data-rich indicator slides report current readings.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 54, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-a433f4a76040", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Action titles convert each datapoint into an implication.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }