{ "kind": "slide_function", "value": "prioritize", "collectionKey": "slides:slide_function:prioritize:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 736, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 31, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "docSlug": "7373eac28d11a5fc", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q4 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "kpi_dashboard", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The chart uses a horizontal bar format to rank priorities, with a secondary column indicating the delta in percentage points.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a horizontal bar format to rank priorities, with a secondary column indicating the delta in percentage points.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-511f530ab1d0#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Paradox Resolver", "slug": "20-paradox-resolver", "bestFor": "Strategic pivots, innovation pitches, challenging conventional wisdom", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-b84b2e030aaa", "evidence": "Slides explicitly state investors want both long-term investment AND short-term delivery.", "position": 3, "objective": "Resolve the long-term-vs-short-term contradiction in investor demands", "structure": "The Apparent Contradiction -> Why Both Seem True -> The Deeper Truth That Reconciles", "confidence": 78, "description": "Introduce a seeming contradiction that captures attention, then resolve it with a deeper truth" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-a52d05d22052", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "What investors want: priorities, capital allocation, dividends/M&A", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 18, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87d9-b4f07e841e7d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Callouts translate findings into priorities for executives", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to show which initiatives address which optimization levers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a checkmark matrix to show which initiatives address which optimization levers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-ee82db654b80", "evidence": "Three coverage matrices map the 8 levers (columns) against operative / material-IT / cross-cutting categories (rows) with checkmarks.", "position": 3, "objective": "Show the 8 levers applied MECE across the 3 domains", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 23, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-0625f7d01f7e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "8 levers applied across operative/material-IT/cross-cutting; capacity-scaling concept.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1441905b54cf", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "8 levers explain where potential comes from.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 76, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The table uses a pie-chart icon to represent feasibility (realiserbarhed).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses a pie-chart icon to represent feasibility (realiserbarhed).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/76", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-76", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 78, "from": 75, "name": "Pareto Focus", "slug": "50-pareto-focus", "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-16f5a44ff006", "evidence": "Four-part proposal list with sizing 78-158 / 17-37 / 50-68 mio. kr.", "position": 13, "objective": "Catalogue all material-/IT-area proposals with size", "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 115, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-08b5faaeae90", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area sizing, 45 one-pagers with provenue, overlap reconciliation.", "position": 4, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 138, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-1b0067a923da", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Detailed 45 initiative one-pagers + implementation timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 155, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a funnel framework to visualize the filtering process of military capabilities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a funnel framework to visualize the filtering process of military capabilities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/155", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-155", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "docSlug": "ee507dc260892073", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 162, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a two-column layout to map excluded capabilities to their specific exclusion criteria.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a two-column layout to map excluded capabilities to their specific exclusion criteria.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555/162", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e11cabfae555#slide-162", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 162, "from": 152, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-3c7d05fd6019", "evidence": "Process diagrams walk through 4 trin: kapacitetsudvælgelse → omkostninger → skalering → økonomisk effekt; Thetis worked example on p.160.", "position": 23, "objective": "Zoom into Track-4 capacity-scaling methodology", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 107, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a table format to map IT elements to specific consolidation and standardization initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a table format to map IT elements to specific consolidation and standardization initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/107", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-107", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 144, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present strategic IT initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a structured table format to present strategic IT initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/144", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-144", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 148, "from": 98, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-54fbecd2dba5", "evidence": "Process in waves (p.112) + decision required on option (p.115) + 200-220 mil. recommended.", "position": 5, "objective": "Sequence IT consolidation in waves with two option scenarios", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 84, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 157, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a grid layout to present six distinct rationales for organizational proposals.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grid layout to present six distinct rationales for organizational proposals.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/157", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-157", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 172, "from": 150, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-5b4fc08a2941", "evidence": "1.752 ansatte mapping -> 6 delområder -> 16-28 mio. kr. samlet potentiale -> indfasning.", "position": 6, "objective": "Diagnose FMI organisation and propose six delforslag", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 165, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-30a6df91c9fe", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Baselines, segmentations, current-state diagnoses dominate first half.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 174, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a list-based structure to present three distinct optimization opportunities, each supported by qualitative descriptions and quantitative baseline data.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a list-based structure to present three distinct optimization opportunities, each supported by qualitative descriptions and quantitative baseline data.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/174", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-174", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 180, "from": 173, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-5fe633c906cc", "evidence": "Three areas -> individual potentialer -> bruttopotentiale ~9 mio. kr.", "position": 7, "objective": "Build up 9 mio. kr. potentiale across three forsyningsdelforslag", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 177, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to present initiatives, their descriptions, and rationales.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a structured table format to present initiatives, their descriptions, and rationales.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/177", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-177", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 180, "from": 173, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-5fe633c906cc", "evidence": "Three areas -> individual potentialer -> bruttopotentiale ~9 mio. kr.", "position": 7, "objective": "Build up 9 mio. kr. potentiale across three forsyningsdelforslag", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a 4-column layout to present key findings from a risk study.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 4-column layout to present key findings from a risk study.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-26ce602f5fa2", "evidence": "p.4 Andrée parable of inaction, p.5 four damning stats (83/81/77/72%), p.6 four-way recommendation.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame the risk gap and preview four-way response", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 78, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-fa2424ef86ee", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Introduction analogy + executive summary framing the risk landscape and four ways", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-10695e25d2ba", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Call to Adventure", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-call-to-adventure", "evidence": "Four ways + risk-everywhere wake-up", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 35, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a horizontal navigation bar at the top to indicate this is the 8th of 10 trends.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a horizontal navigation bar at the top to indicate this is the 8th of 10 trends.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/35", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-35", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 30, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-ebb56d290406", "evidence": "Same data-then-recommendation cadence: elections, M&A, property, minerals, industrial policy.", "position": 5, "objective": "For trends 6–10, drive from data to insight to recommendation", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 82, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-b49d6da6674b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Each trend ends with a 'Business considerations' recommendation slide", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 38, "from": 20, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-c785c164d625", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Charts, maps, and data slides for each of the 10 trends", "position": 4, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to categorize initiatives. The numbering (1-5) likely corresponds to the priority level or phase.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to categorize initiatives. The numbering (1-5) likely corresponds to the priority level or phase.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 28, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-2ffd6cc5f5d8", "evidence": "Labelled axes 'High/Immediate Impact' vs 'Lowest Effort' with quadrants Quick Wins, Strategic, etc.", "position": 7, "objective": "Prioritize initiatives on effort×impact 2x2", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 92, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-997f1af86d7b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "BCG recommends seven actions; Rec #1-#7 one-pagers", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The table uses 'nq' for 'not quantified' and provides specific cost breakdowns for various operational initiatives.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses 'nq' for 'not quantified' and provides specific cost breakdowns for various operational initiatives.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 49, "from": 45, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-3aa305cf2eb6", "evidence": "p.49 'Recommendations can be prioritized based on cost efficiency' chart with 'Better/Worse Options' arrows", "position": 10, "objective": "Sequence 28 initiatives by cost-efficiency to identify quick wins and big bets", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 49, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The chart uses a non-standard axis where the X-axis (Cost per dog) decreases from left to right, effectively making the top-right quadrant the 'Better Options' area.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a non-standard axis where the X-axis (Cost per dog) decreases from left to right, effectively making the top-right quadrant the 'Better Options' area.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/49", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-49", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 49, "from": 45, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-3aa305cf2eb6", "evidence": "p.49 'Recommendations can be prioritized based on cost efficiency' chart with 'Better/Worse Options' arrows", "position": 10, "objective": "Sequence 28 initiatives by cost-efficiency to identify quick wins and big bets", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 142, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-9f808a4e90ee", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Deep-dive recommendations, full report exhibits, peer benchmarks, S/N math", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 144, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2-style matrix layout to categorize initiatives into Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins, and Immediate Actions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 2x2-style matrix layout to categorize initiatives into Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins, and Immediate Actions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/144", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-144", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 146, "from": 143, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-a3fbe814f4fd", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Next steps slide and closing 'bias for action'", "position": 5, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 158, "slideType": "roadmap", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to organize initiatives into four quadrants: Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins, and Immediate Actions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Impact vs Effort) to organize initiatives into four quadrants: Strategic Priorities, Medium-term Initiatives, Quick Wins, and Immediate Actions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/158", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-158", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 159, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The chart uses a reverse X-axis (lower cost on the right).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a reverse X-axis (lower cost on the right).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/159", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-159", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "docSlug": "f48d45408c26f5a2", "documentTitle": "Loose dogs in Dallas Strategic Recommendations", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 195, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, -, |) to evaluate intake types.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, -, |) to evaluate intake types.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21/195", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-d42adb9ada21#slide-195", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 267, "from": 161, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-5934a57a4387", "evidence": "Repeated triplet pattern: e.g., p.166/167/168, p.178/179/180, p.188/189", "position": 18, "objective": "For each initiative, build up Overview → Estimated Impact → Resource Requirements", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 82, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "docSlug": "bc9c22881d997435", "documentTitle": "Reshaping NYCHA support functions", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.401, "pageNumber": 38, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide is marked as 'BACKUP' and includes a disclaimer note at the bottom regarding the non-exhaustive nature of the list.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide is marked as 'BACKUP' and includes a disclaimer note at the bottom regarding the non-exhaustive nature of the list.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51/38", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-bc8e3e952c51#slide-38", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 34, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-003c42db05bf", "evidence": "Comparison tables of changes per function + two pages of specific initiatives.", "position": 7, "objective": "Translate strategy into specific recommended changes and initiatives by function", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 75, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 39, "from": 24, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-e924a2c3eaaf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Exec summary recommendations + key changes by function + initiatives lists.", "position": 3, "confidence": 95, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 47, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a circular diagram to represent five distinct capability areas.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a circular diagram to represent five distinct capability areas.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/47", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-47", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 52, "from": 46, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-51d0978c0da5", "evidence": "'Critical new capabilities are needed' (p.47) + content factory, flywheel, tech/data, measurement (pp.48-52)", "position": 8, "objective": "Define required capabilities and how to build them", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 53, "from": 44, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-25151da82f17", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Action: capabilities to build + ~$11Bn+ revenue impact", "position": 5, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 53, "from": 44, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-31fdeb4518f1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Action: building a digital-ready organization", "position": 3, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79", "docSlug": "2deda760ae33148f", "documentTitle": "The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "risk_register", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to map risks and provides a numbered list for mitigation strategy.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to map risks and provides a numbered list for mitigation strategy.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-85dd78267d79#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-1cd9de5bce62", "evidence": "Severity x ease-of-mitigation 2x2 -> resolution timeline -> policies to adopt today.", "position": 7, "objective": "Prioritize risks and translate to policies", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 88, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 30, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-8506d52b75cf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Pillar 3 grounded in real-world risks, severity 2x2, resolution timeline", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 32, "from": 29, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e1-95c47d192c58", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Prioritize risks, adopt policies, contact team", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9", "docSlug": "3adfc3a384e33148", "documentTitle": "The Evolving State of Digital Transformation", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses color-coded squares to represent different initiatives across industries.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses color-coded squares to represent different initiatives across industries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-93030e4125d9#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30e-8b1c8a8d626f", "evidence": "p.14 categorises COVID-priority initiatives, p.15-16 list top-three goals/capabilities row-by-row across 8 industries.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show how priorities split across industry segments to make COVID response concrete", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-21f5dde2b312", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Specific initiatives and capabilities now prioritized by industry.", "position": 3, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 16, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-3516baf69296", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Priority initiatives by industry as implicit next steps.", "position": 5, "confidence": 45, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae", "docSlug": "16813e406087702c", "documentTitle": "True-Luxury Global Consumer Insights 7th Edition", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded block layout to present two distinct strategic pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a color-coded block layout to present two distinct strategic pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-99776df762ae#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 31, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-2707209ed151", "evidence": "Slide splits 11 initiatives into RESET & STREAMLINE row and INVEST row — classic two-track priority list.", "position": 6, "objective": "Sequence priority investments into 'reset & streamline' (cost out) vs 'invest' (build)", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 75, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-e15683ac6ab2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Section 3 'NEW REALITY & IMPLICATIONS FOR BUSINESSES' lists priority investments.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 33, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e2-f5ce14886b21", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "Priority investments matrix and team/thank you.", "position": 5, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }