{ "kind": "slide_function", "value": "compare_peers", "collectionKey": "slides:slide_function:compare_peers:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 9820, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 410, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Uses donut charts to represent segment distribution.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses donut charts to represent segment distribution.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0c4-94c5-768d-9efe-936cf587a3d1", "evidence": "Donut tiers (p12) and RODI bars by tier (p13) explicitly segment the sample.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split the population into Champions/Contenders/Cadets and show the performance delta", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare performance metrics across segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare performance metrics across segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019de0c4-94c5-768d-9efe-936cf587a3d1", "evidence": "Donut tiers (p12) and RODI bars by tier (p13) explicitly segment the sample.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split the population into Champions/Contenders/Cadets and show the performance delta", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart highlights a significant gap in perceived importance of digital skills between high-performing 'Champions' and other respondents.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart highlights a significant gap in perceived importance of digital skills between high-performing 'Champions' and other respondents.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "name": "Capability Gap", "slug": "48-capability-gap", "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design", "matchId": "019de0c4-957f-74c8-9de7-58acf62073ea", "evidence": "Top skills (p25), top partnerships (p26) and top capabilities (p28) all benchmark Champions vs Others.", "position": 8, "objective": "Show the capability, skill and partnership gap between Champions and Others", "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision", "confidence": 82, "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 25, "beatId": "019de0c4-939e-7269-ac28-020f6d375f9e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions-vs-Others benchmarks for skills, partnerships, capabilities", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 29, "from": 19, "beatId": "019de0c4-9457-7368-85ac-3ac3dad539ad", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "4 practices, roadmap, capabilities, get-in-touch CTA", "position": 3, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "docSlug": "3712a907c7b695bb", "documentTitle": "Blueprint for Service Success", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare four segments (Champions, Leaders, Strivers, Traditionalists) across two categories: Core and New service delivery processes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare four segments (Champions, Leaders, Strivers, Traditionalists) across two categories: Core and New service delivery processes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 13, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-b6f821f98f83", "evidence": "Numbered 1-4 focus areas, each detailed with Champions vs Strivers % gaps.", "position": 5, "objective": "Present four MECE focus areas with peer benchmarks", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 90, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-197db7f6a3b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Champions vs Strivers benchmarks: 43% SLAs, 75% ecosystem partnerships.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 21, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-2ab634b852ec", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Four focus areas, pivot roadmap, call to act now.", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to contrast high adoption rates of leaders (solid purple) against lower rates of laggards (hatched purple).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to contrast high adoption rates of leaders (solid purple) against lower rates of laggards (hatched purple).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-04182ea77f52", "evidence": "p12 lists Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human; p13/14/15 elaborate each; p16 closes with adoption-rate proof.", "position": 2, "objective": "Define Future Systems via three MECE pillars", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 85, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-bf37a6db9d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "'Think like the top 10%' + 3 pillars Boundaryless/Adaptable/Radically Human.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 34, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Main bank defined as the provider of the account from which customers make the majority of payments. Retail banking revenues defined as the average of 2021 and 2022.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Main bank defined as the provider of the account from which customers make the majority of payments. Retail banking revenues defined as the average of 2021 and 2022.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/34", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-34", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 33, "name": "Build Up", "slug": "33-build-up", "bestFor": "Pricing justification, cost estimation, market sizing", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-c1ef7395249f", "evidence": "Total ($100bn) decomposed into two additive sources: non-financial services + ramping traditional product sales.", "position": 7, "objective": "Build up the $100bn revenue prize", "structure": "The Base -> Add Component A -> Add Component B -> Add Component C -> The Total", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start from zero and add components to arrive at a total" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 36, "from": 32, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-72737ff728eb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Chapter 3: quantifies $100bn value at stake in US retail", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 38, "from": 32, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-818b1ef42e7a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Chapter 3 sizes value and calls for reinvention", "position": 3, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "docSlug": "abffd4c7eaab37e8", "documentTitle": "How aligning security and the business creates cyber resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 26, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-20623d50da77", "evidence": "Headline 'Are security and non-security executives on the same page?' with 43% vs 31% comparison.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast security vs non-security executive views as proof of misalignment", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-f0b30fd9e7ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'How to be a Cyber Champion' + 3 pillars (CISO seat, threat-centric, secure cloud).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 20, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare two time periods (2023 vs 2021) across 8 categories of risk management activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare two time periods (2023 vs 2021) across 8 categories of risk management activities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/20", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-20", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 18, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-30f011d5a722", "evidence": "p.18 confidence gap, p.19 progress chart 2023 vs 2021, p.20 explicit 'less proactive when compared to 2021' delta.", "position": 4, "objective": "Show risk function regression vs. 2021", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-fe0d52be3c7f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Risk is everywhere' + 'Organizations need to raise their game' sections lay out the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 26, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1586370e77a1", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Challenges & Allies", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-challenges-allies", "evidence": "Interconnected web, tech and skills allies", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "docSlug": "e5f70e8828822558", "documentTitle": "Hyper-disruption demands constant reinvention", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart compares two segments across 10 specific risk-related business activities.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart compares two segments across 10 specific risk-related business activities.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-21fbbac542b6#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 27, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-3a374715e840", "evidence": "Every chart explicitly contrasts 'more mature' vs 'less mature' groups, culminating in p.31 'Risk leaders are empowering the business'.", "position": 6, "objective": "Quantify leader-vs-laggard gap as the opportunity", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 86, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-06bf25894f0c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Leader-vs-laggard benchmarks proving leaders' agility and empowerment outperform", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 34, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-1a525df1d11a", "arcName": "The Hero's Journey", "arcSlug": "heros-journey", "beatName": "Transformation", "beatSlug": "heros-journey-transformation", "evidence": "Agility, culture, growth-driving reinvention", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "docSlug": "779b6b192abf180f", "documentTitle": "Industrial Speedsters How advanced technologies can turbocharge your speed to market", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide defines three segments based on speed-to-market criteria (I2P, P2P, D2D).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide defines three segments based on speed-to-market criteria (I2P, P2P, D2D).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-272f25908551#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-70cb3ecbd47a", "evidence": "p.8 frames 'Is there a direct link?'; pp.9-11 deliver three pieces of evidence (tech leverage, growth, profitability)", "position": 2, "objective": "Pose the speed-tech-performance question then reveal the speedster advantage across three dimensions", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 85, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-6ea328bbe0be", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Speedster topline growth 7.9% and operating margin 13.8% advantages", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 11, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-79fb6806df3a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Question and three advantages tying speed to tech to performance", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "docSlug": "0e02124818fafd32", "documentTitle": "Innovate or Fade European businesses need to address the technology deficit to turn the tide", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare three regions across multiple technology sectors.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare three regions across multiple technology sectors.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-62f4aa5a1d95", "evidence": "Three areas declared (p12) -> rec 1 + CDO quote (p13) -> IT-spend benchmark (p14) -> AI scaling stat (p15) -> Key steps (p16).", "position": 4, "objective": "Translate digital-core thesis into key steps", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 70, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-481cafea5412", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Three areas of focus declared; recs 1 (digital core) and 2 (smart mfg) opened", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 26, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-58b905426505", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three implications converted into recommendations and benchmark proof", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "docSlug": "0e02124818fafd32", "documentTitle": "Innovate or Fade European businesses need to address the technology deficit to turn the tide", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart compares three regions (Europe, US, APAC) across five specific business processes.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart compares three regions (Europe, US, APAC) across five specific business processes.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-29727d44f101#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 17, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-66cbaac7fc6e", "evidence": "Rec 2 'Extend advantage in smart manufacturing' followed by R&D-as-%-revenue line chart (p21), AI-patent share (p22), HQ-region patents (p23), and Key steps (p24).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify Europe's R&D and innovation gap vs NA/APAC", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 18, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-4c0487de7056", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Benchmark charts: R&D gap, AI patents, board tech maturity vs NA/APAC", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 26, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-58b905426505", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three implications converted into recommendations and benchmark proof", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "docSlug": "bbff997ea013e081", "documentTitle": "Innovation Unleashed Building a culture that drives sustained growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to illustrate the performance delta between two segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to illustrate the performance delta between two segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-2f147326ffb1#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-7d9830a24610", "evidence": "p5 sets up the two cohorts; p6 shows 6.5X / 2.2X / 4.2X advantages; p7 charts the $11.8bn revenue gap.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast Pacesetters vs Stragglers and quantify the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-82d5c70dd096", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Frames innovation culture importance, introduces flywheel and Pacesetter vs Straggler benchmark.", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-969b986656e9", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Stragglers lag, $11.8bn forgone, 81% lack behaviors.", "position": 1, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1", "docSlug": "231d34252220eeae", "documentTitle": "Level Up: Elevate Your Business With a Platform Strategy", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide highlights a consistent 1.5x to 2.6x higher investment ratio for platform adopters compared to non-platform companies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide highlights a consistent 1.5x to 2.6x higher investment ratio for platform adopters compared to non-platform companies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-350b093100e1#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 18, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-34051abf8eaf", "evidence": "p18 paired bars across 7 tech categories show 1.5-2.6x gap between platform and non-platform spend.", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify the tech-investment gap between platform adopters and non-platform peers", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-f8587d99fbd2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three-step playbook with Walmart/LEGO/PayPal/Maersk cases and 2.3x tech-spend chart.", "position": 4, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-09ce1515a37e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Three steps to make the jump and 'game time' CTA.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "docSlug": "e6b3796b5d45dab4", "documentTitle": "Make the leap, take the lead: Tech strategies for innovation and growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked area representation to visualize the widening revenue gap between two cohorts over a 10-year period (2015-2025).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a stacked area representation to visualize the widening revenue gap between two cohorts over a 10-year period (2015-2025).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-3aa280cc16f9", "evidence": "Section 'At the leading edge' systematically benchmarks Leaders vs Laggards on adoption, growth, value, experience.", "position": 1, "objective": "Contrast Leaders against Laggards to size the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-1333d379dbf0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Leaders vs Laggards: 5x growth gap, widening divide.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-21a6d205c0ef", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Laggards falling behind, growth gap widening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "docSlug": "e6b3796b5d45dab4", "documentTitle": "Make the leap, take the lead: Tech strategies for innovation and growth", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart illustrates a maturity or performance gap between two segments across five specific strategic pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart illustrates a maturity or performance gap between two segments across five specific strategic pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-3a3680d6162e#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 5, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-3aa280cc16f9", "evidence": "Section 'At the leading edge' systematically benchmarks Leaders vs Laggards on adoption, growth, value, experience.", "position": 1, "objective": "Contrast Leaders against Laggards to size the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 90, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-1333d379dbf0", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Leaders vs Laggards: 5x growth gap, widening divide.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-21a6d205c0ef", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Laggards falling behind, growth gap widening.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "docSlug": "1053e574c4b7b824", "documentTitle": "March Macro Brief Financial fissures emerge", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-panel layout: a bar chart for capital ratios and a table for liquidity programs, followed by a callout box for corporate implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dual-panel layout: a bar chart for capital ratios and a table for liquidity programs, followed by a callout box for corporate implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-40f6d73c4c1b#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 16, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-7423db0a3dac", "evidence": "p17-18 explicitly benchmark APAC bank rate-risk and capitalization against US/Europe peers.", "position": 4, "objective": "Compare APAC banking resilience versus US/Europe", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 55, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-53cbf20e7eef", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "First Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer", "evidence": "Spotlight section peels into regional banking stress (NA, Europe, APAC).", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 52, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-60c07eb39102", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Bulk of deck is data charts and KPI dashboards across topics.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Figure 5. Uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment companies based on performance.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 14, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-15af582aa7f0", "evidence": "Scatter (47% vs 14%), 13.5pp profit gap, 16pp resilience gap.", "position": 4, "objective": "Quantify gap between leaders and rest across capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0355ac434d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Scatter, gap charts, +7pp/-3pp, 70% benchmark prove leaders' edge.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses two charts (line and lollipop) to demonstrate that high-performing companies maintain higher resilience scores than their low-performing counterparts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses two charts (line and lollipop) to demonstrate that high-performing companies maintain higher resilience scores than their low-performing counterparts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 14, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-15af582aa7f0", "evidence": "Scatter (47% vs 14%), 13.5pp profit gap, 16pp resilience gap.", "position": 4, "objective": "Quantify gap between leaders and rest across capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 88, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0355ac434d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Scatter, gap charts, +7pp/-3pp, 70% benchmark prove leaders' edge.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 17, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0aa83e93e7d6", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Disruption rising; leaders outperform on Resilience Index.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "docSlug": "4c67116c5e4fca81", "documentTitle": "Reinventing for resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses two distinct visualizations: a grouped bar chart for aggregate industry performance and a heatmap/bar combo for granular dimension-based resilience scores.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses two distinct visualizations: a grouped bar chart for aggregate industry performance and a heatmap/bar combo for granular dimension-based resilience scores.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-5f9384dd17d8#slide-22", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 19, "name": "Pattern Hunter", "slug": "02-pattern-hunter", "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-1b0cab11d926", "evidence": "37%, +7pp, 4x, 70% - stacked datapoints converging on digital-core conclusion.", "position": 5, "objective": "Build evidence that digital core drives the advantage", "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion", "confidence": 80, "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0355ac434d2d", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Scatter, gap charts, +7pp/-3pp, 70% benchmark prove leaders' edge.", "position": 4, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 22, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-0ea4d99b742e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Digital core + talent combo lifts probability 4x.", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "docSlug": "2c961bef6a29da9b", "documentTitle": "Resiliency in the making", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a dumbbell plot style to show the range of maturity scores per industry.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a dumbbell plot style to show the range of maturity scores per industry.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-2af016008d30", "evidence": "p10 piecemeal inadequate, p11 31 capabilities, p12 maturity 56/100 with bottom/top quartile spread", "position": 3, "objective": "Show industry maturity gap against Resiliency 2.0 capabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 90, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-1b45fd587109", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Must mature; 31-capability framework; 56/100 industry maturity", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2cd91a9566ea", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Localized reconfigurable chains; reinvented roles; multi-skilled workforce", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "docSlug": "be7f58e911596f6c", "documentTitle": "Strategy at the Pace of Technology", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "peer_benchmark", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The chart uses a base of 1.0 for 'all other companies' and shows the relative multiplier for 'tech-forward' companies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a base of 1.0 for 'all other companies' and shows the relative multiplier for 'tech-forward' companies.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-671619672db6#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-7c9ac3983b89", "evidence": "p10 21% leaders → p11 2.3x ROIC → p12 TRS curve → p13 industry distribution explicitly compares the two groups.", "position": 3, "objective": "Quantify the gap between tech-forward leaders and the rest", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e31-8c9a97f9fdd7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Figures 2-4: 2.3x outperformance, TRS curve, 16-industry distribution.", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 13, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e31-94d7135fdca7", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Establishes tech-forward gap and outperformance data.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }