{ "kind": "slide_function", "value": "compare_options", "collectionKey": "slides:slide_function:compare_options:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 1628, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 68, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "docSlug": "da48f73eb97e2470", "documentTitle": "2018 True-Luxury Global Consumer Insight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to show the delta in consumer behavior between global and Chinese luxury shoppers.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a bar chart comparison to show the delta in consumer behavior between global and Chinese luxury shoppers.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-3e15c6e3bf72#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 41, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-3e11f88f929e", "evidence": "Opens with 3 Chinese segments (~55% spend), then digital ecosystem, WeChat journey, ROPO, brand ranking.", "position": 9, "objective": "Zoom into the Chinese consumer", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 51, "from": 14, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-15ef0d1686df", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Data on casualwear, social, channels, then Millennial & Chinese deep dives", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 51, "from": 30, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-23f7258e57dc", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Millennial + Chinese segment deep dives", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-41f9eb4ca4a9", "docSlug": "f8987efef196926b", "documentTitle": "2019 True-Luxury Global Consumer I nsight", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the distribution of consumer behaviors (Does not participate, Sell only, Sell and purchase, Purchase only) across three regions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the distribution of consumer behaviors (Does not participate, Sell only, Sell and purchase, Purchase only) across three regions.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-41f9eb4ca4a9/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-41f9eb4ca4a9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-41f9eb4ca4a9#slide-37", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 36, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d40-58d69b5f137f", "evidence": "Younger sell / older buy; China sellers vs US buyers.", "position": 7, "objective": "Split 2nd-hand by age and geography to find behavioral asymmetries", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 75, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 48, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-34bd1509e1d8", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Deep-dive data on Collaborations, 2nd-hand, Sustainability, Made-in.", "position": 4, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 45, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-4abcc7d1fe6d", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Granular evidence on collaborations, 2nd-hand, sustainability.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23", "docSlug": "a57481a4ff529b2e", "documentTitle": "AI at Work: What People Are Saying", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 6, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-473503d3086a", "evidence": "Frontline/Manager/Leader bars on p6; Most/Least optimistic & concerned country donuts on p7.", "position": 3, "objective": "Split sentiment by role and by country", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-e19a424fbdb0", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover, exec summary and 7 data slides reporting the AI-at-Work survey numbers.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 6, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-f00dcb5034a2", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Optimism trends reveal the leader-vs-frontline gap as the complication.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23", "docSlug": "a57481a4ff529b2e", "documentTitle": "AI at Work: What People Are Saying", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.91, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-472cb426ad23#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e1-4e049d09205f", "evidence": "29% (frontline) vs 68% (leaders) bubble contrast; 79% global call for regulation with country ranking.", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify the responsibility/regulation gap", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 70, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-e68379f5f1d1", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Responsibility gap (29% vs 68%) and 79% wanting AI regulation surface the meaning.", "position": 2, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 11, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0701-77fe-ae98-f9e407d82b18", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Job-loss fears, responsibility gap and 79% regulation demand quantify the case.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c", "docSlug": "4c918a9a3c4caeef", "documentTitle": "A tough year for European chemicals players has come to an end – We do expect a continuation of the challenges into 2024!", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "cost_structure", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a bar-stacked-100pct chart to illustrate the fixed vs variable cost split.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a bar-stacked-100pct chart to illustrate the fixed vs variable cost split.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-cf4d3a25e55c#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 13, "name": "Quick Win Big Bet", "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet", "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-84021879447e", "evidence": "p.13 lists three measures; p.14 plots them on impact vs. cost-structure axes; p.15 explicitly sequences Step 1/2/3 short->long term; p.16 illustrates flexibilization mechanics.", "position": 2, "objective": "Sequence cash-first quick wins, mid-term flexibilization, and long-term footprint big bets", "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap", "confidence": 85, "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 12, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-854c4a94ba9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Divider 'Fast execution + cash', recommendation, 2x2 measures, three-step roadmap, cost example", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 16, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-9a9b7858fcac", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Cash-is-King recommendation and 3-step roadmap", "position": 3, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "docSlug": "6bd7bf1c917770b7", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q2 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 22, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table uses color-coded cells to indicate shifts in importance (green for more important, red for less important).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses color-coded cells to indicate shifts in importance (green for more important, red for less important).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926/22", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926#slide-22", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "docSlug": "6bd7bf1c917770b7", "documentTitle": "BCG Investor Perspectives Series Q2 2023", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.681, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table uses color-coding to indicate the magnitude of change in importance between Feb 22 and Jun 23.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses color-coding to indicate the magnitude of change in importance between Feb 22 and Jun 23.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-4f5c6d176926#slide-23", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "docSlug": "2175b6c0e7a3a0e6", "documentTitle": "Changing automotive work environment: Job effects in Germany until 2030", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to segment workforce transition needs based on job profile similarity.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a matrix-like structure to segment workforce transition needs based on job profile similarity.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5a55be860a0c#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 7, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-ac18081ad9d8", "evidence": "p7 explicitly enumerates 3 perspectives (time, industries/job families, regions); p8-10 deliver each.", "position": 2, "objective": "Decompose the transition into three distinct, exhaustive perspectives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 88, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-886f3fa613ac", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Time, industry/job-family, regional data slides", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 10, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-96115207e4cd", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Shifts between industries seen via 3 lenses", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "docSlug": "0531041e5c74bb5b", "documentTitle": "Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses the Kodak vs. Fujifilm case study as an analogy for the oil industry's future.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses the Kodak vs. Fujifilm case study as an analogy for the oil industry's future.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-5d89529e8c57#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 27, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-cde6346c3cc0", "evidence": "Hydrocarbon growth question → S&P share shrinking → Kodak vs Fuji precedent → $1T+ carbon-major opportunity", "position": 7, "objective": "reframe O&G strategic choice through Kodak/Fuji", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 82, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-ac4e95d4335b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "O&G strategic question, Kodak/Fuji choice, $1T+ opportunity, discussion", "position": 5, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" }, { "to": 33, "from": 26, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-bbce0888c281", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "O&G choice & opportunity sizing", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-00fa38ad4e81", "docSlug": "ec7332284b546363", "documentTitle": "Conquering the next value frontier in private equity", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "strategic_options", "function": "compare_options", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": null, "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-00fa38ad4e81/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-00fa38ad4e81", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-00fa38ad4e81#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-820a4412635f", "evidence": "p10 explicitly: '01. Driving scale' vs '02. Tackling complexity' two-path framework.", "position": 3, "objective": "Frame two strategic paths PE firms must choose between", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 78, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-dac434824d6c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Moving into new territory' + 'obstacles ahead' + ranked challenges chart on p13", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 17, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-efa5b73e7bb2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Obstacles, lever frequency analysis, modular platform benefits", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a dual-row structure to contrast 'Significance/Critical' vs 'High Maturity' metrics for seven technology pillars.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a dual-row structure to contrast 'Significance/Critical' vs 'High Maturity' metrics for seven technology pillars.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6e679383b598", "evidence": "Significance-vs-maturity matrix (p.11) and top-quartile 0.8% vs 3.4% IT-cost rise comparison (p.12).", "position": 5, "objective": "Quantify maturity gap vs top quartile", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 80, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "docSlug": "0bb95384eb853696", "documentTitle": "Global Banking Consumer Study Reignite human connections to discover hidden value", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Uses a before-after framing to contrast siloed/emotionally-devoid banking with holistic/purpose-driven banking.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-105a91a12da8#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 29, "name": "Maturity Curve", "slug": "36-maturity-curve", "bestFor": "Digital transformation, capability building, benchmarking", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-bc797bce62ff", "evidence": "Figure 6 plots Interest→Satisfaction→Trust→Advocacy bullseye as the maturity progression unlocked by the multiplier effect.", "position": 6, "objective": "Show maturity ladder from satisfaction to advocacy", "structure": "Current Maturity Level -> The Gap to Next Level -> Required Capabilities -> The Roadmap", "confidence": 80, "description": "Show where you are on a progression and what it takes to reach the next level" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-6e405b239df7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Chapter 2: three pivots + four strategic plays + multiplier", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 31, "from": 15, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-7e17626f78e8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Chapter 2 derives pivots and strategic plays", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "docSlug": "77f157094d06f0f2", "documentTitle": "Green by Default", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a contrast-pair structure to define the spectrum of green innovation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a contrast-pair structure to define the spectrum of green innovation.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-15be43bf4625#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 13, "name": "2x2 Matrix", "slug": "30-2x2-matrix", "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-d1ec7aa1fd91", "evidence": "p13 is a Market Impact x Business Model Impact matrix with three columns (Additive 85% / Eco-essential 16% / Boundless 37%); p14 contrasts the two extremes.", "position": 4, "objective": "Position eco-essential innovation as the sweet spot between two extremes", "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot", "confidence": 90, "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-8f2dba73309e", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Eco-essential innovation revealed; framework 2x2; 3-dimension preview", "position": 3, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 15, "from": 11, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-9dba52e21cc2", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Concept reveal + 2x2 framework showing under-served quadrant", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Weakflation' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The 'Weakflation' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 14, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to compare scenarios across three dimensions: Description, Key scenario drivers and assumptions, and Corporate implications.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a table structure to compare scenarios across three dimensions: Description, Key scenario drivers and assumptions, and Corporate implications.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/14", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-14", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Sluggish recovery' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' outcome.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The 'Sluggish recovery' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' outcome.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "docSlug": "07cb2674ed07a20d", "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "scenario_analysis", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The 'Deceleration to new normal' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The 'Deceleration to new normal' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-32250022bc4e#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 13, "name": "Scenario Fork", "slug": "35-scenario-fork", "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d36-e01df46fc288", "evidence": "p13–16 each present 3 scenarios (Soft landing/Weakflation/Mild recession etc.) with one tagged 'Most likely'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Lay out per-region scenarios and identify the most-likely path", "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation", "confidence": 88, "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-ac20a70ee510", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Exec summary + economic outlook data with country PMIs, scenarios", "position": 1, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 17, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-bcf9311edd9b", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Sluggish growth, structural forces, scenario risks per region", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "docSlug": "995a3793461c4fe2", "documentTitle": "Moneyball Moment Marketing Canada", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses arrows to indicate the direction and magnitude of the gap between current and optimal spend.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses arrows to indicate the direction and magnitude of the gap between current and optimal spend.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-b99b3055536e#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-07f0c943a58e", "evidence": "1.7% Canada vs US, 5% current-vs-optimal TV gap, $1.4B missed.", "position": 2, "objective": "Quantify Canada-vs-optimal spend gap and missed sales", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 85, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-b1bdf31f78b6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "5 insights, 1.7% spend, 5% TV gap, $1.4B missed sales.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 12, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820d-c323f729f0d8", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Study scope and Canadian spend benchmarks.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0", "docSlug": "c2bc13ff7529e2ae", "documentTitle": "Out @ Work Barometer", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table uses a heatmap-style ranking system where lower numbers indicate higher importance. The 'Germany, Austria & Switz.' column is highlighted with a red dashed box.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses a heatmap-style ranking system where lower numbers indicate higher importance. The 'Germany, Austria & Switz.' column is highlighted with a red dashed box.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-77c8b6b9b3a0#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "name": "Aha Moment", "slug": "03-aha-moment", "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-496812160171", "evidence": "Two ranked tables surface the insight that LGBT+ culture is #1 criterion and that top attributes are 'concrete guarantees, not enough'.", "position": 2, "objective": "Reveal what LGBT+ talent actually values in employers", "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight", "confidence": 70, "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-e13e52aa33f7", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "What LGBT+ talent actually values; concrete guarantees lead but aren't enough", "position": 3, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 8, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-ef79da10a66c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on out-rates, comfort, criteria, attributes", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-78c20c8fd595", "docSlug": "b12bcf596ad5dacd", "documentTitle": "Out @ Work Barometer The Paradox of LGBT+ Talent", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The table uses a heatmap-style ranking where lower numbers indicate higher priority. Germany is highlighted with a red dashed box.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The table uses a heatmap-style ranking where lower numbers indicate higher priority. Germany is highlighted with a red dashed box.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-78c20c8fd595/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-78c20c8fd595", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-78c20c8fd595#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "name": "Voice Of Customer", "slug": "51-voice-of-customer", "bestFor": "Product strategy, customer experience, market research", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-58b23ea012bb", "evidence": "p.7 ranks criteria from LGBT+ talent survey; p.8 maps attributes companies need.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show what LGBT+ talent values and what companies must offer", "structure": "What Customers Say (Verbatim) -> The Pattern Across Voices -> The Insight -> The Response", "confidence": 75, "description": "Let customer quotes and feedback drive the narrative and validate the insight" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-fe83461984bb", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Required attributes, 4 archetypes, 2x2 paradox, demographic splits.", "position": 2, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 8, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-0f9b038bcf97", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Top criteria + attributes companies must embrace.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280", "docSlug": "8c480ec665143ca2", "documentTitle": "Pulse of Change Index", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded emphasis on 'Talent' to highlight the perception gap.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a color-coded emphasis on 'Talent' to highlight the perception gap.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-492f909e2280#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 9, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d38-74ad9d2e9468", "evidence": "Index ranks Talent #2 vs leaders' #4 (p9) -> 42% cite skills shortage as top-3 industry-wide (p10).", "position": 3, "objective": "Contrast the Index's talent ranking with leaders' perception and surface the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-22f5b2ca1a3f", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Core Insight", "beatSlug": "onion-core-insight", "evidence": "Talent perception gap: Index says #2, leaders rank #4", "position": 4, "confidence": 72, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820e-2f4759977eab", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Preparedness gaps in tech, AI, and talent perception", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "docSlug": "2c961bef6a29da9b", "documentTitle": "Resiliency in the making", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide contrasts current state vs future state of supply chain models.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide contrasts current state vs future state of supply chain models.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-61065ab9340f#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 8, "from": 7, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d39-24fe264d6dcf", "evidence": "p7 today's environment then p8 'From globalized... to localized, reconfigurable' twin world maps", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast today's globalized footprint with future localized chains", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-1b45fd587109", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Must mature; 31-capability framework; 56/100 industry maturity", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 8, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2848206bc095", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Disruption timeline, $1.6t missed, today's globalized footprint", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820f-2cd91a9566ea", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "Localized reconfigurable chains; reinvented roles; multi-skilled workforce", "position": 2, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "docSlug": "7a27e27b944e835f", "documentTitle": "Seeing the BIG Picture", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 21, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a heatmap-style table to show influence levels and a qualitative comparison table for channel preferences.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a heatmap-style table to show influence levels and a qualitative comparison table for channel preferences.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87/21", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-7e1c9fe1bc87#slide-21", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 17, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e7-3c2d5bd4e21c", "evidence": "Lights section deep dive: cross-vertical, cross-demographic, regional digital influence", "position": 3, "objective": "Zoom into evolving consumer behavior across cohorts and verticals", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 22, "from": 13, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-193cf5a111bb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Under-indexed on marketing spends and digital capabilities' diagnosis", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 22, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e0-2986d735d600", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Lights: India market data + consumer behavior facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "docSlug": "04e00f0265e26e9f", "documentTitle": "The disability inclusion imperative", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the breakdown of labor force status (Not in workforce, Unemployed, Employed).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the breakdown of labor force status (Not in workforce, Unemployed, Employed).", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-808e8065cd88#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 7, "name": "Benchmark Gap", "slug": "39-benchmark-gap", "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3a-6e1725139f7f", "evidence": "29%→37% over time and 37% vs ~76% labor force participation gap.", "position": 2, "objective": "Show employment improvement and gap vs. people without disabilities", "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity", "confidence": 78, "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-a8b43c521d11", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Cover, preface, ToC, US workforce employment data establishing the situation", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 19, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e32-be56e502f9fc", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "Workforce gap + culture challenge with concealment data", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }