{ "kind": "loop", "value": "42-hypothesis-test", "collectionKey": "slides:loop:42-hypothesis-test:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 1665, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 70, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "docSlug": "c266d0250725f0c1", "documentTitle": "Building Sustainable Organizations", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 16, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses bubble size to represent SOI score and bubble color to represent quartiles of performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test and confirm DNA-strength to financial+impact performance hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12/16", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12#slide-16", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 16, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-52869adf89cb", "evidence": "Hypothesis stated, 2x2 scatter (p.16) and EBITDA/TSR/ROIC bars (p.17) confirm it.", "position": 3, "objective": "Test and confirm DNA-strength to financial+impact performance hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 82, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-ad9f014f129f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Performance charts (16-17), benchmark (18-19), case studies (20-24)", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-b9b59024ea1d", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "DNA-strong firms deliver 19.6% EBITDA, higher impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "docSlug": "c266d0250725f0c1", "documentTitle": "Building Sustainable Organizations", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 17, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare financial performance metrics across four quartiles of sustainability performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test and confirm DNA-strength to financial+impact performance hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12/17", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-fa9188de4f12#slide-17", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 16, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b773-52869adf89cb", "evidence": "Hypothesis stated, 2x2 scatter (p.16) and EBITDA/TSR/ROIC bars (p.17) confirm it.", "position": 3, "objective": "Test and confirm DNA-strength to financial+impact performance hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 82, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 24, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-ad9f014f129f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Performance charts (16-17), benchmark (18-19), case studies (20-24)", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 19, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-b9b59024ea1d", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain", "evidence": "DNA-strong firms deliver 19.6% EBITDA, higher impact", "position": 2, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "prioritize", "notes": "The slide highlights 'Planning-Execution Alignment' with a red box, indicating it as the focus of the current exercise.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The chart uses grouped bars to show deviations across 2014, 2015, and 2016 for various functional categories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 42, "from": 42, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2eeac853d078", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Capex underrun bar chart shows $20M deviation.", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a simple four-step process flow as a header for a central problem statement.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 44, "from": 43, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "This appears to be a workshop or working session slide.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 44, "from": 43, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-30833ff25247", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Opportunity to improve planning-execution alignment.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "docSlug": "f379d915c04dea3b", "documentTitle": "Business Cost Optimization at Con Edison", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "New York Department of Public Service", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 45, "slideType": "other", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a four-step process flow at the top, highlighting the third step (Design solution and refine through pilot).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971/45", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-fd9d76be0971#slide-45", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 41, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-9344bc086204", "evidence": "Hypothesis -> recall data ($20M underrun) -> opportunity -> pilot -> scale.", "position": 5, "objective": "Test planning-execution hypothesis", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 46, "from": 25, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-2242f31eecd3", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Pipeline decomposition, 5 categories, 4-step methodology, scheduling/planning-execution exercises.", "position": 3, "confidence": 85, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 46, "from": 45, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e6-3416302b15ce", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Pilot solution + scale plan slides.", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses multiple pull-quotes to validate the importance of platform choice and the variability in performance.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide provides data supporting the claim that custom-built platforms are not exclusive to high-revenue firms and exhibit similar traffic patterns to off-the-shelf solutions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_options", "notes": "The slide uses a comparative framework to guide build-vs-buy decisions.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "docSlug": "3948959661e672e4", "documentTitle": "Leading Online Shoppers Finish Line", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.707, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart highlights that custom-built solutions underperform compared to established platforms.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-33d29840c676#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 28, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e4-fef56b141cef", "evidence": "Quote raises build-vs-buy -> traffic-mix exhibit -> Five Dimensions -> custom underperforms.", "position": 8, "objective": "Test the build-your-own-platform hypothesis against like-for-like data", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 80, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 16, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-6bb4c09efa76", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Per-area exhibits 10-20 + Platforms divider with build-vs-buy hypothesis test.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "docSlug": "1e4ab4ba8602a452", "documentTitle": "Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a numbered list format with circular imagery to represent three distinct pillars of innovation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-d7a39f97403f", "evidence": "p.9 sets hypothesis (3 dimensions); p.10/11/12 each test one dimension with supporting data.", "position": 3, "objective": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 84, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-34ef45c9ad71", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Introduces three-dimensions-of-leadership framework", "position": 3, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-443e36e5c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three leadership dimensions explain the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "docSlug": "1e4ab4ba8602a452", "documentTitle": "Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Survey definition of 'Active Players' provided in footnote.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-d7a39f97403f", "evidence": "p.9 sets hypothesis (3 dimensions); p.10/11/12 each test one dimension with supporting data.", "position": 3, "objective": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 84, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-38a407516f45", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three slides each prove one dimension with data", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-443e36e5c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three leadership dimensions explain the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "docSlug": "1e4ab4ba8602a452", "documentTitle": "Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to segment companies by their willingness to pilot AI and a vertical bar chart to show regional differences in pilot willingness.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-d7a39f97403f", "evidence": "p.9 sets hypothesis (3 dimensions); p.10/11/12 each test one dimension with supporting data.", "position": 3, "objective": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 84, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-38a407516f45", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three slides each prove one dimension with data", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-443e36e5c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three leadership dimensions explain the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "docSlug": "1e4ab4ba8602a452", "documentTitle": "Mind the (AI) Gap: Leadership Makes the Difference", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Data from Boston Consulting Group 2018 report.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-72f287ba0dd2#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 9, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-d7a39f97403f", "evidence": "p.9 sets hypothesis (3 dimensions); p.10/11/12 each test one dimension with supporting data.", "position": 3, "objective": "State and validate the three-dimensions hypothesis explaining Active Player success", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 84, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-38a407516f45", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Three slides each prove one dimension with data", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 12, "from": 9, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-443e36e5c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Three leadership dimensions explain the gap", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "implementation_plan", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "Includes a process diagram for the 'BCG Spend Cube' methodology.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide contains redacted content in the 'Key BCG Insights' callout box.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "appendix", "notes": "The slide contains a placeholder for a figure (Figure 8) which is redacted.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "Contains two figures: a Marimekko chart (Figure 9) and a process/tool overview (Figure 10).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 27, "slideType": "appendix_data", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide contains two large blacked-out areas representing charts (Figure 11 and Figure 12).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/27", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-27", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "present_solution", "notes": "The slide contains a large blacked-out area, likely a placeholder for a chart or table that was redacted.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "initiative_list", "function": "plan_implementation", "notes": "The slide contains a large black placeholder box where a figure (Figure 14) would be located.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 30, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide is essentially blank, serving as a placeholder for a figure.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/30", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-30", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "docSlug": "09ad2cf031bccf07", "documentTitle": "Proposal Spend Analysis Procurement Virginia", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.773, "pageNumber": 31, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide contains two figures, one of which is redacted (black box). The methodology is presented as a numbered process flow.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57/31", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-1a4ca0ec1e57#slide-31", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "name": "Hypothesis Test", "slug": "42-hypothesis-test", "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e6-c0a54e08238e", "evidence": "Spend Cube ($9B baseline) -> Ford trucks benchmark -> IT consulting benchmark -> Figure 15 'Initial Hypotheses'.", "position": 3, "objective": "Run spend cube + benchmarks to test initial hypotheses on top-value levers", "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)", "confidence": 75, "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 17, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87df-c2dfe9db308a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "6-component framework, Phase 1 & Phase 2 detailed methodology, tools & timeline.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }