{ "kind": "loop", "value": "04-tale-two-worlds", "collectionKey": "slides:loop:04-tale-two-worlds:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 1672, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 70, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart highlights that Product & Service Design is the top priority for Automotive OES.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746", "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0c4-9330-779d-b51b-df5c225bac9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "cover, premise/research question, survey methodology, current scaling status", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "Scaling intensity is defined as the ratio of average number of POCs scaled to average number initiated.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746", "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 1, "beatId": "019de0c4-9330-779d-b51b-df5c225bac9c", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "cover, premise/research question, survey methodology, current scaling status", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a background image of industrial infrastructure with a purple overlay.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746", "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746", "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "docSlug": "4055ca7b5fd4017d", "documentTitle": "AUTOMOTIVE –OES", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a heatmap visualization to highlight specific technology rankings per function.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca0-7518-b73b-acee6d3c5437#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019de0c4-94a0-729e-b3e3-8a202cf6d746", "evidence": "Every chart in p6-10 is a paired Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry / function comparison.", "position": 2, "objective": "Compare Auto-OES vs Cross-Industry on innovation priorities, scaling, outcomes and tech", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 8, "beatId": "019de0c4-9356-77a3-8ed2-0eb71e802e2f", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "Champions vs Cadets gap, funding/alignment roadblocks, cost of inaction", "position": 2, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 13, "from": 3, "beatId": "019de0c4-940d-76e1-ad2b-fc3bee58b32e", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "survey scope and Champions/Contenders/Cadets RODI facts", "position": 1, "confidence": 62, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-31d4210009bd", "evidence": "Mastered digital servicing vs <15% sales conversion gap framed as digital dividend.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": "The slide uses a three-column text layout to discuss the evolution of digital banking, citing specific examples like BBVA and Bank of America.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-31d4210009bd", "evidence": "Mastered digital servicing vs <15% sales conversion gap framed as digital dividend.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-31d4210009bd", "evidence": "Mastered digital servicing vs <15% sales conversion gap framed as digital dividend.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "client_example", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-31d4210009bd", "evidence": "Mastered digital servicing vs <15% sales conversion gap framed as digital dividend.", "position": 2, "objective": "Contrast servicing-mastered banks with sales/digital-dividend opportunity", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 41, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/41", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-41", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 41, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-5178d73c3b50", "evidence": "Figure 8 CIR stuck at 50-60% across decades vs auto-loan +50% case study.", "position": 10, "objective": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 42, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses area shading to represent trends for three different regions over time.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/42", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-42", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 41, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-5178d73c3b50", "evidence": "Figure 8 CIR stuck at 50-60% across decades vs auto-loan +50% case study.", "position": 10, "objective": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 43, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/43", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-43", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 41, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-5178d73c3b50", "evidence": "Figure 8 CIR stuck at 50-60% across decades vs auto-loan +50% case study.", "position": 10, "objective": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "docSlug": "0bf019d2d4ffd9cd", "documentTitle": "Banking on AI Banking Top 10 Trends for 2024", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 44, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "illustrate_case", "notes": "The slide uses a narrative approach to illustrate the shift from traditional process optimization (Six Sigma) to AI-driven transformation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29/44", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-eed251795d29#slide-44", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 41, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-5178d73c3b50", "evidence": "Figure 8 CIR stuck at 50-60% across decades vs auto-loan +50% case study.", "position": 10, "objective": "Show Six Sigma plateau and the new approach that breaks it", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-6c972da02fde", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Ten trends cumulatively build pressure on incumbent banks.", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 44, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-7acbfe02bbc4", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Ten trends each present data and figures (Figs 1, 2, 7, 8).", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "docSlug": "3712a907c7b695bb", "documentTitle": "Blueprint for Service Success", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a heatmap visualization to show the prevalence of service offerings. The color gradient indicates 'Offered' vs 'Not offered'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast Champions/Leaders vs Strivers/Traditionalists pivoting", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 9, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-ad4dd4327101", "evidence": "Heatmap of offerings + three pivot trajectory diagrams highlighting the gap.", "position": 3, "objective": "Contrast Champions/Leaders vs Strivers/Traditionalists pivoting", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-1093ce9b9880", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Pivoting pitfalls section: 57% lack capabilities; challenges by category.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-2147cf13ce31", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Research findings: 748 execs, 29% revenue, 4 categories.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "docSlug": "3712a907c7b695bb", "documentTitle": "Blueprint for Service Success", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "segmentation", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The slide uses a custom 'Transform the Core' vs 'Scale the New' framework visualized as overlapping circles on a Business Value vs Time axis.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast Champions/Leaders vs Strivers/Traditionalists pivoting", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b632-f2bf907114f0#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 9, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-ad4dd4327101", "evidence": "Heatmap of offerings + three pivot trajectory diagrams highlighting the gap.", "position": 3, "objective": "Contrast Champions/Leaders vs Strivers/Traditionalists pivoting", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 75, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-1093ce9b9880", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Pivoting pitfalls section: 57% lack capabilities; challenges by category.", "position": 2, "confidence": 90, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 10, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8209-2147cf13ce31", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Research findings: 748 execs, 29% revenue, 4 categories.", "position": 1, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "key_messages", "function": "summarize", "notes": "Includes references to 'Reinventors' research.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast Reinventors vs laggards to expose the gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6ab350f1e230", "evidence": "Reinventors 1.8x/9x advantage (p.8) followed by 63/84/79% gap stats between vision and current state (p.9).", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Reinventors vs laggards to expose the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "docSlug": "9b2a7cdd5b4ef874", "documentTitle": "From survive to thrive Achieving tech transformation for communication service providers’ future", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast Reinventors vs laggards to expose the gap", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-0a6ee2f81206#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 8, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-6ab350f1e230", "evidence": "Reinventors 1.8x/9x advantage (p.8) followed by 63/84/79% gap stats between vision and current state (p.9).", "position": 4, "objective": "Contrast Reinventors vs laggards to expose the gap", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 78, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-16f3e148ce03", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "Gap between vision/state, low maturity vs significance, barriers chart (p.9-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 14, "from": 7, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-2a8b4b681537", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Cases, vision-state gap, low maturity, barriers (p.7-14).", "position": 2, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "problem_statement", "function": "frame_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a metaphorical illustration of geometric shapes (sphere, cube, cone) with wireframe overlays to represent the integration challenge.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-6", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a bar chart to visualize the 2x revenue growth gap between Leaders (9%) and Laggards (4%).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses an area-based visualization to show the cumulative revenue gap between two growth trajectories.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-8", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "docSlug": "7183f5a47999c314", "documentTitle": "FULL VALUE. FULL STOP How to scale innovation and achieve full value with Future Systems", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "key_takeaways", "function": "summarize", "notes": null, "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-064c55e03c15#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b774-003b2ff61a5b", "evidence": "p6 names the 'innovation achievement gap'; p7 shows 2X revenue gap; p8 projects 46% gap to 2023; p9 sets up 'Think like the top 10%'.", "position": 1, "objective": "Establish the Leaders vs Laggards gap as the core tension", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 88, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-b8788e340134", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "'Innovation achievement gap', 2X revenue gap, 46% projected loss frames pain.", "position": 2, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" }, { "to": 16, "from": 6, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820a-c8e62209c904", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Survey data on Leaders vs Laggards behaviour and Future Systems traits.", "position": 1, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "docSlug": "abffd4c7eaab37e8", "documentTitle": "How aligning security and the business creates cyber resilience", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.773, "pageNumber": 26, "slideType": "comparison_table", "function": "compare_peers", "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast survey responses and reported metrics between two distinct executive groups.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast security vs non-security executive views as proof of misalignment", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812/26", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-19061fbe2812#slide-26", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 26, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-20623d50da77", "evidence": "Headline 'Are security and non-security executives on the same page?' with 43% vs 31% comparison.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast security vs non-security executive views as proof of misalignment", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 65, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 26, "from": 22, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-f0b30fd9e7ba", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "'How to be a Cyber Champion' + 3 pillars (CISO seat, threat-centric, secure cloud).", "position": 4, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "docSlug": "ee43cd765b3d02ea", "documentTitle": "How will COVID-19 change the consumer?", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a mirrored bar chart structure to compare 'Current' (during outbreak) vs 'After' (expected future usage).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast current device behavior vs sustained future state", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-0ec9abb02db4", "evidence": "p10 explicit Current vs After bars; p11 'increased and likely to maintain' vs 'likely to decrease' split.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast current device behavior vs sustained future state", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-c59d9ed8299b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover/context plus 9 data slides on ecommerce, used devices, and tech usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-df00f592beff", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Nine data slides on ecommerce, refurb, importance shifts, sustained usage.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "docSlug": "ee43cd765b3d02ea", "documentTitle": "How will COVID-19 change the consumer?", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "industry_trends", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the split between 'increased but likely to decrease' and 'increased and likely to maintain' for various device categories, alongside supplementary metrics on entertainment, habits, and workplace trends.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrast current device behavior vs sustained future state", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-1c75f5a44c02#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 10, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b775-0ec9abb02db4", "evidence": "p10 explicit Current vs After bars; p11 'increased and likely to maintain' vs 'likely to decrease' split.", "position": 5, "objective": "Contrast current device behavior vs sustained future state", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 1, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-c59d9ed8299b", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Cover/context plus 9 data slides on ecommerce, used devices, and tech usage.", "position": 1, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 12, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820b-df00f592beff", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Nine data slides on ecommerce, refurb, importance shifts, sustained usage.", "position": 4, "confidence": 60, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }