{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "zone-of-possible-agreement",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:zone-of-possible-agreement:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 2,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b",
      "docSlug": "0ca13b3136727d28",
      "documentTitle": "2024 Executive Perspectives Maximizing Value Potential from AI in 2025",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "thesis_headline",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "Uses a ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement) framework to visualize negotiation dynamics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Visual representation of buyer/seller negotiation ranges and settlement points.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5d-24dad7bccd5b#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Pattern Hunter",
          "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
          "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7df-212ab3f491d1",
          "evidence": "Sequence of evidence slides each quantifying an AI benefit (2x value, 75% automation, 1/2 risk, 70% capacity, first-mover).",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Stack value-driver evidence (savings, speed, risk, headcount) toward the 2x conclusion",
          "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 23,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e38-ef4a2b05f54d",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Value drivers (savings/speed/risk), case studies, then four-pillar deep dive.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 82,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-416fdfe812b7",
      "docSlug": "adf6c6f5a59d628c",
      "documentTitle": "Maximizing Value Potential from AI in 2025",
      "authorId": "BCG",
      "authorName": "BCG",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 9,
      "slideType": "thesis_headline",
      "function": "frame_problem",
      "notes": "Uses a ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement) framework to visualize negotiation dynamics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Visual representation of buyer/seller negotiation ranges and settlement points.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-416fdfe812b7/9",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-416fdfe812b7",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-416fdfe812b7#slide-9",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 6,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e5-a50369e4685f",
          "evidence": "Savings heatmap and 'first-mover advantage | buyers should leverage GenAI now to stay ahead' on p8-9.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Show what is forfeited if buyers do not adopt AI now",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87dd-fc641723d186",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "'2x value vs not leveraging AI' gap (p5) + 'first-mover advantage' urgency (p8-9).",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 92,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 14,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87de-10eb5fadbee7",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "Future Vision (Gain)",
          "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-future-vision-gain",
          "evidence": "Revolutionized house with 2x value, 70% capacity, case proof points.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}