{ "kind": "framework", "value": "waterfall-bridge", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:waterfall-bridge:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 2408, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 101, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-7c03cd42b157", "docSlug": "049deaeb716a8628", "documentTitle": "FY24 Results and Progress Update Presentation", "authorId": "Barclays", "authorName": "Barclays", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research", "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 7, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall bridge to decompose the change in Return on Tangible Equity (RoTE) between two fiscal years.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 2, "evidence": "Floating-bar bridge from FY23 RoTE 9.0% to FY24 10.5% via positive/negative drivers · The slide uses a waterfall chart to bridge the gap between two financial metrics.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-7c03cd42b157/7", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-7c03cd42b157", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-7c03cd42b157#slide-7", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 14, "from": 6, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a004-7fd3875bcfd4", "evidence": "p.6 Group dashboard then p.7 RoTE waterfall, NII bridge, costs, LLR detail", "position": 2, "objective": "Drill into Group-level income, NII, hedge, costs, LLR", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 80, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 32, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-902a-05ef3abdd88a", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Q424/FY24 RoTE, NII, costs, LLR walkthrough at Group and divisional level", "position": 1, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 32, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-07a7-7579-bd5f-94f8f7b215c1", "arcName": "The Transformation Tale", "arcSlug": "transformation-tale", "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)", "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain", "evidence": "10.5% RoTE, 62% CIR — below FY26 ambition", "position": 1, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5", "docSlug": "87a04ea9b7ff0d81", "documentTitle": "Affordable Housing Challenge Blueprint", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to aggregate regional gaps into a world total.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to show the cumulative total of regional affordability gaps.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-d296c13af3c5#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "566d8122-618e-4937-a8fb-479677ae367a", "evidence": "The document presents data on the affordability gap in various cities.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the size of the affordability gap?", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" }, { "to": 6, "from": 2, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "a68f019f-1769-47bb-902f-c34226c6ecb6", "evidence": "The document presents data on the potential consequences of not addressing the challenge.", "position": 2, "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing the affordable housing challenge?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 6, "from": 1, "beatId": "eac2d2b9-7b54-4f00-bb2e-9ee35edffcbb", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document starts with an overview of the affordable housing challenge and its market size.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "58cf8805-42a1-42fb-814d-6857ffccc1f7", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document defines the affordability gap and presents data on its size.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-9fa0e86cc896", "docSlug": "96677a30e6c50ebd", "documentTitle": "Airline Economic Analysis", "authorId": "OliverWyman", "authorName": "Oliver Wyman", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.752, "pageNumber": 37, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a standard waterfall format to bridge the revenue gap between two periods.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart is a standard waterfall bridge showing the components of change between two values.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-9fa0e86cc896/37", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-9fa0e86cc896", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-9fa0e86cc896#slide-37", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 40, "from": 31, "beatId": "98c7a56d-daa0-4459-bddc-e639470cacd6", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The deck offers key takeaways and conclusions", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f", "docSlug": "0fc3aba985cbd390", "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2018 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor", "authorId": "Bain", "authorName": "Bain", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.777, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart is a waterfall-style bridge showing growth from 2015 to 2018E.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart visualizes the components of growth between 2015 and 2018E.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9ba6afcabd7f#slide-13", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 16, "from": 9, "name": "Tale Two Worlds", "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds", "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b311-257012010c4d", "evidence": "p10 explicit 2017 vs 2025F stacked bars by geography and nationality; p13 2x callout", "position": 2, "objective": "Show China overtaking mature markets by 2025", "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication", "confidence": 85, "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 45, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-a9e65c2a1e0d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Six themes unpacking how 'Luxury 2025 will be a different place'", "position": 2, "confidence": 80, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" }, { "to": 40, "from": 10, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e5-b85e99c5ccbf", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Six themes: China, digital, footprint, youth, cultures, one market", "position": 3, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 222, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show how savings are derived from different cost buckets, with a specific focus on the 2018 vs 2022 projections.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The structure of the table and chart implies a calculation of net savings (Anskaffelser + drift - implementeringsomkostninger)", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/222", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-222", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 228, "from": 193, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6422ce1c8ecc", "evidence": "Current bilbase -> optimal 763/916 -> 29% reduction -> 8-12 mio. kr. varigt provenu.", "position": 9, "objective": "Show old fleet vs hybrid pool model with quantified delta", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 82, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 231, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-like logic to arrive at the net potential.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The diagram visually subtracts costs from gross savings to reach a net total.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/231", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-231", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 277, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to establish a baseline and then applies a percentage-based reduction to calculate savings.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart on the left uses a waterfall structure to build up the baseline cost.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/277", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-277", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 302, "slideType": "diagnosis", "function": "diagnose", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to explain the breakdown of total SIM subscriptions into active and inventory segments.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart shows the decomposition of total subscriptions into active and inventory segments.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/302", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-302", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 229, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-6a47af522484", "evidence": "538 mio. addresserbar -> 6 delanalyser -> centralisation, in-sourcing, VTC, hotel, kontorartikler, TV, SIM, kursus.", "position": 10, "objective": "MECE breakdown of Ovrig Drift baseline into six delanalyser plus sub-initiatives", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 80, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 321, "from": 19, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2412ddc609c1", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Twelve effektiviseringsforslag with IPT, kategoristyring, IT, organisation, indkøb.", "position": 3, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 365, "from": 166, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-37e90642ab06", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Potentialeestimater, benchmark gaps, comparison tables.", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "docSlug": "0798c0fb1aaf0664", "documentTitle": "Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 417, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to illustrate the cost reduction from 62m to 16m.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Bridge chart showing cost reduction", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc/417", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-e5735b54e9cc#slide-417", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 367, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e2-713edc37f29d", "evidence": "Current fragmenteret VFK -> enstrenget logistikstruktur -> 35-60 mio. kr. potentiale + business cases.", "position": 12, "objective": "Compare current logistics structure to enstrenget LOGTJ nyordning", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 84, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 420, "from": 322, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-2a66536a5837", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "Admin fællesskaber + nyordning af logistik + insourcing benchmarks and business cases.", "position": 4, "confidence": 92, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" }, { "to": 482, "from": 366, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-3ad263fdddff", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Action (Now What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what", "evidence": "Logistic nyordning, kortlægning, skalering and realiserbarhed methodology.", "position": 3, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "docSlug": "62a3ea47159781a7", "documentTitle": "Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 15, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to bridge 2014 baseline data to 2025 potential, accounting for asset lifespans and productivity growth.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart bridges 2014 baseline to 2025 potential through additive and subtractive components.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180/15", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-e29283e73180#slide-15", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "37a5cd6f-935c-4a17-a19a-e3061505d608", "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of reasoning to support its findings.", "position": 0, "objective": "To identify the key barriers to efficiency improvements.", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 6, "beatId": "892a1ecd-e11d-4609-8dab-9369f04f8efa", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Problem & Complication", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication", "evidence": "The document identifies various barriers to efficiency improvements.", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d", "docSlug": "b0b6467a20271204", "documentTitle": "Future Energy Landscape Netherlands", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 8, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a 'zoom' effect to connect a cross-industry profit distribution (left) to a time-series performance of a single sector (right).", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The left chart uses a waterfall structure to show profit distribution across industries.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d/8", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-f0f0091e2b3d#slide-8", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 1, "beatId": "d0179bc5-557c-4d52-a3d0-5b29dca04fcd", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "The document provides an overview of the current energy landscape, including industry trends and financial analysis", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "docSlug": "1eed10dd489bedbc", "documentTitle": "Global Hydrogen Flows", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.414, "pageNumber": 25, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "Uses a waterfall-style comparison between scenarios to show cost reduction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a bridge-style annotation to show the delta between 'No trade' and 'Efficient decarbonization' scenarios.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd/25", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-40b6ee655bdd#slide-25", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 24, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "4e5436fd-eaa1-40f5-922c-a8d294ac13f3", "evidence": "The deck presents analysis on the costs of inaction in terms of capital expenditures and operational expenses.", "position": 2, "objective": "Understand the costs of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 31, "from": 23, "beatId": "1a92ef67-367e-4749-a065-9be8218b7bed", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps", "evidence": "The deck presents scenario analysis and key takeaways on the implications of global hydrogen trade for efficient decarbonization.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "docSlug": "f355bb3ba498875b", "documentTitle": "International Comparison of Australia’s Freight and Supply Chain Performance 2019", "authorId": "LEK", "authorName": "L.E.K.", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 104, "slideType": "cost_structure", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the retail price into its constituent margins and costs.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the retail price into cost components.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9/104", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-2a4c3fe346c9#slide-104", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a", "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 118, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the impact of four key initiatives (A, B, C, D) on reducing EDL losses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to bridge the gap between two financial states.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/118", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-118", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "docSlug": "f6506cba246b6e5e", "documentTitle": "New Mexico State Staffing Study", "authorId": "Deloitte", "authorName": "Deloitte", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.333, "pageNumber": 39, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to show the $1.35M cost differential between the procurement division budget and actual procurement work performed across the university.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart shows a bridge between the division budget and the actual activity-based cost.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c/39", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-c2f73497811c#slide-39", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 44, "from": 35, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "5538c482-8bc4-4b3d-b292-9cf9d9e1368e", "evidence": "The document provides a detailed analysis of the Procurement function, including labor costs, span of control, and management layers.", "position": 1, "objective": "To understand the current state of Procurement function and identify opportunities for improvement", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 16, "beatId": "03b5dfe0-8cd3-4bbf-9ad1-24c6ddcb0f98", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Evidence & Proof", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof", "evidence": "The document presents data and analysis on various aspects of NMSU's staffing structure and processes, including labor costs, span of control, and management layers.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Evidence", "parentBeatSlug": "evidence" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b", "docSlug": "2d4845138580cb14", "documentTitle": "Saudi Arabia Banking Pulse Quarter 3, 2022", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart shows a net income bridge from 15.12 to 16.53 SAR Bn.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart is a standard financial waterfall bridge.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f38eb376832b#slide-5", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 4, "name": "So What Cascade", "slug": "41-so-what-cascade", "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-77d7554ff7bc", "evidence": "Dashboard table (p.4) numbered 1-8 'Key Trends' cascades into net profit driver chart (p.5).", "position": 1, "objective": "Headline the profitability story with KPI dashboard then drivers", "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)", "confidence": 80, "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 15, "from": 2, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-e558fe4b740c", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "Foreword + macro then KPI-by-KPI quarterly data tables and charts.", "position": 1, "confidence": 75, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 15, "from": 4, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-f699df889704", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Rising Action", "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action", "evidence": "Sequential KPI improvements: NIM, C/I, asset quality, cost of risk.", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-23169247fb38", "docSlug": "1ea0011115e97fc2", "documentTitle": "Trend 2050 Economics and Business", "authorId": "RolandBerger", "authorName": "Roland Berger", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 57, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cumulative impact reduction.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the 90% reduction in radiative forcing.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-23169247fb38/57", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-23169247fb38", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a164-23169247fb38#slide-57", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "7a73af3c-9c85-417d-bc67-005410bb6e72", "evidence": "The document discusses the costs of inaction on climate change and the need for sustainable technologies.", "position": 2, "objective": "To understand the costs of inaction on climate change", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 60, "from": 41, "beatId": "46952975-f4ac-4586-9291-63217a51864f", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "Energy Transition", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The document discusses the importance of the energy transition and the need for sustainable technologies to address climate change.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f9eea07e9440", "docSlug": "dcb8776b5a5b54f3", "documentTitle": "UAE Banking Pulse", "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal", "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 4, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the change in net income.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Subtitle 'Net income bridge – AED Bn' with classic waterfall layout", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f9eea07e9440/4", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f9eea07e9440", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-f9eea07e9440#slide-4", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 7, "from": 3, "name": "Zoom In", "slug": "06-zoom-in", "bestFor": "Technical deep-dives, case studies, detailed analysis", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-d3bec87cfc5f", "evidence": "p.3 big-picture KPI scorecard, p.4-6 zoom into income/liquidity/NIM, p.7 synthesizes forward outlook", "position": 1, "objective": "Open with sector dashboard, zoom into drivers, return to synthesized outlook", "structure": "The Big Picture -> Key Area of Focus -> Specific Detail -> Implication", "confidence": 70, "description": "Start broad, then progressively focus on specific details that prove your point" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e37-54f4eaf2a60d", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Facts (What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what", "evidence": "KPI scorecard, net income waterfall, loans/deposits trends laid out", "position": 1, "confidence": 65, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "docSlug": "b87718276d2e8ef8", "documentTitle": "US Mail Volumes to 2020", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 29, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth, Autopay, etc.) contribute to the net change in payment volume.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge structure to decompose the change in volume.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80/29", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-b4f6703d5f80#slide-29", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 33, "from": 26, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-9676532edd11", "evidence": "p28 confirmed waterfall (8.5B → 4.5B with named drivers); other sender-view segments follow same pattern", "position": 6, "objective": "Decompose each sender-side segment's volume change via waterfall drivers", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 80, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "docSlug": "bccc7ca74c5344e0", "documentTitle": "USPS Future Business Model", "authorId": "McKinsey", "authorName": "McKinsey", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.294, "pageNumber": 23, "slideType": "financial_analysis", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart compares a 'Base Case' scenario with a 'Management Action' scenario, highlighting the delta in both annual and cumulative losses.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses an area-based visual to show the delta between two financial scenarios.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0/23", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0#slide-23", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 19, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "6e74d38d-2ea0-494f-aaea-19fe8eb14848", "evidence": "The deck presents a scenario analysis of the financial outlook for the Postal Service, highlighting the consequences of inaction.", "position": 0, "objective": "Highlight the consequences of inaction", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" }, { "to": 36, "from": 22, "name": "Mece Breakdown", "slug": "40-mece-breakdown", "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis", "matchId": "ebe3a496-98eb-48eb-b1e4-b2b90b2d3590", "evidence": "The deck presents a framework for addressing the challenge, including product and service initiatives, pricing opportunities, and workforce opportunities.", "position": 1, "objective": "Break down the problem into manageable parts", "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 38, "from": 22, "beatId": "6d80f5a5-15f2-424b-aae4-9524e06b6575", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "The deck presents potential solutions, including actions within USPS control and fundamental changes to increase flexibility.", "position": 3, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a35118c423ae", "docSlug": "106e998b85c20d32", "documentTitle": "Value untangled Accelerating radical growth through interoperability", "authorId": "Accenture", "authorName": "Accenture", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 12, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-like bridge to show the cumulative revenue gap between two companies starting at $10B.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart visualizes the cumulative difference between two growth trajectories.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a35118c423ae/12", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a35118c423ae", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b633-a35118c423ae#slide-12", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 12, "name": "Waterfall Value", "slug": "31-waterfall-value", "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations", "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-a80107c2d3c4", "evidence": "Figure 4 is an explicit year-by-year waterfall to $8.2B; p.13 frames the 2-4% cost", "position": 4, "objective": "Decompose the $8.2B value bridge over 5 years and contrast with low cost", "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder", "confidence": 88, "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 18, "from": 3, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-04df35f49686", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Situation & Context", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-situation-context", "evidence": "Section 1+2 frame agility imperative and quantify interop value ($8B / 6X)", "position": 1, "confidence": 88, "parentBeatName": "Setup", "parentBeatSlug": "setup" }, { "to": 18, "from": 5, "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-1df16b87de70", "arcName": "The Sparkline", "arcSlug": "sparkline", "beatName": "What Could Be", "beatSlug": "sparkline-what-could-be-2", "evidence": "Interop = 6X growth, $8B value, low cost", "position": 2, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 28, "slideType": "impact_sizing", "function": "quantify_impact", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge direct economic value (GVA) with broader spillover and intrinsic values.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge direct economic value with broader spillover and intrinsic values.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/28", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-28", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 34, "from": 27, "name": "Precedent", "slug": "09-precedent", "bestFor": "Risk mitigation, strategy validation, building confidence in new approaches", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b30f-d86b5452a8a6", "evidence": "Singapore case study (33) + 'Background: reports and indexes show link' (34) anchor the spillover claim", "position": 4, "objective": "Argue spillover value via Singapore precedent and external indexes", "structure": "The Precedent Case -> What Happened -> The Parallel -> Applied Learning", "confidence": 78, "description": "Use historical or external examples to validate your approach" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 37, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-cc472f38250a", "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit", "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit", "beatName": "Solution & Approach", "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach", "evidence": "Spillover framework + bespoke social-value methodology introduced", "position": 3, "confidence": 82, "parentBeatName": "Turn", "parentBeatSlug": "turn" }, { "to": 52, "from": 27, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e3-dd367b06bb50", "arcName": "The Triple Take", "arcSlug": "triple-take", "beatName": "The Implications (So What)", "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what", "evidence": "Spillover + social value evidence shows why C/C matters", "position": 2, "confidence": 70, "parentBeatName": "Reflection", "parentBeatSlug": "reflection" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "docSlug": "e1c5cbd0ff41f1fd", "documentTitle": "Victorias Creative and Cultural Economy Fact Pack", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.445, "pageNumber": 59, "slideType": "appendix_methodology", "function": "present_framework", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall bridge to reconcile employment figures across different industry classification methodologies.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart uses a bridge structure to show additive and subtractive changes to a baseline value.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70/59", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-cef1acfbea70#slide-59", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376", "docSlug": "7261572e56ae8561", "documentTitle": "What’s in a (Domain) Name? The $2 Billion Secondary Market for Dot-Com Domains", "authorId": "BCG", "authorName": "BCG", "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting", "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting", "presentationDate": null, "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.778, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "data_table", "function": "analyze_data", "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the composition of the total 27.7M registrations.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "The chart visualizes the decomposition of a total value into constituent parts.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b634-a6c6b3ef6376#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 13, "from": 10, "name": "Segmentation Split", "slug": "34-segmentation-split", "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation", "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b310-1218e1bcd675", "evidence": "p.10 1-in-6 share -> p.11 four segment types -> p.12 segment economics -> p.13 corporate +44% standout.", "position": 3, "objective": "Decompose the domainer universe and surface the fastest-growing segment", "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference", "confidence": 82, "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 11, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-23ce28e927e5", "arcName": "The Onion", "arcSlug": "onion", "beatName": "Deeper Layer", "beatSlug": "onion-deeper-layer", "evidence": "Key question + methodology + 1-in-6 domainer share + 4 segment split.", "position": 3, "confidence": 78, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" }, { "to": 16, "from": 8, "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87e4-3be04773b897", "arcName": "The Mountain", "arcSlug": "mountain", "beatName": "Resolution", "beatSlug": "mountain-resolution", "evidence": "Methodology + segment + channel + geography unpack the climax.", "position": 4, "confidence": 55, "parentBeatName": "Resolution", "parentBeatSlug": "resolution" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }