{ "kind": "framework", "value": "valuation-gap", "collectionKey": "slides:framework:valuation-gap:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations", "filters": { "documentKinds": [], "sourceTypes": [], "orientations": [] }, "total": 11, "page": 1, "pageSize": 24, "pageCount": 1, "rows": [ { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-0d6eaeca86d6", "docSlug": "4b514e2a6149", "documentTitle": "Keisei Electric Railway (9009 JT)", "authorId": "24_Palliser_Capital", "authorName": "Palliser Capital", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2023-10-17 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "valuation_reveal", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "The chart uses a shaded area between two lines to visualize the 'value gap'.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Visual comparison of market cap vs intrinsic value", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-0d6eaeca86d6/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-0d6eaeca86d6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-0d6eaeca86d6#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-70939a0f825f", "docSlug": "7ed65c83e062", "documentTitle": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "Elliott", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2019-09-24 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 19, "slideType": "peer_gap", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "Uses Elliott Management's historical engagement as a marker for valuation shifts.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of P/E discount and SOTP upside", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-70939a0f825f/19", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-70939a0f825f", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-70939a0f825f#slide-19", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 9, "beatId": "339120df-84a0-416d-b544-b7f6ab2b1fd5", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Agitate", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse", "evidence": "Elliott highlights the consequences of not taking action, including Marathon's undervaluation and limited growth prospects", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Development", "parentBeatSlug": "development" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80", "docSlug": "0ffe179c4c4e", "documentTitle": "Box, Inc. (BOX)", "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value", "authorName": "Starboard Value", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2021-08-06 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 18, "slideType": "peer_gap", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "The chart uses a dashed green line to indicate the median valuation multiple of the peer group.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of Box's valuation multiple against a peer group median to argue for upside potential.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80/18", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-20e710622d80#slide-18", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 25, "from": 17, "name": "David Goliath", "slug": "16-david-goliath", "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement", "matchId": "31aab6f8-3113-47ea-a1eb-481db4c88a18", "evidence": "The deck frames the issue as a David vs. Goliath story, highlighting the opportunity for Starboard to make a positive impact at Box.", "position": 1, "objective": "Frame the issue as a David vs. Goliath story", "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 20, "from": 15, "beatId": "cb06a9a9-4326-4947-bbe3-561d0f205dcb", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem Statement", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The deck presents a clear problem statement, highlighting Box's struggles with revenue growth, profitability, and capital allocation.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-4ee769c38030", "docSlug": "10fd7642dc40", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "14_Icahn", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 11, "slideType": "executive_summary", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The slide uses a 'weight' metaphor to illustrate the drag of governance and operational issues on valuation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current TEV/EBITDA vs SOTP multiple", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-4ee769c38030/11", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-4ee769c38030", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9d-4ee769c38030#slide-11", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 50, "from": 10, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "78da24a9-7b98-436d-a17d-2f63a2e2870a", "evidence": "The document implies that the cost of inaction is continued underperformance.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction for Phillips 66's investors?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 12, "from": 10, "beatId": "6609b149-6c0d-4f43-a055-da0f23407dd1", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The document identifies the problem of Phillips 66's underperformance.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c", "docSlug": "de33cb3292ec", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "John Pike", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00", "orientation": "portrait", "aspectRatio": 0.77272725, "pageNumber": 13, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "Includes a pie chart showing PSX EBITDA mix and a quote from Bank of America.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current trading multiple vs SOTP multiple", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c/13", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c#slide-13", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02", "docSlug": "jarvis-outerbridge-comtech-presentation-november-2021", "documentTitle": "Outerbridge Comtech Presentation November 2021", "authorId": "outerbridge-comtech-presentation-november-2021", "authorName": null, "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2021-11-01 00:00:00", "orientation": null, "aspectRatio": null, "pageNumber": 24, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "Includes market share pie charts and a peer valuation table.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparing company multiple to peer median to argue for undervaluation", "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02/24", "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02#slide-24", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 7, "name": "Logic Chain", "slug": "01-logic-chain", "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis", "matchId": "00338045-2e93-4c3b-b394-89059a72b8d2", "evidence": "The document presents a clear logic chain, highlighting the contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions.", "position": 0, "objective": "To highlight the contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions", "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)", "confidence": 0.8, "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 28, "from": 7, "beatId": "98e4f7ad-8de8-41a4-ae14-0c0e43066a44", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Expose Contradiction", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The document highlights various contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 41, "from": 13, "beatId": "45e6c166-dec8-486d-b334-331bf6bb5442", "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster", "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster", "beatName": "Peer Benchmark", "beatSlug": null, "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to illustrate Comtech's underperformance.", "position": 2, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de06f-bcbf-724d-996b-1f5e9f5a2ab6", "docSlug": "a7c3404fe6d9b07e562dfbed52ad51d0", "documentTitle": "Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides", "authorId": "pershing-square", "authorName": "Pershing Square", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2018-10-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "quantify_opportunity", "notes": "The chart illustrates a valuation gap, supporting an activist thesis of undervaluation.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current P/E to historical averages to justify investment thesis", "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-bcbf-724d-996b-1f5e9f5a2ab6/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-bcbf-724d-996b-1f5e9f5a2ab6", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-bcbf-724d-996b-1f5e9f5a2ab6#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 5, "from": 1, "beatId": "ad6411b9-df43-430b-b17b-b1159844269d", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Setup", "beatSlug": "setup", "evidence": "The deck sets up the investment thesis and highlights Starbucks' historical performance", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null }, { "to": 5, "from": 4, "beatId": "9936dff0-7c82-4ff0-ac41-88737dedaabb", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Complication", "beatSlug": "complication", "evidence": "The deck highlights the recent stock price weakness and EPS growth despite it", "position": 1, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": null, "parentBeatSlug": null } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-b50b62034906", "docSlug": "48dc66421db8", "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)", "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management", "authorName": "Elliott", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 6, "slideType": "valuation_table", "function": "show_valuation_bridge", "notes": "The slide uses a peer benchmark to highlight the valuation gap between the company's current trading multiple and its implied SOTP value.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of current trading multiple vs SOTP valuation", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-b50b62034906/6", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-b50b62034906", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9c-b50b62034906#slide-6", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 9, "from": 5, "beatId": "7df1b836-58ee-4f41-ab29-d91dbdd8f6c1", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "The presentation identifies Phillips 66's underperformance and conglomerate structure as key problems.", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2ebffcf637e2", "docSlug": "ef179647d85b", "documentTitle": "SandRidge Energy (SD)", "authorId": "14_Icahn", "authorName": "Carl C. Icahn", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2018-05-24 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 9, "slideType": "peer_gap", "function": "expose_gap", "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a horizontal bar chart for asset value comparison and a grouped bar chart for peer valuation multiples.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Comparison of intrinsic asset value vs market trading price", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2ebffcf637e2/9", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2ebffcf637e2", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-2ebffcf637e2#slide-9", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 17, "from": 8, "name": "Cost Of Inaction", "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction", "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation", "matchId": "3dd76b6e-5748-4fc1-9040-4f84e63221c2", "evidence": "The current board's failure is highlighted.", "position": 0, "objective": "What is the cost of inaction?", "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point", "confidence": 0.6, "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5", "docSlug": "e6ccdccde9e4f314d35e33b1eb767bd3", "documentTitle": "Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 102 slides", "authorId": "third-point-management", "authorName": "Third Point", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2019-06-01 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.2938006, "pageNumber": 10, "slideType": "thesis_headline", "function": "diagnose_problem", "notes": "The chart illustrates multiple compression over a 5-year period.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasting strong operating performance with depressed earnings multiple", "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5/10", "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-d4b7-72ab-9bef-74ff505356b5#slide-10", "loopMatches": [ { "to": 19, "from": 9, "name": "Before After", "slug": "21-before-after", "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification", "matchId": "1a25e14a-b3a3-4c71-a968-e44aa294e049", "evidence": "The loop uses before-after comparisons to illustrate the potential benefits of change", "position": 0, "objective": "Show the potential for value creation through transformation", "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta", "confidence": 0.7, "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison" } ], "arcBeatMatches": [ { "to": 10, "from": 1, "beatId": "c479333b-c97c-48b5-95d2-90df7eb35271", "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution", "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution", "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)", "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain", "evidence": "Slides 1-10 introduce the problem of Sony's undervaluation and complexity", "position": 0, "confidence": 0.8, "parentBeatName": "Complication", "parentBeatSlug": "complication" } ], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true }, { "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-3b6193a98eb8", "docSlug": "7d018feb2bc4", "documentTitle": "State Street Corporation (STT)", "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners", "authorName": "Trian Partners", "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck", "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck", "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor", "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor", "presentationDate": "2011-10-16 00:00:00", "orientation": "landscape", "aspectRatio": 1.3333334, "pageNumber": 5, "slideType": "valuation_reveal", "function": "quantify_opportunity", "notes": "This is a classic activist investor 'valuation gap' slide, contrasting current depressed multiples with historical performance and future potential.", "imagePath": null, "matchCount": 1, "evidence": "Contrasts current market valuation with implied target valuation based on operational improvements.", "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-3b6193a98eb8/5", "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-3b6193a98eb8", "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-3b6193a98eb8#slide-5", "loopMatches": [], "arcBeatMatches": [], "imagePathAlt": null, "thumbSrc": null, "thumbSrcAlt": null, "locked": true } ] }