{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "valuation-bridge",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:valuation-bridge:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 329,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 14,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "docSlug": "28a425ed69eb",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-09-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 219,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "quantify_opportunity",
      "notes": "Includes a callout box explaining the logic of the valuation bridge.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly calculates gross value minus rent subsidy to arrive at potential value creation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b/219",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b#slide-219",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "docSlug": "28a425ed69eb",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-09-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 226,
      "slideType": "precedent_table",
      "function": "quantify_opportunity",
      "notes": "The slide uses a valuation bridge structure to arrive at total real estate value by adding ground lease value to the rent-based valuation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table structure adds ground lease value to rent-based valuation to reach a total.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b/226",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b#slide-226",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "docSlug": "28a425ed69eb",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-09-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 227,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a specific reference to Life Time Fitness REIT conversion as a precedent.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a series of valuation adjustments leading to a final enterprise value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b/227",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b#slide-227",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "docSlug": "28a425ed69eb",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-09-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 233,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a valuation bridge calculation for SRG and a peer benchmarking table.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly calculates a valuation range based on EBITDA multiples and share count.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b/233",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c007c91e862b#slide-233",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5eff-723e-9be7-a786a68478f5",
      "docSlug": "b4d4f54e94d87ddb",
      "documentTitle": "2026 02 Investor Presentation",
      "authorId": "Pebblebrook",
      "authorName": "Pebblebrook Hotel Trust",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "quantify_impact",
      "notes": "The slide uses a valuation bridge approach to compare private market NAV per share ($23.50 mid) against the current public share price ($12.00).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of private market NAV components to public market equity value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be7-a786a68478f5/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be7-a786a68478f5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5eff-723e-9be7-a786a68478f5#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 6,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "f1874c48-954a-47f3-804e-9d629d285b05",
          "evidence": "Presents financial analysis and data to support the claim",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Highlight the deep discount in public-market NAV",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "4fa667da-ebcd-40f1-b386-d2f61b762ca2",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Presents the public-market NAV implying a deep discount",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-70b2474f9eca",
      "docSlug": "787232969aa4",
      "documentTitle": "Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. (8830)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Aaron Tai",
      "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
      "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-06-08 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.7727617,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a peer PNAV multiple analysis to argue for undervaluation and includes a narrative summary of investor sentiment.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing components of fair value vs current price",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-70b2474f9eca/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-70b2474f9eca",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-70b2474f9eca#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "016bf8a0-2852-4550-8edd-c9ac99ba614e",
          "evidence": "Elliott implies that inaction will lead to continued undervaluation",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What is the cost of not improving corporate governance and increasing value?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        },
        {
          "to": 10,
          "from": 1,
          "name": "David Goliath",
          "slug": "16-david-goliath",
          "bestFor": "Startups, disruptive innovation, competitive displacement",
          "matchId": "08395a8c-568a-4c0d-80ab-2a8e429c4a1a",
          "evidence": "Elliott frames itself as a catalyst for change",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Can Elliott, as a minority shareholder, effect change in Sumitomo Realty?",
          "structure": "The Giant's Weakness -> Our Slingshot (Unique Edge) -> The Topple",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Frame your initiative as the nimble underdog taking on a slow, bloated incumbent"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 3,
          "from": 1,
          "beatId": "696cd044-a9b7-4a7d-aa77-1c8e47755167",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Problem",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
          "evidence": "Elliott outlines Sumitomo Realty's issues",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "docSlug": "30650a8e606d",
      "documentTitle": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-11-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes specific assumptions for Elliott Management's valuation thesis.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of current market price vs implied valuation based on comps and DCF",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 22,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "58e335ce-95ca-48ef-b123-b5086737778b",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitation",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by highlighting the benefits of dropdowns and GP structure simplification",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "docSlug": "30650a8e606d",
      "documentTitle": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-11-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a scatter plot showing 2017 LP Yield vs 2017-2020 LP Distribution CAGR for peer MLPs.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly calculates the GP valuation based on yield adjustments and peer comparisons.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 22,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "58e335ce-95ca-48ef-b123-b5086737778b",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitation",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by highlighting the benefits of dropdowns and GP structure simplification",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "docSlug": "30650a8e606d",
      "documentTitle": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-11-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a callout box highlighting the percentage of market cap represented by LP units and cash.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly calculates the impact of asset drops on the valuation of the company.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 22,
          "from": 10,
          "beatId": "58e335ce-95ca-48ef-b123-b5086737778b",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitation",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by highlighting the benefits of dropdowns and GP structure simplification",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "docSlug": "30650a8e606d",
      "documentTitle": "Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-11-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses peer multiples (VLO/HFC) to value Marathon's refining segment.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide builds from Actual TEV down to Implied Refining TEV and then applies multiples to reach a fair value range.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8026e9a12aa5#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 50,
          "from": 23,
          "beatId": "181fb6e2-2fcd-4f92-b9ab-ecb17c1992f6",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The deck provides a solution by proposing a full strategic review and dropdowns",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-7c1fa0494803",
      "docSlug": "2589cccda568",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "John Pike and Mike Tomkins",
      "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
      "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-11-29 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes footnotes regarding methodology for capex and peer comparison.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Table calculates share price upside based on EBITDA targets and FCF yield",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-7c1fa0494803/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-7c1fa0494803",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-7c1fa0494803#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "1d2e69f4-ea64-4744-99fa-c31359a7b41b",
          "evidence": "The document presents a potential downside",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What is the cost of inaction?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 4,
          "beatId": "9214a6a4-0b35-4bac-a36a-36f0beeda231",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The document presents a potential downside and an alternative path",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8a44eb154135",
      "docSlug": "57f01d339401",
      "documentTitle": "Toyota Industries Corporation (6201)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott Investment Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2026-01-27 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.4444444,
      "pageNumber": 29,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall-style bridge to isolate the core business value from other assets/liabilities.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing components of intrinsic value vs purchase price",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8a44eb154135/29",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8a44eb154135",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-8a44eb154135#slide-29",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 31,
          "from": 28,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "82b245c3-ad59-43c9-86b1-2eb2e7e5ee78",
          "evidence": "Elliott discusses the tax savings and value implications of the Revised TOB.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Explain the implications of the Revised TOB structure",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b",
      "docSlug": "6ded4b1cfe2c",
      "documentTitle": "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2019-03-18 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 74,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a waterfall-style bridge diagram showing the components of the BMY deal value.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing components of deal value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b/74",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b#slide-74",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 77,
          "from": 71,
          "name": "Iceberg",
          "slug": "10-iceberg",
          "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
          "matchId": "81bf725f-6cb1-4bc2-96ea-81ccf9b935e8",
          "evidence": "The document questions the valuation of Celgene's pipeline and the true cost of the acquisition.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Exposing the true cost of the acquisition",
          "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b",
      "docSlug": "6ded4b1cfe2c",
      "documentTitle": "Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2019-03-18 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 79,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a waterfall-style bridge diagram comparing the $62B calculated value to the $75B management claim.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Bridge chart comparing calculated value to management claim",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b/79",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-fc4318e06f9b#slide-79",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
      "docSlug": "9c639b8b1898",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-03-31 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 14,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a valuation bridge to demonstrate the value leakage of keeping real estate assets within an operating company (OpCo) versus separating them into a REIT structure.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly calculates the difference between two valuation scenarios to show 'trapped value'.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe/14",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe#slide-14",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 7,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "697f8246-ade1-4a6f-ba12-b3f73423ab43",
          "evidence": "The document presents a series of logical arguments to challenge management's decision.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To question management's logic for the Red Lobster separation",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 25,
          "from": 7,
          "beatId": "def716ce-8782-4386-a34a-8053d6ddecbb",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Expose Contradiction",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "The document highlights contradictions in management's rationale for the separation, including timing and valuation concerns.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
      "docSlug": "9c639b8b1898",
      "documentTitle": "Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2014-03-31 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 52,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a comparative valuation table to highlight the difference in EBITDA multiples between the operating business (6.5x) and the real estate assets (14.6x).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly calculates the difference in value between two scenarios (OpCo vs Separation) to arrive at a 'trapped value' figure.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe/52",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-b7733990b4fe#slide-52",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 107,
          "from": 44,
          "beatId": "b1a77d71-e262-47a6-b9b8-0075198da524",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Propose Solution",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "The document proposes alternative solutions, including a comprehensive value creation plan and a detailed turnaround plan for Darden.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565",
      "docSlug": "917aed929317",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses a waterfall-style bridge to show implied value of specific segments based on market multiples of other segments.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing decomposition of enterprise value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 34,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "Iceberg",
          "slug": "10-iceberg",
          "bestFor": "Consulting, complex problem solving, organizational change",
          "matchId": "c88af8df-d59f-4c12-aab2-a16e8b350961",
          "evidence": "The presentation reveals the hidden value in Phillips 66's midstream assets and how they are not receiving full value credit.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Revealing the hidden value in Phillips 66's midstream assets",
          "structure": "The Symptom (Visible) -> The System (Hidden) -> The Root Cause",
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "description": "Reveal that the visible problem is merely a symptom of a deeper root cause"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "73cebb8d-5ee0-4698-a087-3074401b5083",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The presentation agitates the problem by highlighting Phillips 66's poor operational performance, damaged management credibility, and failed governance culture.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.9,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565",
      "docSlug": "917aed929317",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": null,
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 131,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The table uses a 6.1x EBITDA multiple as a baseline for valuation across different business segments and scenarios.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly bridges from 'As-Is' to various 'Spin' and 'Sell' scenarios to show incremental share price upside.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565/131",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-0a9e4ca95565#slide-131",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "docSlug": "de33cb3292ec",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "John Pike",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 15,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation bridge to highlight market undervaluation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Waterfall chart showing components of Enterprise Value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c/15",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c#slide-15",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "docSlug": "de33cb3292ec",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "John Pike",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 44,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "quantify_opportunity",
      "notes": "Part of the 'Streamline 66' activist campaign deck.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Standalone Midstream Valuation chart showing TEV and share uplift",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c/44",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c#slide-44",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 47,
          "from": 43,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "3ba0fdff-5504-43b8-8d9b-97bfa332a7d7",
          "evidence": "The document presents a valuation overview and breaks down the company's value into its component parts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Break down the company's value into its component parts",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "docSlug": "de33cb3292ec",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "John Pike",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-02-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 47,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes a sensitivity table for share buyback premiums and their impact on stock price upside.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Calculates net proceeds from asset sales and applies them to share repurchases to show valuation uplift.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c/47",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-caf7ba55853c#slide-47",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 47,
          "from": 43,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "3ba0fdff-5504-43b8-8d9b-97bfa332a7d7",
          "evidence": "The document presents a valuation overview and breaks down the company's value into its component parts.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Break down the company's value into its component parts",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c4b955586b03",
      "docSlug": "ac649d3561f0",
      "documentTitle": "Macy's Inc. (M)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-01-11 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 21,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes pro forma cash and debt tables showing the impact of JV transactions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a step-by-step derivation of equity value from EBITDA.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c4b955586b03/21",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c4b955586b03",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-c4b955586b03#slide-21",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 19,
          "name": "Before After",
          "slug": "21-before-after",
          "bestFor": "Product demos, process improvements, ROI justification",
          "matchId": "13df8363-bb73-46cf-9061-40b6bf6e8400",
          "evidence": "The document presents a clear before-and-after scenario",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "To show the potential impact of the proposed solution",
          "structure": "The Old Way (Pain) -> The Moment of Change -> The New Way (Glory) -> The Measurable Delta",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Show the dramatic contrast between the old way and the new way through side-by-side comparison"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 26,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "a429c9aa-dc93-4b9a-ade4-8588133aa0e3",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "The document presents a proposed solution and highlights the potential impact",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-ed157055035f",
      "docSlug": "137bd4361640",
      "documentTitle": "Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Jeffrey C. Smith",
      "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
      "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2019-01-07 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a 'before-after' comparison of performance metrics followed by a 'valuation bridge' calculation to isolate the value of the underperforming asset.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Derivation of implied segment value by subtracting standalone parent value from total enterprise value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-ed157055035f/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-ed157055035f",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d9-ed157055035f#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 2,
          "beatId": "d7b3c49d-0daa-45a1-8def-3d1e9d2364cc",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "The document highlights the subpar stock price performance and implied Family Dollar valuation",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-dad031a83edd",
      "docSlug": "843b712a7e02",
      "documentTitle": "Phillips 66 (PSX)",
      "authorId": "02_Elliott_Management",
      "authorName": "Elliott",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2025-04-28 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 130,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The table uses a 6.1x EBITDA multiple as a baseline, with specific adjustments for midstream and asset sales.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly bridges from current valuation to various strategic scenarios (Spin Mid, Asset Sales).",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-dad031a83edd/130",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-dad031a83edd",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6d8-dad031a83edd#slide-130",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}