{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "three-scenario-analysis",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:three-scenario-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 1,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1",
      "docSlug": "4bb31e88e640882d",
      "documentTitle": "Altagamma 2019 Worldwide Luxury Market Monitor",
      "authorId": "Bain",
      "authorName": "Bain",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.777,
      "pageNumber": 8,
      "slideType": "scenario_analysis",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a scenario analysis framework to present 2018 vs 2019E performance metrics.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Explicit Worst/Base/Best columns with 20%/70%/10% likelihood",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1/8",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b635-9f74c35385f1#slide-8",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-088c-724c-b312-ff66fef66945",
          "evidence": "p.8 explicit Worst/Base/Best (20%/70%/10% likelihood); p.9 'bumpy road' alternates",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Establish base/worst/best scenarios for 2019 and 2025 trajectory",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 22,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-5af051098029",
          "arcName": "The Onion",
          "arcSlug": "onion",
          "beatName": "First Layer",
          "beatSlug": "onion-first-layer",
          "evidence": "Customer is Present/Chinese/Young/Phy-gital — observable shifts",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 75,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        },
        {
          "to": 41,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a5-761b-9144-6e7bee705bc3",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Seven customer-trait sections with evidence",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}