{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "sum-of-the-parts-valuation",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:sum-of-the-parts-valuation:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 45,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 2,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ce8e8f2b4a97",
      "docSlug": "c5a10320e53e",
      "documentTitle": "Cintas Corp. (CTAS)",
      "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
      "authorName": "Ben Axler",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2019-11-13 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 73,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation framework to justify a bearish price target.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Explicitly stated in action title and table structure",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ce8e8f2b4a97/73",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ce8e8f2b4a97",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-ce8e8f2b4a97#slide-73",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 73,
          "from": 41,
          "beatId": "9295e289-b490-44ae-9536-0b75d2572428",
          "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
          "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
          "beatName": "The Victory",
          "beatSlug": "overcoming-monster-the-victory",
          "evidence": "The deck concludes with a clear call to action for investors and a valuation analysis.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-d4565c313b68",
      "docSlug": "207d3ac66ddd",
      "documentTitle": "Canadian Tire Corporation (CTC.A)",
      "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
      "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2019-12-05 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 102,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts valuation approach to justify a significant downside for the stock.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide breaks down the company into three distinct business segments (Retail, CT REIT, Financial Services) to calculate a total equity value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-d4565c313b68/102",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-d4565c313b68",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b98-d4565c313b68#slide-102",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 108,
          "from": 102,
          "beatId": "d2776f4c-0db9-4987-9ad0-246f8cab3d56",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The document provides a solution in the form of a short sell opinion, estimating a 35%-50% downside risk.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-8e3ed32b40dc",
      "docSlug": "5a3c61f9c8f5",
      "documentTitle": "Zebra Technologies Corp. (ZBRA)",
      "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
      "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2024-08-08 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 108,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts valuation approach to justify a significant downside risk.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Breakdown of enterprise value by business segment (RFID, Emerging Tech, Hardware, Services & Software)",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-8e3ed32b40dc/108",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-8e3ed32b40dc",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-8e3ed32b40dc#slide-108",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 109,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Logic Chain",
          "slug": "01-logic-chain",
          "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
          "matchId": "87880212-cbbe-4e05-9d94-1053e50417ab",
          "evidence": "The document presents a series of logical arguments and evidence to support its thesis.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To present a logical chain of evidence supporting the short-selling thesis",
          "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
        },
        {
          "to": 109,
          "from": 103,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "5c4fe31c-a26f-49ed-b71a-7a8c4a777bac",
          "evidence": "The document emphasizes the potential downside risk for investors who do not take action.",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "To emphasize the cost of inaction for investors who fail to adjust their positions",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 109,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "4cbc18df-e399-4c42-aa2d-07d690208cbf",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Expose Contradictions",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "The document is filled with slides exposing contradictions in Zebra's statements, financial reports, and business practices.",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c8318190e1be",
      "docSlug": "c1709c763a52",
      "documentTitle": "Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI)",
      "authorId": "54_Spruce_Point_Capital",
      "authorName": "Spruce Point Capital Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2026-01-27 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 93,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation approach to justify a bearish thesis.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Valuing business segments separately to derive total enterprise value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c8318190e1be/93",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c8318190e1be",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b99-c8318190e1be#slide-93",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 93,
          "from": 85,
          "beatId": "5a322485-869d-4a72-805d-55b84e62fdce",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The document implies that a short sale is the solution, providing a sum-of-the-parts analysis and valuation multiples to support the bearish outlook.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-b92c970b8711",
      "docSlug": "16f7093b6ee5bbb5",
      "documentTitle": "Barclays+Investor+Presentation+vFINAL",
      "authorId": "Barclays",
      "authorName": "Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a table to contrast business segments and provides a list of strategic actions to address valuation gaps.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "EBITDA x Multiple per segment summed to Total Intrinsic Equity Value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-b92c970b8711/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-b92c970b8711",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5b-b92c970b8711#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Benchmark Gap",
          "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
          "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-08f7-737a-a004-3bf48484127e",
          "evidence": "Table compares mid-cycle EBITDA, multiples, and EV per business; intrinsic equity $31-$56/unit",
          "position": 2,
          "objective": "Highlight the gap between market price and intrinsic sum-of-the-parts value",
          "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
          "confidence": 78,
          "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9029-b42ac3ec6107",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
          "evidence": "Title 'Disconnect Between Market and Intrinsic Value?' frames the gap",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 78,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        },
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-07a6-74c7-9029-c76975d213cf",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "Current Reality (Pain)",
          "beatSlug": "transformation-tale-current-reality-pain",
          "evidence": "Market undervaluing the company vs intrinsic $31-$56/unit",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 60,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-ed0a3b577822",
      "docSlug": "e78d0b4cc40d",
      "documentTitle": "Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (BOBE)",
      "authorId": "08_Sandell",
      "authorName": "Sandell Asset Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-08-22 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses a sum-of-the-parts logic to highlight market inefficiency.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparing segment-level implied value to total enterprise value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-ed0a3b577822/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-ed0a3b577822",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-ed0a3b577822#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 11,
          "beatId": "fb960833-974f-4be3-ab9b-295ff29f800e",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Industrial logic for a business separation, transactions, tax matters, and range of potential values",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8649997e1ae6",
      "docSlug": "416dbc73dbbf",
      "documentTitle": "E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) (DD)",
      "authorId": "06_Trian_Partners",
      "authorName": "Trian Partners",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2015-04-16 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.75,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "This is a sum-of-the-parts valuation model used by Trian Partners in their 2014 activist campaign.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table breaks down the company into three distinct segments (GrowthCo, Performance Chemicals, CyclicalCo/CashCo) to derive a total equity value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8649997e1ae6/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8649997e1ae6",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-8649997e1ae6#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Golden Circle",
          "slug": "11-golden-circle",
          "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
          "matchId": "468017da-5fc3-4848-b0af-deeab994cb88",
          "evidence": "The thesis headline and valuation table provide a clear answer",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Why invest in DuPont?",
          "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 5,
          "beatId": "3c74c6d0-ab6e-4136-a995-ba6fe109e4e3",
          "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
          "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
          "evidence": "The valuation table presents the solution",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-41a495222153",
      "docSlug": "b442fc01b34f",
      "documentTitle": "Corrections Corporation of America (CXW)",
      "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square",
      "authorName": "William Ackman",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2009-10-20 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 33,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The table uses two scenarios for Cap Rate (8.0% and 6.0%) to determine the valuation range.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly labels the analysis as a Sum-Of-The-Parts Valuation.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-41a495222153/33",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-41a495222153",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-41a495222153#slide-33",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "8204b701-6e31-4162-a39f-402d5a721e7f",
          "arcName": "Rags to Riches",
          "arcSlug": "rags-to-riches",
          "beatName": "Ultimate Achievement",
          "beatSlug": "rags-to-riches-ultimate-achievement",
          "evidence": "The presentation concludes with a valuation of the company and an opportunity for multiple expansion.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-d2f128e476ee",
      "docSlug": "797596405020",
      "documentTitle": "Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC)",
      "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square",
      "authorName": "William Ackman",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2017-05-08 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 38,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a rhetorical question to transition into a detailed valuation breakdown.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions summing Operating Assets, land acreage, and Other Assets to approximate enterprise value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-d2f128e476ee/38",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-d2f128e476ee",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-d2f128e476ee#slide-38",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 50,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "07291121-932a-405b-906e-4d0af6b9eef7",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution (Provide relief)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The presentation provides a solution by highlighting HHC's approach to land development and its potential for growth.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-48381ed99850",
      "docSlug": "da3c4d23871a",
      "documentTitle": "Multiple (GoDaddy, News Corp, Fortrea) (GDDY, NWSA, FTRE)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-10-13 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 50,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a visual bridge to contrast current market valuation with estimated intrinsic value.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares current enterprise value to the sum of individual asset values.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-48381ed99850/50",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-48381ed99850",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-48381ed99850#slide-50",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 70,
          "from": 31,
          "beatId": "f3aae366-04c2-422c-93a1-96bf6d955fad",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "The presentation concludes with potential impact and next steps for the companies.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9",
      "docSlug": "a41d94ca60e8",
      "documentTitle": "GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-10-17 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 49,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a visual addition structure to imply a sum-of-the-parts valuation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Visual addition of business segments to reach a total valuation figure.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9/49",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9#slide-49",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9",
      "docSlug": "a41d94ca60e8",
      "documentTitle": "GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-10-17 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 50,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a simple bridge diagram to highlight the gap between current market valuation and estimated asset value.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of current enterprise value to estimated asset value",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9/50",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-51e90b9c27f9#slide-50",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-2bb5-74da-9a87-823a6749df1f",
      "docSlug": "470162efc15327cf5bd8932f4d4452dd",
      "documentTitle": "Lazard | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 46 slides",
      "authorId": "lazard",
      "authorName": "Lazard",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2005-03-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3655761,
      "pageNumber": 27,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts approach to derive valuation ranges for two segments (ISS/HE/PS and AS) and reconciles them to an implied share price.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The table explicitly labels the analysis as 'Solar Sum-of-the-Parts - Public Market Valuation'.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-2bb5-74da-9a87-823a6749df1f/27",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-2bb5-74da-9a87-823a6749df1f",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-2bb5-74da-9a87-823a6749df1f#slide-27",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 40,
          "from": 24,
          "beatId": "18e9248e-be38-4732-9762-3e9df7473a29",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Detailed financial analyses and data tables",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-25fc98d95c50",
      "docSlug": "5ae5957203aa",
      "documentTitle": "McDonald's Corporation (MCD)",
      "authorId": "01_Pershing_Square",
      "authorName": "Pershing Square Capital Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2006-01-18 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 22,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses sum-of-the-parts valuation logic to justify a higher share price.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly mentions 'sum-of-the parts valuations' as the methodology used by analysts.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-25fc98d95c50/22",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-25fc98d95c50",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b9b-25fc98d95c50#slide-22",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 44,
          "from": 17,
          "beatId": "80372130-4d11-441b-a4bc-6c678b9b2ece",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "The document proposes solutions to improve McDonald's operating performance and unlock shareholder value.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d",
      "docSlug": "94b7a97af4bb",
      "documentTitle": "Groupe Casino Guichard-Perrachon SA (CO FP)",
      "authorId": "51_Muddy_Waters",
      "authorName": "Carson C. Block",
      "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
      "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2015-12-16 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 17,
      "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
      "function": "present_framework",
      "notes": "The slide critiques S&P's lease accounting methodology and details the sum-of-the-parts valuation approach for Casino's assets.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The text describes calculating equity values for individual business units (France, Vietnam) and summing them with non-core assets to reach a total equity value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d/17",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d#slide-17",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d",
      "docSlug": "94b7a97af4bb",
      "documentTitle": "Groupe Casino Guichard-Perrachon SA (CO FP)",
      "authorId": "51_Muddy_Waters",
      "authorName": "Carson C. Block",
      "documentKindSlug": "research-note",
      "documentKindLabel": "Research note",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "short_seller",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Short seller",
      "presentationDate": "2015-12-16 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 18,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Detailed SOTP breakdown including operating assets, non-operating assets, liabilities, and hybrid instruments.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly states 'sum-of-the-parts valuation' and provides a breakdown of assets and liabilities.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d/18",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622c-750b-8b96-5d5485212a1d#slide-18",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Aha Moment",
          "slug": "03-aha-moment",
          "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
          "matchId": "ac478b00-eac3-4140-861a-c657c1639141",
          "evidence": "Our base case sum-of-the-parts valuation is € 782 million (€6.91 per share)",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Present alternative valuation",
          "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 18,
          "from": 18,
          "beatId": "35ce44d9-9152-4a36-a2a0-b72a6f4025b6",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Solution",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
          "evidence": "Our base case sum-of-the-parts valuation is € 782 million (€6.91 per share)",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0",
      "docSlug": "2d207abf9499",
      "documentTitle": "GoDaddy, News Corp, Fortrea",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-10-17 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 49,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a simple additive visual metaphor to represent the sum of parts valuation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Visual addition of business segments to reach a total valuation figure.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0/49",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0#slide-49",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0",
      "docSlug": "2d207abf9499",
      "documentTitle": "GoDaddy, News Corp, Fortrea",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Starboard Value",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-10-17 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
      "pageNumber": 50,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Uses a sum-of-the-parts valuation logic to argue for undervaluation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of current enterprise value vs estimated value of individual assets",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0/50",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-4f76d1ed07b0#slide-50",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-d23acf6e9cdd",
      "docSlug": "67120026e557",
      "documentTitle": "Rubicon Limited (RBC)",
      "authorId": "08_Sandell",
      "authorName": "Sandell Asset Management",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2011-10-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 7,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The slide uses a sum-of-the-parts valuation approach for Rubicon, aggregating equity contributions from TEN and ARBR.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Aggregating equity contributions from TEN and ARBR to derive RBC value.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-d23acf6e9cdd/7",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-d23acf6e9cdd",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-d23acf6e9cdd#slide-7",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 12,
          "from": 4,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "782eedf9-a9a0-466a-b0a4-4f77879b9566",
          "evidence": "Valuation tables and market sizing data",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "Highlight undervaluation and potential for growth",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 8,
          "from": 6,
          "beatId": "73fbcff7-88a1-4a97-8057-48e4e2302a57",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "Rubicon overview and valuation table",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-1b2358468037",
      "docSlug": "b6b6f532847a",
      "documentTitle": "Samsung C&T Corporation (028260 KS)",
      "authorId": "24_Palliser_Capital",
      "authorName": "Palliser",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2023-12-06 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
      "pageNumber": 19,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes specific valuation methodologies for operating businesses (EV/EBITDA multiples and DCF).",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Table breaks down assets into listed holdings and operating businesses to derive NAV.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-1b2358468037/19",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-1b2358468037",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dd-1b2358468037#slide-19",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 24,
          "from": 18,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "9dd92b8f-477e-45af-a756-f15c5ca90d4d",
          "evidence": "The document provides a detailed breakdown of SCT's intrinsic value, highlighting its various business segments and their contributions to its overall value.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "How can SCT's intrinsic value be broken down?",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 16,
          "beatId": "5bcde41d-6d43-4054-83fd-7947f9d155c2",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Agitate",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
          "evidence": "The document agitates the problem by highlighting the causes of the value gap, including inefficient capital allocation and governance issues.",
          "position": 1,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Development",
          "parentBeatSlug": "development"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be",
      "docSlug": "46fe79187184",
      "documentTitle": "Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Peter A. Feld",
      "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
      "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2026-02-18 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 3,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "quantify_opportunity",
      "notes": "Includes footnotes detailing assumptions for capacity, revenue, and valuation multiples.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "SOP-style EBITDA contribution buildup for AI/HPC segment",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be/3",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be#slide-3",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "Waterfall Value",
          "slug": "31-waterfall-value",
          "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations",
          "matchId": "019ddf4e-f7d8-770d-bab5-3276d34e0eb0",
          "evidence": "SOP buildup tables: $1.6B+ EBITDA -> $23-$53 share-price upside via multiples.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Build sum-of-parts EBITDA -> equity value upside",
          "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019ddf4e-f66a-7629-b597-2c074c07f838",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "EBITDA + Equity Value tables yielding $23-$53 share-price upside.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019ddf4e-f74c-743f-8d16-52ecbaba5f1e",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "The Bridge",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Valuation tables + closing ask describe path to transformation.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be",
      "docSlug": "46fe79187184",
      "documentTitle": "Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)",
      "authorId": "03_Starboard_Value",
      "authorName": "Peter A. Feld",
      "documentKindSlug": "shareholder-letter",
      "documentKindLabel": "Shareholder letter",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2026-02-18 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 4,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "Includes footnotes 10, 11, and 12.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Equity value contribution table across multiples",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be/4",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6da-b00b1d0f20be#slide-4",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "name": "Waterfall Value",
          "slug": "31-waterfall-value",
          "bestFor": "Financial analysis, value bridges, variance explanations",
          "matchId": "019ddf4e-f7d8-770d-bab5-3276d34e0eb0",
          "evidence": "SOP buildup tables: $1.6B+ EBITDA -> $23-$53 share-price upside via multiples.",
          "position": 3,
          "objective": "Build sum-of-parts EBITDA -> equity value upside",
          "structure": "The Total -> Driver 1 Impact -> Driver 2 Impact -> Driver 3 Impact -> The Remainder",
          "confidence": 85,
          "description": "Break down a big number into its component drivers to show where value is created or lost"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 4,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019ddf4e-f66a-7629-b597-2c074c07f838",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "EBITDA + Equity Value tables yielding $23-$53 share-price upside.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        },
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "019ddf4e-f74c-743f-8d16-52ecbaba5f1e",
          "arcName": "The Transformation Tale",
          "arcSlug": "transformation-tale",
          "beatName": "The Bridge",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Valuation tables + closing ask describe path to transformation.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 72,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
      "docSlug": "3544dfcc3316",
      "documentTitle": "Viacom (VIAB)",
      "authorId": "18_SpringOwl",
      "authorName": "Eric Jackson",
      "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2016-01-13 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "portrait",
      "aspectRatio": 0.77272725,
      "pageNumber": 91,
      "slideType": "valuation_table",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "The table breaks down valuation by business segment (Domestic Cable, Paramount, Corporate) and adjustments for JVs, debt, and cash.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly uses a SOTP methodology to calculate NAV.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c/91",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6dc-6f41ca4b5e6c#slide-91",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-158d3eacd7e9",
      "docSlug": "430184de7abe",
      "documentTitle": "Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO)",
      "authorId": "05_Third_Point",
      "authorName": "Third Point",
      "documentKindSlug": "conference-presentation",
      "documentKindLabel": "Conference presentation",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
      "presentationDate": "2011-09-14 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.2941177,
      "pageNumber": 5,
      "slideType": "valuation_reveal",
      "function": "show_valuation_bridge",
      "notes": "This is a classic 'sum-of-the-parts' valuation breakdown used by activist investors to highlight undervaluation.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Breakdown of company value into distinct asset components",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-158d3eacd7e9/5",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-158d3eacd7e9",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-622b-71dc-a6db-158d3eacd7e9#slide-5",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 9,
          "from": 5,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "ed031b39-12b5-48a3-a6d3-bb0072e72c1f",
          "evidence": "The presentation implies the cost of inaction through its proposed solution",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in maximizing Yahoo's value?",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.6,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 5,
          "from": 3,
          "beatId": "7960b26e-47e5-4ae4-b292-5eb452dd9335",
          "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
          "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
          "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)",
          "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
          "evidence": "The presentation identifies Yahoo's undervaluation and underutilization",
          "position": 0,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Complication",
          "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}