{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "strategic-options-matrix",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:strategic-options-matrix:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 5,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-cc27462f852b",
      "docSlug": "8f864c9245c9736f",
      "documentTitle": "January Macro Brief",
      "authorId": "Accenture",
      "authorName": "Accenture",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a vertical axis representing 'Exposure' (High to Low) to categorize strategic options.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured comparison of strategic choices based on exposure levels.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-cc27462f852b/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-cc27462f852b",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-cc27462f852b#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 31,
          "from": 30,
          "name": "So What Cascade",
          "slug": "41-so-what-cascade",
          "bestFor": "Data presentations, executive summaries, driving to recommendations",
          "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d37-135994e2e918",
          "evidence": "Diagnosis of China debt/demographics/exports paired with adapt-and-hedge recommendation",
          "position": 10,
          "objective": "China structural risks -> adapt + hedge recommendation",
          "structure": "The Data -> So What? (Insight 1) -> So What? (Insight 2) -> So What? (The Action)",
          "confidence": 80,
          "description": "Chain insights together, each answering 'so what?' until you reach the actionable conclusion"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 39,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-db98ae3fbea7",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
          "evidence": "Per-trend deep dives with charts, scenario cuts and frameworks across 21 slides",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 90,
          "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
          "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
        },
        {
          "to": 39,
          "from": 19,
          "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-820c-e4ee1b18111a",
          "arcName": "The Triple Take",
          "arcSlug": "triple-take",
          "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
          "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
          "evidence": "Per-trend market landscape and diagnosis slides articulating risks",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 65,
          "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
          "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe",
      "docSlug": "5ee5a9db2750184a",
      "documentTitle": "Lebanon Economic Vision",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.333,
      "pageNumber": 1210,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "compare_options",
      "notes": "The slide uses a matrix structure to map strategic approaches to operational requirements.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide organizes strategic choices into a matrix format to compare different approaches.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe/1210",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b639-093f3fd1ecfe#slide-1210",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-cc8c394653ea",
      "docSlug": "2e16b33cb38335ea",
      "documentTitle": "New Brunswick Supply Chain Study",
      "authorId": "Deloitte",
      "authorName": "Deloitte",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.778,
      "pageNumber": 52,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a slider-style visualization to represent qualitative assessment of criteria for each strategic option.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Comparison of three distinct strategic paths across common criteria.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-cc8c394653ea/52",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-cc8c394653ea",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b636-cc8c394653ea#slide-52",
      "loopMatches": [],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 54,
          "from": 49,
          "beatId": "6bf8b192-d1e1-48cc-9e95-a8da106d3261",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
          "evidence": "Strategic considerations and risk mitigation plan",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
          "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394",
      "docSlug": "ec730d1778e1684b",
      "documentTitle": "Technology Mineral Criticality",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.414,
      "pageNumber": 10,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a structured table format to compare strategic options for capacity expansion.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured comparison of strategic alternatives for capacity expansion.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394/10",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-fc4dd3a41394#slide-10",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 7,
          "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
          "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
          "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
          "matchId": "9a9fd096-3359-4e5c-a889-03b109395669",
          "evidence": "The deck emphasizes the importance of investing in technology to meet demand booms and avoid negative consequences.",
          "position": 0,
          "objective": "To highlight the consequences of not investing in technology and meeting demand booms",
          "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 15,
          "from": 8,
          "beatId": "804075f0-0529-484c-8b05-eabf35d507ec",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "The deck presents strategies for meeting demand booms, including technology adoption and productivity improvement.",
          "position": 2,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0",
      "docSlug": "bccc7ca74c5344e0",
      "documentTitle": "USPS Future Business Model",
      "authorId": "McKinsey",
      "authorName": "McKinsey",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
      "presentationDate": null,
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.294,
      "pageNumber": 31,
      "slideType": "strategic_options",
      "function": "present_solution",
      "notes": "The slide uses a color-coded legend to distinguish between legislative and non-legislative actions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Categorization of strategic initiatives into pillars and legislative/non-legislative status",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0/31",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5ca1-7489-b638-a66a0d3463c0#slide-31",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 36,
          "from": 22,
          "name": "Mece Breakdown",
          "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
          "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
          "matchId": "ebe3a496-98eb-48eb-b1e4-b2b90b2d3590",
          "evidence": "The deck presents a framework for addressing the challenge, including product and service initiatives, pricing opportunities, and workforce opportunities.",
          "position": 1,
          "objective": "Break down the problem into manageable parts",
          "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
          "confidence": 0.7,
          "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 38,
          "from": 22,
          "beatId": "6d80f5a5-15f2-424b-aae4-9524e06b6575",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
          "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
          "evidence": "The deck presents potential solutions, including actions within USPS control and fundamental changes to increase flexibility.",
          "position": 3,
          "confidence": 0.8,
          "parentBeatName": "Turn",
          "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}