{
  "kind": "framework",
  "value": "scenario-sensitivity-analysis",
  "collectionKey": "slides:framework:scenario-sensitivity-analysis:all-document-kinds:all-producers:all-orientations",
  "filters": {
    "documentKinds": [],
    "sourceTypes": [],
    "orientations": []
  },
  "total": 3,
  "page": 1,
  "pageSize": 24,
  "pageCount": 1,
  "rows": [
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "docSlug": "bf01386f09de8fd439d9578440d2f1c3",
      "documentTitle": "Evercore | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 37 slides",
      "authorId": "evercore",
      "authorName": "Evercore",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2012-12-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.469013,
      "pageNumber": 20,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "The table uses a multi-column structure to compare different commodity price scenarios (NYMEX Strip, $75/$3, $90/$4, $105/$5) across low and high discount rate assumptions.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Two-way matrix of NYMEX strip vs discount rates.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374/20",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374#slide-20",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 20,
          "from": 16,
          "name": "Sensitivity Test",
          "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
          "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
          "matchId": "019deab3-ce17-7459-ac60-742462e01e7c",
          "evidence": "NAV assumptions pp.16-17, reserves p.18, ultra-deep p.19, NYMEX/discount-rate sensitivity p.20.",
          "position": 4,
          "objective": "Build the NAV case and stress it across price decks and discount rates",
          "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
          "confidence": 82,
          "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019deab3-ccbd-744b-8129-b2f6ab345d92",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Football-field summary then NAV, peers, precedents, analysts, ORRI.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "docSlug": "bf01386f09de8fd439d9578440d2f1c3",
      "documentTitle": "Evercore | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 37 slides",
      "authorId": "evercore",
      "authorName": "Evercore",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2012-12-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.469013,
      "pageNumber": 34,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a multi-year revenue projection table and two sensitivity analysis tables.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Risked ORRI value across discount rates and price decks.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374/34",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374#slide-34",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019deab3-ce97-708c-9885-bf19dd24cb15",
          "evidence": "JV NAV under low/high prices p.32, then risked p.34 and unrisked p.35 ORRI sensitivity.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Test alternative outcomes: standalone JV NAV and Risked vs Unrisked ORRI value",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019deab3-ccbd-744b-8129-b2f6ab345d92",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Football-field summary then NAV, peers, precedents, analysts, ORRI.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    },
    {
      "docId": "019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "docSlug": "bf01386f09de8fd439d9578440d2f1c3",
      "documentTitle": "Evercore | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 37 slides",
      "authorId": "evercore",
      "authorName": "Evercore",
      "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
      "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
      "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
      "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
      "presentationDate": "2012-12-01 00:00:00",
      "orientation": "landscape",
      "aspectRatio": 1.469013,
      "pageNumber": 35,
      "slideType": "financial_analysis",
      "function": "analyze_data",
      "notes": "Includes a primary table for revenue projections (2013E-2022E) and two sensitivity analysis tables for total value and per-unit value.",
      "imagePath": null,
      "matchCount": 1,
      "evidence": "Unrisked ORRI sensitivity matrices mirror p.34.",
      "slideHref": "/slides/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374/35",
      "deckHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374",
      "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de06f-47a7-73ab-976e-8fa8d1d23374#slide-35",
      "loopMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 32,
          "name": "Scenario Fork",
          "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
          "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
          "matchId": "019deab3-ce97-708c-9885-bf19dd24cb15",
          "evidence": "JV NAV under low/high prices p.32, then risked p.34 and unrisked p.35 ORRI sensitivity.",
          "position": 7,
          "objective": "Test alternative outcomes: standalone JV NAV and Risked vs Unrisked ORRI value",
          "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
          "confidence": 70,
          "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
        }
      ],
      "arcBeatMatches": [
        {
          "to": 35,
          "from": 15,
          "beatId": "019deab3-ccbd-744b-8129-b2f6ab345d92",
          "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
          "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
          "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
          "beatSlug": null,
          "evidence": "Football-field summary then NAV, peers, precedents, analysts, ORRI.",
          "position": 4,
          "confidence": 88,
          "parentBeatName": null,
          "parentBeatSlug": null
        }
      ],
      "imagePathAlt": null,
      "thumbSrc": null,
      "thumbSrcAlt": null,
      "locked": true
    }
  ]
}